• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Who Needs an Upper Level Warmblood When You Can Have a Mule!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Was it the best 4th level test ever? Nope. However, it's a MULE doing FOURTH level. It's a mule with flying changes and half pass. THAT is the point. Anyone who can't recognize this achievement is a stuffy poo head.
    http://weanieeventer.blogspot.com/

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by CFFarm View Post
      Although I think what the trainer accomplished is fantastic, I must admit that I was wondering that if he was horse and not a mule if he would have gotten the same scores?

      Ah, he might be an affirmative action mule? There's no way he would have gotten here without a little special help -some easy scoring cuz he's a mule.

      Maybe you should ask the judge.

      Wow
      Paula
      He is total garbage! Quick! Hide him on my trailer (Petstorejunkie).

      Comment


      • #43
        how was he able to compete in a Horse show since he is a mule. I remember many years ago this being an issue for someone who was eventing a mule. although perhaps I misremember.

        My dream retirement animal is a TWH mule!
        A man must love a thing very much if he not only practices it without any hope of fame or money, but even practices it without any hope of doing it well.--G. K. Chesterton

        Comment


        • #44
          I wasn't aware of any restrictions to the kind of horse you can ride in dressage. Did someone tell you that no mules were allowed or something?

          Paula
          He is total garbage! Quick! Hide him on my trailer (Petstorejunkie).

          Comment


          • #45
            Fun to watch - because it was a mule - but I found myself thinking that this ride wouldn't win (or come close to 60) in any of the shows I've been to. He does have changes - but he braces and/or goes crooked in all of them, and he tends to slide his haunches around in canter work - he also goes wide (you really see it in the halts) because he can't/isn't really sitting.

            I am a huge fan of "you don't need a WB to do dressage", but this ride didn't excite me. Loved his floppy ears - I bet he's a lot of fun, but I was a little disappointed when I watched the video

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by MysticOakRanch View Post
              Fun to watch - because it was a mule - but I found myself thinking that this ride wouldn't win (or come close to 60) in any of the shows I've been to. He does have changes - but he braces and/or goes crooked in all of them, and he tends to slide his haunches around in canter work - he also goes wide (you really see it in the halts) because he can't/isn't really sitting.

              I am a huge fan of "you don't need a WB to do dressage", but this ride didn't excite me. Loved his floppy ears - I bet he's a lot of fun, but I was a little disappointed when I watched the video
              So I don't disagree with you to a point, but I do think this goes both ways most of the time. I have seen so many tests where a really pretty/fancy/extravagant mover scores in the 70s, even though the horse is bracing, mouth gaping, hind legs dragging in the dirt, nose way behind the vertical, and just full of tension. But those gaits!

              It's the funny/frustrating thing about dressage for me, the judging is SO subjective most of the time.
              On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by lizathenag View Post
                how was he able to compete in a Horse show since he is a mule. I remember many years ago this being an issue for someone who was eventing a mule. although perhaps I misremember.

                My dream retirement animal is a TWH mule!
                USEF Rule DR.119.1 specifically allows mules for all but USEF High Perf Champs or Qualifying classes. (Not that I have the rulebook in my truck just in case I need to show said rule to a non-believer or anything...)

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by enjoytheride
                  Was it the best 4th level test ever? Nope. However, it's a MULE doing FOURTH level. It's a mule with flying changes and half pass. THAT is the point. Anyone who can't recognize this achievement is a stuffy poo head.
                  Agreed. Congratulations to the rider for this achievement! It's always nice to see someone doing their own thing and having fun, and there were some moments in the test that reflected genuinely good training.

                  Originally posted by gestalt
                  I didn't think it was a quality test. A nice ride and the mule was a good boy, but I'm not seeing this wowza winning test that others are. *I'm in no way an expert* I wonder how many riders were in that class?
                  Also agreed but I doubt this rider needs my input! The full show results are on the USEF website - the score was decent and appropriate IMO. It was a very small class. But I repeat - congrats on a solid 4th level test with a mule!! (...And I was derided in the "woes" thread for suggesting talented non-WBs as potential CDI prospects?!)
                  Proud COTH lurker since 2001.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    What was the score?
                    "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      According to a comment in the video linked a 59.8% and a 61.57% for two tests ridden that day.

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by paulaedwina View Post
                        I wasn't aware of any restrictions to the kind of horse you can ride in dressage. Did someone tell you that no mules were allowed or something?

                        Paula
                        Mules were not able to compete at recognized shows until 2004.

                        Cathy Wieschoff evented a mule at Prelim and was supposedly the reason for mules being banned from eventing as she beat quite a few horses. In 2008 a rule was submitted to allow mules to compete again but was not endorsed because mules could be a distraction to horses.
                        http://weanieeventer.blogspot.com/

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by Perfect Pony View Post
                          I have seen so many tests where a really pretty/fancy/extravagant mover scores in the 70s, even though the horse is bracing, mouth gaping, hind legs dragging in the dirt, nose way behind the vertical, and just full of tension. But those gaits!
                          How is it that "hind legs dragging in the dirt" produce "those gaits!"

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Originally posted by enjoytheride View Post
                            Mules were not able to compete at recognized shows until 2004.

                            Cathy Wieschoff evented a mule at Prelim and was supposedly the reason for mules being banned from eventing as she beat quite a few horses. In 2008 a rule was submitted to allow mules to compete again but was not endorsed because mules could be a distraction to horses.

                            That's kind of sad. Thanks for the information.

                            Paula
                            He is total garbage! Quick! Hide him on my trailer (Petstorejunkie).

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              I agree he showed some "mule-itude" during his changes. So darn cute though. Especially the ears! Quite an accomplishment.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by Mike Matson View Post
                                For those asking about his breeding, I did find this. He's out of:

                                Heart B Lonesome M—Irene’s Star

                                Taken from this CotH article last year:



                                https://www.chronofhorse.com/article...-new-direction
                                Irene's Star is a TB, but on the breeder's page which you can find by going to Heart B Ranch, in Emmett, Idaho, you will find they used a Jack way back who was a Morgan Cross, not sure of the other Jack or the current one. The broodmare's are the special TB Irene plus quarter and paint mares. Porter also was diagnosed with a neurological condition as a youngster, he tripped and fell down, quite a bit, this work seems to have strengthened him out of that problem. That in and of itself is amazing!

                                One thing I have been trying to years to find is something that was shown on some cable station or the other, regarding the Grand Prix jumpers through history who have had mule in their pedigree. A deep, dark secret, but if anyone has seen it and can somehow point the mule ears toward it, I would love to see. Someone needs to alert Fenwick Bartholomule to this page. He would probably be sore amazed and certainly his adoring friend would love it.
                                "We, too, will be remembered not for victories or defeats in battle or in politics, but for our contribution to the human spirit." JFK

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Originally posted by alicen View Post
                                  Originally posted by Perfect Pony View Post
                                  So I don't disagree with you to a point, but I do think this goes both ways most of the time. I have seen so many tests where a really pretty/fancy/extravagant mover scores in the 70s, even though the horse is bracing, mouth gaping, hind legs dragging in the dirt, nose way behind the vertical, and just full of tension. But those gaits!
                                  How is it that "hind legs dragging in the dirt" produce "those gaits!"
                                  Rhetorical flourish, mainly.

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    I don't think any one is saying this is the next olympic gold medalist - the point I believe is that you can progress up through the levels on an animal that didn't cost you $60k - it is a demonstration of good training and riding well to do what you enjoy and improve the rideability, not of uber stylish dressage gaits or stupendous athletic ability for the elite levels of competition.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Originally posted by Calamber View Post
                                      you will find they used a Jack way back who was a Morgan Cross,.
                                      How can a jack be a Morgan cross....a donkey is a donkey.

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        For a mule, he has good conformation. The rider is a nice rider and harmonious pair. The ride itself , underwhelmed.

                                        I guess I am a snob...not about WB's but about mules. I just think they look strange doing dressage and don't see the point, but wish them well.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Originally posted by Calamber View Post
                                          One thing I have been trying to years to find is something that was shown on some cable station or the other, regarding the Grand Prix jumpers through history who have had mule in their pedigree. A deep, dark secret, but if anyone has seen it and can somehow point the mule ears toward it, I would love to see. Someone needs to alert Fenwick Bartholomule to this page. He would probably be sore amazed and certainly his adoring friend would love it.
                                          How could something have "mule in their pedigree"? Either they are a mule (which is a male donkey bred to a female horse), or it is NOT a mule. Mules are sterile - they can't be bred, so something can't be "part mule".

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X