• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Point Two reprimanded for misleading ads

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Point Two reprimanded for misleading ads

    Horse and Hound reports that Point Two has been reprimanded by the Advertising Standards Authority.

    A few quotes:

    'The photo accompanying the advert shows a child wearing only a Point Two jacket.'

    'One advert claimed "the child's Point Two Air Jacket offers six times more protection than a BETA level 3 body protector".'

    'The ASA said it had not seen "suitably robust evidence to support the claim" that the jacket was six times more effective. It ruled that the adverts must not appear again in their current forms.'
    Blugal

    You never know what kind of obsessive compulsive crazy person you are until another person imitates your behaviour at a three-day. --Gry2Yng

  • #2
    Who wants to bet $10 that this *won't* be mentioned on Eventing Nation? (Point Two is one of EN's big sponsors.)

    (And yes, I am an EN reader/supporter... just playing devil's advocate.)
    Road to the T3D
    Translation
    fri [fri:] fritt fria (adj): Free
    skritt [skrit:] skritten (noun): Walk

    Comment


    • #3
      Very interesting, but not surprising!

      I was at a demonstration of sorts hosted by Selena and Morag O`Hanlon a few weeks ago. They both did an excellent job appealing to a very mixed audience (some eventers but lots and lots of western and pleasure riders). It was a genuinely enjoyable session. The only downside was when one of them (I believe it was Morag) credited these new vests with saving O. Townend`s life at Rolex last year. So frustrating to see them being credited with saving lives when there is a lot of data and evidence missing thus far.

      Edited to add: To be clear, it was not a Point 2 or Hit Air demonstration. It was an eventing demonstration, and during the cross-country portion, the comment about O. Townend was made.
      Last edited by Backstage; Apr. 5, 2011, 01:11 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Backstage - they also tried to credit it with "saving" Faith Cook at Branham a couple of years back, even though it turns out she fractured her neck.
        Road to the T3D
        Translation
        fri [fri:] fritt fria (adj): Free
        skritt [skrit:] skritten (noun): Walk

        Comment


        • #5
          It's about time. PointTwo have been seriously misleading.

          The US website homepage used to feature the Faith Cook rotational fall and claim that the rider was 'uninjured.' The truth was -- as substantiated by numerous news reports -- was that she fractured several vertebrae and was hospitalized.

          After those 'minor' discrepancies were pointed out on this BB, the website was changed.

          Also, PointTwo gets a distasteful amount of 'advertorial' mentions in the media outlets in which it advertises. Horse & Hound and Eventing have both been quite guilty of this (as for EN, there might be a lot of product mentions but it in no way compares to the 'saved by a PointTwo' shout-outs in those other pubs).

          Finally, two recent rider deaths -- one last year at a CIC*** in Italy, another at a team chase in the UK -- happened to riders wearing PointTwos. The CIC*** rider died of head injuries so the P2 was irrelevant; the second died of crush injuries to the torso. Hopefully, the coroner's inquest will tell us how the PointTwo performed in the latter incident. I doubt P2 will be forthcoming with that information.

          I'm all for safety products and safety improvements and I have nothing against someone trying to make a buck off safety. But misleading advertising and a lack of science to support the device's safety/protection claims aren't the best of selling points.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by FrittSkritt View Post
            Who wants to bet $10 that this *won't* be mentioned on Eventing Nation? (Point Two is one of EN's big sponsors.)

            (And yes, I am an EN reader/supporter... just playing devil's advocate.)
            I am an EN fan as well, but I have to constantly remind myself that it is a BLOG (with opinions, rumors, speculation) and therefore not governed by the "traditional" rules of journalism (unless they impose those rules on themselves which they have not consistently done in the past). I love that site, but I have to remember to take things with a grain of salt. However, there is no better place to get event coverage and results plus interesting interviews and articles.
            "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals" Immanuel Kant

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JER View Post
              I'm all for safety products and safety improvements and I have nothing against someone trying to make a buck off safety. But misleading advertising and a lack of science to support the device's safety/protection claims aren't the best of selling point.
              Amen. I have hear anecdotal evidence from people who have said that hitting the ground in the vest felt less traumatic. This may very well be the case, even if the vest does not save lives. That is plenty of benefit, IMO.

              What is lacking is a 3rd party study of the vest's benefits. Do we know if one is underway? Would such a study be best if it were done with "crash test dummies" so to speak or should we just be gathering data of falls with the vest compared to without. It seems that the former might provide a more accurate idea of the vests capabilities given that there are so many variables in real life falls. Anyone have a take on this.
              "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals" Immanuel Kant

              Comment


              • #8
                The ATA is really craking down on misleading ads on telly, magazines, newspapers, flyers, and internet lately.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Someone in the audience should have pointed out when they made the O. Townsend statement that photo's clearly show the horse landing on him with vest NOT inflated, as they hadn't separated enough for the cord to pull and deploy the vest.............

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hum.. as someone who events and who owns a P2, I have to say that I was damn glad of my one when competing a young horse at Novice (Prelim?) level last October. He misread the question at a big open corner (I didn't help) and jumped the wide part and into the middle of it. I fell off and banged my back off the back rail in the process. I definitely think I would have been a lot more sore if I hadn't been wearing the point 2.
                    Fingers crossed I won't be testing it out again any time soon!!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I love EN but I agree you won't see this mentioned. The sponsors hold the purse strings.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Napoles View Post
                        Hum.. as someone who events and who owns a P2, I have to say that I was damn glad of my one when competing a young horse at Novice (Prelim?) level last October. He misread the question at a big open corner (I didn't help) and jumped the wide part and into the middle of it. I fell off and banged my back off the back rail in the process. I definitely think I would have been a lot more sore if I hadn't been wearing the point 2.
                        Fingers crossed I won't be testing it out again any time soon!!
                        Personally, I have no doubt that a P2 or Hit Air vest would alleviate some of the impact of a fall. I think in many instances I would end up less banged up with one than without.

                        I simply take issue with the life saving claims. Particularly where it seems evident from pictures that the vest was not responsible for saving a life.

                        I also have some concerns about the possibilities in more serious accidents. If I a horse and rider were to fall together and damage was sustained to the rider`s spinal cord, and then the horse rolled off and the vest went off, would the sudden pressure potentially exacerbate the situation?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by FrittSkritt View Post
                          Who wants to bet $10 that this *won't* be mentioned on Eventing Nation? (Point Two is one of EN's big sponsors.)

                          (And yes, I am an EN reader/supporter... just playing devil's advocate.)
                          You owe anyone that took your bet $10:

                          http://www.eventingnation.com/home/

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by SevenDogs View Post
                            You owe anyone that took your bet $10:

                            http://www.eventingnation.com/home/
                            Go Eventing Nation!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Sigh

                              Wow FrittSkirtt and plainbay, I'm disappointed and saddened by your perspective. Why the heck wouldn't we write about the Horse and Hound article? I don't have any idea what the full story is in Britain but it's not a big deal to us as long as we make sure that we continue to represent our sponsors on EN with integrity and fun.

                              VicariousRider, other than H&H, where are your traditional journalists governed by 'traditional rules' protecting us all with perfectly balanced coverage in reporting this story?

                              To everyone else who gets what we work so hard to do on EN and how we try to do it, thanks for the kind words.
                              Last edited by J3D1; Apr. 5, 2011, 02:25 PM. Reason: last sentence added
                              www.eventingnation.com

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Hey J3D1, I don't think anyone was criticizing EN specifically for having sponsors that you answer to, as a matter of fact you were favorably compared to some other outlets. And good for you for covering the story. A bunch of people here said great things about EN (me too, I'm an addicted fan!) And no one's saying P2's not a good product, just a little concerned about claims that aren't proven to be true. So don't be "disappointed and saddened", be happy so many people read EN. People are allowed to express their opinions, and a lot of those people love EN, but they can say what they're thinking here

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by SevenDogs View Post
                                  Glad to see it posted. Again, I hope that we can see a study of benefits of inflatable vests in the future.

                                  J3D1: Blogs are inherently different from other publications, IME. No need to be so defensive. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I greatly enjoy EN for many reasons and I consider NO publication infallible.
                                  "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals" Immanuel Kant

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by VicariousRider View Post
                                    I am an EN fan as well, but I have to constantly remind myself that it is a BLOG (with opinions, rumors, speculation) and therefore not governed by the "traditional" rules of journalism (unless they impose those rules on themselves which they have not consistently done in the past). I love that site, but I have to remember to take things with a grain of salt. However, there is no better place to get event coverage and results plus interesting interviews and articles.
                                    Very true. It'd be one thing if it were the Washington Post specfically not reporting that only 33% of Kaplan students graduate within six years (Kaplan is owned by WaPo) to specifically cover their asses, but that's a completely different potato. I praise EN for their informative and engaging content (hell, it's the first thing I read in the AM to get my eventing news), but they also have to play the sponsor game, so I truly thought they would have chosen NOT to include the report. However, they did provide the link and a blurb that P2 is a sponsor of H&H and EN, so I owe someone $10. I should have said, "I don't expect a six page editorial from EN on the issue, lest P2 get their panties in a wad and yank their sponsorship."


                                    Originally posted by JER View Post
                                    ...
                                    Also, PointTwo gets a distasteful amount of 'advertorial' mentions in the media outlets in which it advertises. Horse & Hound and Eventing have both been quite guilty of this (as for EN, there might be a lot of product mentions but it in no way compares to the 'saved by a PointTwo' shout-outs in those other pubs).
                                    ...
                                    I'm all for safety products and safety improvements and I have nothing against someone trying to make a buck off safety. But misleading advertising and a lack of science to support the device's safety/protection claims aren't the best of selling points.
                                    I will credit EN for not jumping on the "PointTwo saved me faster than an evangelical TV reverend!" bandwagon, but at the same time I do feel P2 has taken way too many liberties with their advertising in other venues. I remember seeing a P2 advertisement/posterboard at the BoB trailer last year at MCTA with a picture of Faith Cook's fall.

                                    [Not to mention every ULR who wears one and has touted their effectiveness despite having no scientific research/support to back up their claims. If Karen O'Connor and Buck Davidson have been quoted as saying it works, then of course it'll save me, right? ]
                                    Road to the T3D
                                    Translation
                                    fri [fri:] fritt fria (adj): Free
                                    skritt [skrit:] skritten (noun): Walk

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Eventing Nation has more journalistic integrity than either the New York Times or the Washington Post.

                                      And EN is a lot more fun to read.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Really...

                                        Originally posted by FrittSkritt View Post
                                        Who wants to bet $10 that this *won't* be mentioned on Eventing Nation? (Point Two is one of EN's big sponsors.)

                                        (And yes, I am an EN reader/supporter... just playing devil's advocate.)
                                        How fast the worm turns....

                                        John and the others at EN to a great job reporting on all things eventing from around the world. For free.
                                        He hesitated and deliberated for a long time to allow advertising on his free site.
                                        He has reported the good and the bad.

                                        Do I think that he is "afraid" to post something bad about his sponsers? Nope.
                                        I am SURE that IF Point Two or another sponser turned out to be not all that it was advertised and was in fact useless or worse harmful, the ads would be pulled from EN.

                                        EN is blog not the New York Times, who is also biased and selective in this choice of topics.
                                        However, I will say I get more from EN than I do from the USEA website.

                                        Thank you John and all the others at EN.
                                        You have done a great job & I hope you keep up the great work.
                                        For Smurfs like me, I get to live vicariously through you.

                                        There are always those who want to make drama and drag you down.
                                        Kick on and run them over!
                                        GO EN!
                                        "I am a sand dancer... just here for the jumps!" - Schrammo
                                        http://atoxcequestrian.com/
                                        https://www.facebook.com/groups/127749947563045/

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X