• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Rating xc designers

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rating xc designers

    From everything I`ve read, seen, heard, the single most important set of people in modern eventing for the good or ill of our sport are xc course designers.
    A horse friendly, knowledgeable, caring designer can construct courses which can challenge but not hurt or intimidate for the appropriate level. You come off these courses feeling positive and exhilarated.
    Whereas an arrogant, know it all, adversarial kind of designer seems intent on discovering what you and your horse CAN`T DO, rather than what you CAN do.
    As far as I can determine, there is no ranking system, or control system over these people.
    Sure, the TD and/or Rider Rep can theoretically make waves, but look at the reality.
    You get to an event with, say, those huge white boxes like the ones at So Pines that all the riders hate. And yet keep appearing year after year. Each one of those thing weighs a ton, and how, at the last minute, are you going to modify those? Examples like this are legion.
    The key is to educate xc designers not to conceive of bad jumps, horse unfriendly jumps, BEFORE they get built.
    But who teaches future xc designers?
    Often, the current ones who are already the problem. And this is a huge problem.
    I think we need a ranking system for xc designers like college rankings of professors.
    You know, the rankings that tell it like it is.
    And these should come from compilations of opinions from lots of people, not just some angry individual who got eliminated.
    So these people are held accountable.
    If I were a xc designer, and I read that my courses were "often vertical, with trappy, difficult lines,---loves to use big square tables----poor use of ground lines---etc, might it not make me shape up?
    Or discourage events from employing me until I did?
    We rank riders, we rank horses, we rate insructors, why don`t we rate the people who have the greatest control over where our sport is heading?
    http://www.tamarackhill.com/

  • #2
    I agree....it's a great idea
    "A little less chit-chat a little more pitter-pat"

    Comment


    • #3
      Great concept - but I have 2 nuances/complications/factors to mention which I suspect must be quite important.

      One - the designer builder relationship. My understanding is that often a designer will say "I want an imposing table here, and a half coffin there." Then the guys with the chain saws and heavy machinery come along, and I bet can possibly unwittingly have huge impact on the resulting course, depending on whether they use rounded material at the front edge of the jump, or whether the owner tells them "The sponsor tent will be there. Make this pretty!"

      I'm sure everyone involved is well meaning, and talented. I suspect that some builders must be hugely observant of how horses jump and think, and others less so. Some likely get to travel to more courses and see other builders work, others are likely sticking closer to home, for better or worse. I thought it was very interesting Pegasusmom's comment that John Williams did a lot of the building himself when he took over at the CHP, because I have seen John watching horses jump his jumps, and studying their hoofprints afterwards to see what lines they took. I've also heard him talk about groundlines - what ones are useful, and which ones look useful but are in fact trappy.

      Which sort of leads me to mysecond nuance of course design - any given year, *someone* is listed as the designer at a course - but a lot of courses are tag team efforts. Designer A starts with the blank slate, then 4 years later Designer B gets to re-mold the course. Year 1 she might take off the two fences which offend her most from the existing course, but she likely doesn't have the budget to totally remake a course, cwertainly not in 1 year...

      Of course, there are enough new facilities out there that some clearcut "This is THIS designer and THIS builders' work" , but I figure if someone might be making a spreadsheet, might as well consider various layers early.

      On this hypothetical spreadsheet I would be intrigued to see a column for how recently the designer has competed in eventing.
      http://wildwoodfarmnc.com

      http://cantersgutenberg.wordpress.co...g-quiet-goose/

      Comment


      • #4
        I feel that the course designer should have no other position involving power (as in being a team captain or anything.)
        We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
        www.dleestudio.com

        Comment


        • #5
          This is a great idea.

          Trish Gilbert - I've done N and T courses designed by her. courses are very challenging but fair. Nothing trappy. good use of groundlines. Lots of room to gallop and establish a rhythm. courses seem to be aimed at rewarding the horse and building confidence.

          Tremaine Cooper - same as Trish Gilbert. Makes really good use of the terrain.

          Craig Thompson - seems to cater to horses/riders moving up and really needing to establish confidence. Like his courses.

          Nina Fout - seems intent on catching riders and horses out. Makes more use of the maximum difficult side of the curve than the normal area. Courses do not flow. Uses terrain to maximize difficulty. I know I am not alone in this opinion.

          Robert Butts - Waredaca is always, ALWAYS designed well. Always solid for the level, but not designed to catch you out. Designed to instill confidence if you are ready for the level. Love his courses.

          John Williams - Have only done SP. Courses are tough but reward the horse and rider that are ready for the level. VERY good use of groundlines to make the tables inviting. Good use of terrain. Wouldn't use his courses for move ups (at least not SP), but for horses who have had at least a few runs at the level and are ready for more of a challenge within the level. Horses and riders feel a sense of accomplishment after course, but not overfaced.
          Last edited by flyingchange; Mar. 19, 2008, 09:10 AM. Reason: To add John Williams

          Comment


          • #6
            I agree with flying. Especially on Nina. When in the hell is CDCTA and Middleburg going to get a clue as to why no one enters? It's so frustrating! Maybe the ranking would let them know how we feel. Maybe I'm smoking something.
            Anyway, I would like to add
            Brian Ross and VA
            David O'C - rubicon's n/tr. I've heard to not enter prelim as it's quite up and down but I don't have first hand exp.
            Tremaine Cooper
            Trish Gilbert

            My instructor has ridden some of Mike E-S courses and she gushes over them (as much as a pro eventer "gushes"). I wish he wasn't retiring as cd!

            We should also include sj because there are some events that really knocked me out because of rather silly courses and I won't go to them.

            Yet another great idea Denny!
            Even duct tape can't fix stupid

            Comment


            • #7
              As always, Denny has a brilliant idea. Is this something we could suggest if we write to our Area reps?
              http://community.webshots.com/user/CloverExpress08/

              Comment


              • #8
                I said this on another thread but I am going to repeat it here.

                It is a CONFLICT OF INTEREST to have a selection trials for the US team over a course designed by the captain. The pressure and the stakes are far too high in an already dangerous sport.

                That being said, I truly hope that MES will continue to teach course building and his influence will remain because he is a damn good designer.

                I will ride John's courses anyday. They have all looked beautiful.

                Derek DiGrazia is a challenging designer, but his courses flow well for the most part and his lines encourage running out, not flipping and injury. This is how lines should be if not ridden properly.

                Comment


                • #9
                  As a reformed show jumper/hunter all I can say is bring on the breakaway cups.

                  If it is all going to be this technical then for heaven's sake give the horse and rider an out. Stop making everything soo solid in the technical portions of the run. The XC jumps were intended to last year after year in your pastures. With the settings as they are now they can afford to move things around and lighten things up.

                  We have all kinds of new materials that can be used to promote safety.....why not advance from the dark ages? The courses have changed why not the materials. Just look at the jumper rings of today......nothing is stationary and the poles aren't real wood. Why is that? HMMMMMMM

                  Just my thoughts....now I will retreat while everyone shoots at me. BON BON in hand.
                  The rider casts his heart over the fence,
                  the horse jumps in pursuit of it.

                  –Hans-Heinrich Isenbart

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Jazzy Lady View Post
                    It is a CONFLICT OF INTEREST to have a selection trials for the US team over a course designed by the captain. The pressure and the stakes are far too high in an already dangerous sport.
                    I'm sorry, I don't follow why this is a conflict of interest. Perhaps you could elaborate?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It is a conflict of interest, because the guy who designed the course is the guy who is picking the team. If the course is dangerous, who is going to challenge him?
                      When in Doubt, let your horse do the Thinking!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Hony View Post
                        I'm sorry, I don't follow why this is a conflict of interest. Perhaps you could elaborate?
                        Well, if I were looking to be chosen for the team, I would be hesistant to make any negative comments about the coach's course design. Even if I thought it was dangerous.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Europa, that's something that I've thought about for awhile. Why can't the jumps be made out of more forgiving materials? I'm not sure what those materials would be. I'm also not sure if having different types of materials would cause another set of problems, but at least, one of the problems wouldn't be rotational falls.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I have only ridden through preliminary (and one or two intermediate courses). Experience on multiple horses at novice and training level. We should find out if we have a good programmer in the group. We could have the equivalent of tripadvisor for courses and course designers. You could assign 4 things to a courses 1) number of oxers for how big, 1-5; 2) number of Ts for how technical 1-5; 3) number of hills for terrain and; 4) overall rating 1-5 where 1 is easy move up, more like prior level and 5 is serious championship level course. You would also write a little few line review. For example: Training level (Tremaine Cooper) at 2007 Radnor:

                            2 oxers
                            2 Ts
                            1 hills
                            2 level
                            A nice inviting course. Some difficulty level in large ditch in half coffin combination prior to midpoint of course. Must ride through several gates. Water complex well conceived, but footing not well dealt with, making approach difficult. Fairly flat, easy to see from fence to fence. Well decorated, fun course limited by need to use primarily portables.

                            David O'Connors courses are great - challenging, but flowing and really asking interesting, but doable questions at the level

                            John Williams - also, he is likely to speak up if he is riding at an event and sees something that he perceives as dangerous and works hard to make his courses serious, but inviting

                            Trish Gilbert - great, friendly courses

                            Tremaine Cooper - well thought out courses with good flow and tough questions appropriately placed

                            Nina Fout - haven't ridden her courses, but having seen them, they wouldn't be my first choice

                            Mark Phillips - I have never really liked his courses. Have thought they are within the lines of the rules, but not the spirit of asking questions appropriate to the level (remember I've only ridden his training and prelim courses)

                            Robert Butts - great courses at Waredaca, but his name is on others I like less

                            Brian Ross - always great, but variable in difficulty level, so it is hard to know exactly what to expect.
                            OTTBs rule, but spots are good too!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Sure Hony. My thinking behind my statement is this - Every designer puts their stamp on a course that they deem perfectly fair and rideable. Captain Mark, after the carnage at Red Hills and after many riders displayed displeasure in his courses, stated that he didn't understand why there were so many problems and he doesn't know what people were expecting. Here's the problem. He expects these courses to ride well but he doesn't ride them himself. Most riders thought all of these courses unfair for the horses and not in the true spirit of eventing. Well I'm sure there were many potential team members that thought the same, but what can they do? Their hands are tied if they wish to make the US team. If they speak out against the designer at an event and the designer was unrelated to the US team and to the selection process, that would be one thing and I would think more would be willing to take a stand. However, when the designer IS the head of the team and is very much involved in the selection process, how do you speak up against what he feels a fair course if you want a shot at the team?

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                M E-S

                                I rode an M E-S course in early February and thought it was fantastic. LOTS of galloping room, very fair, inviting questions, and ~just~ enough difficulty to challenge my horse and me for the level. Granted it was BN in early Feb, so it should be inviting. But I was more than thrilled with it. I walked the N, T, and P courses and felt they were also fair, open and gallopy, with just enough difficulty for that time of year.
                                ~Living the life I imagined~

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  I like the ranking idea, although I personally love M-E-S's course at Richland, at least how it was several years ago, haven't been in the last year or so.

                                  I'm not sure how the ranking idea would work out. I have one memorable case of a course design from a person who I believe is a very good course designer but as it turned out my horse and I both misjudged the jump badly due to shadows at the early time of day. Square dark table with large shadow thrown in front from early sun, dew sparkling, freshly blacked table sparkling with dew. Add in that the previous jump was a huge ditch and black sloping wall, and you can guess what happened. Thankfully my horse has incredible heart and a lot more scope than I dreamed of. The rest of the course was fabulous but we had a near miss. I'm sure the designer never dreamed that would happen.

                                  I think even good course designers need to be there to see how the course is jumping so they can make adjustments if necessary as I believe most have the best ideals at heart. Would that be a good use of money? I'm heartened to hear about JW being there on course and watching how things are going. Maybe a rating system from competitors would make it more compelling for designers to make things more rideable? Just throwing some ideas around....
                                  Last edited by Hannahsmom; Mar. 19, 2008, 12:45 PM.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I believe that DO'C has a proposal (I don't know in what stage or how formal) to require that course designers be there when events are being run over their courses. I do think this is a good idea
                                    OTTBs rule, but spots are good too!

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Why........so the lynch mob can get to them.
                                      The rider casts his heart over the fence,
                                      the horse jumps in pursuit of it.

                                      –Hans-Heinrich Isenbart

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I agree, Mike E-S and John Williams are brilliant.

                                        Many others (at least in this area) - not so much.

                                        We definitely need some sort of system in place to bring the levels back where they belong. Many, if not most, of the courses in this area feature questions that are NOT appropriate for the level. As a competitor, I feel like there is NOTHING I can do about this. The "suck it up" mentality of eventers makes me feel like I am the only one who will complain, and my concerns will be dismissed as a result. My only option is not to ride - which frustrates me, because I enter a certain level based on my expectations of what a course should be at that level. Has anyone actually looked at the guidelines for levels of horse trials in the rule book lately? They make me laugh...because almost NOTHING that we see around here actually conforms to the guidelines.

                                        Sorry - I just wrote an email about this very issue to Kevin Baumgardner (in response to his message on the USEA website) so I'm a little fired up right now. What he said was right on - things are getting way too technical, all the way down to BN. I find the number of "starter" or equivalent levels that are popping up everywhere a little disturbing - this tells me that *Beginner Novice* is too hard!

                                        I like the idea of a rating system. My fear is that people who are used to the courses that we are seeing in recent years don't know any better. That, plus the "suck it up" mentality, may not make a rating system as useful as we would like. Hopefully I'm wrong about that, but I agree that we need to do *something* to police course design, and get the levels back where they belong.
                                        ~Nancy~

                                        Adams Equine Wellness

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X