• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Update to Forum Rules: Criminal Allegations

In our continuing effort to provide an avenue for individuals to voice their opinions and experiences, we have recently reviewed and updated our forum policies. Generally, we have allowed users to share their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, trainers, etc. within the industry, and that is not changing.

When it came to overt criminal allegations, however, those discussions have in the past needed to stem from a report by a reputable news source or action by law enforcement or the legal system.

We are now expanding our policies to allow posters to share their own first-hand experiences involving overt criminal allegations, such as animal abuse or neglect, theft, etc., but only if they publicly provide their full first and last name along with the post. We still will not allow anonymous postings alleging criminal activity.

So, a user may now make a specific claim against a named individual or company, but it must be a FIRST-HAND account, and they have to IDENTIFY THEMSELVES. Users have always been legally responsible for their posts, and nothing has changed there, but we want to loosen the reins a bit and further allow the free flow of discussion and information relevant to the horse community.

We are not providing a free-for-all of anonymous rumor-mongering. As enduring advocates for the welfare of the horse, we want to provide a forum for those willing to sign their name and shine a light on issues of concern to them in the industry.

The full revised rules are posted at the top of each forum for reference.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums’ policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

Buck blows it again............

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Buck blows it again............

    I don't know Buck personally. I understand he's a really nice guy. But seriously. How many teams are they going to put him on and let him blow it? Seriously, what is his completion rate without a serious fault or elimination? Maybe 25%? Or is it less than that? I get it. He has big backers that donate a lot of money to USEA and USEF, but really....this is just getting ridiculous.

  • #2
    I don't think it's ever appropriate to jump all over riders who withdraw a horse that is not 100 percent ready.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      If he wasn't 100% ready then why did they name him to a team???????

      Comment


      • #4
        Because the horse was already in Europe. Millstreet is not really a marquee event. It's similar to Great Meadow. The next big team event ex WEG is Boekelo in October.

        It's a good horse and Buck put in a solid performance at Aachen where quite a few big names had trouble. Is he going to win an individual gold on this horse? Probably not. But he's a knowledgeable and experienced horseman who's generally a safe choice to get home on Saturday.

        Comment


        • #5
          Agreed with highflyer. Horse welfare must come first, always, no exceptions. Doesn’t matter if you are part of a team or not. Good for Buck for making the horseman’s choice, not the competitor’s choice.

          Also, FWIW, there were only three US riders at Millstreet to begin with. Hardly like he edged anyone out for a spot on the Nations Cup team...

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            So I ask once again. Why name a horse to a team, even if it's already there, if it's not capable of completing the event? Pointless. It only goes to further his terrible record representing the US on teams............

            Comment


            • #7
              Because it allows the US to start a team and the other riders to both a) experience team competition and b) say that they were part of the nations cup team.

              Because it allows the event to say it had teams from x countries

              Because any opportunity to dressage at a big popular crowded completions is huge for us riders.

              Comment


              • #8
                Do we know why he withdrew yet?

                Doubt Buck went into the event planning on withdrawing after dressage.

                P.
                A Wandering Albertan - NEW Africa travel blog!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Polydor View Post
                  Do we know why he withdrew yet?

                  Doubt Buck went into the event planning on withdrawing after dressage.

                  P.
                  I didn't mean to imply he did! I'm sure it was one of the usual 1000 things that go wrong anytime you enter a horse in an event.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Wow. Grudge against someone? Buck didn’t blow anything. They coupled together a “team” of horses that were there. I’m sure Buck would have loved to complete given his stellar Dressage score. But like most things in horses...things don’t go according to plan and he (together with the team) made a decision in the best interest of the horse. This wasn’t an important team event or they would have had a reserve horse who could have been substituted under the new rules. And even with no substitute, the US team did not finish last....and that was in large part to Buck have laid down such a competitive Dressage test.

                    If anything was “blown”, it was by the USEF for not having sent a reserve horse/rider that could have been substituted.
                    ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      BORNFREE...........if you were paying attention you would know there was no reserve because it was the first team to compete under the new rules for the 2020 games where there are only 3 team members, no reserve........so that much more important to name reliable team members, of which Buck has proven over the years he is not.... like I said when I posted the thread, I don't know him, this is not a personal grudge, I am just tired of seeing him named to team after to team only to see him let his team mates and the country down.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by equinedriver View Post
                        BORNFREE...........if you were paying attention you would know there was no reserve because it was the first team to compete under the new rules for the 2020 games where there are only 3 team members, no reserve........so that much more important to name reliable team members, ...
                        Really ?

                        https://rechenstelle.de/media/filer_...0_ermantp2.pdf

                        Team: The Teams will be composed of 3 or 4 Athletes from the same nation. The 3 best results of each Team will be taken into account for the Team classification.

                        https://inside.fei.org/sites/default...18-Rules_0.pdf

                        You really should be berating USEF for not sending 4.
                        Last edited by Equibrit; Aug. 26, 2018, 12:23 PM.
                        ... _. ._ .._. .._

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          All of the other teams have a reserve listed.

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            From the event With France and the U.S. tied for the Nations Cup lead on 85.7 and Great Britain sitting third on 86.5, tomorrow’s cross country is sure to be a nail-biter. Millstreet is testing the three-rider team format that will be used at the 2020 Olympic Games in Tokyo, and Liz said the goal for the U.S. is three clear rounds inside the time across Mike Etherington-Smith’s course.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by equinedriver View Post
                              I don't know Buck personally. I understand he's a really nice guy. But seriously. How many teams are they going to put him on and let him blow it? Seriously, what is his completion rate without a serious fault or elimination? Maybe 25%? Or is it less than that? I get it. He has big backers that donate a lot of money to USEA and USEF, but really....this is just getting ridiculous.
                              Is this for real? Looking out for the welfare of the horse is not blowing it. Last I checked Buck rode actual horses, not the kind you stick a quarter in outside your local wally-world.
                              http://theotherboard.boards.net/ An OT forum for CoTHers to give our dear Mods a break

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                If Buck had continued to the next phase of competition and made a mistake that resulted in elimination, it would be different. But withdrawing your horse for any of the many, many legitimate reasons to do so that are all in the horse's best interest is not blowing it.

                                AS BFNE alluded, under the new format, I think each team competes three members but can substitute in a reserve even after the competition has started - which looks like what the Ireland 2 team did in the results link Equibrit posted. .

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  My whole point is that they should stop naming Buck to teams. He can't be counted on to complete the event either at all or without a major fault. If they are going to spend team money for him to go, send him as an individual. So the horse was already in Europe. So are other American horses. Tina lives over there. They still spent money for entries, housing, grooms etc.......for him to do a dressage test. It's gotten to the point I just assume when he is named to a team that he will be the drop score....and or the team will not finish with a counting score because another team member will also not finish and we won't have 3 scores that count. Just sick of it after all these years. Have stopped donating. No reason to waste my money.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    It's very easy (cheap) to make a judgement like that if you are not in possession of all the facts.

                                    There seems to be a 20 point penalty for making a substitution.
                                    ... _. ._ .._. .._

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I'm pretty sure they "selected" the team once they saw there were three US riders entered. If there had been another US rider available and entered, there would have been three riders selected and the fourth would have been reserve. Kind of like how the UK sometimes fields a team for Great Meadows if there are enough eligible riders going, but doesn't send people over specifically to compete there.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I think you should check your facts before slandering a rider. Since WEG 2014, Buck has only been named to 5 teams, Millstreet included, and this is the first he didn't complete. In fact, he has had pretty good placings otherwise, not to mention completing (with pretty good results) at 4* and major 3*'s recently. From what I know of Buck, there would have had to be a damn good reason for him to withdraw from a team competition. He's not being named to the Tryon team, so what's the problem?

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X