• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

do you think dressage has improved/changed/declined in the last 30+ years? pics

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • do you think dressage has improved/changed/declined in the last 30+ years? pics

    the past (1920's to 1970's):
    http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bridge...?.dir=/2b5ascd

    the present:
    http://www.eurodressage.com/reports/...gen-photo.html
    http://www.eurodressage.com/reports/...onn-photo.html
    http://www.eurodressage.com/reports/..._dm-photo.html


    i've read a lot of different reactions to the pictures, curious to see what this board thinks.
    www.reidsporthorses.net

  • #2
    My first thought would be looking at those pictures is that the quality of the horses has changed/improved significantly through that timeframe.

    Selective breeding proves it's point.

    Comment


    • #3
      The horses are much better now. Don't think any of the horses pictured would be very competitive today. The riding has evolved too. Just like most sports, it has gotten a lot better. Take an Olympic skier of today on his parabolic skis and time warp pair him up with a skier on old wooden skis and you'll see no contest.

      There will always be people who lament the times gone by, talk about the good ole days or romaticize the past, but time and distance clouds the truth a bit.

      Comment


      • #4
        OP, you must love trainwrecks.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Originally posted by egontoast
          OP, you must love trainwrecks.
          not really- i just find that the peple on COTH often have a completely different opinion from TOB.

          curiosity is what prompted me to post the link (yes, i know what curiosity leads to... )
          www.reidsporthorses.net

          Comment


          • #6
            we all know what i think....

            the only thing i will add is that its important to remember that horses from the 20s and 30s were not highly bred and they were not just dressage horses- they had a career outside of dressage - they were military horses. -- so to me it is even more impressive what they could do!

            also they needed to jump in the tests and the tests were like 20 minutes long!!!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by kkj
              There will always be people who lament the times gone by, talk about the good ole days or romaticize the past, but time and distance clouds the truth a bit.
              that is interesting.

              what truth is clouded do you think? do you think that the horses wernt well trained? or the riders not good riders??

              Comment


              • #8
                mbm all I am saying is if you could transport yourself back in time and watch some of the great riders of days gone by in the flesh right next to the great riders of today, you might not think the old ones as great. It is kind of like after you have broken up with someone for awhile and you remember only the fond times. If you were to get back together again, you would quickly remember why you broke up in the first place. (thus my distance clouds the truth comment) I don't think ill of any of the great riders, their training abilities, (horses are better today however), but I don't idolize them and worship them either. I am grateful for what they did and what they taught us etc, and I am grateful for the great riders of today too.

                Comment


                • #9
                  OVERALL the quality of horses and performance has improved. Speaking generally, the modern photos demonstrate better connection, suppleness, athleticism, and that extra "something" (brilliance?); but this is not intended to take away from the past successes of anyone.

                  Do you know what strikes me most about the photos? Seeing that the flaws attributed to "modern" riding existed for the classical riders too. And some of the flaws attributed to classical riders exist for the modern riders too. It is a reminder, or a reality check, that things are really not THAT different between then and now.

                  It's too easy to put modern riders under a microscope, and then view the classical riders with rose colored glasses. For this reason, seeing photos like these are a nice reminder that we're really all closer to being on the same page than some may realize (or admit).

                  We could spend pages and pages picking out specific flaws and qualities in each of the photos, or not. Or I could be lazy, and direct you to the "Farewell" posts in the similar thread on the other board...
                  "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." George Burns

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Neither - I see some very correctly ridden horses back then and now as I see badly ridden horses, with backs dropped and pelvis up/out behind. I do think, or perhaps more hope, that eventually most riders will thrive to correctly develop and ride their horses out of consideration and love for the this nobel animal that allows us do do something with them they were never intended to do - carry a person .

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      "they had a career outside of dressage - they were military horses"

                      baloney. utter, absolute and complete baloney. dressage horses were selected and given separate training and kept as dressage horses. military provided facilities and selections from breeding farms.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        [quote=slc2]"they had a career outside of dressage - they were military horses"

                        baloney. utter, absolute and complete baloney. dressage horses were selected and given separate training and kept as dressage horses. military provided facilities and selections from breeding farms.[/quot


                        THat is just NOT true.slc2.

                        The horses that I won championships on in the mediteranean in 1959/60,were military horses,that we did dressage on when they werent doing polo and other serious military stuff.
                        \"I have lived my life-it is nearly done-.I have played the game all round;But I freely admit that the best of my fun I owe it to Horse and Hound\".

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          My horse wants you to think he's a war stallion, does that count? He makes the most evil faces at you until you try to kiss his nose and then he's like: No no, please, don't kiss me, I'll be good I promise. Ewe, human slobber!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            [QUOTE=fernie fox]
                            Originally posted by slc2
                            "they had a career outside of dressage - they were military horses"

                            baloney. utter, absolute and complete baloney. dressage horses were selected and given separate training and kept as dressage horses. military provided facilities and selections from breeding farms.[/quot


                            THat is just NOT true.slc2.

                            The horses that I won championships on in the mediteranean in 1959/60,were military horses,that we did dressage on when they werent doing polo and other serious military stuff.
                            Right on fernie fox. Are you really from Fernie? We must belong to a different generation.
                            Some riders change their horse, they change their saddle, they change their teacher; they never change themselves.

                            Remember the horse does all the work, we just sit there and look pretty.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Of course its improved. Otherwise all that time, skill, money and selective breeding would have been a waste.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                The old photos and the recent photos just have a different feeling. It is not something I can pin point exactly, because both sets have their faults, but the modern ones just make me feel sad, while the old ones inspire me, they make me want to go out and ride.
                                *Barefoot Eventers Clique*

                                "In the mirror of another being, we see a reflection of ourselves."

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  That is funny FunkyMeerkat, the pictures have the opposite effect on me. The modern ones inspire me and make me want to ride. The old ones make me feel a little more distant. I am glad it is not a military man sport anymore. I bet the horses are glad to have saddles that fit with nice plush pads under them and not some big old man sitting on his butt up in an ill fitting saddle with no pad.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Well, I can see faults in many of the pictures...both then and now. Considering that there are faults shown within all time frames, I think that I like Anna Katerinan Luttgen on Zancor which is near the end of the last clip as the best. If she had let her reins out just about another inch, the horse could have come through all the way to the poll correctly. But, essentially this would be an extended trot that I would like to duplicate.

                                    The quality of the horses has definitely changed through the years. Grooming has become more important. The horses carry a little more weight which helps hide some of the conformation flaws that were apparent in the old photos. The horses in the top levels of competition today are of much higher quality than the typical dressage rider of yesteryear could afford. It was not that a better quality horse was not available, so much as the fact that the better quality horse was not affordable. In other words, more money does help.

                                    If I were to point to the biggest fault that has cropped into riding between then and now, I would have to point to the length of the reins. Many of the top horses today are being held to the movements as opposed to be allowed to flow to the movements. A straight line measurement from the poll to the rider's hands should equal the distance from the rider's hands to the bit. You can easily see that in the newer photos, there is a greater tendency to see the distance from the bit to the rider's hands being less than the distance from the horse's poll to the rider's hands. The restriction in front prevents the horse from coming through completely from behind which results in many of today's faults...including the poll not being the highest part of the neck.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      much improved, all those old pics show horses with hollow backs, no connection, no "parallel" cannons (illustrates that pic are not the whole story) and they don't look really happy- one of them has flat pinned ears- they do not make me want to ride like that (most of the riders are not sitting very well, and most of their hands are up around their chins)

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        For those who prefer the older photos: you can begin to see the "change" (improvement or not, depending on your view) even within these "old" photos, beginning with Wald (1960 medalist). Wald, Dux, and Piaff are already beginning to look much more like "modern" photos than like the rest of the photos on this page. (Wald, Dux, and Piaff span the 1960's and 1970's.)

                                        Do you like the newer classical photos as well as the older ones? Meaning, do you like the photos of Dux etc. as well as the photos of Sabel etc? Some people cite an indescribeable "something" which makes them happier about the older photos. But do the newer of the old photos cause the same reaction?

                                        Do you feel the same indescribeable happiness looking at photos of Wald or Dux or Piaff that you feel when you look at photos of Sable or Linon or Nero? Because really, the start of the "change" is evident in even this 50+ year span of photos...
                                        "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." George Burns

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X