• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Spinoff: bits, bridles, gaping mouths

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Spinoff: bits, bridles, gaping mouths

    The other thread about the OP whose horse is rooting at the bit got me thinking about bitting, bridles, and gaping mouths in the dressage world.

    When I stopped to think about the question and issue more in-depth, I thought of the horses I've seen with "contact issues" and a lot of them are in dressage.

    Why is that?

    Why is it that nosebands exist to clamp shut a horse's mouth in dressage, yet in hunters a horse easily keeps his mouth shut and in western nosebands aren't even used?

    Why is "contact" prized when in order to get it it seems to create tension more than relaxation? Why do other disciplines favor a lighter contact than dressage? Surely horses of other disciplines perform just as many skills as a dressage horse (especially if you consider that the majority of AAs doing dressage are under 2nd level and a well-schooled hunter could do that as well).

    Of course I'm speaking in generalities here, but I am speaking also from the experience of riding my horses with different levels of contact and finding they prefer a lighter and softer contact than what I've been instructed in my own training and what I've seen of others as well.

    Is it because of the types of horses that are popular these days and that people sit the trot before they should or are over-mounted so end up hanging on and calling it contact, or ???

    Before I rode dressage I always wondered about that (I had a friend who was an eventer and she couldn't explain to me why she used a flash), then I kind of just accepted it, and now I'm scratching my head.
    "A horse's face always conveys clearly whether it is loved by its owner or simply used." - Anja Beran

  • #2
    Bad riding. Bad training. Inconsiderate humans looking for a "quick result".

    Just my opinion

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by kmmoran View Post
      Bad riding. Bad training. Inconsiderate humans looking for a "quick result".

      Just my opinion
      Agreed. And it's not just dressage.

      Comment


      • #4
        Actually, the ideal contact in dressage for a horse that is ridden well off the seat is very light. Many other disciplines, to say nothing of legions of dressage riders, do not really ride the horse off their seat. It is "hands and legs and nobody home in between."

        A correctly ridden horse will do a halt transition off seat alone, with the rein held just taught enough to prevent a loop. A correctly ridden horse can do canter pirouettes with a loop in the reins, held in one hand. A heavy contact is not required, but rather putting the horse on the back and seat.


        The video below is my friend riding her 4yo homebred on her 12th ride under saddle.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSbbdisy-Po

        Does the contact look heavy to you? Do you see any problems such as you describe?
        Correctly ridden, it is **right there.**

        (BTW, she doesn't ride five horses a day. She works at a bank, has a retired broodmare and a trail QH, and waited five years for this horse to gestate and grow up before she had something to ride again.)

        Now when you look at horses that have been under saddle for years, and they display resistances, tension, or are heavy to ride around, remember that the above could have been possible from the very beginning if the horse had been ridden correctly.
        Furthermore, if you can find someone who will ride the horse correctly, it will eventually go like that video.

        Hold that picture in your head as a standard and consider whether it is the overall discipline that is coming up short, or its pilots.

        If a trainer you are working with is not able to ride a horse at the very least like a greenie with 12 rides under saddle, without the use of bits/gadgets/etc, ask yourself: is "better" actually possible?
        The Noodlehttp://tiny.cc/NGKmT&http://tiny.cc/gioSA
        Jinxyhttp://tiny.cc/PIC798&http://tiny.cc/jinx364
        Boy Wonderhttp://tiny.cc/G9290
        The Hana is nuts! NUTS!!http://tinyurl.com/SOCRAZY

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Oh, I DO have a standard in my head, but the problem is that it doesn't look like what I see when I look around at many people. I am not saying that no other discipline is without fault, because they all are. This specific topic just came up and got me to thinking.

          Yes, there is a standard of what I'd like to see (which includes no crank or other restrictive nosebands), but why isn't it out there? Why is it next to impossible to buy a dressage bridle without a flash attachments? What is missing in the teaching that causes this to be seen so much?

          Is it because people are in a hurry to get out and show?

          Is it because trainers don't teach timing of aids and proper release?

          Is it because people are over-mounted?

          Is it because of different training theories?

          I will say "yes" to all of the above, at least in what I've seen in a few different regions.

          But why is it acceptable?

          Why is there a standard of "contact" implying a certain heaviness in the hand that is considered proper dressage contact where it seems that others want light contact? I know there was a big discussion about "German" vs. "French" training a few months ago - is that where it stems from?
          "A horse's face always conveys clearly whether it is loved by its owner or simply used." - Anja Beran

          Comment


          • #6
            You obviously haven't been around many local hunter shows Plenty of TIGHT noseband there, just without a flash (although many school in flashes and take them off for shows). You say a 'well schooled hunter' can easily do low level dressage. Well... sure. But, just like dressage, there are more low level hunters with bad training than fancy fancy, well schooled ones. You just trade off issues. The badly ridden/trained dressage horse may be more likely to gape it's mouth because of bad contact, but the badly ridden/trained hunter is more likely to be stiff as a board with NO give through it's neck or body.

            Bad riding exists in ALL disciplines. If you compare a well schooled hunter to a poorly trained/ridden dressage horse, of course hunters will seem more kind/forgiving. But compare a well schooled dressage horse to a poorly ridden/trained hunter, and suddenly dressage seems like the kinder more correct discipline.
            .

            Comment


            • #7
              I am not sure what you mean by "heavy". A well schooled horse working on a movement he is proficient at should not be heavy, but should not "light as feather" either. As he works on something more difficult, it is normal and expected the contact will temporarily be heavier as he struggles with self carriage in the new form and relies on humans more but as he and develop proper strength, the contact will lighten.

              I think of this like ballroom dance, or pair ice skating. Each partner has to offer sufficient feel but should not be heavy like a log either. Have you danced with a professional? They are not light by any stretch, but they are not heavy either. It is a much nicer feeling than dancing with some floppy teenage boy.

              Comment


              • #8
                ALL EXCELLENT POINTS TO PONDER!!!

                Yearssss ago when officiers competed there were no nosebands, and open mouth showed their technique (or the problems with it).

                In initially nosebands (for the military) served the purpose of having a halter to tie the horse.

                In the srs a drop noseband was paired with a full cheek to prevent the crossing of the jaw (which some green horses can do). But even before than, horses were initially ridden in the caveson (with draw reins for lateral flexibility), and then the horse went to a curb alone.

                NEVER were nosebands to clamp shut a horse's mouth during training. And flashes only came to being when auctions decided to change from drops (which were misunderstood by people from other less educated countries came to buy). And then the game was on. MAKE the horse take the bit and flex longitudinally first.

                "Why is "contact" prized when in order to get it it seems to create tension more than relaxation?" Contact (from bit acceptance to being 'on the bit' should follow a progression from light lateral flexibility. Horses are expected to show their full gaits before they are capable of it. So showy gaits created from tension (precipitous flexion) and over tempo are being rewarded. What the judges reward, others will follow.

                "Why do other disciplines favor a lighter contact than dressage? " Self carriage and lightness in hand should be in goal of every rider (NO continously torqued curbs should ever happen). It is not the type of horse, it is that half halts to change balance are not clear for the horse (come up/open/remain active) and cessation of the aids. And if in self carriage they should go on the weight of the rein and also easily seek fdo when allowed. We act, they react by changing balance, and we allow that to continue. But if the horse are ridden lowered/closed the horse cannot come to that. For SURE, EVERYTHING we do on the horse should be explained, not taken for granted because someone say it. We must learn how much the effect of our aids change the horse, but we must also observe what we do and refine it. That makes EVERYTHING us RESPONSIBLE for what the horse does, and not blaming th horse. A heavy load which requires as much mind and forethought as it does experience and REFINING timing.
                I.D.E.A. yoda

                Comment


                • #9
                  You guys know me: I'm the one on the Western Dressage threads bitching about the sine qua non of Dressage being contact.

                  IMO, the big problem is that it takes some good riding to be able to touch and micromanage a horse's mouth all the time. If you don't have that physical skill built on a lot of saddle time, you'll make riding unpleasant for him.

                  I do think that other disciplines like the hunters kinda sorta do the horse a favor by not asking the rider to have constant/so much contact. There is a margin for rider error.

                  We talk a lot about big mouth problems here-- gaping and such. I'd have to see the horse and rider to figure out why that is happening. IRL, I don't see glaring issues around me (that I can't easily ascribe to an uneducated horse or unskilled rider). I also haven't spent a lot of time looking for *the* bit/noseband that fixes it. Maybe that's just because I haven't looked.
                  The armchair saddler
                  Politically Pro-Cat

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    OP, to answer your question: One of the reasons I think contact is "prized" is because it assumes that the rider has all the feel and skill he needs.
                    The armchair saddler
                    Politically Pro-Cat

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      Originally posted by ideayoda View Post
                      ALL EXCELLENT POINTS TO PONDER!!!

                      Yearssss ago when officiers competed there were no nosebands, and open mouth showed their technique (or the problems with it).

                      In initially nosebands (for the military) served the purpose of having a halter to tie the horse.

                      In the srs a drop noseband was paired with a full cheek to prevent the crossing of the jaw (which some green horses can do). But even before than, horses were initially ridden in the caveson (with draw reins for lateral flexibility), and then the horse went to a curb alone.

                      NEVER were nosebands to clamp shut a horse's mouth during training. And flashes only came to being when auctions decided to change from drops (which were misunderstood by people from other less educated countries came to buy). And then the game was on. MAKE the horse take the bit and flex longitudinally first.

                      "Why is "contact" prized when in order to get it it seems to create tension more than relaxation?" Contact (from bit acceptance to being 'on the bit' should follow a progression from light lateral flexibility. Horses are expected to show their full gaits before they are capable of it. So showy gaits created from tension (precipitous flexion) and over tempo are being rewarded. What the judges reward, others will follow.

                      "Why do other disciplines favor a lighter contact than dressage? " Self carriage and lightness in hand should be in goal of every rider (NO continously torqued curbs should ever happen). It is not the type of horse, it is that half halts to change balance are not clear for the horse (come up/open/remain active) and cessation of the aids. And if in self carriage they should go on the weight of the rein and also easily seek fdo when allowed. We act, they react by changing balance, and we allow that to continue. But if the horse are ridden lowered/closed the horse cannot come to that. For SURE, EVERYTHING we do on the horse should be explained, not taken for granted because someone say it. We must learn how much the effect of our aids change the horse, but we must also observe what we do and refine it. That makes EVERYTHING us RESPONSIBLE for what the horse does, and not blaming th horse. A heavy load which requires as much mind and forethought as it does experience and REFINING timing.
                      Thank you for that very thoughtful response.

                      I bolded above what I wonder about as a cause - horses doing more than they are ready for, balance-wise, so the tension is created and heaviness begins as they try to balance themselves.

                      And in speaking of timing, I agree about that, too. Only recently did I learn a sequence of timing that has made a big difference in my horse. It seems so basic and fundamental that it leaves me scratching my head that in 30+ years of riding it was never described to me before. I've ridden on the east coast and west coast, in show barns and with people who describe themselves as "classical." Not once did anyone ever explain something so basic to me (and coming from a non-dressage, non-show-oriented source). I know I am not alone in missing this vital information.

                      Yes, again, I know there is good and bad riding in all disciplines. But in dressage a common theme is "contact" and so I guess that's what my question is about. And I have heard it explained, both from trainers and here on COTH, that a dressage contact is "different" and that dressage riders want "more" (heavier, I've even heard) and my question is why??? Why not go for lightness? Why just accept that "heavier" is the way it is and that's what is wanted?

                      Really, this is a serious question and I'm looking for answers other than "but other disciplines have bad riding, too" or "you just haven't ridden with the right people" or whatever else doesn't explain the root problem.
                      "A horse's face always conveys clearly whether it is loved by its owner or simply used." - Anja Beran

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        mvp, I was replying to ideayoda while you were posting. Good points about why it is prized - to show the feel and skill of the rider. And again a good point about why hunters doing a favor to the horse by not asking the rider to take contact. So perhaps dressage as a discipline (if you're going to go out and show) is asking more of the horses AND riders than they are ready for because it is really so nuanced to be in a horse's mouth and have contact and communicate delicately and precisely?
                        "A horse's face always conveys clearly whether it is loved by its owner or simply used." - Anja Beran

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Pocket Pony View Post
                          mvp, I was replying to ideayoda while you were posting. Good points about why it is prized - to show the feel and skill of the rider. And again a good point about why hunters doing a favor to the horse by not asking the rider to take contact. So perhaps dressage as a discipline (if you're going to go out and show) is asking more of the horses AND riders than they are ready for because it is really so nuanced to be in a horse's mouth and have contact and communicate delicately and precisely?
                          Not really.

                          To correctly ride and train a horse, even at the earliest level, you need to know how to ride with a correct contact.

                          If you skip it "until people are ready" what does that do?

                          Unfortunately people will have to sit on the 20m circle until they can do transitions in and out of all the gaits without stirrups and control the pace/transitions without reins, and someone will have to hold the rein and explain feel to them.

                          The whole problem IS that people are skipping this. Perhaps if more emphasis was placed on getting it right instead of moving on regardless more horses would get a lot better rides.
                          The Noodlehttp://tiny.cc/NGKmT&http://tiny.cc/gioSA
                          Jinxyhttp://tiny.cc/PIC798&http://tiny.cc/jinx364
                          Boy Wonderhttp://tiny.cc/G9290
                          The Hana is nuts! NUTS!!http://tinyurl.com/SOCRAZY

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            [QUOTE=Pocket Pony;6976074]mvp, I was replying to ideayoda while you were posting. Good points about why it is prized - to show the feel and skill of the rider. /QUOTE]

                            No, not to *show* the skill of the rider, rather, having someone hold the horse's mouth simply presumes that the rider can do that well. Lower level tests assume almost nothing about the rider, including his limited skill. That creates a tough situation for the horse who has to show his best gaits, relaxation and submission to his rider.... whether or not the rider warrants those.
                            The armchair saddler
                            Politically Pro-Cat

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I don't think other disciplines require acceptance of the bit at the same level as dressags, and therefore you will see more problems in dressage than elsewhere.


                              My horse had moments of bit acceptance, but only now is he finally overcoming his past and truly learning to accept the bit without ducking or coming above it, and allowing honest contact. It took HUGE improvement in my seat and riding to get it to happen, and he will still duck if I allow him to suck behind my leg. When he is figuring something out he chews, and for him chewing is not the soft ideal but an opening and closing of his mouth - and he does this in his pen with no bit as well. When he is softly in the contact and going well, using his body properly, his mouth is also still.

                              I wish lower level tests looked less for a steady head in the correct position and more for use of the horse's hind end and rider's seat. If a young horse is not forced into a position it well may move its head, but to me that's acceptable as the horse learns to balance itself.
                              Originally posted by Silverbridge
                              If you get anything on your Facebook feed about who is going to the Olympics in 2012 or guessing the outcome of Bush v Gore please start threads about those, too.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I think problems are seen more often in dressage because we seek a different kind of contact. What does that mean though, really? I think the appropriate contact is whatever the rider asks for intentionally. That is achieved with greater or lesser degrees of success. And the rub comes when riders ask for things inadvertently. I disagree with the notion that any noseband can clamp a horse's shut effectively. If you consider the structure of a horse's mouth, it is obvious they can stick their tongue out any time they wish. Whenever you see a gaping mouth or tongue sticking out, it is a sign of discomfort (though not necessarily with the bit or even in the mouth).

                                All of my snaffle bridles have flashes. IMO the usefulness of a flash is to help keep the bit stable in a young horse's mouth. Other than that, they don't do too much.
                                See those flying monkeys? They work for me.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  This is why I school without a nose band I want to KNOW if my hands are causing problems. Clearly the solution is for me to get my sh*t together and not cover it up my strapping my horse's mouth shut.

                                  But of course, I made the mistake of posting a picture on Facebook, only to get a barrage of comments that 'no self respecting English rider would ride without a nose band!'
                                  Pisgah: 2000 AHHA (Holsteiner x TB) Mare (lower level eventing, with a focus on dressage)

                                  Darcy: 7? year old Border Collie x Rottweiler? Drama Queen extraordinaire, rescued from the pound in Jan 2010

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I think you are perhaps misinterpreting "contact" as a stand-alone relationship between rider's hand and horse's mouth... instead of as one essential component of the circle-of-aids.
                                    Proud COTH lurker since 2001.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I learned to ride Forward Seat (hunt seat) over 40 years ago. We were expected to keep contact with the horse's mouth if we were beyond the elementary stage of riding. The nosebands always had 2 fingers of space or more, and we were yelled at if our horses gaped at all. I have had ONE lunging lesson my whole life.

                                      Now, with pretty severe MS, bad balance problems, hand tremors and incoordination, I can still ride horses on contact, not just regular horses but previously abused Arabians, in a snaffle and no noseband (I cut off the chin strap of my Micklem bridles.) One mare is especially sensitive, ever ready to invert when the rider's hands are not good enough for her (previously ridden in a standing martingle). I get an inversion from her two or three times a year and I do not use a martingle.

                                      How do I do it? Lots and lots of two-point to stabilize my legs, concentrating on LIGHT contact, timing my aids correctly, and releasing my aids PROMPTLY. All the horses I ride prefer me using the bit than any of the 6 bitless systems I've used, they are light and responsive 90% of the time.

                                      But of course this will be discounted because I do not compete in dressage.

                                      Sorry, but if I can do it as handicapped as I am why can't dressage riders? When I started riding I was always told that dressage riders had the lightest hands. I do not see that nowadays. If I had ridden back then the way I see dressage riders compete today I would have been yanked off the horse and told in no uncertain terms to improve or quit riding. The "half-halts" I see today look an awful lot like jerking the horse's mouth HARD to me. My ears are still blistered 35years later when I tried something like that at North Forks with Kay Russell. IT WAS NOT ALLOWED.

                                      Sorry for my vehemence. This is a pet peeve of mine (and my riding teacher.)

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Jackie Cochran View Post
                                        How do I do it? Lots and lots of two-point to stabilize my legs...
                                        IMO, this is a totally different ball of wax than dressage. Stabilizing using your legs and stabilizing using just your seat for balance are very different. For me, perhaps because I started as a hunter, stabilizing using my legs is vastly easier than keeping a soft, draping leg and relying on my seat and core alone to maintain my balance.

                                        The kind of contact required for moving up the levels in dressage is a flowing, forward-thinking moving-with-the-horse contact so you have a perfectly consistent, light connection with the horse's mouth even as the location of said mouth changes relative to where the rider's core is. So as the horse's neck telescopes at the walk and canter, you have to maintain the exact same contact as you move. I think this is a lot trickier than the type of hands expected in some disciplines, which stay relatively stationary with a looser rein.

                                        My contact isn't perfect, but I think it's decent. I've been told it is good. I do think starting as a hunter helped me understand the feeling of moving my hands with the horse, primarily as a consequence of some of the jumping instruction I got. I also got drilled into me from an early age to protect the mouth, so if I lose my balance I don't seek the mouth to steady myself -- instead, I do as above and rely on my legs (also not good for dressage, though). I also benefited from eighteen bazillion lunge lessons, primarily overseas.

                                        Personally, I think that people are out there trying their darndest but SO many people in the US don't have access to or the ability to afford good instruction, good schoolhorses, or both. I don't think, in my experience, that people are unwilling to learn, or in a rush to show, or think they are too good for lunge lessons. I think people want to do right -- they simply don't have the access to all the ingredients they need. JMO.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X