• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Boyd and Neville the top lede in the NYTimes!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Boyd and Neville the top lede in the NYTimes!

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/13/sp...n.html?_r=1&hp
    Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by ignorance. -- Oscar Wilde
    Some days you're the bug and some days you're the windshield, today I think you were both -- Jack LeGoff

  • #2
    WOW!

    THIS is the kind of press that our sport needs in the main stream media... a feel-good story.
    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals" Immanuel Kant

    Comment


    • #3
      Very well done and well written.
      Amanda

      Comment


      • #4
        They are on the FRONT PAGE of the Providence print paper. Pretty impressive!

        Comment


        • #5
          It was a nice article (although the use of the word "stablehand" was a little jarring), but did anyone else think it was weird that in the accompanying slideshow and video, you never see Neville jump a fence? There's a little trotting around, and lots of "farm" shots, but not a thing about the actual sport he does...

          Clearly a deliberate choice but I am at a loss as to why....
          The big man -- my lost prince

          The little brother, now my main man

          Comment


          • #6
            The NYT probably showed up on a day where Neville's schedule was flatwork. It is interesting to me that they didn't even show a photo of him at Burghley or WEG, though. I'm going to chalk it up to a basic ignorance about horse sports.

            The article was nice but a little disorganized. I was wondering when a large media outlet was going to pick up on this tale. It's great PR for Boyd and for the sport - Neville really is special.

            Comment


            • #7
              I considered it more of a "we're not going to change our horse's routine so you all can get a fun picture" type thing. I guess they could have gotten some pics of him competing, but who really knows why journalists do things the way they do. There is a photo of what looks like Neville being naughty on a gallop with Boyd. Kinda cute.
              Amanda

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by asterix View Post
                It was a nice article (although the use of the word "stablehand" was a little jarring), but did anyone else think it was weird that in the accompanying slideshow and video, you never see Neville jump a fence? There's a little trotting around, and lots of "farm" shots, but not a thing about the actual sport he does...

                Clearly a deliberate choice but I am at a loss as to why....
                I'm off to read the article, but I did take a glance at the photos. They were all taken by the NYT's photog, probably at a farm shoot pretty recently. NYT probably didn't want to pay for the rights to some of the competition/jumping images. Neville is likely coming off his post-Burghley vacation so probably isn't doing much jumping right now.

                Comment


                • #9
                  "By July, the Martins will know if Neville has earned a spot on the United States team in London, where the Summer Games will commemorate the 100th anniversary of equestrian as an Olympic event."

                  Reckon ?
                  ... _. ._ .._. .._

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    This is the same New York Times which, just yesterday, asked its readers if it should be printing the truth. The readers responded, overwhelmingly, 'YES!' (Good discussion here.)

                    So, perhaps to kick off the new truthtelling Times, we get this nice story on Boyd and Neville. Hopefully, this story will get to the top of the 'most read' and 'most emailed' lists. They pay attention to that.

                    Also, if the NYT's paywall causes anyone any trouble, either search for the story via Google News or go here to grab the NYTClean bookmarklet, which demolishes the paywall in one click.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by JER View Post
                      This is the same New York Times which, just yesterday, asked its readers if it should be printing the truth. The readers responded, overwhelmingly, 'YES!' (Good discussion here.)

                      So, perhaps to kick off the new truthtelling Times, we get this nice story on Boyd and Neville. Hopefully, this story will get to the top of the 'most read' and 'most emailed' lists. They pay attention to that.

                      Also, if the NYT's paywall causes anyone any trouble, either search for the story via Google News or go here to grab the NYTClean bookmarklet, which demolishes the paywall in one click.

                      The truth eh? Slippery little animal, the truth. This article, however, was fantastic. Hard to read, actually, but what a great story.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Well written, great story .

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Any competition photos would be subject to copywright/permission. They also probably thought "stablehand" would be more PC than groom etc. Nice upbeat/uplifting article.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Above poster: "Also, if the NYT's paywall causes anyone any trouble, either search for the story via Google News or go here to grab the NYTClean bookmarklet, which demolishes the paywall in one click."

                            Why is it OK to rip off the Times? Do you think they operate as a charity?

                            Do you suggest people check out great prices on a Craigslist ad because it is stolen tack?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by FatDinah View Post
                              Above poster: "Also, if the NYT's paywall causes anyone any trouble, either search for the story via Google News or go here to grab the NYTClean bookmarklet, which demolishes the paywall in one click."

                              Why is it OK to rip off the Times? Do you think they operate as a charity?

                              Do you suggest people check out great prices on a Craigslist ad because it is stolen tack?
                              An interesting point, considering the issue of internet photography theft that is brought up so often on these boards.

                              I don't know which side of that fence JER is on, but it does seem odd that stealing from one entity is ok, but not another.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                uuhmmmm, you can view 20 articles a month for free from any one location/computer on the NYT website, so lets not get sidetracked into an issue which is not really relevant and will likely not be an issue for most COTHers
                                I thought it was great that the NYT covered it (I was surprised there was no mention of Boyd and Philip going in against the fire marshall's orders to get Neville out- would have thought that would appeal to a reporter doing this kind of story).
                                It was one of the few articles I have read talking about a horse/rider combo as being Olympic team contenders where I have not rolled my eyes and thought "in their dreams they are in contention"
                                It really is a phenomenal story
                                There is something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man.(Churchill)

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by Ajierene View Post
                                  I don't know which side of that fence JER is on, but it does seem odd that stealing from one entity is ok, but not another.
                                  The NYT chooses to make its articles available through Google News for free. The paywall is porous on purpose. They have to let you in to see what you're missing. So it's hardly 'stealing' to access content.

                                  The NYTClean bookmarklet is most useful when you've accessed an article via Google news, then you go to page 2 and the paywall screen comes up. The NYT is well aware of this bookmarklet -- which is a very simple four lines of code -- and has done nothing to stop it. (More interestng stuff here.)

                                  It's hard to call it 'stealing' when it's a tool to gain subscribers. Is it 'stealing' when I read a discarded copy at Starbucks? Is it 'stealing' when I pick it up at the newstand and spend 30 seconds reading a column on the sports page? Is it 'stealing' when a friend or colleague sends me an email with an NYT article attached? If it's 'stealing', why does the NYT still allow freeloaders to email stories to a multitude of friends?

                                  I was a print subscriber and a digital subscriber to the NYT for decades. Where I live now, I can't get the print version delivered. The digital version never ran properly (yes -- I had long correspondence with them about this) and was therefore a total waste of money. I do have a pay account for the archive, which I need sometimes for research. In general, I don't read much news from the NYT as their pro-establishment agenda is simply not my cup of tea. I do look at the front page every day, but rarely more, as I like real journalism, not fake WMDs and 'enhanced interrogation methods.'

                                  I do pay the exorbitant subscription fee for my favorite newspaper -- the Financial Times -- even though I know a way around the wall. Most other outlets I like -- the Guardian, the Independent, der Spiegel -- are free or semi-free.

                                  Comment

                                  Working...
                                  X