• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Dressage Radio interviews McDonald and Peters

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dressage Radio interviews McDonald and Peters

    http://dressageradio.horseradionetwo...ters-joins-us/

  • #2
    way to go debbie!

    great interviews, interesting idea.... and 24 other shows to listen too.

    (and they will be doing an upcoming show with a panel of experts on "the" hot topic- which will be interesting)

    Comment


    • #3
      Very interesting stuff!

      Debbie McDonald made it very clear where she stands on the issue and put the blame exactly where I put it -- on the judges. She also said "it's far overdue!" (a discussion on RK).

      Steffen was more diplomatic -- but I thought it was interesting when he said "I would have to educate myself further on the biomechanics to find out the reason to use it....but it's certainly something I want to stay away from."

      Like he can't figure out WHY the riders need to resort to this "tool."

      I'm like you mbm -- now I have to find time to listen to the other shows!

      Comment


      • #4
        His comments on whether his style of teaching would be accepted there, referring to giving riders options to make decisions, rather than just do what teacher/trainer tells them.

        I love that--that idea that the rider needs to understand why they are doing something and be educated in the decision-making.

        Trust our own standards
        regarding how the horse feels to the rider, supple and adjustable, vs doing the movement for showing.
        Ring the bells that still can ring
        Forget your perfect offering
        There is a crack in everything
        That's how the light gets in.

        Comment


        • #5
          It was a really good interview in all. Debbie's comments were very different from Peter's, though. He was more circumspect.

          In context, the statements about asking questions/getting options seems to refer specifically to questioning hyperflexion.

          It's not hard at all to view hyperflexion as a quick fix, But that's very much not how proponents see it - to them, it does something no other technique does, and is not substitutable and is not optional.

          It's very interesting to hear someone of Peter's stature say he doesn't understand the technique. This guy isn't some tree hugger off in the boonies. He's right in the middle of things, and I'm sure he's ridden plenty of horses trained that way, in the course of training, buying, selling, teaching.

          The best part of it is that he's scoring at the top of the elite dressage world without using hyperflexion. Clearly, he has a method that works very, very well, without using it.

          Would questioning a trainer work? From my experience? No. It would not work. Not with most dressage trainers. Most of them get very angry if they are even questioned.

          About hyperflexion? I think once you question a trainer that fundamentally, you are on your way out the door, one way or another. I don't find most trainers, American or European origin or trained, all that flexible about students wanting to try a different method. Sometimes there is a very good reason for doing something a certain way, sometimes not.

          I've been told to do a number of things that made me very uncomfortable. Why uncomfortable? Either because I didn't have enough experience to understand it, because I thought they were quick fixes, just incorrect fixes, or traditional but too forceful or rushed - there didn't really seem to be any way to negotiate other than quietly leave.

          Some time ago I spoke to a trainer I was interested in working with. I found the trainer was very into hyperflexion. I wanted to see if she would be open to working with someone who was unwilling doing that. I described my horse's and my issues and she just kept insisting that hyperflexion was exactly what was called for, and 'You'll love it' every time I asked any questions or expressed any doubt.

          So I asked HER trainer, who had a lot more experience competing, at bigger venues, at higher levels, than the first trainer.

          To my surprise, her trainer had a very different take on it. Not only was this not the best choice for this particular situation, it was a BAD choice and the WRONG choice.

          All a person can do is just follow their conscience.

          Comment


          • #6
            Steffen is most likely more 'diplomatic' than Debbie b/c he's still actively competing!!! Can't afford to alienate the judges, especially when he's aboard the current top horse.

            He can say, too, that riders need to develop their own styles, but he comes from a world of upper level riders, most of them experienced, and on horses suited for the sport and upper-level work. These students are already well-versed (or at least appear to be) in the basics of connection, fwdness, and throughness. But, in fairness, I'm not quite sure in what context he made this statement or in response to what question.

            It comes from my own experience of watching some very rich, overmounted (as in, the horse was way more talented than the rider, but the rider had no idea) 'riders' who ride in front of uber-ULRs, and b/c their stirrups are long, they think of themselves as dressage riders. THESE riders are not ready for free-thinking approaches. That's like inviting a kid who's just mastered long division to come to a master class in pure mathematics.

            I also think Steffen is a really beautiful rider. He is one of my favorites in the dressage world.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by slc2 View Post
              It was a really good interview in all. Debbie's comments were very different from Peter's, though. He was more circumspect.

              In context, the statements about asking questions/getting options seems to refer specifically to questioning hyperflexion.

              It's not hard at all to view hyperflexion as a quick fix, But that's very much not how proponents see it - to them, it does something no other technique does, and is not substitutable and is not optional.

              It's very interesting to hear someone of Peter's stature say he doesn't understand the technique.
              No, that's NOT what he said. He said he "...didn't understand why you would have to use this technique."

              Very different content.

              I don't care what sort of Pablum the crank & spank (C&S) school is trying to feed the public, I think it's obvious to most fairly educated eyes that RK is mainly used for control & to effect "submission" (and I loved SP's comment about not really even liking the word "submission" -- that he preferred "cooperation"). The contact is so extreme, the horse's expression is so trapped & fearful.

              As for using it to "supple" a horse: I saw a tape of Davignon as a younger horse -- he was about 6 at the time I think. His rider put him in a hyperflexed position -- his neck was totally curled so his chin was against his chest.

              After riding a stride or two in that position, the rider threw away the reins -- literally let them go and rode on the buckle for the next 3-4 strides.

              Davignon kept his head in that position the whole time while he kept merrily going forward. Then the rider patted him on the neck, and D. brought his head back to a "normal" position.

              They did this several times, and D. was very consistant in his response.

              THAT I find no objection to -- it shows you are "suppling" the horse, but the horse is a willing participant.

              Peter obviously feels that you can get a horse flexible without it, and judging from his riding I must concur.

              Yes, Debbie was much more forth right in her statements -- she is retired from competition so she can say "screw 'em".

              I don't think SP was "circumspect" so much as he was being diplomatic...after all, he is still competing & after his contribution to the GDF, maybe he figures he can affect change in more subtle ways...

              Anyway, I'm just really glad to see that top riders are now coming out against RK as well....if you can't "supple" your horse without it or need it to control your horse's "brilliance" then you need to find another horse or another sport, 'cause what you are riding sure isn't dressage....

              Now, if they can just get the judges glasses so they can read the actual FEI standards, we'd be all set...

              Will be curious to see where all of this goes...

              Comment

              Working...
              X