• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

A Wonderful Video Moment at the Charles de Kunffy Clinic at Hassler Dressage

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Discobold View Post
    The thing is, Suzy, that I DO understand your point too, and think this is a glass-half-full versus glass-half-empty type of situation. I think we each provided our own "context" to the video
    Fair enough.

    Comment


    • #62
      Plimsol you are a class act!

      Comment


      • #63
        ok, ok, ok, just keep on heaping on poor old Mike - I for one enjoy a lot of his posts that he puts here for us to enjoy -- but I guess the word 'wonderful' has to be axed from his vocabulary. Sorry Mike!

        Just keep on keeping on, Mike, and consider the source!
        Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

        Comment


        • #64
          Thank you for a great post, Plimsol. And I also thank Mike for starting this thread because I have found it instructive in many ways.
          At this point I am, however, disconcerted by the negative attitude so many people have toward criticism, making mistakes where others can see them, etc. It seems to me that the very word "clinic" suggests that people go to them knowing they have ailments of some sort they would like to have addressed-- I know I do! This discussion reminded me of the following program I heard on NPR, which suggests that this aversion to criticism might be a cultural phenomenon which might explain in part why our students lag so far behind the Japanese in math: http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012...ackle-learning

          It also reminded me of an expensive clinic I attended 20+ years ago which one of my friends (a very accomplished rider) watched. When I emerged from the clinic, I was full of enthusiasm, having heard nothing but praise for my horse, who the clinician used in exercise after exercise to demonstrate for the other riders. My friend's response was "but what did you learn for your money?? Didn't you already know you have a nice horse??"

          That's the context I come from. I am bothered to find my criticism viewed as "not constructive" and/or "rude." It most certainly was not intended that way.
          http://www.tunnelsendfarm.com

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by fish View Post
            Thank you for a great post, Plimsol. And I also thank Mike for starting this thread because I have found it instructive in many ways.
            At this point I am, however, disconcerted by the negative attitude so many people have toward criticism, making mistakes where others can see them, etc. It seems to me that the very word "clinic" suggests that people go to them knowing they have ailments of some sort they would like to have addressed-- I know I do! This discussion reminded me of the following program I heard on NPR, which suggests that this aversion to criticism might be a cultural phenomenon which might explain in part why our students lag so far behind the Japanese in math: http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012...ackle-learning


            That's the context I come from. I am bothered to find my criticism viewed as "not constructive" and/or "rude." It most certainly was not intended that way.
            I don't think people mind criticism from the clinician, trainer, or judge. After all, that's what they're paying for. But the people on this thread are NOT trained professionals whose opinion is being asked. They are a bunch of overly critical arm chair quarterbacks, most of whom aren't riding anywhere NEAR this level. And even if (and that's a BIG if) they know what they're talking about, the woman in this video didn't ask to have her riding torn apart by anyone but the BNT she's clinicing with. So yes, the unasked for criticism on this forum is rude and unhelpful.
            .

            Comment


            • #66
              I don't think people mind criticism from the clinician, trainer, or judge. After all, that's what they're paying for. But the people on this thread are NOT trained professionals whose opinion is being asked. They are a bunch of overly critical arm chair quarterbacks, most of whom aren't riding anywhere NEAR this level. And even if (and that's a BIG if) they know what they're talking about, the woman in this video didn't ask to have her riding torn apart by anyone but the BNT she's clinicing with. So yes, the unasked for criticism on this forum is rude and unhelpful.
              exactly. she did not post this here and does not deserve all the negative critiques posted here based on half a minute of video of her riding in a clinic that someone else decided to post.

              Comment


              • #67
                But Fish, according to that view the video should have first been appreciated as a 'wonderful' example of a dedicated rider working to improve under constructive criticism - or are you assuming that CDK wasn't offering any criticism? I doubt anyone pays a clinic fee hoping for the chance to learn from anonymous internet posters.

                I don't think you were rude, but I do think there were veiled suggestions of disparagement in the rather strenuous objections to 'wonderful'... probably aimed more at MM but easily misread as non-constructive commentary on a rider whose journey we know nothing about.
                Proud COTH lurker since 2001.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by fish View Post
                  At this point I am, however, disconcerted by the negative attitude so many people have toward criticism, making mistakes where others can see them, etc. It seems to me that the very word "clinic" suggests that people go to them knowing they have ailments of some sort they would like to have addressed-- I know I do!
                  People paid money to go to a Charles de Kunnfy clinic.

                  Not a COTH one.


                  Big difference.
                  The Noodlehttp://tiny.cc/NGKmT&http://tiny.cc/gioSA
                  Jinxyhttp://tiny.cc/PIC798&http://tiny.cc/jinx364
                  Boy Wonderhttp://tiny.cc/G9290
                  The Hana is nuts! NUTS!!http://tinyurl.com/SOCRAZY

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Big_Grey_hunter View Post
                    I don't think people mind criticism from the clinician, trainer, or judge. After all, that's what they're paying for. But the people on this thread are NOT trained professionals whose opinion is being asked. They are a bunch of overly critical arm chair quarterbacks, most of whom aren't riding anywhere NEAR this level. And even if (and that's a BIG if) they know what they're talking about, the woman in this video didn't ask to have her riding torn apart by anyone but the BNT she's clinicing with. So yes, the unasked for criticism on this forum is rude and unhelpful.
                    Please look at the link I posted, and note that the primary student learns not only from the teacher (aka trained professional), but from fellow students, who also learn by attempting to teach. IMO, it'd be a pretty sad (and expensive) state of affairs if people were only interested in trying to learn from those they have paid to teach them.
                    http://www.tunnelsendfarm.com

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Yabbut - you have to have a respect for the people offering their opinions - not from people we don't know on an anonymous BB.
                      Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Lost_at_C View Post
                        But Fish, according to that view the video should have first been appreciated as a 'wonderful' example of a dedicated rider working to improve under constructive criticism - or are you assuming that CDK wasn't offering any criticism? I doubt anyone pays a clinic fee hoping for the chance to learn from anonymous internet posters.

                        I don't think you were rude, but I do think there were veiled suggestions of disparagement in the rather strenuous objections to 'wonderful'... probably aimed more at MM but easily misread as non-constructive commentary on a rider whose journey we know nothing about.
                        I wasn't assuming anything. I merely wanted to know what was going on in that "moment" that made it "wonderful" to those who called it that. Gloria did a great job of explaining that to me.

                        If there were any "suggestion of disparagement" in my post, it was so well "veiled" that I was completely unaware of it myself. Quite to the contrary, I was trying to help a rider whose "journey" I felt I did know something about, having strenuously battled similar problems for decades, and eager to find help wherever I could-- anonymous internet posters included.
                        http://www.tunnelsendfarm.com

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by fish View Post
                          I wasn't assuming anything. I merely wanted to know what was going on in that "moment" that made it "wonderful" to those who called it that. Gloria did a great job of explaining that to me.

                          If there were any "suggestion of disparagement" in my post, it was so well "veiled" that I was completely unaware of it myself. Quite to the contrary, I was trying to help a rider whose "journey" I felt I did know something about, having strenuously battled similar problems for decades, and eager to find help wherever I could-- anonymous internet posters included.
                          Dittoing what Fish said. I think that some of you read snarkiness and rudeness where none is intended. This forum is literally called a "Discussion Forum," so items should not be posted if discussion is not wanted OR warn us in the initial post so that we will know not to comment. I would have been completely respectful of a request like that and imagine everyone else would have, too. If anything I wrote offended the rider, I am most genuinely sorry. I am actually more annoyed with the OP for not giving us the context for this clip, and there may indeed be some snarkiness in an earlier post of mine regarding that topic.

                          Regarding anonymous internet posters, there are a few people here whose posts I have been reading for years, and they have offered some incredible gems, so be careful about throwing out the baby with the bath water.

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #73
                            Originally posted by Foxtrot's View Post
                            ok, ok, ok, just keep on heaping on poor old Mike - I for one enjoy a lot of his posts that he puts here for us to enjoy -- but I guess the word 'wonderful' has to be axed from his vocabulary. Sorry Mike!

                            Just keep on keeping on, Mike, and consider the source!
                            Not to worry. I wear my Big Boy riding boots and breeches when I'm posting on the CotH Forums. It's just the "usual suspects" that like telling others what to do. Reminds me of this.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	peanuts teacher.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	25.3 KB
ID:	9135976
                            "No matter how well you perform there's always somebody of intelligent opinion who thinks it's lousy." - Laurence Olivier

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Crockpot View Post
                              Plimsol you are a class act!
                              Seriously, Plimsol. Your reply was so gracious.
                              "The mighty oak is a nut who stood its ground"

                              "...you'll never win Olympic gold by shaking a carrot stick at a warmblood..." see u at x

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Good for you! Wonderful post Plimsol.

                                I have not yet viewed the video as it won't upload on my iPad. If I could have the title I can search it on YouTube and watch it that way.

                                Comment


                                • #76
                                  I think it's very rude to give unsolicited advice and be so hard on the rider. No one should be secretly videoed let alone have it posted on two dressage websites. I'm not sure why it was set to a public setting but that does not mean its free rein to barrage the rider.
                                  I don't really put a lot of stock into nameless Internet people personally, or even those I know are trainers. I would not ride with any of them after hearing real world stories.

                                  Comment


                                  • #77
                                    Wonderful?

                                    Maybe not so much.

                                    Looks like a VERY weak rider (little core strength) well behind the motion of the trot with her waving hands way up in the air and little contact or stability with a nice easy going horse.

                                    Yawn.

                                    Comment


                                    • #78
                                      Wonderful?

                                      Maybe not so much.

                                      Looks like a VERY weak rider (little core strength) well behind the motion of the trot with her waving hands way up in the air and little contact or stability with a nice easy going horse.

                                      Yawn.
                                      How rude. Oh well.

                                      Maybe mike (who never posts a vid of himself but loves to post videos of other people without consent ) will find a half minute of video of you to post here without your consent. We'll all be sure to pounce on it and tell you how much you suck.

                                      Comment


                                      • #79
                                        In my experience, if all we look for is the bad and the mistakes then that is all we learn to see. If riders intend to use videos to improve their eye, then they need to look for the positives as well. And ultimately, if the negatives are all we see, then we subconsciously learn to emulate the mistakes. It is one of the downsides of teaching too many beginners--it does not bode well for our own riding, unless we have upper level riders to watch as well. Seeing what is right is perhaps far more important than seeing what is wrong.

                                        Comment


                                        • #80
                                          exactly and that is also what is so counter productive about the pervasive hobby seen all over the net of trashing riders from behind the keyboard all in the name of 'educating the eye". Yeah, right.

                                          Humility and glass houses.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X