• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

One fall and you're out rule

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • One fall and you're out rule

    Everyone:

    I aplogise for the goofy formatting I tried to edit it...

    I urge everyone to contact the USEA and USEF and make their opinions known on this rule change.

    I personally do not think simple falls, not related to obstacles should be penalized by elimination, at least from Training Level down. This past weekend a woman popped off her horse on x/c when he spooked at another horse coming out of the bushes. It was a silly fall, no one was hurt, she remounted and continued. I personally believe this rule to be a knee jerk reaction and believe it should not be passed.



    [FONT=Times New Roman][/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]On May 15, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Penny & Brian Ross wrote:[/FONT][/SIZE]
    [SIZE=3][/SIZE]
    [SIZE=3][/SIZE]
    [SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman][/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]The rule passed. After 3.5 hours on Tuesday ( BOG) another 4 hours on Wednesday Eventing Task force. In very passionate debates over the one fall =Elimination - Majority ruled! Tuesday The vote was 3 against ( me included) 9 for; Wednesday 2 ( me and one other) - not sure how many for but the ya's moved it forward to the USEF Exc. Committee for processing today no reason to think that we will not see this rule as of JUNE 1 2008! (Every single issue you all have written was brought up) . [/SIZE][/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]I am very conflicted to say the least to where we are as a sport at the moment! It is for me a very uncomfortable - emotionally & mentality, place to be. As it would seem that the Ya's know something that I don't or perhaps I am just not in the same place in my head as they are.[/SIZE][/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]Brian and I still are fighting to keep the long format for the one star alive, we also are fighting to keep our past alive.[/SIZE][/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]Majority rules and I understand that, like it - no, but understand . Perhaps they are right, perhaps this is the direction that our current community deems necessary - pass generations of riders and horses are gone forever and this is now a new generation and a new sport. [/SIZE][/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2] For us old folks is will never be the same.[/SIZE][/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]One thing I can say that is at all positive this morning for me, I will expect to see more entries at our schooling shows, they so much more FUN![/SIZE][/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2] For ever reason brought up like, we already have rules in place to address, they come back with; officials are not using them, Riders are not taking responsibility they are climbing back on and finishing when they should not. It is a competition and riders should be expected to stay on if they fall off they should go home and spend more money and time "practicing" rather then "practice while competing" . There is no proof that after one fall they ride better on and on and on![/SIZE][/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]There was much more discussed that I will share with you a bit later but I really MUST get times done and posted![/SIZE][/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]Until later folks[/SIZE][/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]Penny[/SIZE][/FONT]
    Last edited by LAZ; May. 19, 2008, 11:03 AM. Reason: weird formatting

  • #2
    I agree in spirit, but...

    I have seen some really bad falls that were not obstacle related, both on course and in warm-up. Nallabor seems to be an example of the former. I think these riders should be eliminated, but not the silly slip off's that you describe.

    Q:How do we write that rule?

    A: We can't.

    Thus,

    A)we catch some dolfins with the shark, and learn to live with it.

    OR

    B)accept responsibility for ourselves and reject the notion that RULES are the solution
    Last edited by groom; May. 19, 2008, 11:26 AM. Reason: (I like option B best)

    Comment


    • #3
      Do we want to be safer or not? Yeah, there will be some people who had silly falls that could go on, but they can try again another day. There will always be other events. To be safer though I like the fall = E rule. It may not be ideal, but how do we judge who has an OK fall and who doesn't? It is better for everyone to be safer even if it is at the MINOR expense of another rider finishing that could have, than have unsafe riders out there.
      http://community.webshots.com/user/CloverExpress08/

      Comment


      • #4
        My personal preference would be for this rule to apply only at P and above (boy can my horse spook when he wants to!) but if I have to choose between no rule at any level, and rule at every level, I would rather have the rule in place. Consider it taking one for the good of the sport, I guess.

        Comment


        • #5
          but if a rider doesn't have a good enough seat to get through a spook (unless it is a major spook, then I understand) why should they continue on that day? Even a novice rider ought to have a good enough leg and seat to sit through a good spook. (and yes, I've come off from minor spooks years ago, and then my last job as a working student, I was the "velcro-butt" rider in the barn and had to sit on everything - and didn't fall, thankfully) A good seat won't come unstuck from unforeseen spooks. If I come off from a spook, I know I need to address my seat.

          Comment


          • #6
            Falls are part of horse riding. By creating a no fall rule we will likely see some scary attempts to stay on. A no fall rule will not prevent idiots from eventing. What it will do is create the mindset that falling off is bad when in fact it isn't.

            Comment


            • #7
              This not quiet correct, or half the story.

              The fall has to be in conection with a jump, falls that are not conected with a jump do not fall under this proposal.

              A nother proposal conected to the rule, is a medical check out, before a rider can get back on the next horse
              That I have no use for them, does not mean, that I don't know them and don't know how to use them.
              Caveman extraordinair

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Hony View Post
                Falls are part of horse riding. By creating a no fall rule we will likely see some scary attempts to stay on. A no fall rule will not prevent idiots from eventing. What it will do is create the mindset that falling off is bad when in fact it isn't.
                I agree completely. If you don't want to fall off of a horse, then don't ever get on one. I see this proposed rule as a dumbing down rather than addressing the real safety issues. Over 99% of falls off of a horse result in bruised egos at worst, even in competition.

                Now, I do agree that something needs to be done at lower levels regarding competitors who really don't have good seat/legs/hands and are out there, anyway. For starters their trainers need to be just saying no, because often these riders don't honestly know that they don't have a sufficient base to be giving it a go, they are relying on what their trainers tell them. Scary, but true.

                But penalizing all falls, whether defined as associated with fences or not...no.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I have changed my mind on this issue.

                  I used to be against this rule - again, for the rider who has a stirrup break, or falls on their feet, etc.

                  BUT

                  At least 2x in the last year while I've been a controller, a rider has fallen, seemed to be fine, remounted, and fallen again - the second time with serious injuries.

                  Fence judges are already overworked, under appreciated, and much needed. We cannot ask them to differentiate between an "ok" fall and a "not ok" fall.

                  So I am now for the "1 fall XC and you're out".

                  It is already a rule in stadium (excuse me, "show jumping" )

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I agree that at first I was against the rule change, but I think it is a better safe than sorry move that needs to be taken.

                    I was wondering though, at the Horse Trial level if running on true format D-XC-S (rather than D-S-XC), could a rider eliminated on XC ask to ride stadium as Hors Concours (sp?) ?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Over in hunter/jumper land - if you fall off you are excused and that's that.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by FlightCheck View Post

                        I Fence judges are already overworked, under appreciated, and much needed. We cannot ask them to differentiate between an "ok" fall and a "not ok" fall.

                        I agree with Flightcheck about what we should task j-judges with.

                        I've fallen when my horse looked at the jump and decided to do a 180. "Run for your life!" I landed on my butt, was not injured at all and able to continue. As frustrating as it would have been for me to walk off course that day, I dont think we will be able to write rules that are gray, and have jump judges apply them correctly. We also can't have a TD and a medic at each fence to make the decisions for us. The day I fell in competition (fence 2), we had a lovely warm-up, then a horrid ride, each fence I had to decide to pull up or not. He eventually worked out of his "mood", and completed the xc course fine, but was eliminated the next day in stadium when he wouldn't take his focus off of the tent. In hindsight, I probably should have walked off the course after the fall, or the second refusal 2 jumps later. I did learn alot about riding and evaluating when my horse isn't 100% on task though, so it wasn't a lost experience.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I dont think

                          Eliminating a person for a fall is going to change the problems that exist, not by a long shot.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            H/J land is much different from XC land. I think a rule that allows officials to deal with riders on an individual basis might be more helpful. This way the rider who is loose in the tack and has one fall can be told they are not allowed to continue while the rider who's fall is do to something like a broken leather or an unusual slip can continue.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Exactly what I was thinking

                              Originally posted by Hony View Post
                              Falls are part of horse riding. By creating a no fall rule we will likely see some scary attempts to stay on. A no fall rule will not prevent idiots from eventing. What it will do is create the mindset that falling off is bad when in fact it isn't.
                              You worded it well. I thought so the mind set will be stay on at all costs!
                              You know some folks will feel that way.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Could we please not interject more subjectivity into what is supposed to be, primarily, an objective sport? If we must be eliminated for a fall, then eliminate us for any fall while on the competition course. And, folks, it IS a horse riding competition. If you aren't on the horse, you aren't riding it. The reasons are irrelevant, it's just a fact.
                                Treat Jockey for Spellbound and Smidgeon

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  A fall is a fall. Doesn't matter if it's HJ or eventing. It's still competition. If you fall off H/J ON COURSE you're done. I'm surprised this hasn't been a rule in eventing. Why should you be allowed to finish the competition after you've fallen? Why is it an acceptable rule for your 2-3 min. stadium trip, but not for your 6-11min cross country trip where most of these accidents are occurring? Competitions are to show who is best that day or weekend. If you've fallen, you weren't the best. Game over, go home, evaluate what happened, and keep practicing and try again.

                                  Most people that fall have one of two things happen 1) they get rattled 2)they get mad. Getting right back on and continuing under both circumstances is just not safe for anyone.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I strongly support this rule

                                    One thing I have always hated about eventing is the "if you are not bleeding or have not broken something (like in an overtly apparent way) then you aren't really that hurt" mentality.

                                    I have fallen off and gotton back on and finished courses only because I didn't want to hear my coach and friends give me a bunch of back talk for not really being "that hurt" on more than one occassion and I think that most of these very same people would probably admit that they have done the same. What is one of the first things we all learn when we are kids just starting out? ... If you fall off you have to get right back on... We are a bunch of bad ass athletes and we do have to have a certain "tough" mentality to even leave the start box. BUT... how many of you have known people to fall off, get back on and finish courses only to find out later that they have a concussion, broken arms, broken collar bones, dislocated shoulders... I could name ten right now. Sometimes you don't have to hit the ground very hard at all to seriously hurt yourself and when adrenaline is involved the rider is not the right person to make these calls. And unless we are going to start requiring our jump judges to be actual doctors or EMT's then I do not think we can burden them with the job of deciding who is and is not injured enough to continue... We take such amazing care of our horses, and we fuss that the public does not perceive of what we do as a real sport... yet we refuse to give our own bodies the honor and respect that a real athlete deserves.

                                    Yes, it sucks if you have a "stupid" fall and have to go home, but... I'm not even sure if I believe in "stupid falls". I think that when we fall off there is usually a reason. So go home, train a little and try again next weekend.

                                    I think that if there is a concern about people doing crazy things to not hit the ground then there could be some kind of 10 second clause where if you are still hanging onto the horse's side after 10 seconds or so you are eliminated anyway so you might as well let go.

                                    In my mind, this is a long overdue rule change and was needed well before the recent bout of problems the sport has been facing.

                                    I also strongly believe that if anyone falls off and gets eliminated, or even if that rule change doesn't happen, they should have to get cleared by the EMT's before they are allowed to continue on other horses for the weekend.


                                    Rebecca

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Hony View Post
                                      Falls are part of horse riding. By creating a no fall rule we will likely see some scary attempts to stay on. A no fall rule will not prevent idiots from eventing. What it will do is create the mindset that falling off is bad when in fact it isn't.
                                      People already do some scary things to stay on and prevent getting the penalty points associated with falling off. I love watching the clip of Karen O'Connor on youtube trying to stay on her horse.

                                      I also agree that we do not need any more subjective rules in this sport.

                                      If the ruling is for a fall that is associated with a jump attempt then that doubles my support. At every level we have a responsibility to ourselves and our horses to approach jumps in a safe and controlled manner, yes things go wrong but a competent rider ought to be able to handle those situations.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by ponyjumper4 View Post
                                        A fall is a fall. Doesn't matter if it's HJ or eventing. It's still competition. If you fall off H/J ON COURSE you're done. I'm surprised this hasn't been a rule in eventing. Why should you be allowed to finish the competition after you've fallen? Why is it an acceptable rule for your 2-3 min. stadium trip, but not for your 6-11min cross country trip where most of these accidents are occurring? Competitions are to show who is best that day or weekend. If you've fallen, you weren't the best. Game over, go home, evaluate what happened, and keep practicing and try again.

                                        Most people that fall have one of two things happen 1) they get rattled 2)they get mad. Getting right back on and continuing under both circumstances is just not safe for anyone.
                                        Just to play devil's advocate... if you fall off in a hunter or jumper class, you have another shot in the next class, or the next day, or the day after that, since there are multiple classes over multiple days. You have another chance to get back on and ride in the next class. So, if a jumper rider falls in one class for a "silly" reason, should they not be allowed to show for the rest of the show, or at least the day?
                                        http://community.webshots.com/user/CloverExpress08/

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X