• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Boyd's WS position listed on his blog...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • If I were younger and of college age, I would do this and consider it my education. Too bad that PELL grants cannot be used.

    And I know people who have one day off from their WS position and spend that day teaching lessons at various locations, etc. and they also get up at the crack of dawn and go muck out 20 stall barns before 7 am...

    If there is a will and a way, it can happen. I would bet that a very talented applicant could brainstorm with Boyd regarding ways to make it work....

    Ann (who had over $50k of college student loans by the time she got her doctorate)

    Comment


    • Originally posted by FairWeather View Post
      I thought it was hilarious. Some folks need to find their humor bone and hang out with it for a while.
      I thought it was pretty funny, but only in the "he's such an ass" kind of way!

      Comment


      • I agree. I found it humorous.... and COTH does have quite a reputation for posters getting their "panties in a wad."

        Or maybe they want people who do NOT sit around posting on COTH via tablet, computer, or phone, when they should be using both hands to get work done.

        I took it as tongue in cheek....

        Originally posted by loshad View Post
        I thought it was hilarious, but then I can recognize when someone's being tongue in cheek.

        I suspect, though, that it's not really aimed at someone like me, but at the sort of person who would get all panty wadded over a joke reference to a thread on which people got all aflutter over his right to run a WS gig as he sees fit. Sort of a shorthand way of saying "If you've got no sense of humor, you need not apply."

        Comment


        • Like most things, it's funny because it's true.

          Exhibit A: This thread.
          Exhibit B: Other Threads.

          I'm not going to pretend to be Boyd's inner-monologue, but if I had to hazard a guess I would guess he's talking about the afore mentioned Panty-Waddedness that is often found on COTHBB...and those who suffer from said affliction.
          ------------------------------
          Life Goes On

          Comment


          • LOL, very funny. And an important reminder that even the "famous" people read COTH.

            I think it's a difficult position to be in, people on COTH are allowed to bash anybody they please but if that person comes on to set things straight they get in even more trouble.
            http://weanieeventer.blogspot.com/

            Comment


            • That is certainly the "reputation" with which I am familiar. The complaint I hear is that people anonymously bash others, especially famous persons (wasn't there some thread bashing KOC?) and those people do have feelings and do get hurt. And the reaction is sometimes that COTHers who do so, know nothing, and are sitting on their pedestals bashing those who do.

              For those who do this, please do not shoot the messenger.

              For those who do not, I would assume you know what I am talking about.

              I am new to this forum. I do find it quite interesting that people post anonymously. I choose not to (hence the ahbaumgardner and kirkwood sporthorses), because if I can't put my name to something I say, then I figure it is not worthy of sharing.

              Thankful that the red thumbs are gone! They do sting!

              Originally posted by enjoytheride View Post

              I think it's a difficult position to be in, people on COTH are allowed to bash anybody they please but if that person comes on to set things straight they get in even more trouble.

              Comment


              • It is, of course, entirely possible to have a well-developed sense of humor and to simultaneously think a "joke" was badly-executed and in poor taste.

                Comment


                • Ditto Baxtersmom!

                  Comment


                  • Agreed, Mom of Baxter and Kelly!

                    And it could be a well-executed joke, IF she had added some sort of qualifier! I am not sure, off-hand, what that qualifier would be....but I can imagine that some reference to COTH, previous critiques etc., might bring a chuckle

                    Comment


                    • I'd like to weigh in.

                      Boyd, Boyd....not very nice to take a swipe at COTH. I know this board is very exasperating at times, but it's also been a pretty great place to find friends and knowledge, too. I understand the comment -- but in terms of looking for a good working student, offering some other information probably is more helpful.

                      In regard to working student positions in general - in order for something to be an "education", qualified people need to be teaching it. As in credentialled or approved or registered. In eventing we have the ICP program to qualify teachers. There is also university degrees and higher learning at the college level, resulting in credentials. I know eventers with bachelor's degrees, masters, degrees, and many on COTH with doctorates. Boyd's formal education pales in comparison. (As do many of our top level equestrian professionals.)

                      However, the experience of one of America's top international event riders is immense, and I have no doubt that a student position in his barn would help you learn more about the sport in a quick immersion period than you'd get in years doing it on your own or with lessons from your local pro. There is no substitute in the equestrian world for the knowledge you get working in a large barnful of competing horses. I know. I have a college degree in the field (Agriculture), have worked as a working student, and have operated a large barn of competing (race) horses, in addition to hiring and training new and inexperienced employees. Almost nothing I did in my prior 20 years with horses prepared me for running a 45-horse barn. You can talk about it forever but until you've experienced a day in that life, you can't figure it out from a textbook.

                      My feeling is a student position needs to be carefully looked at from the educational aspect. What will you learn, how will you learn it, is the time period sufficient to reach the educational goals, and will the learning be of quality commensurate with the cost? Without credentials and a track history of the educational institution (which can be a professional stable) you have very little to go on in order to make your decision about getting an eventing education. Much of what is on a website is a sales pitch.

                      What has to be done is your own research and compile facts. Who are past working students, what have they accomplished? Do their results mirror your goals? I think that is the way to determine if a WS position is what the pro offering it says it is. Because it really is just their say-so without educational credentials, or detailed information.

                      Because labor law investigators don't tend to notice the horse industry problem of uncompensated workers, the WS system survives. It's borderline illegal and it needs to be fixed. I know a trainer personally who was sued and LOST over a working student system and this is not a joke and can cost a trainer a fortune. Labor laws are serious business and strictly speaking how most trainers set up working student programs are pretty much against federal and state labor laws, from what I understand from friends in the know.

                      It would be nice to see our eventing organizations set up credentialled educational guidelines for working student compliance. Most of our top riders probably already have wonderful programs in place that have been working, and one would not have to reinvent the wheel but just document what is being learned, and categorize the levels as well as perhaps create short, pony-club-like knowledge tests for working students. Once you've tested past certain levels you have a credential that proves your knowledge going forward and can help you get a job or add to your resume. (There I go again....ideas.....can't help it....)

                      It would solve a lot of problems and probably help keep a healthy pipeline of young talented kids moving into our top ranks as well as helping our current top riders fill their needs, too.

                      (In my personal view, COTH is worth more than just a complaint listing. We can make a difference in a good way with our discussions here.)
                      Proud & Permanent Student Of The Long Road
                      Read me: EN (http://eventingnation.com/author/annemarch/) and HJU (http://horsejunkiesunited.com/author/holly-covey/)

                      Comment


                      • Some people have suggested that Boyd was trying to be funny. Well there are times when humor is not appropriate and this is one of them.

                        He could have said "sense of humor is required for this position". That's not too difficult.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by SnicklefritzG View Post
                          Some people have suggested that Boyd was trying to be funny. Well there are times when humor is not appropriate and this is one of them.

                          He could have said "sense of humor is required for this position". That's not too difficult.
                          Why was it such an inappropriate place for humor? It's HIS job listing, for HIS farm, trying to convey the type of person that would fit into HIS program. Obviously a sense of humor is needed for the job, so someone who didn't take it as such need not apply. I don't see what the huge issue with that is.
                          High Quality Tack Resale

                          Comment


                          • Many ULRs charge board or for housing for their working students. The tricky part is making sure you really DO get the lessons and opportunities that are presented as your "pay" for the experience. Too many working students muck stalls and clean tack for a twice-a-week lesson with an assistant trainer.

                            Comment


                            • Well, I worked my a$$ off through grad school as a research and teaching assistant... probably amounting to well less than minimum wage... and I was still responsible for tuition etc. I have no problem with this program. And if you really look at it from a barter standpoint, what is the cost of a private lesson with Boyd? How does that translate to hours worked per day? And in addition to the lessons, one gets informal lessons and gets to audit training sessions in exchange.

                              Do the math. It's a great deal. I would take it in a heartbeat if I could borrow, beg, steal, and wasn't this old!

                              Comment


                              • ^ ^ ^ Why was it such an inappropriate place for humor? Because humor is an art and not everyone can pull it off. And when it isn't clear that what is written IS humor it can come across as sarcasm, a nasty dig, or a pile of stink. Using humor in a business advert, esp when the humor is easily misunderstood, make people wonder about the professionalism and decision-making of the owners.

                                COTHers may love to get their judgy pants on -- but many lurkers and members donate to their favorite eventers. Horse syndicates are pretty pricey and UL eventers don't want to alienate their supporters.

                                Comment


                                • Comment


                                  • The joke could have been worded so that it worked better. Shucks. However, anyone who applies for that position isn't going with the intention to learn facility with the English language, so I don't think it's that big of a deal.

                                    I do disagree with the comment (on their blog, one of the replies) that we COTHers shouldn't take pot shots at people in defenseless positions. We'd welcome Boyd coming on here to defend his WS program, if he felt he had been so seriously abused by this or other threads. Or, he could do the smart thing, and just ignore us ...
                                    "One person's cowboy is another person's blooming idiot" -- katarine

                                    Spay and neuter. Please.

                                    Comment


                                    • I took it as humor -- and also an effective way to drum up interest. Here we are talking about it.

                                      Put another way, the only thing worse than having everyone talking about you is having no one talking about you.

                                      Originally posted by ahbaumgardner View Post
                                      The complaint I hear is that people anonymously bash others, especially famous persons (wasn't there some thread bashing KOC?) and those people do have feelings and do get hurt. And the reaction is sometimes that COTHers who do so, know nothing, and are sitting on their pedestals bashing those who do.
                                      Eventing is a sport. There's no reason why it shouldn't be treated like a real sport in terms of how people talk/argue/discuss. That's what real passion for sport looks like online -- enthusiasm for mulling over all aspects of eventing, the good and the bad, the funny and the serious. Truly inappropriate comments usually meet with correction measures and hearty smackdowns.

                                      I find it hard to believe that 'famous persons' in our sport can fly over frightening solid obstacles yet fall to pieces if they read anything less that high praise about themselves.

                                      Also, I really, really resent the notion or assumption that anyone on this BB 'knows nothing'. We're all here because we love horses and participate in eventing in various ways. Experience with horses is experience with horses. It's a great equalizer, regardless of the levels at which you compete.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by JSjumper View Post
                                        Why was it such an inappropriate place for humor? It's HIS job listing, for HIS farm, trying to convey the type of person that would fit into HIS program. Obviously a sense of humor is needed for the job, so someone who didn't take it as such need not apply. I don't see what the huge issue with that is.
                                        I think a lot of people took issue with Boyd poking fun at COTH. Not professional.

                                        Comment


                                        • I don't think it's about knowing nothing, it's about thinking you know everything and that everyone else knows nothing.
                                          http://weanieeventer.blogspot.com/

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X