• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

What do you think will happen if case against Nunnick goes forward?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What do you think will happen if case against Nunnick goes forward?

    I don't know if many people saw this news article about how a judge is allowing the case to proceed against trainer Kristi Nunnick. This is a dangerous thing as I understand it, because if it holds up, it would create precedence that would hurt trainers everywhere in what they are liable for. I personally believe the rider in question was an adult, and therefore the person who should have known her horse, and pulled up if she felt unsafe. In addition she ignored previous jump judges attempts to stop her. Anywho, I just thought it surprising that nobody was talking about it, and figured most people didn't notice it.

    Judge Rules Erikssons' Case Against Nunnink Can Proceed
    By: John Strassburger
    Print ShareA California appellate judge ruled on Jan. 10 that the case brought by the parents of event rider Mia Eriksson against her former trainer can go to trial. Justice Jeffrey King ruled against trainer Kristi Nunnink’s request for summary judgment in the parents’ claim of negligence.

    Mia Eriksson, then 17, died at the Galway Downs International Three-Day Event (Calif.) in November 2006, after her horse, Koryogrophy, fell at a water jump and landed on her. She died hours later in the hospital. Prior to the fall, Eriksson did not heed course officials attempting to stop her, as she’d already exceeded the maximum number of refusals allowed on course.

    Parents Stan and Karan Eriksson, of Tahoe City, Calif., had previously brought cases against the U.S. Equestrian Federation, the U.S. Eventing Association and event officials, but those cases have been dismissed. This case charges Nunnink, of Auburn, Calif., with negligence as Eriksson’s trainer, insisting that Eriksson’s horse had fallen in two previous events and that Nunnink should have known if the horse was fit and healthy for this event. Eriksson’s parents had reportedly signed a standard release of liability statement.

    A judge in Riverside County, Calif., the county in which the event is held, had previously ruled in Nunnink’s favor, writing, “There was no showing of competent evidence fulfilling the requisite elements of duty, breach of duty, and legal causation on the part of [Nunnink], legally causing the subject incident…, and the action is barred by the primary assumption of the risk doctrine.”

    But King disagreed, writing a decision that could be significant to all trainers regarding their responsibility to students and their horses. He ruled that a coach has a duty of ordinary care not to increase the risk of injury to a student by encouraging or allowing the student to compete when he or she is physically unfit.

    In her statement to the court, Nunnink said that “[a]t no time before Mia Eriksson began her cross-country course run did anyone, including Mia Eriksson, ever complain that her horse was not behaving characteristically or in a manner that would suggest that ‘Kory’ would present a danger to Mia Eriksson.”

    King reasoned this did not establish the horse’s fitness to compete.

    “The distinction between ‘no one complained to her,’ and ‘I did not know nor should I have reasonably known,’ is significant,” King wrote. He added that the Erikssons “could very well admit that no one complained to Nunnink about the fitness of the horse, yet Nunnink, based on her own expertise, could still have known or had reason to know that the horse was unfit.”

    Nunnink said that Koryography had not fallen twice prior to Galway Downs. She said he had “kind of a freak, little fall” at Ram Tap (Calif.) in his previous start and that she didn’t know of any other fall.

    Nunnink pointed out that the Erikssons owned and operated a 40-stall professional training center in Tahoe City, where they trained Koryography. Nunnink traveled twice a week to Tahoe City to give lessons to Eriksson and other students; the horse was not in her barn or under her direct supervision. Nunnink said that she had suggested to Mia that she contest the CCI* instead of the CCI** to be sure of her own and her horse’s confidence after Ram Tap, but Mia declined.

    “And now Mia’s gone, and this [lawsuit] isn’t going to bring her back,” said Nunnink. “The one good thing that came from this is that everybody tripled their efforts to be able to pull up riders on course if they’re having problems. But, ultimately, it was up to Mia [to stop], and there was nothing I could do once she was on course.”

    Mia Eriksson’s older sister, Shana, 18, died of head injuries after being thrown from her own horse while she was trail riding with teammates at Fresno State University (Calif.) in September 2003. The Erikssons filed a $10 million suit against the college for negligence and were ruled against in September 2007.

  • #2
    There is already an extensive thread on this.


    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).


    • Original Poster

      where? I searched for Kristi Nunnick, and nothing came up. Maybe I missed it. If you could post the link I would appreciate it. I will go searching again as well.


      • #4
        I just added it to my post.

        chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).


        • #5
          Originally posted by chestnutwithchrome View Post
          where? I searched for Kristi Nunnick, and nothing came up. Maybe I missed it.
          You misspelled it. The name is Kristi Nunnink.

          But Janet kindly posted the thread.


          • #6
            Before you get too concerned about "hurt trainers everywhere"... keep in mind this is California. Their court system lives in is own world. That is why so many companies have left the state and or done everything they can to minimize their employment there.


            • #7
              The court's decision was basically a procedural one, in which the court simply found that the trial court erred in granting a Summary Judgment to the defendant and returned the case to the trial court for trial. It did NOT rule that the "coach" was at fault but only that a trial court and jury should determine the question. The court also does not seem to have created any new law but does quite thoroughly review the long established law in the issue of assumed risk. The decision is relatively lengthy but, if you are truly interested in the facts and issues... take the time to read it. It is understandable to non-lawyers.

              And, by the way, California is not "out there" in the ether when it comes to legal analysis. In fact on most legal issues, the state's court decisions are ultimately followed as a model around the country by most other states. Leading edge, yes. Crazy... no. Don Wilson