• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

The New Bar: Better Breeding? Training? Riding?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The New Bar: Better Breeding? Training? Riding?

    Or better scoring by the judges?

    Astrid on EuroDressage poses some interesting questions. Discussion?

    I couldn't help but wonder that the concept "top horse" has to be redefined now. In the presence of such great horses as Totilas, Parzival and Mistral any other 72% scoring horse, for instance, looks "normal". To what has the dressage world come?

    Edward, Laura and Adelinde have stepped through star gate and entered a new era in dressage. These young talents have abdicated the old heroes and legends, who are now trying hard to catch up with them but a new league has arrived.. For some reason the words "Le Beaujolais Nouveau est arrivé" rings through my head.

    At the press conference a Dutch journalist tried to generate credit for the "Dutch school" as initiators and innovators of dressage. Somehow I was wondering to what extent this new trend has anything to do with "Dutch school," or the Dutch way of training.

    In my mind it is breeding that matters here and even more so getting the right horses in the right hands at the right time. How Dutch is Totilas with 50% of his genes being German (his sire is Trakehner Gribaldi). What about Parzival who has thoroughbred and Westfalian blood on the dam side through Ulft and Roemer?

    How Dutch is Laura Bechtolsheimer who has been trained in the most classical way imaginable.. And even Adelinde is not truly "Dutch school" as she is from the rural town Beilen in Drenthe and never got truly exposed to the notorious Dutch training system.

  • #2
    My hope is that this era of extreme movement doesn't have a trickle down effect in the ammatuer world. It's already hard enough for people with ordinary horses, nice moving but not extravagant, to get decent scores without perfect riding and submission.

    Frankly, the short necks on most of those horses, especially in the extended trots, is troubling. If I were Dutch, I wouldn't be proud of that.

    Comment


    • #3
      The question still to be answered is whether dressage is a "test of obedience" or a "1000-lb poodle show?"

      In dog show analogies.....are we looking at dressage as an obedience trial or a Westminster kennel club "conformation" show?

      In the recent past it was an obedience show

      ..from the past Article 401:
      1. The object of Dressage is the harmonious development of the physique and ability of the horse. As a result it makes the horse calm, supple, loose and flexible but also confident, attentive and keen thus achieving perfect understanding with his rider.

      2. These qualities are revealed by:

      a) The freedom and regularity of the paces;

      b) The harmony, lightness and ease of the movements;

      c) The lightness of the forehand and the engagement of the hindquarters, originating in a lively impulsion;

      d) The acceptance of the bridle with submissiveness throughout and without any tenseness or resistance.

      3. The horse thus gives the impression of doing of his own accord what is required of him.......

      4. His walk is regular, free and unconstrained. His trot is free, supple, regular, sustained and active. His canter is united, light and cadenced. His quarters are never inactive or sluggish. They respond to the slightest indication of the rider and thereby give life and spirit to all the rest of his body.

      5. By virtue of a lively impulsion and the suppleness of his joints, free from the paralyzing effects of resistance the horse obeys willingly and without hesitation and responds to the various aids calmly and with precision, displaying a natural and harmonious balance both physically and mentally.
      We might have "uber movers" today, but do they embody the ideal describe above?
      Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress.
      Alfred A. Montapert

      Comment


      • #4
        Maybe the phrase has been used before, but I literally just choked on my coffee reading the "1000-lb poodle show" comment. Thanks, Pluvinel!

        I agree with your post.

        Claire, I also believe that to some degree several groups/individuals are jockeying for position near the top of sport. Thus, the spin coming out of the journalist that Astrid is questioning. And it is spin. There is a staggering amount of money paid for horses, training, commissions, etc. at the top of the sport and most involved at that level want a piece of it. The development of the *sport* is not nearly as exciting as the development of the *profit* and prestige. Marketing has come of age in dressage and I am continually amazed by how marketing concepts shape this sport.
        Proud member of the Colbert Dressage Nation

        Comment


        • #5
          can someone give the link to the article...we all should really do that
          Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama

          Comment


          • #6
            my goodness! i think i have found my peeps

            glad to know i am not the only one that thinks some of the things mentioned here. phew!

            (btw: are any of you international judges and or are you there in person? )

            Comment


            • #7
              I was there and have been here in England all week for the competition. It was the most amazing ride I've ever seen. But I'm not convinced that we will suddenly start seeing tons of dressage horses that can perform like Totilas. He may be one in a million.
              Visit Sonesta Farms website at www.sonestafarms.com or our FaceBook page at www.facebook.com/sonestafarms. Also showing & breeding Cavalier King Charles Spaniels.

              Comment


              • #8
                sonesta - if your replying to me.... sorry i was making a joke ..... since it appears now that only those that are int'l judges and were there in person are allowed to voice an opinion

                Comment


                • #9
                  Link?
                  Redbud Ranch
                  Check us out on FB

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    Link

                    Sorry. Here is the link to Astrid's EuroDressage article.
                    (I credited and quoted her remarks in my OP)

                    http://www.eurodressage.com/reports/...iary_day3.html

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by J-Lu View Post
                      Thus, the spin coming out of the journalist that Astrid is questioning. And it is spin. There is a staggering amount of money paid for horses, training, commissions, etc. at the top of the sport and most involved at that level want a piece of it. The development of the *sport* is not nearly as exciting as the development of the *profit* and prestige. Marketing has come of age in dressage and I am continually amazed by how marketing concepts shape this sport.
                      Didn't I just read some where this week that Parcival was $13,000 (USD)? That is not a staggering amount of money.
                      From now on, ponyfixer, i'll include foot note references.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Pony Fixer View Post
                        Didn't I just read some where this week that Parcival was $13,000 (USD)? That is not a staggering amount of money.
                        'Tain't so much marketing as greed.
                        http://asci.uvm.edu/equine/law/cases/sales/neal.htm
                        Plaintiffs owned a dressage horse named "Aristocrat" that they wished to sell. Aristocrat was boarded in the Netherlands at the time relevant to this cause of action. In 1997 plaintiffs met with defendant in Florida, where defendant had a house, and arranged for him to serve as their agent in selling Aristocrat. Defendant was familiar with dressage horses and trained riders and horses in the Netherlands. It was understood that defendant would receive the standard 10% commission on any sale. Plaintiffs expected that the horse might sell for about $500,000 due to its performances in dressage competitions. Defendant made phone calls and sent facsimiles to plaintiffs in Tennessee on several occasions in 1997 to discuss the sale of the horse and to present offers to purchase the horse made by third parties. The offers were rejected by plaintiffs because the price was too low. In January 1998, defendant called Tyrone Neal, John Neal's son, in Tennessee and stated that he had a possible buyer for Aristocrat for about $310,000. Tyrone Neal told defendant that $310,000 was too low, but defendant told Tyrone that plaintiffs had placed an unrealistically high value on the horse. Defendant negotiated further with the prospective buyer and called back to Tyrone to say that the prospective buyer would pay $312,000. Defendant also told Tyrone during that conversation that because he had been unable to find a buyer at the price plaintiffs were asking, he would forgo his commission if plaintiffs accepted the $312,000 offer. Plaintiffs instructed defendant to sell the horse for $312,000, with no commission going to defendant. Plaintiffs received a wire transfer at their bank in Tennessee from defendant for $311, 964.50 shortly thereafter.

                        Plaintiffs subsequently learned, without disclosure from defendant, that the buyer had actually paid defendant $480,000.
                        Back "in the day" to compete in the Olympics, an athlete had to be an "amateur." Remember Jim Thorpe having his medals rescinded because he played in some backwater league.

                        In equetrian sports, the athletes were wealthy and did not need to earn the mortgage thru training, clinics, or horse sales. It was a gentleman's sport.

                        As fallout of the Soviet Union's "professional amateurs" in track, swimming, gymnastics...etc., the Olympics eliminated the amateur (shamateur) requirement in the 1980's.

                        Interestingly, this is when dressage quite being an arcane equestrian discipline and became big money.
                        Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress.
                        Alfred A. Montapert

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Pony Fixer View Post
                          Didn't I just read some where this week that Parcival was $13,000 (USD)? That is not a staggering amount of money.
                          Pony Fixer, surely you get my point. Lets contemplate how much the *typical* International GP horse costs, how much trainers and rider charge, how much campaigning costs, vet and farriers at that level, etc. How much do you think was invested into Parcival since the low purchase price? How much do you think Parcival would cost if sold today? $50,000(USD)? I'm certain they would only ask for their investment plus a small profit back, right? How much to you think it cost for Parcival's 2008? Or 2009? I suggest that by any standard it was "staggering".
                          Proud member of the Colbert Dressage Nation

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The generation time of a horse is much less than the generation time of a person. Riding is not any better or worse. The horses have changed and the riders have adapted. The article implies that riders of 30 years ago would not ride the current horses well or that Edward Gal would ride Peron or Rembrandt or Biotop better than their own riders. I do not agree with this viewpoint. In 30 years, people will look at the horses of today and call them crappy [fill in the blank]. Little changes over time in dressage.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Plaintiffs subsequently learned, without disclosure from defendant, that the buyer had actually paid defendant $480,000.
                              similar story happened to a friend of mine, who paid 1 million for the horse and got cc on the email to agent with price tag of 1/2 a million only, agent tried to pocket another 1/2 million for himself! At the end, the commission question was cleared with out legal actions, but friendship was lost.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                it was not parcival who was 13K - it was Carl Hester's horse that he bought for 10,000 british pounds.

                                how much would parcival cost now - at least 1,000,000 euros.
                                RoseLane Sportponies
                                Golden State - 2012 Bundeschampion & 2014 USDF Horse of the Year
                                Golden West - 2014 & 2015 Bundeschampion Pony Stallion
                                Petit Marc Aurel- FEI Dressage Pony Stallion

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by Kaluna View Post
                                  Little changes over time in dressage.
                                  That’s true and it's hard to imagine that just in the last few years horses and riders can make such an incredible jump up. If it was just one Totilas, I would think it's an exception, but there are others...

                                  I honestly hope that we will not be watching 1000 pound poodle dressage with short necks for the rest of our lives.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Sonesta View Post
                                    He may be one in a million.
                                    Right up until Sisther De Jeu comes out at GP - at which point there will be 2 in a million!

                                    Honestly - I credit myself as being a pretty good rider, but no way in hell am I ever going to be rider enough to ride that horse or anything like it

                                    I'm not saying that I like it, or that I don't like him (I will say that 90% was overgenerous) but I really hope this doesn't become what everybody seeks to achieve in breeding as there simply isn't enough "Edward Gals" out there to ride the damn things!
                                    If you want to feel rich, just count all of the things you have that money can't buy.

                                    -Anon

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      The question continues to fester - what matters more, movement or training? It seems in the "good ol' days", fancy, fabulous gaits earned the score in the "gaits collective", and in a few of the true "brilliance" movements (such as the extended trot). Remember all movements are scored considering the "overlay" of the collectives (gaits, submission, impulsion, rider). Back in the olden days the "submission" overlay score mattered in every single movement much more than anything else. The "gaits" overlay score really just meant were the gaits pure and unconstricted (free and regular) or not? Now the judges must consider that "gaits overlay score" to mean scope and brilliance much more than free and regular. Is this where the sport is destined to go?

                                      It is incredible to see a horse such as Totilas - he is a wonder horse, just as we see a few athletes in any discipline that rise about the rest, but is this where our discipline is going? Is this where the powers that be want to see the sport go? That is the eternal question.
                                      www.MysticOakRanch.com Friesian/Warmblood Crosses, the Ultimate Sporthorse
                                      Director, WTF Registry

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Which is why "Gaits" (and "Impulsion")now has a coefficient of 1 and "Submission (and "Rider") has a coefficient of 2.
                                        one oak, lots of canyons

                                        http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X