Stallion Spotlight

Feinrich-Nr_1-12-18-10-074 Beelitz

Real Estate Spotlight

DSC_0001
  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

Buck blows it again............

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Buck blows it again............

    I don't know Buck personally. I understand he's a really nice guy. But seriously. How many teams are they going to put him on and let him blow it? Seriously, what is his completion rate without a serious fault or elimination? Maybe 25%? Or is it less than that? I get it. He has big backers that donate a lot of money to USEA and USEF, but really....this is just getting ridiculous.

  • #2
    I don't think it's ever appropriate to jump all over riders who withdraw a horse that is not 100 percent ready.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      If he wasn't 100% ready then why did they name him to a team???????

      Comment


      • #4
        Because the horse was already in Europe. Millstreet is not really a marquee event. It's similar to Great Meadow. The next big team event ex WEG is Boekelo in October.

        It's a good horse and Buck put in a solid performance at Aachen where quite a few big names had trouble. Is he going to win an individual gold on this horse? Probably not. But he's a knowledgeable and experienced horseman who's generally a safe choice to get home on Saturday.

        Comment


        • #5
          Agreed with highflyer. Horse welfare must come first, always, no exceptions. Doesn't matter if you are part of a team or not. Good for Buck for making the horseman's choice, not the competitor's choice.

          Also, FWIW, there were only three US riders at Millstreet to begin with. Hardly like he edged anyone out for a spot on the Nations Cup team...

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            So I ask once again. Why name a horse to a team, even if it's already there, if it's not capable of completing the event? Pointless. It only goes to further his terrible record representing the US on teams............

            Comment


            • #7
              Because it allows the US to start a team and the other riders to both a) experience team competition and b) say that they were part of the nations cup team.

              Because it allows the event to say it had teams from x countries

              Because any opportunity to dressage at a big popular crowded completions is huge for us riders.

              Comment


              • #8
                Do we know why he withdrew yet?

                Doubt Buck went into the event planning on withdrawing after dressage.

                P.
                A Wandering Albertan - NEW Africa travel blog!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Polydor View Post
                  Do we know why he withdrew yet?

                  Doubt Buck went into the event planning on withdrawing after dressage.

                  P.
                  I didn't mean to imply he did! I'm sure it was one of the usual 1000 things that go wrong anytime you enter a horse in an event.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Wow. Grudge against someone? Buck didn't blow anything. They coupled together a "team" of horses that were there. I'm sure Buck would have loved to complete given his stellar Dressage score. But like most things in horses...things don't go according to plan and he (together with the team) made a decision in the best interest of the horse. This wasn't an important team event or they would have had a reserve horse who could have been substituted under the new rules. And even with no substitute, the US team did not finish last....and that was in large part to Buck have laid down such a competitive Dressage test.

                    If anything was "blown", it was by the USEF for not having sent a reserve horse/rider that could have been substituted.
                    ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      BORNFREE...........if you were paying attention you would know there was no reserve because it was the first team to compete under the new rules for the 2020 games where there are only 3 team members, no reserve........so that much more important to name reliable team members, of which Buck has proven over the years he is not.... like I said when I posted the thread, I don't know him, this is not a personal grudge, I am just tired of seeing him named to team after to team only to see him let his team mates and the country down.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by equinedriver View Post
                        BORNFREE...........if you were paying attention you would know there was no reserve because it was the first team to compete under the new rules for the 2020 games where there are only 3 team members, no reserve........so that much more important to name reliable team members, ...
                        Really ?

                        https://rechenstelle.de/media/filer_...0_ermantp2.pdf

                        Team: The Teams will be composed of 3 or 4 Athletes from the same nation. The 3 best results of each Team will be taken into account for the Team classification.

                        https://inside.fei.org/sites/default...18-Rules_0.pdf

                        You really should be berating USEF for not sending 4.
                        Last edited by Equibrit; Aug. 26, 2018, 11:23 AM.
                        ... _. ._ .._. .._

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          All of the other teams have a reserve listed.

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            From the event With France and the U.S. tied for the Nations Cup lead on 85.7 and Great Britain sitting third on 86.5, tomorrow's cross country is sure to be a nail-biter. Millstreet is testing the three-rider team format that will be used at the 2020 Olympic Games in Tokyo, and Liz said the goal for the U.S. is three clear rounds inside the time across Mike Etherington-Smith's course.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by equinedriver View Post
                              I don't know Buck personally. I understand he's a really nice guy. But seriously. How many teams are they going to put him on and let him blow it? Seriously, what is his completion rate without a serious fault or elimination? Maybe 25%? Or is it less than that? I get it. He has big backers that donate a lot of money to USEA and USEF, but really....this is just getting ridiculous.
                              Is this for real? Looking out for the welfare of the horse is not blowing it. Last I checked Buck rode actual horses, not the kind you stick a quarter in outside your local wally-world.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                If Buck had continued to the next phase of competition and made a mistake that resulted in elimination, it would be different. But withdrawing your horse for any of the many, many legitimate reasons to do so that are all in the horse's best interest is not blowing it.

                                AS BFNE alluded, under the new format, I think each team competes three members but can substitute in a reserve even after the competition has started - which looks like what the Ireland 2 team did in the results link Equibrit posted. .

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  My whole point is that they should stop naming Buck to teams. He can't be counted on to complete the event either at all or without a major fault. If they are going to spend team money for him to go, send him as an individual. So the horse was already in Europe. So are other American horses. Tina lives over there. They still spent money for entries, housing, grooms etc.......for him to do a dressage test. It's gotten to the point I just assume when he is named to a team that he will be the drop score....and or the team will not finish with a counting score because another team member will also not finish and we won't have 3 scores that count. Just sick of it after all these years. Have stopped donating. No reason to waste my money.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    It's very easy (cheap) to make a judgement like that if you are not in possession of all the facts.

                                    There seems to be a 20 point penalty for making a substitution.
                                    ... _. ._ .._. .._

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I'm pretty sure they "selected" the team once they saw there were three US riders entered. If there had been another US rider available and entered, there would have been three riders selected and the fourth would have been reserve. Kind of like how the UK sometimes fields a team for Great Meadows if there are enough eligible riders going, but doesn't send people over specifically to compete there.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I think you should check your facts before slandering a rider. Since WEG 2014, Buck has only been named to 5 teams, Millstreet included, and this is the first he didn't complete. In fact, he has had pretty good placings otherwise, not to mention completing (with pretty good results) at 4* and major 3*'s recently. From what I know of Buck, there would have had to be a damn good reason for him to withdraw from a team competition. He's not being named to the Tryon team, so what's the problem?

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X