• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Bit spin-off (regarding Tom Thumb)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bit spin-off (regarding Tom Thumb)

    Is this bit a tom thumb?

    Alright-new link http://www.tractorsupply.com/equine/...se-bit-4007559

    If not a Tom Thumb, any official name for it?
    Last edited by spirithorse22; Sep. 30, 2009, 11:19 PM. Reason: try new link
    True Bearing Equestrian
    St. Helena Island, SC

  • #2
    I haven't looked at the picture but a snaffle does not have shanks. A broken mouth piece doesn't make a snaffle. A snaffle can be broken or solid but never uses leverage (shanks).
    You know why cowboys don't like Appaloosas?" - Answer: Because to train a horse, you have to be smarter than it is.

    Comment


    • #3
      I can't see the mouthpiece there.

      This is article has some pictures comparing different kinds:

      http://www.todayshorse.com/Articles/...thTomThumb.htm

      The writer (Mark Rashid) outlines why he doesn't like it (because it muddles clear signals to the horse, in large part), which I found interesting but haven't experienced and don't know enough about to comment on.

      Comment


      • #4
        I can't open the link but a TT has almost straight shanks, 6"'s, and about a 2" purchase. The mouthpiece is broken and could be steel or copper or inlaid. An argentine has a curve back right above the rein rings and a little loop for a slobber chain, if you wanted. It also has a snaffle rein ring, NOT for the curb chain (which too many people think that's what it's for...dumb clucks...).

        Anyway, back to the snaffle vs. curb thing. It depends on who you listen to about what is a snaffle and what is a curb. I grew up that if the mouthpiece is broken, it's a snaffle, shank or not. I have seen old bit books from the late 1800's-early 1900's that say it's a snaffle. A master bitmaker in Great Britain had a pamphlet out that said it was also a snaffle. Also, the Ranching Heritage Center at Texas Tech University in Lubbock, TX has (it was there as of about 9 yrs ago) an old book that calls this type of bit a snaffle. Also, someone once told me that C. Anderson calls it a snaffle. Numerous bit catalogs still call it a snaffle although I have noticed they have begun to change to plain old 'Tom Thumb'.

        Then about 20 yrs ago, I started hearing the shanked 'snaffle' wasn't a snaffle but a curb bit. Due to leverage. The snaffle works off of the lips, not so much the bars.

        I've found that people either really like the bit or absolutely hate it. Once a lady had a bunch of newbies on another horse site convinced that a TT just sitting in the horse mouth hurts them horrribly. Stoopid stuff like that.

        You'll find, I'm sure, that people are very opinionated about what is a snaffle and what is a curb. They can get VERY snotty about it too. This is one subject that people won't budge on.

        Okay, am going on here but it's one of my pet stories. Personally, I'm good with this bit.
        1.20.2013

        Comment


        • #5
          I read thru Rashid's piece and he has it wrong. A TT is for a WELL broke horse, NEVER for a colt or for training a youngster. He's right, in a colt it sends the wrong message but it's not a transition bit. That's why people have such trouble with this bit. It LOOKS like a training bit but it's not. For well-broke, loose reined, responsive horses ONLY.

          Neck reining is the WEIGHT of the rein of the rein against the horse's neck, never pulling the horse over. If you have to pull in indirect or direct pull, that's not neck reining, that's some sort of plow reinging, not neck reining.

          Hmmm, the more I read from his article, my estimation of him is going down...wow...not that I knew very much of him anyway but it would serve him to really learn what bits are for and how they work. Even his assessment of the full cheek and grazing bits...
          Last edited by Hip; Sep. 30, 2009, 10:13 PM. Reason: Forgot to add...
          1.20.2013

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Hip View Post
            I read thru Rashid's piece and he has it wrong. A TT is for a WELL broke horse, NEVER for a colt or for training a youngster. He's right, in a colt it sends the wrong message but it's not a transition bit. That's why people have such trouble with this bit. It LOOKS like a training bit but it's not. For well-broke, loose reined, responsive horses ONLY.
            .
            This is the complete opposite of what I have been taught and seen done by every reining/working cow/WP trainer I have been around.

            What style riding do you do that people are putting broke horses in a jointed curb instead of a more traditional bit?

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              try new link

              Alright, try this link: http://www.tractorsupply.com/equine/...se-bit-4007559

              This is the bit I'm talking about in the photo (that ppl seem unable to bring up, erg.).

              Anyway, re: snaffle, re: ppl's opinions. No kidding! Just trying to get a straight answer.

              Originally posted by Hip View Post
              I can't open the link but a TT has almost straight shanks, 6"'s, and about a 2" purchase. The mouthpiece is broken and could be steel or copper or inlaid. An argentine has a curve back right above the rein rings and a little loop for a slobber chain, if you wanted. It also has a snaffle rein ring, NOT for the curb chain (which too many people think that's what it's for...dumb clucks...).

              Anyway, back to the snaffle vs. curb thing. It depends on who you listen to about what is a snaffle and what is a curb. I grew up that if the mouthpiece is broken, it's a snaffle, shank or not. I have seen old bit books from the late 1800's-early 1900's that say it's a snaffle. A master bitmaker in Great Britain had a pamphlet out that said it was also a snaffle. Also, the Ranching Heritage Center at Texas Tech University in Lubbock, TX has (it was there as of about 9 yrs ago) an old book that calls this type of bit a snaffle. Also, someone once told me that C. Anderson calls it a snaffle. Numerous bit catalogs still call it a snaffle although I have noticed they have begun to change to plain old 'Tom Thumb'.

              Then about 20 yrs ago, I started hearing the shanked 'snaffle' wasn't a snaffle but a curb bit. Due to leverage. The snaffle works off of the lips, not so much the bars.

              I've found that people either really like the bit or absolutely hate it. Once a lady had a bunch of newbies on another horse site convinced that a TT just sitting in the horse mouth hurts them horrribly. Stoopid stuff like that.

              You'll find, I'm sure, that people are very opinionated about what is a snaffle and what is a curb. They can get VERY snotty about it too. This is one subject that people won't budge on.

              Okay, am going on here but it's one of my pet stories. Personally, I'm good with this bit.
              True Bearing Equestrian
              St. Helena Island, SC

              Comment


              • #8
                Yup, people's opinions. Just depends on your experience, how you were trained, where you grew up, etc. Really, it doesn't matter that much to me whether anyone here agrees with me or not. I'm giving my opinions, the same as the other posters.

                A TT can be used on ANY well broke horse. My horses HAVE to be able to go in almost any bit I hang in their mouths and do their job. I expect it of them so this includes any TT. The exception would be that a horse hasnt' been brought along to go in a spade or higher learning bit but is still well broke and has a good handle. You don't have to get into their mouths, they understand leg/weight/rein movements/etc. One ear back at you.

                A true bridle horse needs to be collected and hair-triggered. A TT or a grazing bit isn't going to cut it in the long run. Look at the ION cowboys, they have spades or at 'worst', half-breeds (not quite the training of a bridled horse, but part way, hence only 'half', still a great handle though). They wouldn't get caught dead with a TT on their horses. But in the general riding horse world, a well-broke saddle horse MUST be able to go with anything, including the TT. But it is NOT a colt bit. Matter of fact, I'm so surprised Rashid would say such a thing!!

                Also, just because a rider is a 'name' in the WP, reining or working cowhorse world, doesn't mean they know much more than the rest of us. I've worked with World Champ horse owners who could bluff and buy their way in.

                We are in a day and age now where any sort of info, due to the internet and things, can be distributed by anyone and will be believed by anyone. Example: Just check out the latest Equus mag, an author of an article stated that a bucking horse was 16.5h. There's no such thing as .5h. A hand is 4 inches, period. Goes back 3,000 years starting with the Egyptians and was later standardized. But this author is putting out wrong info and now people will pick up on it and soon we'll have a discussion on how to properly measure a horse. So a mag like Equus let this out...
                1.20.2013

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Hip View Post

                  Neck reining is the WEIGHT of the rein of the rein against the horse's neck, never pulling the horse over.
                  We might just be splitting hairs on the semantics, but for mine, neck reining is pretty much just the touch of the rein on the neck (accompanied with appropriate leg cues, though mine neck rein on autopilot too).

                  In my lexicon, the Tom Thumb is a curb bit with a jointed mouthpiece. I've used 'em, and pelhams with jointed mouth pieces, and kimberwicks with jointed mouthpieces, for decades (among many other bits, I really ought to inventory my collection one of these years)- foxhunting, reining, and many other things. For some horses, just the ticket. It's not the bit, it's the hands.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by LuvMyNSH View Post
                    What style riding do you do that people are putting broke horses in a jointed curb instead of a more traditional bit?
                    What style riding? Any style. In my experience- some horses just like 'em better. I tend to go with what the horse likes.

                    I've hunted several different horses in a jointed pelham- really, just rode on the snaffle rein most of the time, used the curb rein only when needed for little corrections or really fast stops.

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      The guy I worked for I respected tremendously. I'm really going off of his recommendations, b/c as someone mentioned, the proof is in the hands and the individual horse. I personally love the way my horses have gone in what I *think* would be termed a Tom Thumb.

                      What I'm really trying to get at here is whether the bit in the photo of the link IS a Tom Thumb.
                      True Bearing Equestrian
                      St. Helena Island, SC

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Spirit, that is what I think of when I say Tom Thumb.
                        bar.ka think u al.l. susp.ect
                        free bar.ka and tidy rabbit

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by spirithorse22 View Post
                          What I'm really trying to get at here is whether the bit in the photo of the link IS a Tom Thumb.
                          Interesting question...I would say not. Back in the day, the Tom Thumb had shorter shanks (hence use of the term Tom Thumb). The one you posted had a 6.5 inch shank. This one is a little shorter, 6 inch shank, which is more like what I think of in terms of proportions of the bit.

                          http://www.rods.com/Reinsman-one-hal...-Bit,4965.html

                          To put it another way, maybe: I'm looking at a picture of me from about 1969 showing a mare in a Quick Bit with a jointed mouthpiece- the shanks extend at least an inch below the horse's lips. A Tom Thumb's shanks end above the horse's lips. Does that make sense?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Hip View Post
                            But it is NOT a colt bit. Matter of fact, I'm so surprised Rashid would say such a thing!!

                            :
                            I didn't understand Rashid to say that. He said (to my understanding) that it was designed to be a transitional bit but was not a good choice for that purpose.

                            He said:
                            The Tom Thumb snaffle was originally designed as a transition bit that was to be used in Western training. When a green horse was far enough along that perhaps a training snaffle was no longer necessary, but not far enough along to be moved into a curb bit, the Tom Thumb would be used. This would be great, if in fact, it made the transition simple and easy. Unfortunately, it doesn't. The truth of the matter is that, due to its design, it could possibly be considered one of the worst bits that somebody could use at a highly critical time in a young horse's training.
                            You know why cowboys don't like Appaloosas?" - Answer: Because to train a horse, you have to be smarter than it is.

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Beverley View Post
                              Interesting question...I would say not. Back in the day, the Tom Thumb had shorter shanks (hence use of the term Tom Thumb). The one you posted had a 6.5 inch shank. This one is a little shorter, 6 inch shank, which is more like what I think of in terms of proportions of the bit.

                              http://www.rods.com/Reinsman-one-hal...-Bit,4965.html

                              To put it another way, maybe: I'm looking at a picture of me from about 1969 showing a mare in a Quick Bit with a jointed mouthpiece- the shanks extend at least an inch below the horse's lips. A Tom Thumb's shanks end above the horse's lips. Does that make sense?
                              You had me until the 'above the horse's lips'...you mean that the shanks, if put alongside the horse's muzzle, would match the length of the horse's lip but not go any further? I guess that threw me b/c I always think about shanks sweeping back towards the rider and not 'at' the horse's lips. BUT they aren't actually *below* the lip. *sigh* I think I just confused myself!

                              Thanks for answering my post though! Same as you, Ruby. And everyone else too, of course! I'm always interested in learning theory-something I'm sorely lacking when it comes to western context.

                              As a matter of fact, are you looking for the same fit with these bits as you are w/ english bits? I assume so, no one has told me different so far. And typically when I ask a question, I'm told that I will learn it on my own. Since I'm used to micromanagement from my english coaches, this approach leaves me a bit anxious sometimes.
                              Bit fit: 2 wrinkles, doesn't pinch/sit too high/too low, curb chain w/ two fingers between chain and chin?
                              True Bearing Equestrian
                              St. Helena Island, SC

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by Beverley View Post
                                What style riding? Any style. In my experience- some horses just like 'em better. I tend to go with what the horse likes.
                                Arrgh, not even close to what I meant.

                                I have always seen a jointed curb used a baby/transition bit. It is made as such, marketed as such, and overwhelmingly used as such.

                                I want to know what style uses a jointed curb as a bit for finished horses only, because I have never heard of such a thing.

                                You might keep a horse in it if they like it, but to say that using it on a green horse is 100% wrong...just seems backward. Sort of like if someone stepped forward and said that a double bridle was for starting green horses only.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by spirithorse22 View Post
                                  Bit fit: 2 wrinkles, doesn't pinch/sit too high/too low, curb chain w/ two fingers between chain and chin?
                                  Here is a little something else people differ on.
                                  Two wrinkles isn't ALWAYS right for EVERY horse! Mouths are different so fit the bit to the mouth. My special lady would be miserable with two wrinkles, one is fine for her thank you.

                                  Curb chain...when I use a kimberwick on my mare I keep the chain so loose it has no effect at all...not needed. But on other horses I have used the two finger measure as they needed it but would never go tighter than that.
                                  You know why cowboys don't like Appaloosas?" - Answer: Because to train a horse, you have to be smarter than it is.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I think I'm late to the party but the link I was able to open shows the bit that came with the bridle that came with the horse (whew!) back in 1971. The whole length of the bit was about 6 and a half inches, so the actual shanks were maybe 3 and a half, four inches, it had a jointed mouth and I used a curb strap. Tom Thumb was what it was called.
                                    Last edited by ReSomething; Oct. 1, 2009, 10:50 AM. Reason: misread a sentence about bits for finished horses
                                    Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
                                    Incredible Invisible

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by pj View Post
                                      I didn't understand Rashid to say that. He said (to my understanding) that it was designed to be a transitional bit but was not a good choice for that purpose.

                                      He said:
                                      The Tom Thumb snaffle was originally designed as a transition bit that was to be used in Western training. When a green horse was far enough along that perhaps a training snaffle was no longer necessary, but not far enough along to be moved into a curb bit, the Tom Thumb would be used. This would be great, if in fact, it made the transition simple and easy. Unfortunately, it doesn't. The truth of the matter is that, due to its design, it could possibly be considered one of the worst bits that somebody could use at a highly critical time in a young horse's training.
                                      That's what I thought, too - he meant: "some people and the designer of it think of it as a transition bit, but it's not really good for that, or much else."

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by spirithorse22 View Post
                                        You had me until the 'above the horse's lips'...you mean that the shanks, if put alongside the horse's muzzle, would match the length of the horse's lip but not go any further? I guess that threw me b/c I always think about shanks sweeping back towards the rider and not 'at' the horse's lips. BUT they aren't actually *below* the lip. *sigh* I think I just confused myself!
                                        Purchase: From the mouthpiece 'up' to where the bridle attaches
                                        Shank: from the mouthpiece 'down' to where the reins attach.

                                        Does that help?

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X