• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

This is probably a dumb question but.....

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This is probably a dumb question but.....

    What is the difference between say a beginner novice horse and beginner novice rider? I looked around the USEA site and briefly checked through the rules and nothing jumped out at me so thought the all powerful eventing CoTHers would know the answer.

    Thanks
    Yogurt - If you're so cultured, how come I never see you at the opera? Steven Colbert

  • #2
    upper-level riders can ride a horse that's new to eventing competition in the "BNH" division, while a a new-to-eventing rider could be riding a solid novice or training level horse in the "BNR" division...
    that is how I understand it. I'm sure there are specific rules as to how each may be qualified, determined etc...
    proud momma of an evil grey QH/Arab who can jump the moon... and he stole my heart

    Comment


    • #3
      I think EHB's explanation is sufficient. Basically, the divisions have different "greenies." BNR will have riders that are green at that level and BNH will have horses that are green at that level. Therefore, in BNR the rider could be on a packer but doing their first BN event and in BNH a pro could be riding a horse doing their first BN.

      To determine if you or your horse qualifies for BNR or BNH at a recognized event you would have to consult Appendix 3 of the Rule Book (available on the USEA website) which states:

      4.5 RIDER (R) - Levels restricted by rider are limited to those competitors who have not completed more than two Horse Trials at the next highest level or higher in the previous 24 months. e.g. Training Rider - the competitor may not have completed more than two Horse Trials at the Preliminary Level or higher in the previous 24 months.

      4.6 HORSE (H) - Open to competitors of any age, horse may not have completed an event above the level, e.g. a Novice Horse may not have completed an event at Training level or above, a Training Horse may not have completed an event at the Preliminary level or above, etc.


      Hope that helps.
      "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals" Immanuel Kant

      Comment


      • #4
        Just a clarification.....the riders and horess in those divisons may not be green. They may be very well established at that level. Just with the horse it will not have competed at a level above....and with the rider, they will not have competed at a two HTs a level above in the last two years.


        So in other words...technically, a horse or rider could have been competing and winning in BNH/BNR for the past 10 years. And a rider in BNR could have ridden around Rolex 3 years ago.


        It also isn't unusual for horse/rider combo to qualify for both divisions and have a bit of a choice. And generally speaking...the classes will be like the other posters have described. More often, the horse divisions have more experienced riders on less experienced horses....and the rider divisions will have more less experienced riders (horses will be a mixed bag). Because I've been riding for a while...I generally pick the horse divisions even though I might qualify for a rider division. IME--the horse divisions are typically a bit more competitive but not always.
        ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

        Comment


        • #5
          The rule book is your friend.

          Appendix 3 section 4
          4.5 RIDER (R) - Levels restricted by rider are limited to those competitors who have not
          completed more than two Horse Trials at the next highest level or higher in the previous
          24 months. e.g. Training Rider - the competitor may not have completed more than two
          Horse Trials at the Preliminary Level or higher in the previous 24 months.

          4.6 HORSE (H) - Open to competitors of any age, horse may not have completed an event
          above the level, e.g. a Novice Horse may not have completed an event at Training level
          or above, a Training Horse may not have completed an event at the Preliminary level or
          above, etc.
          So "Beginner Novice Horse" has no restrictions on the rider ( the rider could have ridden in the WEG last year). But the horse must have never completed a Novice Horse Trial (ever).

          Conversely, "Beginner Novice Rider" has no restrictions on the horse (the horse could have been ridden in the WEG last year). But the rider must not have completed TWO Novice (or above) HT in the last 24 months.
          Janet

          chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            Thanks for all the responses. Got it down now.
            Yogurt - If you're so cultured, how come I never see you at the opera? Steven Colbert

            Comment


            • #7
              Why can't we have a BNR riding BNH division? I think that would be perfect!!!

              Comment


              • #8
                Just be warned it is going to change next year.
                Janet

                chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                Comment


                • #9
                  Janet: care to give us a hint as to what is going to change?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The full text is here
                    http://www.usef.org/_IFrames/RuleBoo...44c5d7c258.pdf

                    In summary, it changes to
                    TWO levels up and FIVE years for Rider
                    TWO levels up, ever, for Horse.

                    A rider will be eligible for Beginner Novice Rider unless he/she has completed at TRAINING (or above) in the last 5 years

                    A horse will continue to be eligible for Beginner Novice Horse until it completes at TRAINING (or above).
                    Janet

                    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      So in other words...technically, a horse or rider could have been competing and winning in BNH/BNR for the past 10 years.
                      One of my biggest pet peeves. Ride in the Open, for pity's sake, and let the actual newcomers have a crack at the nice ribbons.
                      Click here before you buy.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by deltawave View Post
                        One of my biggest pet peeves. Ride in the Open, for pity's sake, and let the actual newcomers have a crack at the nice ribbons.
                        I beg to differ.

                        I was raised to believe the USING THE RULES, as they are written and intended, to your advantage is PART OF competing. (This was motorcycle racing, but the principle is universal.)

                        Not finding obscure loopholes, not bending the meaning of words. But using the clearly written intention to your advantage when possible.

                        That being said, I rarely put "Rider" as a high preference when it is a level I am experienced at, even if I an eligible for Rider. But I also do not feel that there is a significant advantage to going in the Rider division- there are a lot of packer horses in there.
                        Janet

                        chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by bornfreenowexpensive View Post
                          Just a clarification.....the riders and horess in those divisons may not be green. They may be very well established at that level. Just with the horse it will not have competed at a level above....and with the rider, they will not have competed at a two HTs a level above in the last two years.


                          So in other words...technically, a horse or rider could have been competing and winning in BNH/BNR for the past 10 years. And a rider in BNR could have ridden around Rolex 3 years ago.


                          It also isn't unusual for horse/rider combo to qualify for both divisions and have a bit of a choice. And generally speaking...the classes will be like the other posters have described. More often, the horse divisions have more experienced riders on less experienced horses....and the rider divisions will have more less experienced riders (horses will be a mixed bag). Because I've been riding for a while...I generally pick the horse divisions even though I might qualify for a rider division. IME--the horse divisions are typically a bit more competitive but not always.
                          I think the key word here is "completed",
                          not competed",as stated above, makes a difference.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Janet View Post
                            I beg to differ.

                            I was raised to believe the USING THE RULES, as they are written and intended, to your advantage is PART OF competing. (This was motorcycle racing, but the principle is universal.)

                            Not finding obscure loopholes, not bending the meaning of words. But using the clearly written intention to your advantage when possible.

                            That being said, I rarely put "Rider" as a high preference when it is a level I am experienced at, even if I an eligible for Rider. But I also do not feel that there is a significant advantage to going in the Rider division- there are a lot of packer horses in there.
                            As a pro trainer who did not event for three years and is now bringing a young horse along, the "horse" "rider" definitions make me eligible for divisions I have not been eligible for many, many, many years.

                            At this point I am sticking to the "horse" and "open" divisions. Feels weird to know I am eligible for the "rider" divisions.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by LookmaNohands View Post
                              As a pro trainer who did not event for three years and is now bringing a young horse along, the "horse" "rider" definitions make me eligible for divisions I have not been eligible for many, many, many years.

                              At this point I am sticking to the "horse" and "open" divisions. Feels weird to know I am eligible for the "rider" divisions.
                              I don't "enter" "Rider" either. (Though I can not control which division the secretary puts me in)

                              But it does not bother me in the least that other experienced riders, who happen to be eligible for Rider, are in the Rider division.
                              Janet

                              chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Reasonable minds can disagree on this one. I just think it's tacky. Particularly so when a "professional" does it.
                                Click here before you buy.

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  I have to agree with DW on this one. It's a little disheartening when you have professionals riding in the lower levels and winning everything when you (the amateur) with one horse have struggled long and hard to get to that level.
                                  Yogurt - If you're so cultured, how come I never see you at the opera? Steven Colbert

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Mtn trails View Post
                                    I have to agree with DW on this one. It's a little disheartening when you have professionals riding in the lower levels and winning everything when you (the amateur) with one horse have struggled long and hard to get to that level.
                                    At least in my area, I don't see much of this (if any).

                                    I'm a lower level, one horse ammy and have never had true professionals in my division (20 years worth). Frankly, I wouldn't mind competing against them, but they are either in the "Horse" division or, more commonly, the "Open" division.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      There are no dumb questions... only dumb people



                                      Sorry, I couldn't resist. I always say that to my consultants (at least the ones that know me well enough and comfortable enough to snark back)

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I have to chime in on the opposite side. I think one of the coolest things about our sports is that at every level, I can compete directly against olympians. How cool is that.

                                        I also think the line between ammy and professional has become blurrier with the new rules. For example, I am now a "professional". I teach a few lessons a month to students in my former trainer's program on her school horses. I get lessons in exchange. I still work a 60 hour per week day job, but am now a professional (my choice, I totally know and I love the teaching so that is not the point).

                                        I like the 5 year rule better than the 2 year rule, but I can say that for someone who had a nice horse as a young adult, then spent 5 or 6 years in school, working, etc. I think it would be totally fine for them to be in Rider divisions whether they were a pro or an ammy.
                                        OTTBs rule, but spots are good too!

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X