• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Jaguar Saddles in Comparison to Albion

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jaguar Saddles in Comparison to Albion

    Unfortunately, I have to part with my new-to-me Albion Original Comfort.

    I LOVE this saddle. Short flap, wide twist, puts me in the right position.

    I have come across a Jaguar with a short flap, and based on the reviews, it will fit my horse GREAT.

    The Albion has gussets, which don't work for my mare as they are so big they sit on her kidneys. The saddle is also a wide with super wide panels. I planned on having the saddle narrowed by an authorized shop, but at this point the saddle will need too much customizing to make it work.

    The Jaguar is an 18.5 seat, like the Albion, 15" flaps (Albion has 14.5 I believe). It is listed as a wide, but measures narrower than the Albion. Also is not gussetted.

    From the description, I believe it will fit my horse (who is not flat backed and has slight hollows behind the withers).

    From my reading, Jaguars have a narrow twist. I have always preferred wider, but I have never sat in a Jaguar.

    Thoughts on these? I can do a 7 day trial on the Jag before commiting, but I will need to sell the Albion.

  • #2
    The seat balance on the Jaguar is TOTALLY different from Albion - I hate the forward balanced seats, so I have no positive feedback, sorry. Some people love them - but I think you need to try it yourself to decide if it will work.

    Comment


    • #3
      Agree with MysticOakRanch: the seat architecture will be night-and-day different from an Albion Original Comfort. You'd just have to sit in it and see.
      Head Geek at The Saddle Geek Blog http://www.thesaddlegeek.com/

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        Thankfully a local shop has one I can sit in. I tend to fall forward and the Albion really makes a night and day differance.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think if you tend to fall forward naturally, then speaking as a fellow short person, the jaguar is likely to exacerbate that problem.

          My dressage saddle is a custom Heritage, and I think it rides pretty similarly to my old SLK Ultima. That may be an option for you as brand new, made to fit, fully loaded the saddle was $1550.
          Originally posted by PeanutButterPony
          you can shackle your pony to a lawn chair at the show...so long as its in a conservative color.

          Comment


          • #6
            I love my Albion, regularly ride in a variety of other saddles - Niedersuss, some synthetics, Passier, Excelle.
            On one saddle fitting adventure, I tried about 6 saddles on my young growing horse - he LOVED the Jaguar, I was afraid to breathe in it. Tried it again - same result, I did not like it at all.

            A tall rider with a long thigh bone LOVED the Jaguar saddle, as did her horse.

            They are well made saddles. Try one if you get a chance.
            Horses should be trained in such a way that they not only love their riders, but look forward to the time they are with them.
            ~ Xenophon, 350 B.C.

            Comment


            • #7
              Reviving a thread because I have a Jaguar question I hope you guys can answer.

              What does a "forward balance ride" mean? That means your pubic bone will be way low when you sit in the saddle's sweet spot? So you'd better be able to lengthen the front of your body?

              The slope up to the pommel is gentle? And the saddle isn't a bucket?
              The armchair saddler
              Politically Pro-Cat

              Comment


              • #8
                The Jaguars, as others have mentioned, fit on the forward-balance principle, which wants the rider's weight as close to the horse's center of balance as possible. The UK/SMS school of thought, otoh, wants the rider's weight spread over as large a bearing surface as possible w/o interfering w/the shoulders or going past T18. The forward-balance saddles are often a good solution for really short-backed horses, though mostly any UK-made saddle can be had w/a sloped back cantle and shorter, more upswept rear panel, which accomplishes almost the same thing, but often offers a bit more bearing surface.

                As far as the rider's end of the deal, many of the forward-balance saddles are deeper seated, without the flat spot in the seat that some of the UK saddles offer.
                Kitt Hazelton
                Saddle Fitter
                www.pantherrunsaddlery.com
                www.saddlefitter.blogspot.com

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by mvp View Post
                  Reviving a thread because I have a Jaguar question I hope you guys can answer.

                  What does a "forward balance ride" mean? That means your pubic bone will be way low when you sit in the saddle's sweet spot? So you'd better be able to lengthen the front of your body?

                  The slope up to the pommel is gentle? And the saddle isn't a bucket?
                  Kitt gave a good answer, but to build on her answer, being a forward-balance saddle or not has basically nothing to do with the seat depth or the slope to the pommel. It simply means that the seat's balance point for the rider is placed in front of the saddle's true middle point.

                  Perhaps a visual aid would help.

                  Forward balanced (a Dominus, if you're wondering):
                  http://s176.photobucket.com/user/jn4...c7c19.jpg.html

                  A more moderately balanced saddle whose balance point is in the true center of the tree and seat (a Frank Baines, if you're wondering):
                  http://s176.photobucket.com/user/jn4...ml?sort=3&o=25

                  You can build a forward-balanced saddle with a deep seat, a shallow seat, etc. Don't buy it? Google the Amerigo Pinerolo Alto versus the Amerigo Deep Dressage.

                  Yes, to some degree, most forward-balanced saddles do have a pretty steep rise to the pommel--because duh, if the rider is parked closer to the front of the saddle, the pommel can gets kinda smushed up there. But have I seen forward-balanced saddles without a steep rise to the pommel? Yes. Typically, such saddles are very shallow-seated saddles overall. The alternative would be kind of clownish: some huge, high cantle pushing you forward into a non-existent, nothing-to-stop-you-from-just-tipping-forward-onto-your-horse's-neck pommel. I admit that I've actually seen that circus show on certain crappy low-end knockoffs of high-end, forward-balanced saddles (::cough:: certain Toulouses ::cough:.

                  That said, I would hate for folks to read Kitt's description and get the misimpression that forward-balanced saddles tend to make horses uncomfortable. Frankly, these forward-balanced saddles are super common--a lot of people who own them don't even realize that's what they bought--and thousands of horses can't be wrong. They are also not the exclusive provenance of the French, Italians, and Swiss; some British, German, etc. saddles are also forward-balanced. But Kitt's right that forward-balanced saddles, at least the intelligently designed ones, tend to distribute weigh and shock through different means than a British saddle with a wide and deep panel. The exact mechanics are beyond the scope of this post since it's done differently by different brands, etc.

                  But a big bogey that a lot of saddle shoppers don't think about is that a forward-balanced saddle necessarily puts you closer to the front of the saddle (as described above), which in turn means your entire leg is situated further forward on the flap. So you get people who try forward-balanced saddles in a smaller/their usual seat size, and they're all like "Oh my leg must be really long and I must need a forward flap!" Uh no dudes, it's just that this particular type of saddle parks you closer to the pommel and you probably need to go up a seat size partly to accommodate that leg. And obviously, since you're parked further forward on the seat, the net effect is that there's often more cantle hanging out behind you, which can be exacerbated in visual effect when you go up a seat size. So H/J riders and others who are obsessed with aesthetics are often surprised, or even disturbed, by how much cantle may be hanging out behind your butt in a properly fitted forward-balanced saddle. I had to trick one client into sitting in a 17.5" Amerigo instead of a 17"; she fought and fought me on it, but sure enough, I tricked her into sitting in a 17.5" and the angels started to sing. She also had five fingers' clearance behind her (it's not that dramatic for everyone; I've only got four fingers' clearance behind my Amerigo, and I've fit zaftig riders who end up with just three fingers' clearance in an Amerigo. But five-fingers-behind-her girl had a tiny, bony little butt). She agreed that after feeling how the saddle rode, she could care less about how much or how little cantle was hanging out behind her.

                  (A brief rant: all those threads in the H/J forum complaining about how CWDs are crotch destroyers whose flaps don't fit the rider right, but surely they are riding in the right seat size because they have 3 fingers' clearance behind their butts? Yeah. Classic signs of riding in a forward-balanced saddle but not realizing it and not having your saddle fitter explain it to you. I'm not saying that everyone will be comfy in a CWD/Amerigo/etc. if they just size up a seat because some people's bodies are better suited to a truly middling balanced point a la Crosby or even a backseat balance point a la the Black Country Quantum and County Stabilizer...but nonetheless, sizing up in a forward-balanced saddle is often a good idea. I've stopped responding to such threads over on H/J because frankly, a lot of the would rather achieve "the look" than listen to this structural argument, and it's become a waste of my breath. Sad but true.)
                  Last edited by jn4jenny; Mar. 19, 2014, 12:04 PM.
                  Head Geek at The Saddle Geek Blog http://www.thesaddlegeek.com/

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    My 4 year old has a "young horse saddle" which means both more open seat and the forward balance mentioned - the thought being with the balance young horses have and their lack of overall strength weight off the loin area is a very good thing. In our case, we had 7 saddles from 4 brands to try on after the saddle fitter did a preliminary check her previous visit to get an idea of shape and size for us, and it was the ones which fit us both very comfortably. It makes me ride with a straighter leg than normal, but she's a narrow young horse so it's actually comfortable anyway.

                    As for Jaguars - I find them unrideably uncomfortable - they dig into my thighs terribly. Maybe they have a narrow twist so it's the sides of the tree that get me, but it sure felt like a wide twist to me. Just awful.
                    If Kim Kardashian wants to set up a gofundme to purchase the Wu Tang album from Martin Shkreli, guess what people you DON'T HAVE TO DONATE.
                    -meupatdoes

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Revitalizing this thread. Question for Jn4jenny. I am currently trying an Amerigo Cortina. My young horse loves the forward balance. It is a 17 1/2. I'm 5'8" and 135 lbs with a long thigh. I have to ride really long in order to fit my thigh to thd flap. I have adapted but couldn't ride shorter it I wanted to on those days that I am a little tight. Do you think an 18 would be too big or be more comfortable? Any other insight is much appreciated. You seem very knowledgable on the forward balance saddles. Riding in an Amerigo has made an enormous difference in my horse. She has never been able to canter under saddle without a struggle. With the Amerigo, her back is free to undulate and she is balanced in both the canter a downward transitions. Always a struggle in the past.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Not jenny, but FWIW, I'd guess that going up a half-inch might make a difference. The Amerigos ride a little small IMO, and someone of your height might do better with that extra bit of room. It's also possible that the flap set may be at issue here; I *think* you can order one with a more forward flap, but check with Ann Forrest at Equestrian Imports - she sells Amerigo, and could tell you for sure.
                        Kitt Hazelton
                        Saddle Fitter
                        www.pantherrunsaddlery.com
                        www.saddlefitter.blogspot.com

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Thanks Kitt. I just feel like my butt is stuffed up against the rise of the cantle. Do you think that the extra 1/2" would dump me towards the back of the saddle and the panels would be much longer? Also, I would wonder if a more forward flap would interfere with my horse's shoulders. She has large shoulders and a short back.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by jn4jenny View Post

                            Perhaps a visual aid would help.

                            Forward balanced (a Dominus, if you're wondering):
                            http://s176.photobucket.com/user/jn4...c7c19.jpg.html

                            A more moderately balanced saddle whose balance point is in the true center of the tree and seat (a Frank Baines, if you're wondering):
                            http://s176.photobucket.com/user/jn4...ml?sort=3&o=25
                            Well call me a doof, but I don't see the balance point moved far ahead in the Dominus so much as the whole thing being more of a steep bucket.

                            I think of Frank Baines saddles as being a nice, neutral British-made kind of saddle. (And I think they are well-made for the price, deserving of more renown that they get. Do you agree?) So what I see there is a longer "working center". Some call this an more "open" seat. But in geometric terms, I'm not sure the deepest part of the seat is farther back behind the stirrup bars and the pommel than it is in the Dominus. What am I missing?

                            Oh, and both saddles have been set level in the picture, right? Sometimes, I think saddles are put on stands that have them tipped forward or back and that screws up the whole Geometry Estimation thing for me.

                            I always assume the front edge of the flap will be vertical when the saddle is on the horse… and knowing that tells you the orientation of the saddle (tipped forward or back in a picture). But that's not so! Some saddles are designed to have a bit of an angle forward to the flap when on the horse and level. Well, boy-howdie that screws up the whole Geometry Estimation thing again.
                            Last edited by mvp; Apr. 22, 2014, 12:57 PM.
                            The armchair saddler
                            Politically Pro-Cat

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Forward-balance saddles also have a smaller weight-bearing surface than a "standard" balance saddle; the latter focuses on spreading the rider's weight over as large a bearing surface as possible w/o interfering with the shoulders or going past T18, while the forward-balance saddles want the rider's weight as close to the horse's center of gravity/withers as possible. Both fits can work - depends on the individual horse and rider.
                              Kitt Hazelton
                              Saddle Fitter
                              www.pantherrunsaddlery.com
                              www.saddlefitter.blogspot.com

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X