• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

CMP course design the problem?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CMP course design the problem?

    Is anyone else noticing that the majority of the horrible fatalities are happening on CMP's courses?

    And to add to the recent issues, I know of a fantastic horse that died at Menfelt (which was a CMP course also) many years back on a complex that rode horribly for many people. It was a campfire complex with two very airy and skinny 4 foot verticals down a steep hill to a ditch and wall. The solid ditch and wall was visible through and underneath the very vertical skinnies, and I think was quite visually difficult for the horses, especially being downhill. Many good horses hung legs at one or both skinny verticals. They continued to use that complex even after the horse's death, until the event stopped running.

    I feel like he tries to impress the spectators with his creatitivity, but is not creating horse friendly jumps. I wasn't at Red Hills this year, so can't fully comment on that course, but I saw the same trend in course design on the pictures from the Red Hills thread. And the constant, constant technical questions are definitely part of the problem.

    Thoughts?
    http://www.MyVirtualEventingCoach.com

  • #2
    I think the fact that so many serious accidents happen on his courses says a lot.

    There can be technical questions and combinations that still encourage forward, rhythmical riding. But it seems that his courses to not promote this, and without rhythm successful XC is impossible.
    http://community.webshots.com/user/CloverExpress08/

    Comment


    • #3
      CMP designs a heck of a lot of courses although I have no idea how many in comparison to some of the other really active CDs. But if Course Designer A designs 5 courses, and Course Designer B designs 30, and all the accidents happened on B's courses, I'd still have to take into consideration the huge increase in the number of attempts at obstacles on B's courses, before I could draw such a conclusion.

      Just like in assessing the risk inherent in any particular fence type, you have to take into consideration the number of opportunities for accidents to occur at that fence type, before you identify something or someone as a problem. In one of the last safety threads, someone was going on and on about how tables had to be banned because more accidents occurred at tables than any others. Yet when you look at the actual data, which show the RATIO of falls at fence type X to ATTEMPTS at fence type X, tables did not come out tops on the list and no particular fence seemed to have a statistically significant higher RATE of falls, rotational falls etc. This may well vary substantially from year to year, but it's the same with the number of serious accidents. How many starters were there? If you don't take into consideration the huge increase in the number of starters, a/k/a opportunities for disaster, you are not getting a meaningful picture.

      And I do think riders putting their necks and those of their horses on the line have a right to a sort of "safety analysis" of every CD, and should demand that the governing bodies publish it to them on demand so you can make informed choices. That will go over real well, I'm sure. If it were me, or my kid, I would be demanding it. And I'd copy various higher ups at the USOC, and then start collecting signatures and send it again.
      "See I hope to IMPROVE humanity as a whole and yet feel lost on this forum."

      Comment


      • #4
        I think part of the problem is also the position that CMP is in.. no riders are going to criticize his courses, as it might affect their chances for being on the team, and no officials are going to because, quite frankly, they're probably scared of him and his self-righteous attitude.

        In all reality, Mark Phillips has been a major factor in transforming this sport into what it is today in America. Why do you think so many ULRs/BNTs blindly followed him into the (apparent) disaster which is the short format? Because if they disagree with him, they're screwed for a spot on the team.

        Have you seen the course design at Burghley in the recent years that he's been designing it? I consider it apalling.. technical question after technical question after technical question. Granted, there have not been injuries at Burghley such as the ones we've seen at other competitions, but that course has gotten so trappy and unjumpable, and yet you still have people going clear so apparently it's not tough enough, and it will become increasinly technical every year.

        It's a vicious cycle and we've lost touch with what cross country is supposed to be about. And you would think that with the injuries and deaths occuring on his courses, he would step back and evaluate what he was doing, but of course Mark Phillips is the messiah from heaven and it was everyone else's faults for not being perfect like him and jumping his fences clear.

        Comment


        • #5
          The Fork is Next

          Originally posted by TexasTB View Post
          I think part of the problem is also the position that CMP is in.. no riders are going to criticize his courses, as it might affect their chances for being on the team, and no officials are going to because, quite frankly, they're probably scared of him and his self-righteous attitude.

          In all reality, Mark Phillips has been a major factor in transforming this sport into what it is today in America. Why do you think so many ULRs/BNTs blindly followed him into the (apparent) disaster which is the short format? Because if they disagree with him, they're screwed for a spot on the team.

          Have you seen the course design at Burghley in the recent years that he's been designing it? I consider it apalling.. technical question after technical question after technical question. Granted, there have not been injuries at Burghley such as the ones we've seen at other competitions, but that course has gotten so trappy and unjumpable, and yet you still have people going clear so apparently it's not tough enough, and it will become increasinly technical every year.

          It's a vicious cycle and we've lost touch with what cross country is supposed to be about. And you would think that with the injuries and deaths occuring on his courses, he would step back and evaluate what he was doing, but of course Mark Phillips is the messiah from heaven and it was everyone else's faults for not being perfect like him and jumping his fences clear.
          We are signed up for the Fork and I am worried. I need your advice out there,
          who is the organizer, it is not listed in the Omnibus, only the sec.?
          Also, it closes tomorrow so in order to withdraw and get a refund, it has to be today.
          We have never done it, so for those of you experienced ULR, Intermediate-
          Please tell me, is it another " show jumping" cross country course with combination after combination or a TRUE gallopping fair course???
          I see CMP is again the designer.... YUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          Comment


          • #6
            I don't know if he's always been the cd but in the past, the nov and tr courses were VERY nice.
            Even duct tape can't fix stupid

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by TexasTB View Post
              Have you seen the course design at Burghley in the recent years that he's been designing it? I consider it apalling.. technical question after technical question after technical question. Granted, there have not been injuries at Burghley such as the ones we've seen at other competitions, but that course has gotten so trappy and unjumpable, and yet you still have people going clear so apparently it's not tough enough, and it will become increasinly technical every year.

              It's a vicious cycle and we've lost touch with what cross country is supposed to be about. And you would think that with the injuries and deaths occuring on his courses, he would step back and evaluate what he was doing, but of course Mark Phillips is the messiah from heaven and it was everyone else's faults for not being perfect like him and jumping his fences clear.
              I agree with TexasTB - I think this is the biggest issue. If too many people go clear then make the course harder - WHY? Why should we not be aiming for 90% to go clear?!@! If the course is appropiate for the level and riders are running the right level then 90+% SHOULD go clear?? When did cross country become about trying to eliminate rather than test horses and riders??????

              Comment


              • #8
                Did CMP design the course where Mia had her accident?

                Comment


                • #9
                  The Question: CMP course design the problem?

                  Answer : YES!!!!!!!!
                  "Fifteen minutes of excellent work is better than an hour and a half of wandering aimlessly around." -Col. Bengt Ljundquist

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The BIG question:

                    Why does cross country have to get more and more difficult? Grand Prix dressage doesn't get harder movements added each year, Grand Prix show jumping doesn't get taller each year. Why must eventing get more challenging? What happened to having a few combos (coffin, sunken road, water) and mostly galloping fences? The local event around here had less than half the competitors make it around prelim, and the ones that did were shitting themselves. I think courses should be challenging, but they don't need to be intimidating to a well-prepared rider.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by snickerdoodle View Post
                      Did CMP design the course where Mia had her accident?
                      Don't think so, that was at Galway downs in CA I am pretty sure and I don;t think CMP designed it.
                      http://community.webshots.com/user/CloverExpress08/

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Mike E S designed Galway at the time of that accident. Ian Stark is now the course designer there as of this year.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Well I'll bet the chain saws are out in full force at the fork this week. There simply cannot be a repeat performance of last weekend. All this in an olympic year as well when we should be building confidence...not tearing it apart.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I won't enter events where he is the CD. Not that there are many near me, but it's the main reason I'm not interested in The Fork.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The Fork

                              Actually, just spoke to the Fork. Seems that CMP just got in last night and is "just starting to lay out the tracks".... HMMMM
                              Let's all pray that he does the right thing and makes it SAFE and FAIR.
                              This sport cannot afford another weekend like Red Hills.
                              People should call The Fork and voice their concerns NOW.
                              (704 )474-4052 X228

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                i agree with snoopy, these courses should be building confidence it is an olympic year, why are we trying to hurt our horses before they have a chance to shine? This sport at the lower levels is closer to what it used to be, the upper levels not so much. The XC courses are getting more technical with every year, even the dressage and show jumping is getting tougher and bigger. If they want to make the dressage harder, ok. But why do we need to make the XC so technical that no one can get around a course with out time/ jump faults (beyond a run out or a mistake?) Why is the Show Jumping turning into a Grand Prix? The horses are usually tired/sore after XC at a big competition lets throw some big a$$ jumps at them and break their confidence down (having rails/refusals). It doesn't make sense, after what people have said about how much the sport has changed it is not right.

                                I don't think it is one particular course designer either, i think they all have some problem fences/courses that need to be re-designed to make them more horse/rider friendly. There was a broken bridge jump at Rolex some years ago (early '90's) they had to airlift a rider from there too, they ended up taking that jump out. I went to Rolex a couple years ago '02 and '06 on each of those courses there were some serious bogey fences, the same one's over and over again catching riders (the skinny stumps out back by the hollow on weird bending line thing, and the brush boxes on the "hills" again on a weird line, that did not ride the way it walked) I don't know who the course designers were but it just goes to show that through the years there have been some not so good choices made on XC and the horses and riders pay for it.

                                I think the higher ups in the USEA need to look at what has happened over the last couple of years and listen to its members on what they think would be appropriate for the level.

                                I jump judged this weekend at Southern Pines and there were things on that course at BN and N that when i started eventing would have been a training/prelim question.(trakehner (N), up bank-three strides down over a log(N);was on champ course.) It was just made smaller and slightly easier, and its fairly early in the season, so by the end of the season the people going novice are pretty much going to be jumping a training course without the height. I am all for introducing the harder questions at the lower levels but jeez, its march! most of the people that i know this is one of the first events of the season.

                                Sorry for the long post and little rant it is just frustrating to see people/horses get hurt when it could be avoided (i.e. a more open galloping course, instead of jumping a solid fenced show jumping round) the courses need to be more horse friendly, instead of having forty jumping efforts in which twenty five of them are in a combination, make it less about the jumping and more about the stamina of the horse, if they can go out and jump thirty galloping, straightforward always on the go jumps and they still look good at the end of the day then you know you're doing something right with your training. We need the long format three day back, it was less about the technicality of the course and more about the stamina/heart of the horse and rider.

                                sorry, it just frustrates me to no end.
                                Last edited by jumpjesterjump; Mar. 17, 2008, 05:04 PM.
                                R.I.P. Bourneville Jester 12/06/06

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  I'm glad someone started this thread.
                                  Reed and I were talking about this very subject last night. I want to say something on COTH but was too chicken.
                                  He and Gnep design XC fences. Right now they are working on the frangible pin design for tables and other fences which most of you know about.

                                  I mentioned that pretty soon every XC fence was going to have to be designed with the pin system and the courses are going to become too expensive to build and eventing will go ka-put.

                                  So I ask CMP, "Why the hell are things getting WORSE!?"
                                  I just want to go sucker punch some people.
                                  CMP is putting in fences that are unfair questions for the horses. We all have agreed on that aspect.
                                  I don't understand how the system works and I don't understand why such tough XC questions need to be asked.
                                  If the USEA needs to increase technicality why not increase the level of efficiency in the dressage? Put up great SJ courses, and open up the XC courses again.
                                  If they don't, I'm sad to say, our sport won't be around much longer.

                                  EX: Pine Top Advanced. I ran the Prelim course. There were two technical combos and one kind of technical water combo. The rest was open and running. I think we even had a minute with only two jumps at one point. I didn't even have to check and sit up at the 1st water. I just galloped in, up out via bank and then two very open strides to a small coop. It was fun and tested my horse’s willingness to keep pace through the water.
                                  The course was not difficult and gave lots of gallop room, yet no one made the time. That course was fantastic. Caused little jumping issues and still proved its point by time penalties. Allowed the horses to jump out of a good strong pace.


                                  I just don't get it.
                                  I'll tell you what though. Right now I am getting to the point where I don't want to go advanced and I know there are tons of other riders that are feeling the same emotions.
                                  Once the big wigs of today are gone there will be no up and comers to take their place.
                                  http://kaboomeventing.com/
                                  http://kaboomeventing.blogspot.com/
                                  Horses are amazing athletes and make no mistake -- they are the stars of the show!

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I'm not hallucinating a memory am I? This spring wasn't David O brought in to CD at The Fork? I had assumed (whoops) that it was in the tradition of bringing a fresh eye to the course, but maybe Mark just couldn't make it over in the spring, or something?
                                    http://wildwoodfarmnc.com

                                    http://cantersgutenberg.wordpress.co...g-quiet-goose/

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Hit the nail on the head!

                                      Originally posted by eqsiu View Post
                                      The BIG question:

                                      Why does cross country have to get more and more difficult? Grand Prix dressage doesn't get harder movements added each year, Grand Prix show jumping doesn't get taller each year. Why must eventing get more challenging? What happened to having a few combos (coffin, sunken road, water) and mostly galloping fences? The local event around here had less than half the competitors make it around prelim, and the ones that did were shitting themselves. I think courses should be challenging, but they don't need to be intimidating to a well-prepared rider.
                                      I think this is exactly the problem. There is NO need for any course to get harder as the years go by. Courses need to be changed up, but they don't need to get harder every year.
                                      There is something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man. ~Winston Churchill

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by boppin along View Post
                                        Actually, just spoke to the Fork. Seems that CMP just got in last night and is "just starting to lay out the tracks".... HMMMM
                                        Let's all pray that he does the right thing and makes it SAFE and FAIR.
                                        This sport cannot afford another weekend like Red Hills.
                                        People should call The Fork and voice their concerns NOW.
                                        (704 )474-4052 X228

                                        X228 is Rebecca's line - dial x 221 to get someone in the main office.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X