Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You're responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it--details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums' policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it's understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users' profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses -- Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it's related to a horse for sale, regardless of who's selling it, it doesn't belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions -- Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services -- Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products -- While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements -- Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be "bumped" excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues -- Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators' discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you'd rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user's membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

Ashley Stout , 13 and her horse, killed in Rotational Fall (Named to YR Training team)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TMares
    replied
    None of us are saying "do nothing." None. Emotions are high, as they should be.

    Shared on behalf of the Stout Family:

    ***In honor of Ashley, all fellow riders are encouraged to wear formal competition attire (sans helmet) to the services.

    A life so beautifully lived deserves to be beautifully remembered. Please join us as we celebrate the life of Ashley Stout. Friends will be received from 2:00PM-4:00PM and 6:00PM-8:00PM on Monday, July 15, 2019 at Koch Funeral Home (2401 S. Atherton Street, State College). The funeral service will be at 11:00AM on Tuesday, July 16, 2019 at Good Shepherd Catholic Church (867 Grays Woods Blvd, Port Matilda) with a luncheon to follow. Ashley’s passion for riding and for her beloved horse, Grady, drove her young life. For this reason, in lieu of flowers, the family requests memorial donations be made to Area 2 Young Riders Program in Ashley's name.

    https://www.usea2.net/departments/young-riders

    Leave a comment:


  • IFG
    replied
    Originally posted by horsemom141 View Post
    Is is difficult to read these comments from my perspective as a rider, mom, member of the local community, and acquaintance of those directly involved. I understand the passion for the sport and sense of urgency that leads you all to try make sense of this tragedy and possibly prevent another. There are so many statements here that feel like judgement from afar, speculative question being asked, by a lot of people, none of whom were there or have any actual data. This is a widely read and respected international forum. For the sake of those of us experiencing this more intimately (and my grief is miniscule by comparison to the families, breeder, trainer, and close friends) ... it's barely been 72 hours ... we are still reeling from the reality that these two are forever gone from this life. It's hard enough to deal with it based on what we do know, without having to read about what everyone else thinks they know. I, myself, competed at a high level in another high risk sport. Tragedies like this happen outside of eventing. They should make us strive for safety but bad things do happen despite everyone's best effort. Sometimes you can point to a reason and say, "this was avoidable," and try to make it sport safer for the next participant. Sometimes bad things just happen despite doing everything according to "best practices" and with as much care, equipment, and common sense possible. The words "freak accident" and the reference to "a curb" were made literally a few hours after this happened, while I'm sure the person who used those words was still in a state of shock and disbelief. Don't make it harder for us by taking those words and turning them into some sort of platform for your own opinion and imagining you have some sort of omniscient understanding of the what wrong here. Strive to be safe, strive to make your sport better. Do that. But don't imagine you know how or why this happened or who is responsible when you weren't even there. I'm not saying, don't ask the hard questions, I'm just saying, read what you are writing and ask if it is fair, or whether you are implying any sort of blame or judgment on the people involved, while trying to make your possibly very valid point.
    I am so sorry for you and all of her connections. Trust me, those of us on this thread who ask questions are not pointing fingers of blame. Instead, the scientists who are posting, and there are several of us, want to dissect the accident as quickly as possible , while recall is fresh, to learn from the event and potentially prevent future tragedies. Just as the NHTSA, NTSB and FAA investigate accidents as quickly as possible to prevent future tragedies, we wish to do the same for eventing accidents.

    Leave a comment:


  • horsemom141
    replied
    Is is difficult to read these comments from my perspective as a rider, mom, member of the local community, and acquaintance of those directly involved. I understand the passion for the sport and sense of urgency that leads you all to try make sense of this tragedy and possibly prevent another. There are so many statements here that feel like judgement from afar, speculative question being asked, by a lot of people, none of whom were there or have any actual data. This is a widely read and respected international forum. For the sake of those of us experiencing this more intimately (and my grief is miniscule by comparison to the families, breeder, trainer, and close friends) ... it's barely been 72 hours ... we are still reeling from the reality that these two are forever gone from this life. It's hard enough to deal with it based on what we do know, without having to read about what everyone else thinks they know. I, myself, competed at a high level in another high risk sport. Tragedies like this happen outside of eventing. They should make us strive for safety but bad things do happen despite everyone's best effort. Sometimes you can point to a reason and say, "this was avoidable," and try to make it sport safer for the next participant. Sometimes bad things just happen despite doing everything according to "best practices" and with as much care, equipment, and common sense possible. The words "freak accident" and the reference to "a curb" were made literally a few hours after this happened, while I'm sure the person who used those words was still in a state of shock and disbelief. Don't make it harder for us by taking those words and turning them into some sort of platform for your own opinion and imagining you have some sort of omniscient understanding of the what wrong here. Strive to be safe, strive to make your sport better. Do that. But don't imagine you know how or why this happened or who is responsible when you weren't even there. I'm not saying, don't ask the hard questions, I'm just saying, read what you are writing and ask if it is fair, or whether you are implying any sort of blame or judgment on the people involved, while trying to make your possibly very valid point.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jealoushe
    replied
    Originally posted by Manahmanah View Post
    The only way to completely eliminate rotational falls over fixed objects is to ban jumping over fixed objects. In other words, banning eventing.

    Otherwise, this is a rare but real risk in the COMPLETELY VOLUNTARY sport you choose to participate in.

    Even if we could get every single jump in every single venue turned into collapsible objects, there would still be falls and deaths. There are falls and deaths in show jumping. There are deaths in barrel racing. A woman who lived down the road fell off her horse and died trail riding not too long ago.

    Deaths from rock climbing can be eliminated by banning rock climbing.

    Deaths from racing motorcycles can be eliminated by banning motorcycle racing.

    I think it's in extremely poor taste to spin up a thread like this to push the "dangerous eventing" agenda before this poor young girls body is even cold.

    We get it. You think eventing is dangerous. Absolutely nobody is denying that eventing is dangerous. Riding horses is a dangerous activity. Maybe that should be banned too.

    Spinning up these emotionally driven threads in the heat of the moment does nothing to help eventing be safer. It just serves to drive people away. If that is your goal, congrats on it.

    Huge strides HAVE been made to make eventing safer in the past decade, and it is safer now. Safety improvements continue to be made.

    I just dont see how this helps anything at all, and the family of this young girl is sure to come here and read all of this and have their grief multiplied by the usual agenda pushers.

    If you hate eventing and think it's so horrible and dangerous, please do go find another sport.
    Hey if you don’t like to the topic or the commentary, don’t enter the thread. Go start your own condolences thread. This forum is one of the only places we can come and discuss Eventing safety in an open dialogue with intelligent and educated people. Sorry it makes you uncomfortable. Sorry it makes people get on their rant calling us haters of the sport and too dumb to know the risks blah blah.

    Another person died yesterday at an unsanctioned event in the UK. But that’s totally normal right?

    Leave a comment:


  • Manahmanah
    replied
    I am answering a direct question about mainstream sports. Not comparing this situation to TT. I even made it a quote. Obviously. Dont be dense. Nobody is dismissing her death. Stop with the drama.

    Leave a comment:


  • StormyDay
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruth0552 View Post
    This is horrific, in my mind particularly because the horse was solid and young, not old or of questionable soundness, and because it sounds like the jump was not ridiculously large. I’ve always thought of my plebeian lower level being fairly safe. Also horrific because the rider was so young.

    I’m honestly interested in seeing the jump and approach. I don’t think of a fence under 3’ being capable of causing a rotational fall, but obviously it is.
    I had a neighbor who was in a rotational fall over a 2ft log. The horse just didn’t jump. Both were ok.
    If the jump is taller than the horses knees, they can have a rotational fall

    Leave a comment:


  • RAyers
    replied
    Yes, the TT is well known to kill racers (250+ to date, averaging 2 per year). How many are children?

    MotoGP spent 12 years developing the racing leathers and protective gear, instrumenting every rider at every race to measure all the forces imparted on riders that allows racers to survive crashes at 200 mph (See recent Pirolla crash). Formula 1 racing spent decades to eliminate driver deaths (See book by Sid Watkins who lead the effort since the 1970s, The Science of Safety: The Battle Against Unacceptable Risks in Motor Racing).

    Your cavalier attitude is dismissing the death of a child.

    Leave a comment:


  • Manahmanah
    replied
    Originally posted by KellyS View Post

    So well said!

    What other mainstream sports, with and without horses, have a similar rate of death for participants?

    I’m curious to know where eventing fits in, in terms of both human and horse fatalities.

    Growing up entrenched in motorcycle racing I can tell you for certain this sport. There is a single location in Europe (aisle of man) whose 37.7 mile course claims 3 to 4 lives every year. One singular course on one tiny island.

    There is a huge difference in the attitudes of the participants. Racers fully understand the inherent risks of the sport, they understand it is dangerous AF, and pick their races according to the amount of risk they want to take. Some courses are lots more dangerous than others. People uncomfortable with the increased risk of injury or death don't ride those.


    Leave a comment:


  • HLMom
    replied
    Originally posted by BeeHoney View Post


    My observation is that in the past, many eventing obstacles were somewhat similar in style to fox hunting obstacles--coops, brush type fences, logs/log piles, etc. There were corners, combinations and banks and water jumps, etc. but the obstacles were visually straightforward and easy for horses to "read." A horse could be galloping along, see the next jump up ahead, and start getting a clue about what was next. Nowadays, I see a lot of jumps that must be incredibly difficult for a horse to visually process on the approach. Airy jumps, narrow jumps, complex groups of jumps/narrow jumps (which one are we jumping?) and complex combinations. I also see various jumps that I think create an optical illusion for the horse, for example, with odd light/dark materials or odd patterning. There also are occasionally jumps and combinations with visual distractions that make it harder for a horse to visually process in a fair manner what the jumping question is.

    Having watched eventing for decades, I feel like it has gotten progressively more dangerous. These deaths and falls--they were not happening at this rate 20-30 years ago. (If someone has data, please correct me--maybe RAyers does.)
    I think I've heard that statistics show that deaths and serious injuries have actually decreased in recent decades. But I would welcome more authoritative information.

    Nonetheless, I agree with you about the obstacles. The Disneyland effect... with the cutesy sculptures and such. Horses must be wondering, "what on earth is this?!" as they approach. One marvels at the bravery of these horses (so unlike my daughter's pony, who regarded many jumps with healthy suspicion until they proved themselves innocuous)... but perhaps it's gone a bit over the top.

    Leave a comment:


  • She's Pure Gold
    replied
    I echo those who say that now is absolutely the time to ask the difficult questions. I don't see anyone here hating on the sport or saying no one should event- I hear caring individuals who seek to improve the sport by making it safer. Will we ever eliminate ALL horse and rider deaths? Probably not. But what is wrong with trying to cut the number to half, or a quarter, if research and technology would allow us to do so?? Why would anyone be against that?

    As for the references to cars and other hazardous sports- yeah, people hurt or get killed. But guess what happens? We do research into why and how those injuries and deaths happen and then modify equipment to minimize it. Cars weren't originally built with seat belts. Babies rode on mother's laps, or rudimentary seats. Now we have state of the art R&D, and effective seatbelts and car seats for infants through tweens that have exponentially reduced deaths.

    I believe for those calling for investigation, that is the line of thinking we are after. Yes, we have better equipment now in eventing than 30 or 40 years ago. We have frangible pins being utilized in some fences. But why shouldn't we continue to expand the focus on safety?

    My heart goes out to this poor girl's family and friends, I cannot even imagine their devastation- let it not be in vain. Let's work together to make our beloved sport safer, not shrug our shoulders and say "what else could be done?" rhetorically.

    Leave a comment:


  • BeeHoney
    replied
    Originally posted by frugalannie View Post
    My deepest condolences to Ashley's family and friends.

    A slight aside query that I post only because so many knowledgeable people are on this thread.: Are there a comparable number of serious/ fatal incidences in hunt fields? They, too are often jumping solid obstacles, without the chance to walk teh course before. Just wondering, and I truly mean to take nothing from the gravity and sorrow of this thread's subject.
    I think you ask a good question. I don't know that anyone has ever kept good statistics about fox hunting accidents, but speaking as someone who used to event and also has fox hunted for many years, my impression is that there are far fewer (proportionately) fox hunting accidents, at least in the US. In some ways, you would think that fox hunting would have a lot of terrible accidents. The footing is unmanicured and often boggy, slippery, or riddled with errant rocks or roots, there are plenty of riders that have questionable equitation (no insult intended here), plenty of horses that are not athletic jumpers, and plenty of the horses (and plenty of the riders) have a few years on them. And hunting can be very strenuous, lasting much longer than a cross country round and horses are often quite tired at the end of a days' hunting.

    But there are some key differences. First of all, many fox hunting obstacles are not as solid as they appear. The planks of a coop that have been weathering outside all year typically break fairly easily. Secondly, most fox hunting obstacles have great ground lines. In the case of coops, the shape of the jump does not allow a horse to use a too close take off spot. Obstacles like stone walls have an obvious solidity that naturally encourages horses to back off and jump carefully. Visually, the obstacles are typically easy for a horse to process. Jumps are often set into fence lines. Also, the horses are almost always able to see the horses in front of them jumping the obstacle before they have to jump it. Lastly, the horses often hunt over the same territory multiple times in one season, jumping the same jumps more than once, so there is an element of familiarity.

    My observation is that in the past, many eventing obstacles were somewhat similar in style to fox hunting obstacles--coops, brush type fences, logs/log piles, etc. There were corners, combinations and banks and water jumps, etc. but the obstacles were visually straightforward and easy for horses to "read." A horse could be galloping along, see the next jump up ahead, and start getting a clue about what was next. Nowadays, I see a lot of jumps that must be incredibly difficult for a horse to visually process on the approach. Airy jumps, narrow jumps, complex groups of jumps/narrow jumps (which one are we jumping?) and complex combinations. I also see various jumps that I think create an optical illusion for the horse, for example, with odd light/dark materials or odd patterning. There also are occasionally jumps and combinations with visual distractions that make it harder for a horse to visually process in a fair manner what the jumping question is.

    Having watched eventing for decades, I feel like it has gotten progressively more dangerous. These deaths and falls--they were not happening at this rate 20-30 years ago. (If someone has data, please correct me--maybe RAyers does.) Which is why I feel that it is nonsense to suggest that we should just accept these deaths and accidents as an inevitable part of a dangerous sport. It doesn't have to be this way. We are smarter than this, better than this. Our riders and our horses are worth more consideration than this.

    My heart goes out to the family and friends of this young person who obviously loved her sport. It is heart wrenching for all of us who ride and who have family and friends that event.

    Leave a comment:


  • KellyS
    replied
    Originally posted by RAyers View Post

    Let me ask you this? How many more kids would you prefer to die or be maimed while you sit and give thoughts and prayers. What happened isn't new.

    FEI statistics show that horse falls were UP last year while rider displacements were down. The risk of rotational falls has dropped to 1 in every 750 falls while regular falls are 1 in every 55 rides. The risk of severe or fatal injury is still "high" at over 1 in every 500 starts. Now think about that. At Rebecca Farms coming up, there are over 500 starters. That suggests the possibility the one rider may die in the next week. That is the reality.

    I'm not looking at this fall and death. I am looking at the next one, the next 10 and trying to prevent that. And part of it is getting rid of semantics that "justify" a child being killed in a sport that is supposed to be fun.

    Next time I will underline for emphasis.
    So well said!

    What other mainstream sports, with and without horses, have a similar rate of death for participants?

    I’m curious to know where eventing fits in, in terms of both human and horse fatalities.

    If something this tragic doesn’t make you question how dangerous an activity is, what type of data is needed to evaluate its safety, and what is being done to prevent future fatalities in participants, then some serious soul searching is in order.

    I am not a parent, but if I was and saw something like this happen, I would seriously question whether that is a sport I would want my child participating in.

    Of course, children and adults die doing everyday activities but would you intentionally continue in a sport where death is shrugged off as part of participation? Where people tell you to go do another sport if you question safety?

    Maybe everything possible has been done to make the sport safe, but we don’t even know that because there isn’t enough data and research available to make educated conclusions.

    I do think there is a much higher number of deaths in eventing compared to other sports, but I don’t know for sure, hence my question above.

    If it turns out to be true, don’t we have some responsibility for the minors and horses involved in eventing? Shouldn’t we be sure we are giving them every opportunity to come through training and competing alive?

    Please do not scold me for discussing the above on this thread...as Reed said above, thoughts and prayers do nothing. How many deaths does it take for people to stop trying to explain away deaths in this sport?

    Leave a comment:


  • beowulf
    replied
    Originally posted by Figment View Post
    I believe that eventing trainers and hunter/jumper trainers teach differently regarding getting to a good distance, appropriate speed and balance for the situation, and where a horse's forelegs and knees should point.
    Well of course they do. A horse crawling around a course on his forehand would have some very serious trouble jumping a solid fence out of stride and/or with terrain involved. Apples and oranges -- actually, not even in the same fruit metaphor. Eventing is completely different than H/J and suggesting this person would have been better off if she had a hunter jumper trainer is so left field and insulting to the parties involved I don't have much of a respectful comment to make here.

    My sincere condolences to all of her (and her horse's) connections. There are not many things I hate more than seeing updates like these.

    Leave a comment:


  • asterix
    replied
    Indeed, Figment, I would also like to understand your point better.

    Leave a comment:


  • HLMom
    replied
    Originally posted by Figment View Post
    I believe that eventing trainers and hunter/jumper trainers teach differently regarding getting to a good distance, appropriate speed and balance for the situation, and where a horse's forelegs and knees should point.
    Can you elaborate on the point you are making?

    Leave a comment:


  • Figment
    replied
    I believe that eventing trainers and hunter/jumper trainers teach differently regarding getting to a good distance, appropriate speed and balance for the situation, and where a horse's forelegs and knees should point.

    Leave a comment:


  • frugalannie
    replied
    My deepest condolences to Ashley's family and friends.

    A slight aside query that I post only because so many knowledgeable people are on this thread.: Are there a comparable number of serious/ fatal incidences in hunt fields? They, too are often jumping solid obstacles, without the chance to walk teh course before. Just wondering, and I truly mean to take nothing from the gravity and sorrow of this thread's subject.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rallycairn
    replied
    To me, calling a common occurrence a "freak accident" is most definitely essentially saying, "shit happens." It's an excuse to look the other way and avoid investigating change, as is trumpeting, "We can't say anything now when the tragedy is so fresh." (Problem is, after the initial reaction is over, rarely does anything get said.)

    Here's a definition of freak accident: https://www.yourdictionary.com/freak-accident
    1. freak-accident. Noun. (plural freak accidents) An incident, especially one that is harmful, occurring under highly unusual and unlikely circumstances.
    Trained for the level or not, this type of fall is not highly unusual and it is absolutely NOT unlikely in eventing. Calling this fall a freak accident is demonstrably misusing the common definition of the term.

    Denial isn't just a river in Egypt. Overreaction to statements calling for investigation and change is classic defensiveness.


    This is such a tragedy for an apparently amazing young lady having her life cut incredibly short, her family whom I know must be absolutely stricken, her barn family, her horse -- and for the eventing community as a whole, especially if we can't understand that fatal events like this should be investigated to try to avoid their happening again, ending more and more amazing lives.

    I think we are all shocked and grieved about fatalities in the sport. But we shouldn't hurl accusations at people who want to attempt to make changes for the better. Get angry at the circumstances and try to change them! Don't seek emotional equilibrium/emotional coping by getting angry at people who want to change the status quo in the direction of better safety.

    Leave a comment:


  • dr j
    replied
    Originally posted by Jealoushe View Post

    It does though, because we can learn from it and it is a good and important question. I also would like to know if she was wearing an air vest.

    I believe it was a training level fence, not a fence the size of a curb as someone mentioned on Facebook, that was just an example someone used to say how easy the horse should have cleared it. There are many factors that are in play here. The rider was only 13 and no matter how good a rider, one year at the level at age 13 does not exactly line up with someone being very experienced, as talented as she may be.

    We can grieve and discuss the safety of our sport, theydo not have to be kept seperate imo.
    I keep coming back to this, her age. No matter how talented of a rider, horse, team - there is much solid evidence that the 13 year old brain is NOT a mature, competent in all situations, decision making brain. Even the most precocious child still has some elements of childlike thinking. Needs to be considered in this and all decision making.

    Leave a comment:


  • FlaxenChestnut
    replied
    What a tragedy. A parent’s and rider’s worst nightmare.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X