• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

do you think dressage has improved/changed/declined in the last 30+ years? pics

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Mickeydoodle: Possibly, "unloved?"

    Comment


    • #42
      So your the one to blame for all this mess bronte! Would you like one last cigarette before sent off to the gallows?

      BTW, I agree with your assessments!

      Comment


      • #43
        Well, I like the "good" older pics better, but of course, the quality of horses has improved quite a bit - but that seems to have inspired short-cuts, since the natural quality is already there - it doesn't have to be worked for quite as hard as in the "good old days."

        That being said, I've always liked most of the pictures I've seen of Chammartin and Wolfdietrich, especially the ones in Neil Ffrench Blake's "World of Dressage" where he particularly remarked about the ease with which Chammartin extended and collected this horse. I remember one picture in that book where the horse was SO round and engaged, without being behind the vertical. This is the only good picture I could find of them that I could post:

        http://70.85.102.94/netpub/server.np...0&site=horse05

        In Podhajsky's book he talks about Nero - the discarded, "sausage" horse upon which he won the bronze medal. Certainly, one could say dressage accomplished it's true purpose of IMPROVING a horse in that case. With today's superhorses the talent is already there: It needs to be developed, which is certainly not a negligible talent on the part of the riders, but one might say the older riders accomplished more with less.

        I kinda like this one of Filatov and Absent, the gold medal winning (1960 - Rome) Akhal teke, too:

        http://70.85.102.94/netpub/server.np...0&site=horse05

        Comment


        • #44
          Sandy M, I like the first pic you posted. That is a nice old picture.

          Bronte You go. Great assessment. You must be a good judge.

          Comment


          • #45
            Sandy M, the first photo you posted is quite nice. It too could pass as a modern photo if it were in color (wink). Interesting to see things were NOT always so different! That horse/rider would still be competitive today.

            In reference to the second photo, I suppose I could direct you to the other toe flicking thread (lol, grinning.)


            mbm wrote:
            and finally i want to say that this is kind of an unfair comparrison... we are looking at the top modern riders/horses and random pics from the past - we dont even know if they were thought of as good at the time the were taken. .....

            becuase some of the old images are not so good and i dont think it is fair to compare good modern images with bad old images. (does that make sense??)
            No, this doesn't make any sense. What we are comparing are old images WHICH WERE DEEMED WORTHY OF A BOOK, and new images compiled randomly and informally for an "on the scene" type of thing with little (or no) real review by anyone "expert" (vastly different from the careful process and selection for a BOOK.)

            Why is it that an unflattering classical photo is a fluke, a mistake, a bad moment in time, random............ Yet a modern unflattering photo is considered indicitive of the fact that all of dressage apparently is going to hell in a handbasket. How fair is that?
            "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." George Burns

            Comment


            • #46
              Oh this should be good! (rubbing hands together)

              Originally posted by pinecone
              Sandy M, the first photo you posted is quite nice. It too could pass as a modern photo if it were in color (wink). Interesting to see things were NOT always so different! That horse/rider would still be competitive today.

              In reference to the second photo, I suppose I could direct you to the other toe flicking thread (lol, grinning.)


              mbm wrote:

              No, this doesn't make any sense. What we are comparing are old images WHICH WERE DEEMED WORTHY OF A BOOK, and new images compiled randomly and informally for an "on the scene" type of thing with little (or no) real review by anyone "expert" (vastly different from the careful process and selection for a BOOK.)

              Why is it that an unflattering classical photo is a fluke, a mistake, a bad moment in time, random............ Yet a modern unflattering photo is considered indicitive of the fact that all of dressage apparently is going to hell in a handbasket. How fair is that?
              On pins and needles waiting for this answer!

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by mbm
                we are looking at the top modern riders/horses and random pics from the past - we dont even know if they were thought of as good at the time the were taken.
                Not necessarily disagreeing, but in the case of the picture I posted (Chammartin), he was the individual gold medallist at the '64 Tokyo Olympics, and on the silver medal Swiss team at the 1966 World Championships. He was, indeed, "thought of as good" at the time [the picture] was taken.

                When he won the Olympic Gold in '64, the bronze medallist was Filatov ('60 gold medallist) and the silver medal went to Harry Boldt.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Well, I recently watched videos of some of the classic riders of long long ago (taken off old movies). Some were awful. One rider in particular who's considered a name sat on his horses like a brick. Another of the classical riders was just amazing. There was a section of collected trot into extended trot that was jaw droppingly lovely.

                  I agree with those that say it's just like today, some poeple were great and others weren't

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by pinecone

                    mbm wrote:

                    No, this doesn't make any sense. What we are comparing are old images WHICH WERE DEEMED WORTHY OF A BOOK, and new images compiled randomly and informally for an "on the scene" type of thing with little (or no) real review by anyone "expert" (vastly different from the careful process and selection for a BOOK.)

                    Why is it that an unflattering classical photo is a fluke, a mistake, a bad moment in time, random............ Yet a modern unflattering photo is considered indicitive of the fact that all of dressage apparently is going to hell in a handbasket. How fair is that?
                    well considering i never said that a bad pic was a mistake or fluke, i will pass that comment right by..... as for the pics being in a book: i have no idea what the comments on those pics said.... i have plenty of books that have good and bad old (or new for that matter) images with corresponding subtitles and explanations. in other words - just becuase it is in a book doesnt make it good. (shrug) .. we *do* know what the judges thought of the horses that were listed on that web site since they were winning comps.

                    that is all i meant. and still, i think it would be interesting to take the BEST of the old and the BEST of the new in the same position and compare - THAT would be interesting.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Excuses excuses

                      You have no idea what the comments for the pictures from the books was?

                      How 'bouts:

                      1.) Upside down horse.
                      2.) Horse not using back.
                      3.) Undermuscled.
                      4.) Clearly not engaged because NO part of the hind leg is even close to parallel to the foreleg.
                      5.) I want my mommy.

                      Etc. I think you get the point.

                      Since when does classical equal perfection? They were only human, and better training is available today through the education of the classical riders than ever before. Dressage in general, and especially what we see in the show arena has MUCH improved. However, the only people I hear complaining about it is the dinosaurs who have been passed by.

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by pinecone

                        Why is it that an unflattering classical photo is a fluke, a mistake, a bad moment in time, random............ Yet a modern unflattering photo is considered indicitive of the fact that all of dressage apparently is going to hell in a handbasket. How fair is that?

                        Because it is safe to say that XYZ classical trainer, published author and competitor is deserving of respect and - on the other hand ABC- new and upcoming (dutch) rider without training history, book or other major accomplishments- is not deserving and a young, uncontrolled hotshot- that abuses horses....
                        It's because we are all very insecure about this- because there is no finite recipe on how to make a succesful horse and how to compete it successfully and make history in the dressage world....
                        my prediction will be though- that if Anky once in the future does sit down and write a comprehensive book- she will truly begin - even maybe in her lifetime - to enter the ODG world and become classical...
                        you know- it's like it is with cheese- it has to ripen and age before it's really good....
                        "the man mite be the head but the woman is the neck and the neck can turn the head any way she wants..." -smart greek woman

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          " Dressage in general, and especially what we see in the show arena has MUCH improved. However, the only people I hear complaining about it is the dinosaurs who have been passed by."

                          I don't believe this dinosaur comment would hold up, to name a few: Ingred Klimke, Balkenhol and company on http://www.xenophon-classical-riding.org as well as George Morris' recent comments in his COTH article (excerpted on posts #29 and #34).

                          Even so, Lendon Gray is doing amazing work with her DressageForKids program, teaching young riders dressage as well as overall care and understanding of the horse. It's really a wonderful contribution to the world of dressage.

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Dinosaur? Possibly. But, having done other riding disciplines before I got serious about dressage, I can tell you that I am beginning to see elements in dressage that are akin to Saddleseat. These elements were not there some years ago, but are fairly new to the scene. I am also seeing more riders hanging on the curb rein of the double bridle which in yesteryear would have been punished. I am not saying that all was rosey back when the ODGs were not ODGS. What I am saying is that dessage has changed, and developed new faults, or perhaps, I should say, things to which a dinosaur would point as a fault. Yes, I can see problems in the old pictures as well...dinosaur or no.

                            What is really funny was a disparaging remark made to me about Saddleseat years ago. Whether there is any truth to it or not, I do not know. I was told that immigrants coming to this country wanted riding such as they had seen in Europe. However, these immigrants had not been trained in the "classical" method of horsetraining. So as they trained horses toward what they thought they had been watching, they focused purely on the front end of the horse. The results became Saddleseat, a discipline created by unknowledgeable folk trying to duplicate what they perceived that they had seen.

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              but you're not biased at all about saddleseat, ROFLMAO.

                              the idea that something is always perfect because it's old...well, how about applying that to me, lol. i'm old.

                              slc

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                mbm, the old photos were of Olympic medalists so they were also "winning comps" as you say.

                                sm, the two dressage riders you listed, while they may not be dinosaurs, could easily be perceived as having a motivation to take the stands they're taking. R. Klimke was a legend, I. Klimke is building on her father's fame, and he's an icon of many classicists, although whether his riding looks more like 1920 or 2000 is a matter for another debate. As for Balhenhol, and what motivates him...............

                                Sabine, I have no doubt Anky has firmly established herself as a legend in the history of dressage, even if she were to retire entirely tomorrow.
                                "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." George Burns

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  I think you must ask people who saw both periods in real time. It also depends upon what you are looking for in the horse.

                                  Interesting thing about Filitov's horse, there is a movie which shows the horse with a newspaper blowing by and wrapping around the horses legs while he is piaffing (in a snaffle warming up on the lightest of contact) and then blowing on.....no change in tempo or anything...stilll relaxed and working!

                                  Calhoun...Dux is Klimke, Piaff is (mama) Linsenhoff and won the 72 games in Munich. Piaff was sired by Gaspari ridden by Viebke (head of the national school in sweden) in Rome (60) and got the highest scores even given for one tempis at that point (9 for 15 which entirely filled up the diagonal correctly).
                                  I.D.E.A. yoda

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    And not ALL upper level horses were babied and pampered and did nothing but dressage. Klaus Balkenhol's Goldstern was a working police horse throughout all his competition life! I find it hard to believe that the older horses didn't 'work' as well.
                                    Tranquility Farm - Proud breeder of Born in the USA Sport Horses, and Cob-sized Warmbloods
                                    Now apparently completely invisible!

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Goldstern was way too spooky to be a police horse and was basically useless for any such work. Most of the other riders used to hiss (politely under their breaths coz this is dressage, after all) when KB rode into the arena in his policeman's uniform.
                                      yes--Goldstern was originally BOUGHT for that job, but that did not turn out to be his 'real' job. Goldstern was not good hacking on the streets, even with another horse.

                                      Filatov's horses DEFINITELY worked, no matter what else was going on, but I think the word 'relaxed' is not what comes to mind<g>.
                                      one oak, lots of canyons

                                      http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Being a GP competition horse and especially a top International Olympic calibre GP horse is working! I don't understand why people think it's nothing and that the horse should have a 2nd or 3rd career.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Originally posted by fiona
                                          Being a GP competition horse and especially a top International Olympic calibre GP horse is working! I don't understand why people think it's nothing and that the horse should have a 2nd or 3rd career.
                                          It is "work" in that it involves physical activity, but no it's not a "real" job. Never has been and never will be. The only reason dressage exists is to make the real job easier. Sorry, but an "international level" GP horse who cannot be hacked down the road is nothing but a failure!

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X