• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Amateur Owner Divisions in Eventing Yeah or Nay

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Amateur Owner Divisions in Eventing Yeah or Nay

    Heard thru the grapevine USEA is considering adult amateur divisions. Frankly I think it is long overdue...what do you think?

    They are actually proposing Adult Amateur division like USDF vs Amateur Owner like H/J...

    I vote for three classes within each division...Open, YR, and Adult Amateur/Owner then if necesssary split further by previous horse or rider experience (I.E. Like NH, NR now)...

    would it increase costs? If so how? Mind you I am not suggesting they requiring an event to offer the split divisions unless sufficient entries warrant a split...

    [This message was edited by tractor queen on Nov. 12, 2003 at 01:29 PM.]

    [This message was edited by tractor queen on Nov. 12, 2003 at 01:29 PM.]
  • Original Poster

    #2
    Heard thru the grapevine USEA is considering adult amateur divisions. Frankly I think it is long overdue...what do you think?

    They are actually proposing Adult Amateur division like USDF vs Amateur Owner like H/J...

    I vote for three classes within each division...Open, YR, and Adult Amateur/Owner then if necesssary split further by previous horse or rider experience (I.E. Like NH, NR now)...

    would it increase costs? If so how? Mind you I am not suggesting they requiring an event to offer the split divisions unless sufficient entries warrant a split...

    [This message was edited by tractor queen on Nov. 12, 2003 at 01:29 PM.]

    [This message was edited by tractor queen on Nov. 12, 2003 at 01:29 PM.]

    Comment


    • #3
      Sure, why not? I'm still showing just plain "Training" not "Open Training" so I doubt it would affect me much, but anything to modernize the structure of divisions.

      ---------------------------------------------
      "If you think your hairstyle is more important than your brain, you're probably right." Wear a helmet!
      Pictures!
      Helmet Nazi, Bah Humbug, Mares Rule, Breed Your Own and Michigan cliques!
      Click here before you buy.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hey tractor queen, I know this will proabaly sound really picky, but is there anyway I could talk you into changing the title of this tread from "Amateur Owner" to "Adult Amateur"? We are examining ways to facilitate the offering of amateur divisions, but ownership of the horse by an amateur has not been a part of the discussion up to this point. I'm concerned that people who read the thread title, but not the thread itself, will get the wrong idea about this initiative.

        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        They say cats have nine lives. They would settle for one good one. Adopt a cat (or dog) today.
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        If the Number 2 pencil is so popular, why is it still number 2?

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Canterlope...I would, but I was specifically interested in feedback as to whether USEA members would prefer Amateur Owner or just Amateur...I prefer Amateur Owner as it more closely defines the peers against whom I would prefer to measure my performance.

          Comment


          • #6
            Definitely prefer Adult Amateur to Amateur Owner. If you want to see how well A/O will fly, do a search for it over on H/J... Probably the most divisive (and ridiculous) rule ever.

            ______________
            "No horse with cart horse blood inside three crosses can stand an extreme test against horses bred for Epsom Downs and the Metairie Course..."
            --Marguerite Bayliss, The Bolinvars
            "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm not really excited about this idea. Part of the chaos of hunters is the whole definition of "amateur." Personally, I think our divisions are pretty fair as they are. The pros are pretty much limited to the open divisions, so why is there a need to officially declare the regular/restricted-type divisions "amateur only?"

              ~AJ~
              I've been there...that's why I'm here.
              “A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it.”
              ? Albert Einstein

              ~AJ~

              Comment


              • #8
                Canterlope,

                Do you want to do the honors on this thread or should I?

                P

                Comment


                • #9
                  Generally I have found that the current divisions place me where I should be -- competing against other A/As. For many years, I had to borrow horses to ride and didn't own any, so you might want to consider A/A rather than A/O.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Have at it, my dear. You'll do a much better job than I.

                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                    They say cats have nine lives. They would settle for one good one. Adopt a cat (or dog) today.
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                    If the Number 2 pencil is so popular, why is it still number 2?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm not too excited about this idea either. The playing field is already leveled enough by having divisions based on horse or rider experience.
                      Hindsight bad, foresight good.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The open divisions are fine until you buy that schoolmaster and you have dabled a bit at prelim then you are in the open div no matter what.

                        Cindy
                        Be sure to always Kick On!
                        Cindy

                        Make any mistakes going forward!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Rule proposal is already approved by USEA executive committee. It allows organizers to offer amateur sections from Int. down as long as the participants qualify under the USAEQ standard for amateur (Rule 808 through 810)

                          This is a total permissive change (not forced) so anyone who does not wish to compete in amateur classes will nto have to.

                          As for the popular misconception that "divisions already divide into amateur v. professional" the rules do not allow this. Experience in eventing does not speak to the issue of whether a rider is or is not professional. Experientially based qualifications are now being used to divide competitiors between the levels or between regular and open divisions only. Further, current rules do not allow organizers to divide competitors by experience at preliminary and above. Rather, they nmay only split by age, and then randomly (by draw).

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            By way of further explanation, we will be hosting an open forum to discuss the proposed rule change, discuss the rationale behind it and also try to answer any questions or concerns that our competitors might have. If you have specific questions, I can send anyone that is interested a copy of the propsoal, a survey to fill in, and other information related to the issue. But I will insist that you have a rule book in front of you when discussing as this is an extremely difficult issue to discuss without it. USe Private topics to let me know your e-mail address and I will respond instantly (almost).

                            Packy

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              This is a topic close to my heart.

                              One of the things I have always loved about eventing is that it has avoided the whole "amateur/shamateur" issue. If you were inexperienced at a level you competed in the Novice/Training/etc "rider" division. If your horse was inexperienced, you rode in the Novice/Traiing/etc "horse" division. If you had an experienced horse/rider team, they were in the "open" division. It really makes a lot of sense.

                              Now, I really have to work hard to afford my horse and unfortunately, my regular salary just doesn't always cover all the horsey needs. Therefore, I teach a very limited number of basic lessons (2/week) that help buy feed, bedding, etc.

                              Now, if the amateur division is added, will I be forced to ride in the open division? Will there be a division for a rider like me who is just getting their feet wet at Training that doesn't pit me against seasoned professionals?

                              I know there are a lot of people like me out there. There is a whole group of riders who are gaining experience at new levels (and sometimes a new discipline like eventing) while passing their already gained experience (or separate discipline experience) onto other riders through lessons. Seems like restricting divisions to Open, Amateur, and YR/JR would leave us with no where to go but Open.

                              Would it keep me from eventing? No, but it would make the sport more "elitist" catering to the amateurs who do not need to supplement their income and professionals at the top of their game.

                              Please don't flame me!!!

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Kelly S

                                There will still be regular divisions that are reserved for riders with no experience babove that level.

                                The amateur rules will prevent any horse and rider combination from moving down two levels into an amateur section. (ie: if an amaetur goes amateur Intermediate, they will be prohibited from entering amateur Training. they may of course still enter Open raining.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Thanks, pgm! How are they thinking of setting up the divisions versus the current YR/JR, Horse, Rider, Restricted, and Open divisions? Or will the Amateur division just be in addition to the ones already listed?

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    KellyS:

                                    We separate first into three general categories of competitor: Young folk, pro and amateur. Experience does not really define these categories although there is an interaction.

                                    As for the definition of amateur, I suggest that you read a dictionary on the subject. No really. It is very helpful. The way you use the word reflects "amateurish" as in not so good. The way the USAeq rules define it, the first issue is whether you hold yourself out as someone who trains, rides, or teaches others for money (along with other issues). This refelcts the understanding that how one makes money is the most improtant factor. If you are lucky enough to earn money from teaching, holding yourself out as an expert of some kind, well I have to say that it makes you a pro as far as that definition goes. We have to draw the line somewhere.

                                    As I said above, this doesn't mean that you are not still elligible for those divisions reserved for the less experienced competitors.
                                    As I said above however,

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      For the 2005 season: rules will offer the following

                                      regular
                                      Open
                                      Jr. or Young Rider
                                      Amateur

                                      that's all.

                                      Organizers will be free to continue to offer other section at training and below as the market dictates. (Young Horse) for example.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Nay.

                                        It's not a bad idea per se, but I don't see why eventing needs it. Although I do care very much how I ride at horse trials, it doesn't matter at all to me who I'm riding with in my division.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X