• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

please compare Point Two and Hits air vests

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • please compare Point Two and Hits air vests

    I'm not really asking whether or not you think air vests are good...I'd like to hear the pros and cons of the two main types. Thanks.

  • #2
    Hit Air is significantly cheaper ($400, while Point 2 is $680) and is also the original manufacturer of the air vests. They are a Japanese company than originally made the vests for motorcyclists. From what I've seen, the Hit Air vests are much closer fitted than the Point 2 vests. It seems that although the Hit Air vests were the original one on the market, Point 2 is much better at marketing and so they seem to be more popular. Point 2 also makes their vests in colors (for an extra $150), while Hit Air currently comes only in black. But I believe they too will do colors in the near future. Hit Air also has a kid's size on their website, and I don't believe that Point 2 does. Also, the Hit Air vest is quiter when activated than the Point 2. I've heard the Point 2 when my friend jumped off her horse and forgot to unclip, and it was pretty loud.
    Hit Air link: http://www.air-vest.com/ and
    Point 2:
    http://www.doversaddlery.com/product...&ids=333380037
    http://www.bitofbritain.com/Point_Tw...ket_p/2078.htm

    Comment


    • #3
      hit air also comes up for more neck support & lower to the tail bone.

      Comment


      • #4
        Looking for the same info

        Hoping more folks can weigh in on the differences. I am going through the process now of trying to decide which vest to buy.

        I think bit of britain now carries them both and I am hoping if i go to the store i can try them both on inflated to try and make the decision.

        Other difference i know of is the that the pointe 2 inflates a tenth of a second faster than the hit air.

        Comment


        • #5
          Point Two inflates inward Hit Air outward, so doesn't feel so tight when it inflates
          The parent co for both vests is the same maufacturer
          Hit Air orginally designed for motorcycle crowd and was not marketed to equestrian
          Point two pretty popular with ULR as they gave them all vests and they pay some to endorse
          Hit Air somewhat quieter when it inflates, both make loud "pop" when the cannister is activated
          Quality pretty comparable, function pretty close to identical
          Hit Air somewhat cheaper

          Comment


          • #6
            As deployment times are reported in tenths of a second, Point Two reportedly deploys in 0.1 - 0.2 sec, Hit Air in 0.7-0.8. What difference does half a second make? Drop to the ground from the height of your horse. How soon would you like your vest to deploy? Our rider is in a Point Two and unfortunately has tested the deployment times - glad she had the extra half second.
            With all due respect, I have to differ in opinion with the comparison of coverage of the Hit Air (being more extensive) and the Point Two. The Point Two doesn't give up coverage to the Hit Air.
            Colors a factor? Not in our decision making - the deployment time was the most significant consideration. ULRs in the Point Two? Not a decision swayer. The rest of the debate regarding prospective studies of either or both vests (and their as of yet undocumented/unstudied benefit) ---- this has been noted on this board over the past year and would not rehash again.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by bonshaw View Post
              As deployment times are reported in tenths of a second, Point Two reportedly deploys in 0.1 - 0.2 sec, Hit Air in 0.7-0.8. What difference does half a second make? Drop to the ground from the height of your horse. How soon would you like your vest to deploy? Our rider is in a Point Two and unfortunately has tested the deployment times - glad she had the extra half second.
              With all due respect, I have to differ in opinion with the comparison of coverage of the Hit Air (being more extensive) and the Point Two. The Point Two doesn't give up coverage to the Hit Air.
              Colors a factor? Not in our decision making - the deployment time was the most significant consideration. ULRs in the Point Two? Not a decision swayer. The rest of the debate regarding prospective studies of either or both vests (and their as of yet undocumented/unstudied benefit) ---- this has been noted on this board over the past year and would not rehash again.
              YES, agree with everything stated above!

              Comment


              • #8
                Yep, bonshaw is right on all counts.

                The Point Two has better neck and coccyx coverage, and it deploys a lot faster. Also, you WANT some room with the air vests...they shouldn't be tight prior to deploying. (At Surefire there was a rider whose Hit-Air vest failed when she fell at the water jump. I don't know what happened, but seeing it first hand made me glad I didn't have one!)

                I was really happy with the level of expertise among Point Two's reps at Blenheim last year, and comforted by the fact that most big names in England had been riding in them for some time before I decided to get mine. It may sound weird, but it would have worried me to buy from a Japanese company whose old website was riddled with poor grammar and totally nonsensical statements (it's since been updated). Point Two as a company is well known in England and they've been really easy to reach and responsive to questions. When you're making that big of an investment, good customer service is really crucial in my mind.

                Yes, the Point Two is more expensive, but I think, as with many other things, you get what you pay for.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I have chosen the Hit-Air vest over the Point Two vest.

                  Point Two IMPLODES (hence the need for a looser fit) whereas Hit-Air Explodes. I prefer the exploding. There has been a lot of discussion on the imploding of the Point Two against the body - additional pressure against the torso and all the organs worries me. Hit-Air deploys in .25 seconds - not .7-.8seconds as noted above (per Hit-Air website).

                  Hit-Air is not as bulky but provides the same coverage (as I have found). Additionally, when you ride in it, you don't feel as if it is on. The nick and butt/tailbone protection is conveniently rolled against the body protector and immediately releases upon air pressure (doesn't take much as I tried the demo model with an air pump). As I watch riders in their Point Two vests, I see them literally sitting on the tail portion, or the tail portion getting stuck on the cantle of the saddle. I rode XC in the Hit-Air for the first time at Millbrook - I was never once distracted by it. It is very light weight and breathable.
                  www.MurphyEventing.com

                  Follow us on FACEBOOK

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The 'neck protection' factor is a moot point as neither vest can offer any, except perhaps if you're looking for protection against bug bites.

                    For neck protection to protect you from riding-related neck injuries, you'd need a rigid device, like the HANS device that drivers use in motorsports. This has been discussed ad nauseum on this BB already. I'm not looking for more discussion, just sending out a reminder that there's no point in making 'neck protection' a criteria to choose between these two garments.

                    Any neck-related features on an air jacket are purely a fashion statement.

                    Carry on.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      As a side note, Point Two is making a $50 contribution to the USEA Areas for each vest sold. You must put in a code for your area.

                      The code:
                      Aug2010p201 for Area 1
                      Aug2010p202 for Area 2
                      Aug2010p208 for Area 8 and so forth.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Are either of them safe if you are riding without a vest, such as while schooling? Has anyone tried deploying one or fallen off while not wearing a vest?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I started a thread on this a few months ago. I decided to go with the Point Two after talking to MANY people. Everyone has their own opinion. I saw both in person and I feel like the Point Two covers better than the Hit Air. I also was swayed to the Point Two because of the faster deployment time. I do not like that it looks like I am wearing a garbage bag, even if it is a navy garbage bag. But if it helps keep me out of the hospital then I will wear it.
                          I have worn both vests without a safety vest and had them deployed in a demonstration. Neither one hurt or caused me discomfort. I think you need to make sure both are fitted correctly according to instructions (not too tight with the Point Two) and be careful how you secure your pinney on top if them. After that it is personal preference I suppose.
                          www.trainoreventing.com

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by advmom View Post
                            Point Two inflates inward Hit Air outward,
                            How do they control which way the air expands?
                            www.OneJumpAhead.ca

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X