• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Dangerous riding setdowns/AERC

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dangerous riding setdowns/AERC

    In the sport of endurance, when a horse dies on a ride, for any reason, it triggers an immediate inquiry under AERC (American Endurance Ride Conference) rules.
    It would be easy to get from them their protocals.
    The results of the inquiry determine penalties, setdowns, whatever, and the results are always printed in the AERC Magazine.
    This is part of the culture of endurance, as a sport, to be exceedingly non tolerant of anything even hinting of horse abuse.
    Their motto is "To finish is to win." Eventing`s unofficial motto is "Over, under, or through."
    Just there you can see a huge cultural difference.
    So if we in eventing investigated each horse accident with the possibility of assigning blame, instead of usually saying "poor baby, your horse died, so terribly sorry", I do believe we would start to change our basic culture.
    Think about this.
    http://www.tamarackhill.com/

  • #2
    Yup,
    But here in lies the dilemma, we have all these layers we have to peel off if the death occurred at prelim and above. We have to deal with the gestapo of the USEF and FEI. THAT'S where we get really pissed off because then we know the rider is only, or maybe, possibly, if we're lucky, get a slap on the wrist. And then continue to compete when we(the people of the sport) still harbor bad feelings towards that person because we KNOW they haven't learned their lesson.
    Are the USEF and FEI going to change their ways? Heck no. I work for the DofD and I know they don't change sh- for 20 years. Even if it takes a nanosecond to change a little something, doesn't matter. Not going to do it.
    Even duct tape can't fix stupid

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Changing a culture that began in cavalry days isn`t going to be easy.
      But is that a reason not to try?
      The young lady that`s being talked about so much had been warned and warned. Had there been penalties in place, she might have listened.
      The AERC office is in Ca. A simple phone call from our USEA office to theirs, just to kick ideas around, how hard is that? For a start?
      http://www.tamarackhill.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        I was thinking about the "go fast, faster, fastest" attitude last night as I was doing my barn chores. I'd love to see, instead of dressage ribbons for the best test, a ribbon for the rider who was closest to optimum time. It's a small idea, but it's time to start rewarding riding the pace, not going hell bent.

        I'd also want to see the USEA publish the reports of dangerous riding and accidents like the AERC does.

        Cultural change in this sport starts with open dialogue between all competitors, officials, and volunteers. Whether we like it or not, the sport has morphed into something different, and I'm not so sure the 'warrior mentality' has a place in this sport anymore.

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm a little pissy this morning at the gov't because I actually have a teeny code change that has now taken me 5 days to do because of peripheral crap
          So, I didn't want to poo poo the idea. Sorry.
          I think publishing the person in question who gets a flag or deemed dangerous is a great deterrent for the person.
          Would a demerit or something really be a wake up call? I think so. Hubby is a cop and they got that big speed calculator sign thingy. Stuck it in a known spot where folks should slow down. And statistically, it works. Also, if you have cops walking the beat, it's a deterrent. I'm thinking of assistant td on x-c day type of thing. The td can't be everywhere at once. At the big shows, they have the gj out there and seems to be working but at ht, we don't have that luxury.
          Wouldn't it be great to have one of those huge hooks and if the person is dangerous, just break out that hook and knock them off their horse immediately?
          I think the USEA should contact the AERC. And probably will since it's a great idea. I just don't think the USEF nor the FEI will do squat. Maybe just maybe, if the USEA imposes this kind of investigation and then hands out some kind of penalty, it would be enough. But I don't know if they have any authority if it's a CIC or CCI. Then again, we do see these people a ht and it might just work ...
          Even duct tape can't fix stupid

          Comment


          • #6
            I hope that when selection time comes for any international event (Olympics, World Cup, Champ's, etc.) that people's record for riding hell bent for leather is taken into consideration. I'm sure not - but it is something that should be. They should not be rewarded by riding wrecklessly and winning or doing well by the skin of their teeth. Just because someone won or has done well - doesn't mean that they RODE well and that they thought of their horse's well being first. I'm sure you get what I am getting at....
            To test unconditional love - put your dog and your boyfriend into the trunk of your car for an hour. Who is happy to see you when you come back? That's unconditional love...

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Fence2Fence View Post
              I was thinking about the "go fast, faster, fastest" attitude last night as I was doing my barn chores. I'd love to see, instead of dressage ribbons for the best test, a ribbon for the rider who was closest to optimum time. It's a small idea, but it's time to start rewarding riding the pace, not going hell bent.

              good idea except that from what I've receintly read, Opt Time shouldn't actually be achievable for most people. Maybe a ribbon for the person in the middle of the pack time wise.

              Comment


              • #8
                Denny that's a great idea.

                As an aside (and I know you weren't talking about this but I'll add this anyway for others), I hope that riders of horses with artery ruptures are not blamed by the public. Horses do not have to be galloping full out to die from an artery rupture.

                Comment


                • #9
                  The culture needs to change so that these things aren't just whispered about. We need to be direct and honest and willing to hear criticism.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Along these lines, might it not be nice to emphasize "Best Condition" winners? As in endurance riding, the horse adjudged to be in the best shape at the end of the event?

                    I believe this is done at some events--why not all?
                    "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                    ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      In addition to what Denny said is eventing's motto:
                      Eventing`s unofficial motto is "Over, under, or through
                      I see an awful lot of "grab mane and kick on" posted on this board. I'd much rather see some people pull up and check the horse.
                      Tranquility Farm - Proud breeder of Born in the USA Sport Horses, and Cob-sized Warmbloods
                      Now apparently completely invisible!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Ghazzu View Post
                        Along these lines, might it not be nice to emphasize "Best Condition" winners? As in endurance riding, the horse adjudged to be in the best shape at the end of the event?

                        I believe this is done at some events--why not all?
                        I love this idea. I think that there should be a mandatory vet box after cross country a la pony club rallies. If your horse is obviously overstressed for the level then you get penalties.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Ja Da Dee View Post
                          good idea except that from what I've receintly read, Opt Time shouldn't actually be achievable for most people. Maybe a ribbon for the person in the middle of the pack time wise.
                          I think we should make it acheivable. Optimum time is figured by pace. With the advent of GPS and such we should be able to figure the optimum time in pieces so that a tricky place is figured at 350 mpm but a long galloping stretch is faster. THat way the optimum really reflects the best speed for the course.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Agreed.

                            People do not know how to take or give criticism. Some appear to take it as a challenge and actions to back up the words are indeed needed.

                            I remember growing up- when I made a mistake, my trainer let me know it was scary. Bad. Awful. My trainer insisted that I stay at 2'6 at shows until 3' was flawless at home. She had no qualms with making us scratch if we were riding like idiots. And me, my parents, her other clients - we never questioned her judgement.

                            I think now that the respect for authority has somewhat eroded. If people are being told- "You are dangerous" and not making changes, then yes, official set downs are needed. Jockeys are penalized for dangerous riding. We penalize people for drugging. Personal responsibility only goes so far- the horses need protection from barn blind riders who have too much belief in themselves. And with eventing- I think to do it- you need faith in your ability and probably really most ULR's need extra eyes making sure that they are not taking undue risks.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              ?

                              Denny, when you say "the rider....was warned and warned to slow down", is that recorded somewhere, or just general 'knowledge' in ULR circles. I'm not trying to point fingers, here, but could there be a system whereby 'warnings' become a recorded thing. If so, then there might be more basis for setdown, disqualification, etc? Just a thought.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                What is dangerous riding ?
                                That I have no use for them, does not mean, that I don't know them and don't know how to use them.
                                Caveman extraordinair

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  If someone is "warned and warned" why are they rewarded by being made part of the developing riders program? The message is too conflicting, particularly if the warnings are "all talk". The action, the reward, that's what sticks.

                                  Emily
                                  "It's not a perfect world....But it's still good to be alive! If you don't know by now, you'll probably never understand the way it feels to wanna live....One Perfect Moment!!"

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    ..

                                    Perhaps it is subjective, but when I was jump judgeing at probably one of the most tricky parts of a Prelim course, a girl came through at a gallop and did not set up for anything. By luck and a good horse, she got through fine BUT the TD took off immediately to meet her at the finish line and give her a warning. The TD was serious business at this event. I think a penalty would have been totally appropriate.
                                    The truth is rarely pure, and never simple. Oscar Wilde

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Pixie- if that was MCTA I also witnessed the TD giving somebody in the novice division a talk about DR. Basically you were going to fast and we have our eye on you. Afterwards, the rider was laughing about it.

                                      What I took away from that exchange was that the rider was not going to change her ways because she did not see herself as dangerous. Maybe actually giving her the DR penalty might have convinced her they were serious. The person seemed very concerned about her placing so the DR would have dropped her way down and hopefully convinced her to go home and work on controlling her horse before attempting to compete again.
                                      http://www.benchmarksporthorses.com/

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        At the same time, I once saw a stadium judge give a girl a warning about dangerous riding after watching a kid rush around with long reins. The kid was pretty stunned.

                                        Kid's trainer came up and and complained to the judge about making her rider upset. Consistent messages from TD's, Judge's and Trainers are needed. But some teeth - moving a placing down, suspensions and fines are probably the most effective message.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X