• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Talk to me About Tucker Saddles and Other English style Endurance/Trail Saddles

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Talk to me About Tucker Saddles and Other English style Endurance/Trail Saddles

    My husband and I are really doing a lot more riding and camping with our horses. I had forgotten how much fun it is after a long break from it! We just got back from the Uwharrie National Forest a few days ago and are already planning our next outing!

    Anyway, my old Wintec AP is KILLING my bottom. After a few miles in that thing walking, I was nearly crying. I managed to get through two days of riding but I'm still sore. It also has no way to attach saddlebags, etc...

    I much prefer english type saddles...I don't like horns..I just get hung up on them. I had someone show me a used Tucker Equitation saddle that he had for sale and it was intriguing. I was not able to ride in it but did sit in it and I felt it was too large for me. My thigh did not reach the knee roll..and it was a 17 inch more or less. I'm petite. I like the idea of the saddle though but wonder how they are to ride in in practice.

    Tucker saddles seem expensive and seem to hold their value. I've been watching Ebay and am surprised at how much even the used ones go for. I'm curious if they are "all that" or mainly hype?

    I'd also appreciate budget conscious suggestions for a trail/endurance type saddle if anyone knows of any. I looked up an old thread and tried to look up Thorowgoods but could not find any Endurance models. I really would rather find something more suited to long distance riding than just another all purpose style of saddle for my horse's comfort.

    I'm not opposed to treeless...I own a Fhoenix dressage saddle I love...but that saddle is way to straight in the flap for long trail rides and the thigh block makes it hard to get your leg in front of you for steep downhills. I found that out on our last ride on a Snowy River kind of slope.

    Anyway, thanks for any help!

  • #2
    I love my Sensation Hybrid treeless saddle. It is secure, stable and absolutely the most comfortable saddle ever. I demoed and purchased mine from www.freedomtreeless.com. If you prefer a more forward, shorter flap rather than the dressagle flap you can get it made with the shorter, more forward english trail flap. These saddles are highly customizable to suit any individual. They also make english trail, dressage trail, jumping and western type saddles. All of them are super secure and comfortable.
    "My biggest fear is that when I die my husband is going to try to sell all my horses and tack for what I told him they cost."


    • #3
      I had a Tucker Montreal Trooper Light that I loved and was very sad to have to sell it. I put a lot of miles on it though and it held up beautifully and fit the horses I had at the time well.
      I currently have an Ortho-flex dressage and an Ortho-flex Patriot that I really like- both are very comfy but the mare that I currently ride the most is not thrilled with the Ortho-flex. This weekend I purchased a Black Forest Aspen treeless that should be here soon so I can give a review of that once I get to ride in it some.
      "As soon as you're born you start dyin'
      So you might as well have a good time"


      • #4
        I rode in a Tucker once and it was very comfortable, but to me it seemed like it didn't sit you quite right. It seemed to pitch me forward a little because of how padded the seat was.


        • #5
          speaking of Snowy River, you might like an Aussie stock saddle....


          • #6
            Tuckers are nice. I don't own one, but I've ridden several.

            I ride in either my Stubben Aramis (a dressage model) or my Siegfried II (a close contact model). I do endurance rides in the dressage saddle. It obviously has a straight flap, but has minimal blocks and is really comfy to ride in for a long time. I can get out of the saddle enough to pop over small logs if I need to.


            • #7
              I don't like to ride in those heavier saddles, too much bulk for me and I don't really consider them English saddles. Have you thought about a dressage saddle? You could get a very comfy used one easily. I also always use a thick sheepskin seat cover.
              Life doesn't have perfect footing.

              Bloggily entertain yourself with our adventures (and disasters):
              We Are Flying Solo


              • Original Poster

                Thanks for all the replies. I already have a dressage saddle and I don't like it for longer rides nor for the thick thigh block. I tried taking out the block and my leg just swung around. :-\ The AP was nice in that I felt very secure but it chafed the heck out of you know where...

                I've never ridden in an Aussie saddle. It might be worth trying but the thigh block looks restrictive.

                Glad to hear some decent reports on Tuckers. They do seem a bit heavy don't they?

                I'll check out some of the suggestions you all made! Thanks!


                • Original Poster

                  Do those Sensation Treeless saddles have a gullet?


                  • #10
                    I just love my Solstice made by Arabian Saddle Co.


                    My horse, not an arabian, is sort of flat backed, low withered, wide, short.

                    It seems to fit her well, and I understand it is easy to adjust if there are problems. It is very comfortable for me.

                    I got mine used off the endurance.net board. It was about 10 yrs old. They really hold their value, so I know I can easily resell it if it doesn't work out.
                    There is no snooze button on a cat that wants breakfast.


                    • #11
                      I do the camping/trailriding thing, too. I looked into saddles this spring for a new one.

                      Tuckers are made by Circle Y, and yes, they are very good quality.

                      I ended up with a High Horse saddle - also made by Circle Y. They are basically the economy line for Circle Y, but they are not lacking in quality, just the fancies. I got a 'hybrid', the fenders, and skirts are cordura, the seat, cantle and jockeys are leather. I LOVE my saddle. It has the flex tree, and because it's not all leather, it only weighs 20 lbs.

                      If I were you, I'd take a look at the High Horse saddles. They have just about every style you could want, with much more reasonable prices.

                      I've put 400 miles on my saddle this year, and it's held up and then some.


                      • #12
                        I ride a Stubben Scout (police/military saddle). Very comfortable, lots of D-rings.

                        Sometimes you'll find an M1936 Phillips Officer's Saddle available. I've tried them and and they don't work as well for me. You might find them quite comfortable.

                        I've seen some German Armeesattles from time to time. There are a number of variations on these (from both the German and Swiss military). Lots of folks like them. Very popular in Europe.

                        The McClellan is the choice of many. It was designed to carry a trooper and 60 pounds of gear, weapons, etc. I find them uncomfortable, but many like them. There are a number variants from M1859 to M1928 with sub-varients, too. The enlisted models had a very hard seat, the officer versions often had padded seats.

                        Two of my favorites for exploration would be the Grimsley Dragoon Saddle (predecessor of the Mac; very comfortable, deep seat, good carrying capacity). The other would be a Whitman military (almost selected as the Mac successor in the late 1880s; not done as there were so many Mac trees in storage).

                        The Tucker is a modern variation of the British Universal Pattern (UP) saddles, first used in about 1795. There is a current version used today with some of the Royal ceremonial horse units. It's a "suspended seat" which gets you up off the horse's back (a Good Thing) but it's not very "close contact" (for some folks, a Bad Thing). It excellent for hanging stuff on.

                        I've tried Aussies before and they just don't fit me.

                        I've made my views on "treeless" know before (I don't like them). For camping saddles they would be even worse than for just riding as you're going to be carrying lots of other stuff with no solid foundation. 'Nuff said, I suppose.

                        Some endurance saddle models can do well, as long as they are substantial enough to handle camping gear, bed role, etc. as well as the rider.

                        There are a lot of choices out there. This might give you some more ideas:


                        Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão


                        • #13
                          I HATED the western Tucker trail saddle that I had. Talk about uncomfortable! It fit my horse really well, but that saddle about killed me. I had the Gen I High Plains model. I hated how the seat sat so high off the horse. Not a close contact seat...and after being a predominantly english rider I found the Tucker to feel awkward and bulky. But the biggest issue was that it really hurt me after about 30 minutes of riding...therefore, I got rid of it!!


                          • #14
                            Treeless!!!!! There isn't a treed saddle on the planet that I can ride in for any length of time without being in agony. I have fibromyalgia and have found that I've become extremely sensitive to anything the tiniest bit uncomfortable. But I can do 50 mile endurance rides in my Bob Marshall and barely felt like I rode at all.


                            • #15
                              A friend of mine does competitive endurance and loves her synergist. Real nice quality saddle.

                              Another very good friend has a big horn endurance and might chime in here.

                              Said good friend also has a really cool saddle that her husband rides that I can't remember the name...

                              My daughter (and said good friend) also have abetta endurance saddles. My daughter struggles with the fenders on hers but she's quite short and that seems to be a short person problem on nearly every saddle. I can't say I'm super thrilled with the saddle but it was worth the price for a 10 year old kid.

                              I ride a BMSS treeless which I like real well on some fronts and do not like on other fronts. I'd proceed with caution with a treeless. It depends a lot on your build, your horse's build, and where you're both comfortable.
                              “Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.” Stephen R. Covey


                              • #16
                                I have two Tucker Trail endurance saddles kind of hybrid English/Western/Aussie looking. I am a very small person that rides a very tall horse. These Tuckers only weigh 26 pounds, I know the western versions are REALLY heavy. Weight was a factor in my purchase. My Tucker seat is a 16.5 and I can ride in a 14 inch Western comfortably.

                                I am a former Saddle seat rider and this is the saddle I chose. They will give you more of a chair seat considering the position of the stirrup bars. They are made for comfort in trail riding. Oh and the gel seat is marvelous.

                                Do try one out before you buy, some people don't like them.


                                • #17
                                  Hastilo's in PA sell the Thorowgood Jill Thomas endurance saddles. I have one and love it. Have ridden over 5 hours in it.


                                  • #18
                                    Hello, good friend CBM

                                    I had a Tucker River Plantation I loved- but it encouraged a chair seat so if that bugs you, then it'll bug you. I rode miles and miles and miles in rugged Montana wilderness on a little Arabian mare of CBMs and it fit us both like a dream. You are 'off' the horse in the seat but close through the legs...not like sitting in a western saddle with a lot of bulk under your thigh. No horn, just a pit of a peak and open between seat and gullet so you can hang stuff off of it. I sold it b/c I just didn't need it. Well made, soft leather, not really heavy. Any of their Western saddles are heavy as Hades.


                                    I have a no name from Ider, Alabama that lives at CBMs house- once a year I ride the Hell out of it and it's really comfortable. Low cantle so it's easy to get out of - for long rides many prefer a higher/steeper cantle for lower back support. I think Valley Saddlery made it, it's not a Big Horn. Do I have a Big Horn endurance? LOL too many saddles!


                                    The Abetta is a workhorse but you get what you pay for- you don't mind tearing it up but the thing I dislike about them in general is they do not break in and mold to your shape like a western leather saddle would.


                                    • #19
                                      Huh, I thought this one was a Big Horn but it must not be! LOL Too cold out there this morning to go investigate before posting, obviously!
                                      “Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.” Stephen R. Covey


                                      • #20
                                        I have a Tucker (the Cheyenne, a western style w/horn) that I really like. It's not one of the newer ones, and from what I've seen, the newer ones aren't nearly as nice as when they were made by Tucker themselves. When I got mine, I had to order it directly from Tucker in Tennessee. Fantastic workmanship and quality leather. The newer ones I've seen on eBay and in person don't impress me much, and I think they're way overpriced now.

                                        That said, while I do love my Tucker (which only weighs around 25 lbs), it doesn't give me the great seat that my vintage Circle Y did (which became hubby's saddle). But it's a trade-off I can live with to avoid hefting that iron-weight Circle Y. It's a monster to lift.

                                        Interesting about Circle Y now making the Tuckers, but not surprising that I don't like the newer Tuckers since I don't much care for the newer Circle Y's either. IMO, older is better in both cases.

                                        For an english-style trail saddle, I had a Miller Collegiate Marathon (which can be found for sale on eBay for around $400-500) that I really liked. Unfortunately I had to sell it a few years ago when I needed the money and couldn't part with my Tucker.
                                        Equus Keepus Brokus