• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Letter from USEF President David O'Connor and USEA President Kevin Baumgardner

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Letter from USEF President David O'Connor and USEA President Kevin Baumgardner

    29 April 2008

    Dear Members of the Equestrian Community,

    This past weekend at the Rolex Kentucky Three-Day, Laine Ashker suffered a serious fall during the cross-country stage of the competition. She is currently in critical condition at the University of Kentucky hospital in Lexington. Laine's horse and another involved in a separate accident had to be euthanized.

    These accidents come just a month after Darren Chiacchia, an Olympic rider, had a serious fall at an event in Tallahassee, Florida. They also come in the wake of a recent article in the New York Times about 15 rider fatalities in cross country that have occurred worldwide over the last two years.

    These accidents have hit us hard in the sport of eventing - we are all riders who care deeply about the horses, their welfare and the image of the sport. For us, the issue is also a personal one.

    This spate of accidents has raised important and potentially troubling questions for those of us who govern the sport: Why are so many riders and horses having accidents? Is there more that can be done to make cross country safer? Is the sport just too dangerous?

    There is no question that eventing is a demanding and yes, risky sport. Riders cross undulating terrain at high speed and jump a series of challenging fences - all while atop a 1,000 pound horse. So there is a constant need for us to ensure that every precaution is being taken to reduce the risk of injury to riders and horses.

    Although we have implemented several measures to improve safety over the last year, clearly more needs to be done. In the coming days and weeks, we will be redoubling our efforts to identify additional steps we can take to make sure that riders and horses can compete as safely as possible. We would like to ask your help in this effort - whether you're a rider, trainer, coach, veterinarian, or simply a horse enthusiast.

    We invite each and every one of you to the USEF/USEA Safety Summit to be held in Lexington, KY June 7-8. We will break the issue of safety down and examine the causes and potential solutions with some of the best minds in the game. In the meantime, if you have immediate thoughts about how we can improve the safety of cross country, please email them to us at:

    safetythoughts@usef.org and/or safety@useventing.com.

    Over the last few days, we have received emails from people who were at the Rolex event over the weekend and were disturbed by what they saw. They are asking hard questions of us and questioning whether they should continue to support the sport of eventing. To them and to you, we want to say that we too are disturbed by what we see. No matter how much we tell ourselves that injury is a part of our sport, it is always traumatizing to see a horse fall.

    Therefore, we are working closely with FEI to do whatever we can to better protect riders and horses and to repair the public image of our sport. We are proposing today that within the U.S. the following five initiatives be put into effect:
    1. If a horse has a rotational fall, horse and rider are suspended from competing for three or six months
    2. If a horse has a rotational fall, horse and rider lose their qualification at the level at which they are competing.
    3. If a rider falls off on the course they are eliminated.
    4. Open oxers on courses at every level are made frangible.
    5. If a horse falls related to a jump both horse and rider are suspended from competing for one month.
    We don't have all the answers, we are deeply concerned about what is going on in the sport of eventing and we need your help.

    Sincerely,

    David O'Connor, USEF President
    Kevin Baumgardner, USEA President
    Volunteer Coordinator, Equiventures, LLC
    and the Sunshine State, Little Everglades,
    & Live Oak Combined Driving Events
    tincupeventing@gmail.com

  • #2
    It's a good start.

    SCFarm
    The above post is an opinion, just an opinion. If it were a real live fact it would include supporting links to websites full of people who already agreed with me.

    www.southern-cross-farm.com

    Comment


    • #3
      truly - suspensions might save lives
      Nothing says "I love you" like a tractor. (Clydejumper)

      The reports states, “Elizabeth reported that she accidently put down this pony, ........, at the show.”

      Comment


      • #4
        Kudos to them and to all eventers for being smart and pro-active on this.

        I'm so sorry it's required at all, but as a PR person I'm very glad to see some intelligent moves from the top.

        Comment


        • #5
          Yeah, I applaud it, for sure...but who decides if it was a rotational fall and how will that prevent more? Riders don't know that their decisionmaking (or whatever) will result in that kind of fall--or any fall at all--so kinda "punishing" them (I don't know if that's really the intent though--I'm not sure what the goal of suspending them is, alas) isn't going to prevent such falls from happening, is it?
          Sportponies Unlimited
          Athletic Thoroughbred crosses for the highly motivated, smaller rider.

          Comment


          • #6
            Like LLDM said, it's a start.

            However, I need some clarification on point #1. Does it mean the rider is suspended from ALL his/her rides or just from that horse? Is the horse suspended from competing with ALL riders? If the rider is struck off all mounts and the horse is banned from all competition, I think it's a much better rule than if the rider/horse is still allowed to compete in other combinations.

            Same goes for #5 -- does it mean the rider is banned from all competition on all horses? Does this include falls in showjumping as well as XC?

            Comment


            • #7
              It is a good start.

              I think though that once the horse and rider have a rotational fall, it is already too late in many cases.

              I think a subjective element to XC riding might be added to certain UL HTs - and if you fail to score adquately, your score is non-qualifying. This would eliminate those rounds where people "get around" from qualifying them for the three days that they are usually using them to get to.

              We already have the subjective element in the dressage, and it can make a double clear round, finishing on the dressage score, non-qualifying. Why not use subjectivity to get to the crux of the matter - the xc riding.

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #8
                Email your thoughts to them.
                Volunteer Coordinator, Equiventures, LLC
                and the Sunshine State, Little Everglades,
                & Live Oak Combined Driving Events
                tincupeventing@gmail.com

                Comment


                • #9
                  Good start, and I'm glad this is being taken seriously. But would any of those initiatives have saved the horses' lives this weekend?

                  The only thing I've heard that would have likely made a difference is Denny's radical statement about getting rid of xc fences with vertical faces.
                  "It's not a perfect world....But it's still good to be alive! If you don't know by now, you'll probably never understand the way it feels to wanna live....One Perfect Moment!!"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by pwynnnorman View Post
                    Yeah, I applaud it, for sure...but who decides if it was a rotational fall and how will that prevent more? Riders don't know that their decisionmaking (or whatever) will result in that kind of fall--or any fall at all--so kinda "punishing" them (I don't know if that's really the intent though--I'm not sure what the goal of suspending them is, alas) isn't going to prevent such falls from happening, is it?
                    Rotational falls follow a very very distinct pattern. The horse hits the jump between the point of shoulder and forearm on one side. The horse slides up across the jump on that one shoulder, and his body is pivoted over that shoulder (it's not always a spectacular somersault like frodo; usually it's a semi-lateral flop). If the jump breaks away like in SJ, he is able to put his front feet down to save himself. If not, he continues his rotation and lands on his chest or the fore shoulder. Rider may or may not be thrown out of the way.

                    As to the other questions in your post, I can't answer those.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by pwynnnorman View Post
                      Yeah, I applaud it, for sure...but who decides if it was a rotational fall and how will that prevent more? Riders don't know that their decisionmaking (or whatever) will result in that kind of fall--or any fall at all--so kinda "punishing" them (I don't know if that's really the intent though--I'm not sure what the goal of suspending them is, alas) isn't going to prevent such falls from happening, is it?
                      I would assume the Jump Judge would be required to describe the fall. It is their job to be watching closely. I would guess that the TD or the PGJ would decide if it was a rotational fall based on the description and interviewing the JJ.

                      Yes, it should be punitive. The idea would be to ensure that a rider is really, really sure that they are capable of taking this horse, at this moment in time, safely around the course. And to give them a really, really good reason to withdraw or retire if their round starts to go south.

                      It probably shouldn't be necessary. But right now it is.

                      SCFarm
                      The above post is an opinion, just an opinion. If it were a real live fact it would include supporting links to websites full of people who already agreed with me.

                      www.southern-cross-farm.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Yes, but suspending a rider/horse for a rotational fall doesn't keep the horse that fell alive.
                        So how would this work? ... Frodo is suspended now?

                        - I think that training and qualifications are seriously important - but they are personal responsibilities and should not be legislated because .... as keeps getting pointed out these were not rookies riding out of control. They were experienced horse people who made a mistake.

                        We have to demand an environment where the answer to a mistake is not death. Fences that break fall down are not going to encourage bad riding - RAyers point is perfect - does having a airbag make you play chicken with a truck? - But it may keep you alive if you don't see the truck coming.
                        Our x-cntry jumps need to be built to a standard that is challenging, allows for speed and bravery and takes in terrain, but doesn't kill when an error is make.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by DizzyMagic View Post
                          Good start, and I'm glad this is being taken seriously. But would any of those initiatives have saved the horses' lives this weekend?

                          The only thing I've heard that would have likely made a difference is Denny's radical statement about getting rid of xc fences with vertical faces.
                          # 4 might have.
                          ** I LOVE PUIKA & SHELLA FAN CLUB*** member
                          Originally posted by 2DogsFarm
                          Good job R&G!
                          You may now add Horsesaver Extraordinaire to your resume

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Clarification on the points needed....

                            for the rotational does that mean that horse and rider (no matter what horse) are suspended. That could be problematic for the pro's if a baby hangs a leg somewhere and flips. Can they not show anything for that time?

                            for the fall of horse related to the jump, does that mean that some of the horses that submarine in the water on landing are included? Or that the time my darling horse tripped directly after a fence and fell would count? Or like my 2 star in the mud we slipped going up the bank and bellied at the top?

                            I could think without a lot of clarification these could get hairy. How would they know if it was a full rotational or just a fall? Just off what the jump judge says? Or will there be video? Trust me I love fence judges and know that we can't do this without them, but most have 0 horse experience and wouldn't know what was what anyways.

                            Seems like a good jumping off point but a nightmare to put into effect and police properly.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              You mean 'if they survive' a rotational fall? Then they have to sit in the corner?

                              Is it more like you are thinking that a penalty will make them reduce the chance of such a fall, like anyone would plan for one?
                              Don't let anyone tell you that your ideas or dreams are foolish. There is a millionaire walking around who invented the pool noodle.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by LLDM View Post
                                The idea would be to ensure that a rider is really, really sure that they are capable of taking this horse, at this moment in time, safely around the course. And to give them a really, really good reason to withdraw or retire if their round starts to go south.SCFarm
                                Definitely a laudable idea. I just don't see how it would work. Seems to run counter to the prevailing attitude of eventers such that many might simply not make the connection.

                                "Wildarse is a difficult ride, but I'm sure I can get him around the course anyway!"

                                How many riders will stop thinking that way and instead conclude that "Wildarse is a difficult horse, so I better not compete him today"?
                                Sportponies Unlimited
                                Athletic Thoroughbred crosses for the highly motivated, smaller rider.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by pony grandma View Post
                                  You mean 'if they survive' a rotational fall? Then they have to sit in the corner?

                                  Is it more like you are thinking that a penalty will make them reduce the chance of such a fall, like anyone would plan for one?
                                  Yes, the idea (I'm guessing) is to put the "Fear of God" back into the ULRs, heck into everyone. It's called "Personal Responsibilty with Teeth".

                                  If your life or your horse's life isn't enough of an incentive, how about the loss of your liveyihood? Or your ability to to chase points?

                                  If this is what it takes, I am all for it.

                                  SCFarm
                                  The above post is an opinion, just an opinion. If it were a real live fact it would include supporting links to websites full of people who already agreed with me.

                                  www.southern-cross-farm.com

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by pwynnnorman View Post
                                    Definitely a laudable idea. I just don't see how it would work. Seems to run counter to the prevailing attitude of eventers such that many might simply not make the connection.

                                    "Wildarse is a difficult ride, but I'm sure I can get him around the course anyway!"

                                    How many riders will stop thinking that way and instead conclude that "Wildarse is a difficult horse, so I better not compete him today"?
                                    Then they will get some vacation time to mull it over. It's a start.

                                    Heck, pwynn, we aren't allowed to shoot them...

                                    SCFarm
                                    The above post is an opinion, just an opinion. If it were a real live fact it would include supporting links to websites full of people who already agreed with me.

                                    www.southern-cross-farm.com

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Well, OK. I'll admit that shooting riders is certainly an effective way to reduce the number of errors they make.
                                      Sportponies Unlimited
                                      Athletic Thoroughbred crosses for the highly motivated, smaller rider.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Is anyone from here thinking of going?

                                        I'd like to see scientists like Reed and IFG and others with safety experience (albeit not eventing related) and design engineers there for their perspectives on things.

                                        Could the CoTH board raise funds to send representatives?
                                        "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                        Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X