• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Rolex entries question

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rolex entries question

    I'm a non-eventer going with a buddy to Rolex this year. We have a question- with this being an Olympic year will we see Olympic entries competeing at Rolex? Is Rolex part of any selection process for various teams??

    Really, we don't have a clue as to how this Rolex might tie in with Olympics, like will it be chock full of Olympic horses or second tier horses? And I'm not slamming second tier horses, totally in awe of eventing at any level!!!

  • #2
    It depends a little what you mean by "second tier" Rolex is actually harder than the Olympics! Some Olympic hopefuls will be there. Others who believe they have a more secure spot on the team or have been told that, may not choose to compete. It is part of the selection process for many teams.
    OTTBs rule, but spots are good too!


    • Original Poster

      What makes Rolex harder than the Olympics?? Make me smart!

      I know, typing "second tier" seemed wrong because while I don't event, I DO understand the massive effort it takes to make an event horse. It would be more correct to ID them as the "up and coming" horses.
      Last edited by SLW; Jan. 13, 2012, 06:36 PM.


      • #4
        It will be a bit of both. Rolex is a selection trial for the U.S. (and maybe the Canadian?) team. The press release on the Rolex site can be seen here: http://www.rk3de.org/news/rolexkentu...april2629.html

        However, some of the top pairs who are the most likely Olympic choices at this point (like Sinead Halpin, who placed 3rd at Rolex in her first four star ever last year, and Boyd with Neville, who finished strong at Burghley last fall) likely have been given a pass by the selectors, as they have already proven themselves at the level and now need to fine tune their performance and stay sound (I think Sinead already announced that she will not be contesting Kentucky). However, I do think we will still see some great pairs and many Olympic hopefuls!

        Have fun! You will have a blast (hope to be there myself as well if all goes well!)


        • #5
          The Olympics takes into account the less experienced riders/ horses from countries not traditionally strong in eventing-- it has to be slightly softer so that they have a shot at least surviving


          • Original Poster

            Thanks for the info Highflyer, that helps.


            • #7
              For example, if you watched the WEG, every 'tricky' jump had a much simpler option... people from countries that are not traditionally strong in eventing could make it around and complete the course safely, just with massive time penalties. Rolex has options, but not so many as to make the course 'slow and easy.' (Unless you're Denny, then everything these days is easier than the good ol' days!)


              • #8
                Originally posted by archieflies View Post
                (Unless you're Denny, then everything these days is easier than the good ol' days!)
                I think you misunderstand Denny! He doesn't say it's easier, just not the sport it was and that having to do a full three day takes a more versatile horse and rider.

                Having come up through the years watching him with the utmost admiration and respect (after all, he's earned it), I wish someone would do an actual comparison about the percentage of horses staying sound "back in the day" vs today. I think as a result of getting horses so much more fit for the full three day, that more horses stayed sound longer. Just a thought... I have no facts.

                Cut him some slack... he's done both and is certainly entitled to express his opinion.


                • #9
                  Originally posted by runnyjump View Post
                  Cut him some slack... he's done both and is certainly entitled to express his opinion.
                  I apologize for joking. Apparently humor is unwelcome.


                  • #10
                    Rolex is a four star. Olympics are more like a 3 star.
                    Click here before you buy.


                    • #11
                      Sorry, off topic but I just want to say WOOHOO! First Rolex thread of 2012! Can't wait, can't wait!


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by archieflies View Post
                        I apologize for joking. Apparently humor is unwelcome.

                        You can joke all you want but just let us know you're kidding. A smilie face, cheesy as it may be, lets your readers you're being friendly and silly.
                        Proud and achy member of the Eventing Grannies clique.


                        • Original Poster

                          Originally posted by deltawave View Post
                          Rolex is a four star. Olympics are more like a 3 star.
                          Perfect, this helps too. By the time Rolex gets here we'll be smart enough to blend in with the crowd.


                          • #14
                            Does anyone know if they are planning to do the Rolex featured riders this year. I love reading about the lead up to the event but they almost didn't do it last year and they usually have it up by now, no?


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by NCRider View Post
                              Does anyone know if they are planning to do the Rolex featured riders this year. I love reading about the lead up to the event but they almost didn't do it last year and they usually have it up by now, no?
                              I would think they'd wait til entries start coming in - I haven't really seen much in the way of rider committments yet as far as their plans to do Rolex are concerned.
                              "Lord if we should fall, my horse and I, please pick my horse up first."



                              • #16
                                Originally posted by deltawave View Post
                                Rolex is a four star. Olympics are more like a 3 star.

                                You just may be surprised by what Sue "has cooking"....and until it is officially downgraded and designated 3 star, one better be prepared. It is still a CCIO4 and the designer has every right to design such a course (obviously with slower/easier routes to help).