• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Edward Gal clinic- can anyone translate a bit?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Edward Gal clinic- can anyone translate a bit?

    I was watching this Edward Gal clinic video, and was wondering what he was saying as he put more and more loft into Totilas' trot steps.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7itK8W6J4E

  • #2
    look how he leans back a bit past the vertical to sit the trot. Totilas seemed to shift his weight back too.
    Literature is mostly about having sex and not much about having children. Life is the other way round.
    David Lodge

    Comment


    • #3
      Watching this makes me understand what hyperflexion is. Check out 2:30 to 2:50, and around 4:50 on. That is pretty extreme, but it does get results. Should Totilas' neck be sweating like that? When Edward is wearing a jacket?
      2012 goal: learn to ride like a Barn Rat

      A helmet saved my life.

      Comment


      • #4
        You're kidding, right?
        Let me look for an analogy...... You've just run a couple of miles - should your back really be that sweaty?
        Siegi Belz
        www.stalleuropa.com
        2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
        Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by woodcat View Post
          look how he leans back a bit past the vertical to sit the trot. Totilas seemed to shift his weight back too.
          This is actually a very interesting technique that my trainer was teaching me. There is absolutely NO PULLING back on the reins and no digging you seat bones. Its rocking your weight back then the horse rocks back on his hocks. It's a rebalancing, not intended as immediate collection. Think of a tilt table, your just adjusting the weight transfer back a bit which eventually helps the horse to learn he can sit which in turn will help the ability to collect in the future.

          Weight distribution is something that we don't concentrate on enough I think. You ideally should be able to influence where the weight is at any given point in your ride. i.e Is that right hind taking enough weight or is the horse avoiding it and taking too much on the left. This is where you really realize if your horse is balanced and even.

          Comment


          • #6
            I've seen over many years, not just recently or 'with rollkur', but with some very, very classical folks, that using the weight, to a point, does help the horse balance and becomes an aid in collection.

            And, one has to remember that some of these riders are very light in weight and very slim, I think some of these folks have to make more of a position. A taller upper body or a soft flexible waist and lower back, can also have the effect of exaggerating the look of that change in position.

            In the past, from very classical trainers, old guard German, statements like, 'women can't do pirouettes because they don't have enough weight to shift back in the saddle'....despite how that sounds, it does bring out the point that shifts of weight are used and they do assist higher degrees of collection.

            Comment


            • #7
              I wish two things- 1. that I understood what he was saying 2. that I could sit the horse one 1/000 as well as he does, his seat is totally with the horse, and he talks thru the whole thing! I get short of breath after 2 min of sitting trot

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #8
                But see how he goes into HF, then out again, then Totilas starts with that big shoulder movement? I'm dying to know what EG says at that point.

                Comment


                • #9
                  What does HF mean?

                  Edward seems to have that same extremely long thigh like Anky van G, and like her tends to put his lower leg forward at times. It's really interesting watching him the way he positions himself given his own 'conformation' - he puts his lower leg rather forward, it seems, whenever he is not actively giving a specific aid with the leg, and the horse goes by himself the rest of the time (the lower leg forward seems to be kind of an aid itself).

                  The coolest thing is to see he never, EVER punishes that horse for going forward. Horse breaks to a gallop and goes flying across the diagonal...no problemo. Maybe that's why he can put his leg like that.

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    Hyperflexion. I was trying not to use the "r" word

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      That is just how they use hyperflexion. They loosen up the back and shoulder/neck by using it, then put the horse in a more classical posture and go forward. Trainers who don't use hyperflexion usually supple the horse using some other method, then also send the horse.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        as far as i understand, and it isnt far, when you put a horse in rollkur, or way over flex them - the muscle that gets affected the most is the upper front leg/shoulder (sorry don't know the names) . this creates more ability to have a "free" shoulder - this is why you see the horse being able to be more expressive up front.

                        while it doens't appear to be discussed much, this seems to me to be the 2nd most important idea behind the concept, the first being to teach the horse to go "in any frame the rider asks" ie" "put the neck anywhere" .. which of course sounds good on paper, but the horse uses it's neck to balance. so Rollkur, teaches the horse how to go without using its neck, which allows the rider more control, more precision and which is why so many rollkur'd horses appear to have necks of stone

                        before any jumps all over me - just go do some research before doing that, k?

                        as for the clinic - it would be very interesting to understand what he is saying.... while i totally disagree with rollkur, there are some aspects of his riding that i do appreciate and it would be interesting to hear what he has to say.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I don't think the primary or first goal actually is to achieve 'the ability to put the horse in any position'. I think you're wrong there. And I have researched it. A lot. From both sides, pro and con.

                          I think the main idea of rollkur is to supple horses' muscles. Whether you agree or not, or like it or not, or think it can DO that or not...that's still the main idea of it.

                          Most opponents say it DOESN'T supple horses. They say it makes the horse stiffer. In fact, the most strong opponents say it affects every single characteristic or attribute of dressage that exist, in a negative way. It puts the horse on the forehand, behind the bit, stiffens the back and neck, causes an artificial carriage, destroys the horse's will, violates classical principles, ,and a bunch of other stuff I can't think of right now.

                          And I think that's why they think people do it - just to subjugate the horse or to prove they can position the horse; that is just another part of the opponent position.

                          Rollkur is abusive and brutal, so the person CAN'T be doing it to supple the horse, but to subjugate it, in fact, they have to be, because that's how those people think - they want to abuse and subjugate their horses. They want to win, they don't care how the horse feels, and they'll do anything to win, especially abuse their horse. The judges pin them because the judges can't tell the difference or don't care or have been corrupted by you-scratch-my-back type deals on selling horses etc.

                          In other words, to maintain the strong opponent position, one has to maintain that rollkur doesn't supple horses. If it suppled horses, it would have a usefulness and a purpose other than subjugating the horse, causing it pain and abusing it. That's not a part of the stronger opponent position. The other part is degrading the character of the riders and the judges who 'permit' it and reward the riders. Those are both VERY important parts of the stronger opponent position.

                          I've talked to and watched alot of people use this, and they never say they are doing it 'to prove they can put the horse in different positions'. That is what opponents say; it is not what proponents say.

                          It is done to supple the muscles. Proponents believe it supples muscles. Opponents do generally not. Proponents usually believe different positions ALL supple horses, in different ways. Opponents usually only believe that SOME positions supple horses, and that rollkur does not.

                          The video makes it rather clear that something pretty noticeable happens.

                          If opponents do recognize this effect, they usually maintain that it only increases the freedom of the forelegs, creating a defective gait in which the hind legs are dragging along behind with an action that does not match the forelegs.

                          Proponents will say that it affects the back as well, and allows the horse to have more freedom; the forelegs are given more freedom and lift because the self carriage and suppleness increases. The increased suppleness allows the hind quarters to take more weight, the self carriage to improve, and lightens the forehand. Opponents say it does the opposite - puts the horse on the forehand, reduces self carriage, etc.

                          In other words, opponents say one thing, and proponents say something else. What each group says follows fairly predictable lines. How much they impune the character of the opposite camp, and how many aspects they say rollkur affects, is a good measure of how polarized their position is.
                          Last edited by slc2; Sep. 7, 2009, 05:44 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            mbm - you obviously don't see the contradictions in your own posts.... You say that rollkur allows the rider to "put the neck anywhere" and end in the statement that "many rollkur'd horses appear to have necks of stone".

                            How can you have a neck of stone that can be put anywhere????? Or doesn't logic play a roll when it comes to rollkur?

                            I think Edward's clinic would be totally lost on you because you have already made up your mind that it's bad.

                            Just my opinion....
                            Siegi Belz
                            www.stalleuropa.com
                            2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
                            Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              hi seigi, i think you misread what i wrote.

                              i wrote "while it doens't appear to be discussed much, this seems to me to be the 2nd most important idea behind the concept, the first being to teach the horse to go "in any frame the rider asks" ie" "put the neck anywhere" .. which of course sounds good on paper, but the horse uses it's neck to balance. so Rollkur, teaches the horse how to go without using its neck, which allows the rider more control, more precision and which is why so many rollkur'd horses appear to have necks of stone"

                              so i am saying that the people that use rollkur will say they want to be able to put the neck anywhere, have the horse in any frame, and i say that this goes against the nature of the horse, who uses the neck to balance. the end result, in my view, is a neck like stone too short and too tight.

                              as for the rest - if the only thing he is talking about is rollkur, it would still be interesting to hear what he has to say about it......

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                why is it then, that the horse nods his head less and as his collection improves and becomes more correct, and why then is that the goal of the most classical, traditional trainers to see that 'balancing gesture' decrease and decrease?

                                The horse uses his neck for balance, then why do they say that?

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  there is a difference in the horse progressively becoming more and more balanced/collected so that he does not have to use his neck for balance, and a rider taking the neck usage away from the horse.

                                  eta: it would be like a gymnast learning to do the beam over time so that she uses her arms less and less to the point of rarely having to use them, but being able to if she needed too...

                                  and that same gymnast having to learn the beam with her arms tied behind her back.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    The video is 6:10 minutes long. The horse is put behind the vertical for a total of 44 seconds on separate occasions. I don't see how that amounts to taking away his neck usage. Also keep in mind that Totilas' stallion neck is none too long.

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by mbm View Post
                                      as far as i understand, and it isnt far, when you put a horse in rollkur, or way over flex them - the muscle that gets affected the most is the upper front leg/shoulder (sorry don't know the names) . this creates more ability to have a "free" shoulder - this is why you see the horse being able to be more expressive up front.
                                      This is what I had heard as well, and I was wondering whether he actually mentioned that, or discussed hyperflexion, in the clinic.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by alicen View Post
                                        The video is 6:10 minutes long. The horse is put behind the vertical for a total of 44 seconds on separate occasions. I don't see how that amounts to taking away his neck usage. Also keep in mind that Totilas' stallion neck is none too long.
                                        my comments were made in general and were not specific to the video.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X