• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

FEH news on USEA Website Frontpage

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FEH news on USEA Website Frontpage

    For all those interested, they have posted some new info for FEH program on the front page of the USEA Website as well as a new contact person for the program.

  • #2
    Just for clarification, our dates on the USEA website are incorrect.

    The Ark will hold their 6th year of FEH/NEH/YEH classes on Sunday, April 1 and Sunday, August 12. Our Spring USEA/USEF HT is March 31 and an NCDCTA D/CT event on August 11 instead.

    Thanks!

    Comment


    • #3
      From the USEA page:

      Changes have also been made to the judging guidelines including putting emphasis that the first impression should be of an event horse ‘type’ meaning a horse that appears naturally structured to become an all-around athlete.
      Makes you wonder what they were emphasizing in past years in the Future Event Horse classes. But this is good emphasis.

      The USEA is also encouraging owners to submit a copy of their horses’ pedigrees when they are registered so the USEA can start to gather the information needed to create a searchable database in the future.
      Good. This is a very necessary step if this program is ever going to achieve its goals.

      Comment


      • #4
        Wonder what "type" they will consider good event horse type...
        Pacific Coast Eventing
        Standing Yeager GF

        Comment


        • #5
          We have mixed feelings about requiring a certain score to go to the championships.
          1. turn out has not been huge without a qualifying score, so I wonder if this will really hit attendance.
          2. the judging is so erratic that, last year, our mare who won the 3 year old filly class at the championship would not have qualified but our Haflinger x German sport pony cross would have.... And our mare was judged by the same judge both times.....

          Frankly, we were really excited about going to the FEH open forum at the USEA conference this fall, but we had such a negative experience interacting with one of the committee members after presenting the data we gathered about characteristics of horses winning at the CCI***** level there, that it really turned us off the program, and we are not making the championships a priority this year. We were not turned off breeding which we LOVE, but we were turned off our previously enthusiastic participation in the FEH.
          www.witsendeventing.com
          Facebook
          Twitter
          YouTube

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Wits End Eventing View Post
            Frankly, we were really excited about going to the FEH open forum at the USEA conference this fall, but we had such a negative experience interacting with one of the committee members after presenting the data we gathered about characteristics of horses winning at the CCI***** level there, that it really turned us off the program, and we are not making the championships a priority this year. We were not turned off breeding which we LOVE, but we were turned off our previously enthusiastic participation in the FEH.
            I hope someone with clout/influence is reading this--WitsEnd breeds/brings amazing horses, and has been a wonderful supporter of this program.

            As an organizer, I offer the classes for breeders like WitsEnd and JER to have a meaningful place to showcase their babies...if we're really only getting more lip-service about necessary changes/clarifications and alienating the target clientele, the program will never survive.

            Comment


            • #7
              I have never gone to the championships although I have supported the individual "qualifiers". I have never thought the judging was consistent enough to warrant a full "overnighter" with babies in strange stalls and locations.
              It has also never helped me market my babies - and that is the main reason that I have a half hearted attitude toward the championships. With a very few exceptions, it has not rewarded or attracted the purpose bred horses.

              Unfortunately,I think the target clientele has already made their decision about the usefulness of the program as it stands and although I would really lik e to hope that this change will help, I am not sure we will see a substantial difference in the way in which it has been run
              JMO
              http://www.cngsporthorses.com

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by JER View Post
                Good. This is a very necessary step if this program is ever going to achieve its goals.

                JER, I agree with just about everything you've said regarding the FEH program. But I just want to note that this has, from my experience, already been an expectation.

                From the entry form: NOTE: Please fax your horse’s pedigree information to the USEA, or mail to USEA, 525 Old Waterford Rd. NW, Leesburg, VA 20176

                I'm not sure why this is an emphasis in the article as just about every show I've been to has listed in the program the pedigrees of every horse. Maybe it's a problem for West or Central?

                Also agree judging is too sporadic to warrant a championship qualification score, though for the most part I don't think I've seen many scores below that so not sure it's really enforcing anything anyway. However, judging criteria/scoring might change.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I wonder if running this as a futurity, with pay-ins, and area/regional based judged shows all by the same judges who travel to all the areas, would help it achieve the quality and consistency it would need to become marketable.

                  After all, the quarter horse people have developed the futurity system to a fine art, and it has helped to sell, market, create interest in selling and marketing, and fed the horse show system for them for decades. Can't be all wrong.

                  If we had two judges who got along, were above reproach and huge credentials and knew what they were doing judge ALL -- what a difference that would make. If we gave young horses two opportunities per area, maybe one in the smaller areas, to come to an already existing USEA recognized event and show under these guys. We would have a Top ten based on scores nationally without the need for a head to head championship; but could also offer the West/East championship at the current venues based on scores AND placings. If a horse WINS an area competition, they should be eligible to the championship, no matter what the score.

                  We don't need a whole lot of FEH classes, I just think we need GOOD quality ones, and wouldn't it be nice to win money like the futurities do, where you at least can have the opportunity to get an entry fee or some gas money back when you place, and possibly pay for the whole weekend and a couple bags of grain if you win!
                  Proud & Permanent Student Of The Long Road
                  Read me: EN (http://eventingnation.com/author/annemarch/) and HJU (http://horsejunkiesunited.com/author/holly-covey/)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by retreadeventer View Post
                    ...and wouldn't it be nice to win money like the futurities do, where you at least can have the opportunity to get an entry fee or some gas money back when you place, and possibly pay for the whole weekend and a couple bags of grain if you win!
                    While not a bad idea, it's not feasible with the number of participants and current (reasonable) entry fees.

                    We've run the FEH at a financial loss twice each year for the last 5 years (and I organize, secretary, set-up, score, etc. for free). The average entry fee for an FEH is only $50, and most shows only have 10-20 entries. So, there isn't much left in the 'pot' to redistribute to winners after paying for the judge, prizes, ribbons, the facility, etc.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by inquisitive View Post
                      JER, I agree with just about everything you've said regarding the FEH program. But I just want to note that this has, from my experience, already been an expectation.

                      From the entry form: NOTE: Please fax your horse’s pedigree information to the USEA, or mail to USEA, 525 Old Waterford Rd. NW, Leesburg, VA 20176
                      But this is different from this:

                      The USEA is also encouraging owners to submit a copy of their horses’ pedigrees when they are registered so the USEA can start to gather the information needed to create a searchable database in the future.
                      secretariat has posted on here several times about how the program PTB declined to have a tracking system/database when the program started, despite the urging of breeders like secretariat.

                      It seems that the USEA has finally gotten the message. The numbers aren't big -- they're tiny by data standards -- so tracking entries, scoring, and tying them to future performance records should not be difficult at all.

                      I do hope the USEA FEH folks are reading this thread as well as the other recent FEH discussion. If they are, they'll see a group of eventers/breeders/organizers who are supportive of the program and want to see it thrive.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Ah, I guess I didn't think the searchable DB would be anything other than the USEA dashboard (which isn't really searchable by pedigree, just thought that was their "lingo"). I figured they were going to actually start putting FEH results into the existing DB for USEA results, instead of just an HTML page. Right now if you search for my FEH horses, their records are empty except the standard details (including breeding) that I filled in.

                        Guess we'll see what they come up with

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by inquisitive View Post
                          I figured they were going to actually start putting FEH results into the existing DB for USEA results...
                          It would be wonderful if USEA would include the YEH and FEH results in the horses' records (from the beginning of the programs)! The horses have to be registered to have done the classes, so they might as well post the final scores and placings (especially now that we have to send in $10 USEA starter fees just like regular horse trials classes).

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Wits End Eventing View Post
                            We have mixed feelings about requiring a certain score to go to the championships.
                            1. turn out has not been huge without a qualifying score, so I wonder if this will really hit attendance.
                            In general, I think achieving a minimum score is a good thing. Championships should be "earned" right? I showed my boy in the USDF shows in 2010, and in order to qualify for championships, he had to prequalify at a show, and they had to have gone to at least 3 shows prior to championships. The top 3 from each class competed for champion and reserve. Those winners qualified to attend championships. Also, a score of 77% or higher in their class automatically qualified them. My boy qualified both in scores and in being reserve in a championship class. So every horse at championships was there because of their prequalifiying.

                            Even with year end USDF HOY awards, they had to achieve a median score of at least 65% after 3 shows. The program says it's to recognize outstanding horses....

                            We were going to do the FEH shows in 2010 (got our number etc), but they are several hours drive away from us. It just wasn't feasible to haul all that way to do one in-hand class and come back home.

                            He is being started over fences this spring now that he is turning 4, and hopefully we will go do the YEH as a 5 year old.
                            Cloverfox Stables

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by FLIPPED HER HALO View Post
                              In general, I think achieving a minimum score is a good thing. Championships should be "earned" right?
                              We agree with you; however, the point we were trying to make is that, until the judging standards are more controlled, an individual score does not really stand for anything since scores can vary SO widely from show to show. The example with our Halflinger/German Sport Pony cross who qualified for the championships was supposed to illustrate that. Yes, Val has plenty of talent, and he is darn cute but he will probably max out at 14h. Could he be the smallest horse to ever go around Rolex? Perhaps......but we would put our money on our TB/ISH (7/8TB) cross out of a mare that schooled advanced who didn't get the qualifying score but then won her division at the championships...... SO, our concern is that we are setting an arbitrary "number" when the program has not shown that it can produce consistent scoring.

                              I wonder if running this as a futurity, with pay-ins, and area/regional based judged shows all by the same judges who travel to all the areas, would help it achieve the quality and consistency it would need to become marketable.
                              Exactly. What the program needs is someone with BOTH the passion and the time to line up a good set of sponsors. I believe Michelle Robbins was instrumental in getting the current sponsor, a little help from someone good at that kind of thing would go a long way.

                              I have never gone to the championships although I have supported the individual "qualifiers". I have never thought the judging was consistent enough to warrant a full "overnighter" with babies in strange stalls and locations.
                              It has also never helped me market my babies - and that is the main reason that I have a half hearted attitude toward the championships. With a very few exceptions, it has not rewarded or attracted the purpose bred horses.
                              It is a sad state of affairs when the 2009 USEF Eventing Breeder of the Year feels this way about the program. We think a big part of the issue is that the program has not really reached out to the breeders to find out what they want and what works for them.
                              www.witsendeventing.com
                              Facebook
                              Twitter
                              YouTube

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X