• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

USEF Committees meet to hear regrets over selection process

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • USEF Committees meet to hear regrets over selection process

    http://www.dressage-news.com/?p=2898

    USEF Committees Nominating New American Dressage Chef d’Equipe/National Coach Meet, Hear Regrets Over Selection Process
    Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama

  • #2
    Hurray for Ranhousen for speaking up.

    I must say that the selection process left me with a bad taste in my mouth. Many years ago an employer of mine decided to make an "affirmative action" hire, and announced that there would be another person hired as well who would do the actual work.

    Probably because of that memory, all I could think of when the hiring of two individuals for the dressage team was mentioned was that TPTB did not have confidence that an American woman could do the job so they needed to hire a european with different genitalia as well.

    I have absolute faith that Anne Gribbons can do a great job ,and I thought that consideration of splitting the postion in two was insulting to her.
    "Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain" ~Friedrich Schiller

    Comment


    • #3
      SO.... the word "coach" has been struck from the lexicon, but now is back.

      The Eligible Athlete's Committee wanted two people but now miraculously have always wanted one person (this is a parallel universe we are living in, I guess.)

      Confidentiality is important. But then, feh. Transparency is the name of the game, so long as all the information comes from a designated source.

      As for the job being only for one person--I guess that is news to Holland who have managed, in their tiny country where dressage is truly a buisiness-sport and popular and growing, to divide the duties between Sjef Janssen as coach (one word) and Mariette Sanders as technical advisor (two words).

      Not to mention of course, a complete strategy plan which includes sponsorship, other coaches, and enormous support for the athletes.

      What a silly silly charade.

      Good luck to our riders and the horses.
      one oak, lots of canyons

      http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        This "source" of dressage "news" sounds/feels more like a tabloid than a journalistic site. Again, I'm suspect of this site's focus and journalistic intent

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Originally posted by Tiligsmom View Post
          This "source" of dressage "news" sounds/feels more like a tabloid than a journalistic site. Again, I'm suspect of this site's focus and journalistic intent
          Not me I think some of the others are to political...to worried they may step on some toes.

          CanyonOak we are not the Netherlands like I've said before if we were to put ALL our horse people in the state of Maryland(the size of the netherlands) even they wouldn't be able to beat us
          Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama

          Comment


          • #6
            Interesting

            Dover confirmed to dressage-news.com, however, that he has sent an application to the Canadian Equestrian Federation seeking to become their national coach. The Canadian federation is scheduling interviews with applicants next month.

            And this:

            Several members of the committees made it clear that they believe that instead of funds being allocated to several coaches, the money might better be spent in grants for elite riders with trainers of their choice. None of the elite riders likely to seek to ride for the U.S. at the 2010 Alltech FEI World Equestrian Games in Kentucky train with Gribbons or the other trainers whose names have been associated with her coaching program.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by canyonoak View Post
              As for the job being only for one person--I guess that is news to Holland who have managed, in their tiny country where dressage is truly a buisiness-sport and popular and growing, to divide the duties between Sjef Janssen as coach (one word) and Mariette Sanders as technical advisor (two words).
              In the abstract, there is nothing wrong with having two jobs filled by two qualified individuals. If they had advertised for two separate positions, it would not create the same perception of impropriety. It is changing the rules in the middle of the game that smacks of unfair dealing.
              "Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain" ~Friedrich Schiller

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Eclectic Horseman View Post
                In the abstract, there is nothing wrong with having two jobs filled by two qualified individuals. If they had advertised for two separate positions, it would not create the same perception of impropriety. It is changing the rules in the middle of the game that smacks of unfair dealing.
                it's not unfair- it's highly political- to the point where it is nauseating. I am with Oakie that we need 2 to do this job- and Gribbons would have been a good admin/diplomat and be well suited for that position. As a national coach- I believe we could have at least chosen someone that actually competed at the GP championship level, which she never did.

                Thus her impact will be limited- and although she is quickly asking Debbie and Lendon to the rescue- I am hesitant to believe that this was the best choice for the US as a whole.

                It shows once again that the core system is not properly representing the knowlege/needs/interests of our top riders...and why do we need this position in the first place- if not to serve our top 20 riders...
                "the man mite be the head but the woman is the neck and the neck can turn the head any way she wants..." -smart greek woman

                Comment


                • #9
                  This could all be pure fiction. Why would you believe what this person says ? He needs to take a job with the National Enquirer.
                  ... _. ._ .._. .._

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    and of course there might have been additional highly qualified candidates that did not apply because though they would be highly interested in only 1/2 of the position but not qualified for or interested in the other 1/2 of the position.

                    i do think there is great value in having anne (or robert or...) anyone who is interested in looking at the whole program and creating a cadre of developing horses and riders while maximizing the performance of the riders who are already at the elite level.

                    the limitation of grants for the elite riders and no general coach is that there is not enough money to fund grants for 20 horses and riders and then for sure nothing left over to develop the just below group

                    as coaching goes for the elite riders, I think they know their weak points and should have significant input into who they would as a group value as a coach/ground person/etc...and the top 3-4 still benefit from someone they respect, even if it isn't their first pick

                    imo it might be best suited to a 2 person job, but it is a shame that they didn't let that be known to widen the applicant pool when they decided it was an option

                    I would very much like to see a full time coach simply to create more training days available to those who are just outside of the elite pool but have the requisite quality of horse and rider to be able to step up with the right help

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      That site appears to be consistent in its pro- Dover anti-Gribbons bias.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Equibrit View Post
                        This could all be pure fiction. Why would you believe what this person says ? He needs to take a job with the National Enquirer.
                        Agree! This "source" is clearly Pro - Dover and the "reporting" is badly skewed! Much more aligned with the veracity of the National Enquirer

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Tiligsmom View Post
                          Agree! This "source" is clearly Pro - Dover and the "reporting" is badly skewed! Much more aligned with the veracity of the National Enquirer
                          Hardly!
                          Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            It's just not that big a deal...

                            If they allow the riders to train with other people they've already been working with, so much the better. The coach for our team has been a figure head for years. The riders always work with someone of their choosing and occasionally work with the coach as a sign that they are doing what is required of them to be a part of the team. We were lucky with a few that were very good and many of the riders wanted to train with them, but since it's mostly a position for someone who knows the international judges and likes to stand around and offer support to the team members at competitions, I think they picked the right person. She has those connections.

                            I have a feeling that if Dover was in the position of Chef d'Equippe, it would end up being all about him training everyone and no one would be allowed to work with their coaches, who by the way were the ones that got them to the level where they could qualify for the team.

                            Then again, that's JMHO.
                            "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Politics? In dressage? Really? Gosh, I'm so surprised!

                              Best wishes to Gribbons for the US as well as to Dover for Canada (should he win that post).

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X