• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

proposed rule changes -#1

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • proposed rule changes -#1

    Here are 2 proposed rule changes for dressage suggested by the USEF dressage committee:

    #1. << Effective Dec 1, 2009, riders at Third Level and above must be eligible according to qualification criteria established by the Federation's dressage committee.>>


    My dubiousness comes from allowing the committee to decide on the criteria with NO input /NO voting from members.

    Who is going to be in charge of the databank (ie who is paying for) that keeps track os scores etc? This will affect every 2nd level rider in the US who competes at recognized competitions.

    Who is getting to decide who gets grandfathered in?

    Perhaps they could at least let us in on their decisions as to what scores will be necessary.
    one oak, lots of canyons

    http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

  • #2
    Their current database is a piece of crap. And now they want to add qualifying criteria to it????? Good luck moving up to 3rd!
    Tranquility Farm - Proud breeder of Born in the USA Sport Horses, and Cob-sized Warmbloods
    Now apparently completely invisible!

    Comment


    • #3
      Gotta love it. Ya have to cough up $$ every year to be the member of an organization that makes decisions without a single vote from the membership.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Tiki View Post
        Their current database is a piece of crap. And now they want to add qualifying criteria to it????? Good luck moving up to 3rd!
        I agree. There is so much wrong with the collected data that its seems hard to control anything!
        www.spindletopfarm.net
        Home of Puerto D'Azur - 1998 NA 100 Day Test Champion
        "Charcter is much easier kept than recovered"

        Comment


        • #5
          If they implemented it at Fourth Level, instead of Third Level, they could just use the Bronze medal for qualification, and not have to worry with a bunch of extra record keeping and data collection. The Bronze medal is pretty straightforward and easy to understand.
          River Oaks Farm - home of the Elite Book Friesian Sporthorse Grand Prix dressage stallion Lexington - sire of four consecutive FSA National Inspection Champions. Endorsing the FSA.

          Comment


          • #6
            but getting that medal means you must compete a LOT (to me!) so that would shut out those with limited fund. hmmmmm.

            So basically they want to make dressage riders meet criteria from 3rd level and above? that shuts out most adult amateurs in America anyway. good luck getting to 2nd with the level of instruction available.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by canyonoak View Post
              #1. << Effective Dec 1, 2009, riders at Third Level and above must be eligible according to qualification criteria established by the Federation's dressage committee.>>
              Who is going to be in charge of the databank (ie who is paying for) that keeps track os scores etc?
              So TPTB don't have a problem spending the $$$ to establish a data bank to keep track of 2nd Level scores...

              But establishing a data bank to link pedigree + performance is too costly and labor intensive?

              I guess they are looking at what benefits the organization short term...rather than the long term benefit of establishing a data base that will help advance the breeding of American bred performance horses.

              Comment


              • #8
                I forsee very small classes above second level. Heck, they are small now, they will be miniscule in the future. I especially love that they still haven't decided what the qualifications will be. Just the straw that may keep paying members from being paying members.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by feisomeday View Post
                  but getting that medal means you must compete a LOT (to me!) so that would shut out those with limited fund. hmmmmm.
                  Not really, just 6 scores. For most people doing 1 level per year, that's 1 or 2 shows per year.
                  "You become responsible, forever, for what you have tamed." - The Little Prince

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by RiverOaksFarm View Post
                    If they implemented it at Fourth Level, instead of Third Level, they could just use the Bronze medal for qualification, and not have to worry with a bunch of extra record keeping and data collection. The Bronze medal is pretty straightforward and easy to understand.
                    Great idea with minimum expense and human power involved!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I don't get it. If you're willing to pay the fees and show at whatever level and possibly make a fool of yourself, who cares?
                      So, if I decided I didn't care about showing at lower levels (true), but might want to show 4th or PSG one day---I'd have to spend lots of time and $$ to show at lower levels first??? Sure makes me want to renew my membership...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by retrofit View Post
                        Not really, just 6 scores. For most people doing 1 level per year, that's 1 or 2 shows per year.
                        That's assuming one gets a qualifying score each and every ride.
                        Donald Trump - proven liar, cheat, traitor and sexual predator! Hillary Clinton won in 2016, but we have all lost.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          perhaps they should amend the proposal to exclude the amatuers rather than eroding the base of support in the usdf/usef
                          Nothing says "I love you" like a tractor. (Clydejumper)

                          The reports states, “Elizabeth reported that she accidently put down this pony, ........, at the show.”

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            That's how they do it in Holland, you have to get a 55% to get 1 point, (60 for 2 and 65 for 3 I believe
                            ) by 10 points you can move up to the next level. (Used to be 5)
                            I think it will be good for the sport, as you can't just go buy a GP horse and do a PSG test.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              well yes, in Holland the top rider is a major celebrity - she's on the news for goodness sake - here, you have to explain to 99.9999999% of the public what "dressage" is
                              Nothing says "I love you" like a tractor. (Clydejumper)

                              The reports states, “Elizabeth reported that she accidently put down this pony, ........, at the show.”

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Has nothing to do with Anky, having to be able to get decent scores to move up just means people won't fool themselves and overask their horses. If you have 10 points, at least the judge thinks you can handle the next level.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by AndalusianMom View Post
                                  I don't get it. If you're willing to pay the fees and show at whatever level and possibly make a fool of yourself, who cares?
                                  So, if I decided I didn't care about showing at lower levels (true), but might want to show 4th or PSG one day---I'd have to spend lots of time and $$ to show at lower levels first??? Sure makes me want to renew my membership...
                                  I agree.

                                  Plus, even if you have a rider qualify under their rules, that doesn't mean that the judges won't be shocked by a particular horse/rider pair.
                                  If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    It’s not about the riders, but about correct training and wellbeing of horses. If riders have a hard time cracking 55% - it's too hard for a horse to do this level.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      In that case these "qualifications" should be based on Horse/Rider teams?
                                      So Debbie McDonald would have to re-qualify each horse up the levels, just like Jane Doe?
                                      She would not be able to bring a horse out at PSG?
                                      ... _. ._ .._. .._

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Stupid idea, IMO. You don't raise the level of competency when you start in the middle of the pack. And, as others have said, that's a whole new database for USDF to screw up. Niiiiiice.

                                        Why not just raise the qualifying scores for championships to something realistic? Or, make a rider have to "win out" of a level, as the hunters have to "win out" of some of their classes? Or, have a limit as to how many years one can be at the same level? I agree that something needs to be done to get the average rider to be more correct, but this isn't the way to go about it.

                                        JMO.
                                        In loving memory of Laura Jahnke.
                                        A life lived by example, done too soon.
                                        www.caringbridge.org/page/laurajahnke/

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X