• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Helmet safety rating database for football helmets

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Helmet safety rating database for football helmets

    Football helmets are getting a database to track safety performance. It seems that eventing helmets could use something similar:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/09/sp...09helmets.html

  • #2
    I have forever wondered why there weren't "head to head" (pardon the pun) studies of different helmets. The ASTM-SEI certification is fine, but why not an actual rating or scoring system so we can see which helmets are BEST, instead of merely meeting the standard?

    If a helmet needs a (theoretical) "score" of 50 points to receive ASTM-SEI certification, and brand X scores a 51 while brand Q scores a 90, well, I'd be shopping for a brand Q, all things considered.
    Click here before you buy.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Originally posted by deltawave View Post
      I have forever wondered why there weren't "head to head" (pardon the pun) studies of different helmets. The ASTM-SEI certification is fine, but why not an actual rating or scoring system so we can see which helmets are BEST, instead of merely meeting the standard?

      If a helmet needs a (theoretical) "score" of 50 points to receive ASTM-SEI certification, and brand X scores a 51 while brand Q scores a 90, well, I'd be shopping for a brand Q, all things considered.
      ENHAP used to score helmets, but they stopped. I am not sure why. Perhaps push back from manufacturers?

      Comment


      • #4
        aaaaahhhh

        To play the devils advocate,

        Would that 51 guarantee me less injury than 90?

        Regards,
        Medical Mike
        equestrian medical researcher
        www.equicision.com

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm not looking for a guarantee. But if there are data showing that the 90 offers more protection than the 51, AND the 90 fits me well AND the improved score is meaningful for what I do, then I would certainly favor the 90 over the 51.

          This kind of score or rating would require "crash test dummy" type of tests, I would imagine. And I'd accept something along the lines of what car companies provide: a 5-star rating for front, side, and rear impact at galloping speed from about 7-8 feet in the air would be nice.
          Click here before you buy.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            If there were a registry of accidents/helmet types worn, then it would definitely be possible to correlate level of injury with type of helmet worn. Together with sales information, you could even calculate injury rates/ helmets sold annually. Could the stats be confounded by the type of people who bought the specific helmet brands? Probably yes, but it would still provide tons of good usable information.

            So yes, a database of this type would definitely provide data useful to answer the question, "Which helmet is safest?"

            Comment


            • #7
              I would LOVE to have access to such info. I think it's ridiculous that I can find reams of advice on which toaster works best, but nothing about an item that could potentially save my life.
              Proud member of the EDRF

              Comment


              • #8
                The Mark Davies Injured Riders Fund used to do this in the UK.

                Just don't expect to see this sort of testing and data coming from any entity that is dependent on the advertising or sponsorship dollars from one of the helmet companies.

                Here's a cautionary tale from the motorcycle world:

                How the Truth About Motorcycle Helmets Got a Journalist Fired

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Originally posted by JER View Post
                  Just don't expect to see this sort of testing and data coming from any entity that is dependent on the advertising or sponsorship dollars from one of the helmet companies.
                  [/URL]
                  JER, a registry would not require anything from industry. All that is needed is for a rider (or a rider's family) to report the type of helmet, the type of accident, and the nature of the injuries. It can be a very cheap thing to assemble and run. These registries are quite popular in health care for capturing information on cancer, characteristics associated with certain medical tests, etc.

                  No information from industry nor testing is needed. That is what makes it so appealing.

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    p.s. Not sure why, but the link is now requiring you to register to view. I think because it is now "yesterday's news." Sorry.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      IFG, who would maintain this database?

                      The USEF and USEA have sponsors like Helmet Company. If their helmets appeared in any kind of negative light, Helmet Company might pull their sponsorship or ask that the database be shut down.

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        Originally posted by JER View Post
                        IFG, who would maintain this database?

                        The USEF and USEA have sponsors like Helmet Company. If their helmets appeared in any kind of negative light, Helmet Company might pull their sponsorship or ask that the database be shut down.
                        Not sure, but I can tell you that medical device makers will often sponsor studies in which their products are compared with those of their competitors. I would think that USEF or an independent entity could set it up. If someone tech savvy were willing to work on it, it might not be that pricey.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I did a lot of research on helmets awhile back. What I found was most depressing. The studies done on helmets basically involved dropping a weight onto the helmet and measuring absorbed force.

                          None were done to simulate actual falls, difference in body weight, head weight and how the helmets themselves can cause additional injury in some kinds of falls.

                          Speaking of equestrian helmets.

                          I found many articles on other types of helmets and the results were basically the same.

                          It did seem as though advertising and sales still trump safety every time.

                          I even inquired to some companies without response.

                          If you have a few hours with nothing else to do it is enlightening.
                          “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.”
                          ? Albert Einstein

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Some added thoughts

                            Originally posted by horsefaerie View Post
                            I did a lot of research on helmets awhile back. What I found was most depressing. The studies done on helmets basically involved dropping a weight onto the helmet and measuring absorbed force.

                            None were done to simulate actual falls, difference in body weight, head weight and how the helmets themselves can cause additional injury in some kinds of falls.

                            Speaking of equestrian helmets.

                            I found many articles on other types of helmets and the results were basically the same.

                            It did seem as though advertising and sales still trump safety every time.

                            I even inquired to some companies without response.

                            If you have a few hours with nothing else to do it is enlightening.
                            Helmets have to be tested on equipment not on actual people, that is unless you would like to be the tester

                            The ASTM standard is an open procedure that allows ALL interested parties to have input. The group does their best to determine what are the typical forces involved in an equestrian accident and then translates that into a test procedure that uses a helmet on a testing head etc. While the idea that the standards can be improved is certainly valid, the idea that the current standards are done in an unscientific manner or one that does not consider the rider, head weight etc. under different conditions is not accurate.

                            All helmets that are tested to the ASTM standard and pass do have different test scores. Some are higher than the what is required to pass. While it is likely that a helmet with a higher rating would be safer, the question is how much so? If it can withstand a force of 500 joules rather than 400 is it 25% safer ? A very difficult question to answer.

                            Not really sure what you are saying about advetising trumping safety. Please elaborate.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Your tax dollars at work.

                              The National Highway Transportation Safety Board test motorcycle helmets against the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 218. Although this FMVSS 218 standard is less demanding than ASTM F1163-04a, the NHTSB publishes the actual test results. Some helmet test results are well within the requirements of ASTM F1163-04a.

                              For example I now wear a motorcycle half helmet that tested with a maximum decelleration measurement of 200g. Lower numbers are better. ASTM F1163-04a sets the maximum decelleration at 300g.
                              ------------------------------------------------------------
                              But all the finest horsemen out—the men to Beat the Band—
                              You’ll find amongst the crowd that ride their races in the Stand

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X