• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

German Junior Riders just won all medals at the European Championships at Ermelo

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • German Junior Riders just won all medals at the European Championships at Ermelo

    German Junior Riders won all medals at the European Championships at Ermelo

    Guided by Sanneke Rothenberger, the German Junior riders did a marvelous job by winning all three medals during the individual test at the European Championships at Ermelo (the Netherlands). The Dutch riders made too many mistakes, while the German riders just did their job, and hardly made any mistakes. The top 2 riders of the Dutch team toke to much risk in trying to overscore the 76+ change of Sanneke and her magnificent horse Deveraux, and were punished for that.

    More info at :

    http://www.topdressage.tv/phpBB3/vie....php?f=42&t=45
    Last edited by freestyle2music; Aug. 8, 2009, 08:23 AM.

  • #2
    well, that's how the junior Dutch riders will learn the hard lesson!
    one oak, lots of canyons

    http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Originally posted by canyonoak View Post
      well, that's how the junior Dutch riders will learn the hard lesson!
      This has nothing to do with the medals, but the USA judge Mc'Donald was a complete disaster during this competition. .

      Somebody called "Dressageart" on this forum tried to tell the world how superiour the judge-education is in the USA. But what I have seen during this competition was a complete disaster. And I don't only mean the endscores, but specially her scores per movement.

      Comment


      • #4
        well, I looked today,and her scoring is pretty much in line with the other judges.
        one oak, lots of canyons

        http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by freestyle2music View Post
          This has nothing to do with the medals, but the USA judge Mc'Donald was a complete disaster during this competition. .

          Somebody called "Dressageart" on this forum tried to tell the world how superiour the judge-education is in the USA. But what I have seen during this competition was a complete disaster. And I don't only mean the endscores, but specially her scores per movement.

          Actually, looks like McDonald was right in line with the other judges. (McDonald actually scored the Dutch riders higher in some cases than the Dutch judge, and the Dutch judge gave the German riders much higher scores in many cases than McDonald.)

          http://www.eurodressage.com/scores/2...yr_ermelo.html


          And what does DressageArt have to do with anything???

          Comment


          • #6
            Theo does not complain about judges because they score Dutch riders particularly low--he was complaining because the FIRST day of judging, the US judge's scores were indeed all over the place.

            But I do think that there are very few great trainers, very few great riders--and very few great judges.

            I think the great ones have their 'eye' always in place and the others, like the horses and riders, sometimes take a little more time to get all the dots connected.

            And as we all know<g> in September, they will have The Great Judge-down at Aachen and much hue and cry will go on and they will try various systems of judging and while a lot of this is just piffle and for show, at least it will be an honest attempt to work out HOW to accomplish better judging.
            one oak, lots of canyons

            http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by freestyle2music View Post
              This has nothing to do with the medals, but the USA judge Mc'Donald was a complete disaster during this competition. .

              Somebody called "Dressageart" on this forum tried to tell the world how superiour the judge-education is in the USA. But what I have seen during this competition was a complete disaster. And I don't only mean the endscores, but specially her scores per movement.
              McDonald's scores were in line with the other judges. Please explain how this constitutes a "complete disaster". I second the question: what does DressageArt have to do with how a US judge scores during a competition?

              ETA: I looked up the rides on day 1. McDonald has only 1 or 2 instances where she is the high or low score on the panel. Out of 68 rides. The dutch judge has instances where he was the high and low score. Each judge has an instance when he/she is the high or low score.

              Please link to the disasterous scores by the US judge, Theo. I must not see them.

              http://events.scg-nl.nl/2009/ermelo/results/results.htm
              Last edited by Arathita; Aug. 8, 2009, 09:38 PM.

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #8
                Originally posted by canyonoak View Post
                Theo does not complain about judges because they score Dutch riders particularly low--he was complaining because the FIRST day of judging, the US judge's scores were indeed all over the place.

                But I do think that there are very few great trainers, very few great riders--and very few great judges.

                I think the great ones have their 'eye' always in place and the others, like the horses and riders, sometimes take a little more time to get all the dots connected.

                And as we all know<g> in September, they will have The Great Judge-down at Aachen and much hue and cry will go on and they will try various systems of judging and while a lot of this is just piffle and for show, at least it will be an honest attempt to work out HOW to accomplish better judging.
                This is the biggest mistake everybody makes. The judge was in line with the others That's also what La Withages always stated. However since the marks per movement were also given she was wayyyyyyyy out, time after time. It even became a sport for the commentators (riders, judges ,trainers and EQ journalists) to mention it several times.
                Four times an 8 and one a 5, next movement 4 times a 5 and one 8, "Guess from which judge this is coming from." etc..etc....
                Furthermore in another topic DressageArt mentioned that the USA program for educating judges was far better than the European program and that the Europeans had asked the US to help them with their judge education program.

                Theo

                Comment


                • #9
                  I'd love to see Deveraux video or photos, one of my mares is a full sister to his dam.
                  Tracy Geller
                  www.sixpoundfarm.com
                  Find me on Facebook!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by freestyle2music View Post
                    Furthermore in another topic DressageArt mentioned that the USA program for educating judges was far better than the European program and that the Europeans had asked the US to help them with their judge education program.

                    Theo
                    And I see that got stuck in your memory?

                    It is true FACT Theo that several European countries reached out to USDF to share their "L" program for dressage judges’ education. This program is pioneering in thinking and is clearly the best that there is for now for the beginning education of dressage judges. It is very successful to prepare and give an idea what dressage judging is to the curious judgelinks. The program is only 15 years old, so none of the international judges went thru it, but most are “L” instructors.

                    Just b/c the "L" program comes from USA - you don't have to kick it

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Just have to chime in here..... I know a couple of "L" graduates in my area that can't find their butt with both hands when it comes to judging what is really in front of them. If they are any indication of what this program is churning out then I'm less than impressed.
                      Siegi Belz
                      www.stalleuropa.com
                      2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
                      Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The L program is only as good as the judges who run them and the applicants who go through the program.
                        And the reality is--there are very few great judges, at the start and even at the finish. We all know of "O" judges we think are poor.

                        This is sad, but true.

                        I looked at the US judge scores AS GIVEN in the results,and have no way to know that it is the individual scores that are so off.

                        Once again--I really do not understand WHY the movement-by-movement scores cannot be released after a competition.

                        I asked/begged/whined/nagged at World Cup....nada.

                        These days, with computers for all the big shows, it is a moment's time to put stuff on a flash drive or hit "Save" and send it out.

                        The judge fraternity--like ALL fraternities everywhere-- wants to keep 'the secret handshake', the 'special words of welcome' and all the other nonsense that has always gone with secret societies that want to seem special.

                        I just wish they would make the scores public. I think THAT would go a long way to improving the judging.
                        one oak, lots of canyons

                        http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          so i am curious.

                          do we wnat the judges to all give the exact same score for each movement even tho they see the movement from different angles?

                          if that is the case - why have multiple judges?

                          it seems to me the reason you have multiple judge is to even out any high/low scores?

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            Originally posted by canyonoak View Post
                            The L program is only as good as the judges who run them and the applicants who go through the program.
                            And the reality is--there are very few great judges, at the start and even at the finish. We all know of "O" judges we think are poor.

                            This is sad, but true.

                            I looked at the US judge scores AS GIVEN in the results,and have no way to know that it is the individual scores that are so off.

                            Once again--I really do not understand WHY the movement-by-movement scores cannot be released after a competition.

                            I asked/begged/whined/nagged at World Cup....nada.

                            These days, with computers for all the big shows, it is a moment's time to put stuff on a flash drive or hit "Save" and send it out.

                            The judge fraternity--like ALL fraternities everywhere-- wants to keep 'the secret handshake', the 'special words of welcome' and all the other nonsense that has always gone with secret societies that want to seem special.

                            I just wish they would make the scores public. I think THAT would go a long way to improving the judging.
                            The only thing I want to say is that the tryout from the FEI to invite judges from the US to judge at European championships has failed completely. Or should I say : Jeanne McDonald proved the last five days that she don't belong in a judgebox <period>

                            The Europeans are already collecting money to send her back to the US.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by freestyle2music View Post
                              The only thing I want to say is that the tryout from the FEI to invite judges from the US to judge at European championships has failed completely. Or should I say : Jeanne McDonald proved the last five days that she don't belong in a judgebox <period>

                              The Europeans are already collecting money to send her back to the US.
                              Gosh Theo you are so harsh!

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by siegi b. View Post
                                Just have to chime in here..... I know a couple of "L" graduates in my area that can't find their butt with both hands when it comes to judging what is really in front of them. If they are any indication of what this program is churning out then I'm less than impressed.
                                Well that is our bright future of dressage judges in US. And only 1/3 of "L" participant passes the final exam with distinction that allows them to continue to the next level. "Look at your right, look at your left, only one of you will pass with distinction" = only ~3 people out of the whole "L" group!!!! So IMHO = it's a pretty tough 1-2 year long ($3K to $5K) program already = I'm not sure how much more tougher you want to make it AND have anybody passing with distinction? And in Europe, there is NO education program for beginner judges at all. They are on their own to educate themselves. So "L" educational program is a huge step forward.

                                There are people judging who never went thru "L", there are people judging who went thru one part of "L", there are people judging who went thru "L" and failed to graduate, there are people judging who went thru "L" and graduated, there are people judging who went thru "L" and graduated with distinction = there is a difference between them, and it's really up to you who do you prefer as your judge.

                                PS: I would love to see the scores become public as well as the colletive scores with comments.
                                Last edited by Dressage Art; Aug. 9, 2009, 04:17 PM.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Well, I am going to chime in here, sure to get some Theo kicks myself But - it is a fact, right now, there are NO comprehensive judging training programs anywhere in the world, and the U.S. has a better head start with it's L program than any other country. So yes, other countries ARE looking at the USDF L program as the base line for a judges training program. I'm sure they will tweak and make changes - just as USDF has over the years. It is a relatively new program (I think the early 90s was its very first session), and as DA points out, none of the current international judges went through it - in fact, many of our national S judges didn't go through it either. Granted the program is not perfect - but it is a good education, and a great start when considering a more expanded international judges program.

                                  At some of the CDIs here, some of the non-US judges have spoken with great interest of our program.

                                  Siegi, you may find some L graduates that are not stellar "judges" - to be honest, NONE of us are stellar yet - L means LEARNER - it is nothing more than a start in the right direction. Some are better than others - some barely passed, thus are graduates, but are not qualified to ever move on to the "r" program. You really shouldn't base your opinion of the program on a couple of grads - audit the program and make a judgement based on that experience instead! Having gone through the program, and scribed for someone else going through the program, I can tell you not everyone has the eye or the vocabulary to be a judge. And interestingly, riding ability and judging ability are not necessarily one and the same. Some excellent riders don't have the EYE to judge - they can feel, but they can't see or articulate.

                                  Anyway, I really do recommend people audit the program and make judgement based on that experience.

                                  As for Jeanne - she is actually a pretty highly respected judge, both in the US and abroad. And again, based on scribing experience, she has always been a very gracious person as well - just because you don't agree with a few of her marks, hardly makes her the wicked judge of the west. I think most of us here in the US will be quite happy that you send her back to us in one piece!
                                  www.MysticOakRanch.com Friesian/Warmblood Crosses, the Ultimate Sporthorse
                                  Director, WTF Registry

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by FriesianX View Post
                                    As for Jeanne - she is actually a pretty highly respected judge, both in the US and abroad. And again, based on scribing experience, she has always been a very gracious person as well - just because you don't agree with a few of her marks, hardly makes her the wicked judge of the west. I think most of us here in the US will be quite happy that you send her back to us in one piece!
                                    DITTO!!!

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Dressage Art View Post
                                      Well that is our bright future of dressage judges in US. And only 1/3 of "L" participant passes the final exam with distinction that allows them to continue to the next level. "Look at your right, look at your left, only one of you will pass with distinction" = only ~3 people out of the whole "L" group!!!! So IMHO = it's a pretty tough 1-2 year long ($3K to $5K) program already = I'm not sure how much more tougher you want to make it AND have anybody passing with distinction? And in Europe, there is NO education program for beginner judges at all. They are on their own to educate themselves. So "L" educational program is a huge step forward.

                                      There are people judging who never went thru "L", there are people judging who went thru one part of "L", there are people judging who went thru "L" and failed to graduate, there are people judging who went thru "L" and graduated, there are people judging who went thru "L" and graduated with distinction = they is a difference between them, and it's really up to you who do you prefer as your judge.

                                      PS: I would love to see the scores become public as well as the colletive scores with comments.

                                      Thank you, Dressage Art and FriesianX for the sharing this information about the USDF judging program.
                                      (And for getting this thread back on a more civil track )

                                      Why do you think that the scores for each movement as well as the collective scores are not made public?

                                      Also, are there other base points (other than the USDF program) being studied as a possible FEI judging program?

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by FriesianX View Post
                                        As for Jeanne - she is actually a pretty highly respected judge, both in the US and abroad. And again, based on scribing experience, she has always been a very gracious person as well - just because you don't agree with a few of her marks, hardly makes her the wicked judge of the west. I think most of us here in the US will be quite happy that you send her back to us in one piece!

                                        I'll be polite and don't post the PM's which I received from some US-topriders, but PLEASE keep her in the USA and take away her indentity card and her passport and make sure she stays on your side of the ocean.

                                        And NO her judging didn't harm the Dutch, Germans or my favourite riders or horses, and YES sometimes she was in line with the other judges, but when you watched her scores per movement she made a complete fool out of herself.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X