• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Colleen Rutledge

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Colleen Rutledge

    Many of us have been puzzled by Colleen's absence from any of the Training lists. I know I am. I have just donated to the fund set up to help her get to Badminton (see her blog for information how to do this). Let's everyone put our money where our mouths are and donate, even if it's only a few dollars. I for one hope she and Shiraz get to Badminton and kick ass!

    Katie

  • #2
    Donation sent.

    When the USEF sends me their next fundraising or donation request, I plan to write across the form "donation sent directly to Colleen Rutledge" and mail it back.

    Does anyone know when Mark Phillips contract technically terminates? Does it go through the end of 2012 or just the London Olympic Games? I want to have one more thing to be thankful for tomorrow!

    Comment


    • #3
      The donation link is on the right side of the homepage at Colleen Rutledge Eventing.

      This is a great idea.

      Comment


      • #4
        I feel like I've heard or read something about Shiraz's dressage not being spectacular but I am not sure if that would be a reason to leave the pair off of a list. THat horse is an absolute XC machine. Gives me chills to watch them.
        "Lord if we should fall, my horse and I, please pick my horse up first."

        www.thestartbox.wordpress.com
        www.useaiv.org

        Comment


        • #5
          Dressage

          From what I saw last year, their dressage wasn't spectacular at all, not spectacularly good, not spectacularly bad. It was workman-like, with room for improvement in ringcraft. I saw absolutely nothing that would make me think they couldn't drop at least 10 points, if not more, within the next year.

          Given the fact that their x-c is spectacular, they'd seem like a pair that would have benefitted tremendously from some extra dressage lessons over the winter. It's too bad there's not some sort of USEF funded program to help stellar jumping pairs become more competitve in the dressage phase so that they'd be in a position to help future US teams.

          Instead we'd rather spend money funding more dressage lesson over the winter for dressage specialists who have stopping/bravery/galloping issues. And then we wonder why we have trouble finishing a team.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by NCRider View Post
            From what I saw last year, their dressage wasn't spectacular at all, not spectacularly good, not spectacularly bad. It was workman-like, with room for improvement in ringcraft. I saw absolutely nothing that would make me think they couldn't drop at least 10 points, if not more, within the next year.

            Given the fact that their x-c is spectacular, they'd seem like a pair that would have benefitted tremendously from some extra dressage lessons over the winter. It's too bad there's not some sort of USEF funded program to help stellar jumping pairs become more competitve in the dressage phase so that they'd be in a position to help future US teams.

            Instead we'd rather spend money funding more dressage lesson over the winter for dressage specialists who have stopping/bravery/galloping issues. And then we wonder why we have trouble finishing a team.
            THIS x100000

            Come on already...I've never even heard of half the pairs on the Developing Riders list...no offense to them as I'm sure they have paid dues too (pretty sure none of them have paid their way to Burghley though...)

            Colleen is obviously being snubbed and I'd like to know if there's a good reason behind it or if it's just the disgusting USEF politics once again! Definitely going to donate to help her get to Badminton and kick ass. Love the idea about sending the USEF envelope back with a nice message too
            No Trouble
            2/2/05 - 7/29/13
            Rest In Peace my quirky brave boy, I will love you forever.

            Comment


            • #7
              Fantastic idea!

              I was so impressed (AGAIN!) with her and her classy response to being left off the lists. When she stated that she has all the confirmation she needs from happy, healthy horses...she won me over...AGAIN!!!!

              Let's donate to her, folks!

              Comment


              • #8
                I would agree with you, Carried. And comparing her to Sinead, who did place higher but by no means left Colleen in the dust, makes it even more puzzling why she would have gotten left off of, at the VERY least, the DR list unless there was some serious snubbing going on.

                On a side note, I selfishly would rather her run Rolex again so I can see her magnificent XC run again in person. :-D
                "Lord if we should fall, my horse and I, please pick my horse up first."

                www.thestartbox.wordpress.com
                www.useaiv.org

                Comment


                • #9
                  Although I have never met Colleen, she seems like a top notch person and competitor. It would be easy to be resentful or angry about not making the list and instead she responds in the most classy way. So impressed and will definitely be supporting her and her dreams.

                  Go Colleen and Shiraz!!!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Old Boys network. Who's sleeping with whom; who's trained with whom; "who do we know?" You have to either be a club member or absolutely, rivetingly spectacular to get into the inner sanctums. If you haven't been trusted with the secret handshake by an already member, potential doesn't matter. Only proven performance does. In the South we play a game upon meeting someone new. It's called "Who do you know" and it places new people in an immediate context and social ranking that may or may not be justified.
                    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                    Thread killer Extraordinaire

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Perhaps this would be more appropriate to post on the training list thread, but it seems like the US selectors would rather focus on/bank on potential rather than trying to fix/tweak otherwise good combos. That approach just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Just because a horse hasn't yet run a 4*, doesn't mean he will be anymore successful than one who has done so with some issues.

                      In my view, you need to attack on both fronts - the horses with lots of potential who haven't yet proven themselves at that level and the horses who need some help to realize their potential. Shiraz is a good example - he needs help in the dressage department. Another example might be Slate River. He hasn't been out since Rolex, but assuming there are no major soundness issues, he seems like one worth putting on a list.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I really enjoyed watching her go at Rolex this year, especially during her SJ warm up with DOC & Jimmy. Very educational!

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #13
                          I love the return message on the USET hit letters idea. Great thinking -but I'd expext nothing less from SevenDogs!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I'm in and also want to give Colleen kudos for being one of the volunteer clinicians for the Area II Adult Riders Training 3 day at Waredaca. I like that someone that is clearly the sort of horseperson she is, is helping others learn those important lessons in the context of the long format.
                            OTTBs rule, but spots are good too!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I am totally in, will give to Colleens badminton fund instead of USET, this year. The thought that the selectors might be paid for making these sort of decisions makes me really want to not donate to the cause even more. I do hope they donate their time. That would make me feel a bit better about the money i have donated to them in the past.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I think I agree with the good ole boys club. I also think the closed door system of why they do or do not choose someone justifies this idea. A person, who, for whatever reason, is left off. There is no explanation, to them, nor even a notification that they were left off. Here is a problem with this.

                                IF you are serious about trying to make the team, and you don't know the WHY of it all, you are really running in blind circles, and may never fix the issue. I can't imagine any other scenario where we want the best, but refuse to help people get there.

                                As for C.R. And dressage. A selector told me, they won't even bother looking at someone not in the 40's at a CCi in dressage. Of the three phases, that one seems the most fixable. Obviously you can't give a ton of movement where there'd might be so little, but you can improve on it.

                                You can't improve on a horses boldness, without major risk of injury, and over work.

                                This whole thing is frustrating, and ridiculous. I also don't hold out a lot of hope that it will change with a n coach. I suspect that this network, includes mmy who will be there in 2016 as well. I agree, its more who you know, what you have to spend, and less about talent.
                                May the sun shine on you daily, and your worries be gone with the wind.
                                www.mmceventing.com

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Posted before done. I think that talent is obviously a factor, most of those people ride amazing....but the omission of CR.. questions WHAT EXACTLY are they thinking?
                                  May the sun shine on you daily, and your worries be gone with the wind.
                                  www.mmceventing.com

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Am definitely donating (again) to Colleen's Burghley fund. Have met her and saw her ride Shiraz at Waredaca (intermediate, I think?), thought she was super then and now.

                                    And adore the idea about telling USEF where my donation went.
                                    I tolerate all kinds of animal idiosyncrasies.
                                    I've found that I don't tolerate people idiosyncrasies as well. - Casey09

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by gold2012 View Post
                                      WHAT EXACTLY are they thinking?
                                      The selectors are mean and petty. No way around it.

                                      It's disturbing on a number of levels. The selectors are tasked with finding the best horse/rider combos for our teams and for our future teams.

                                      Have they done that by leaving Colleen of the lists? No.

                                      Is there any reality-based universe in which the selectors can choose 40+ pairs over Colleen and Shiraz? No.

                                      This lot must go. I don't care who they are or who they think they are because, in this case, actions speak louder than words and they've made it clear that they're not fit for the job.

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by JER View Post
                                        The donation link is on the right side of the homepage at Colleen Rutledge Eventing.

                                        This is a great idea.

                                        Except on an iPad for some weird reason ......

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X