• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

The neckware only with jackets rule

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Okay I am talking Circa 1968..
    Aggghh~

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Sannois View Post
      Okay I am talking Circa 1968..
      Aggghh~
      I DO have a circa 1965 rule book, but it refers to a "separate pamphlet" (which I do not have) for Dressage.
      Janet

      chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by alto View Post
        one had to be male and a calvary officer (to compete at the Olympic level).
        BOLD is mine. I believe that would be "Cavalry"???
        www.ayliprod.com
        Equine Photography in the Northeast

        Comment


        • #24
          BHS training stressed long sleeves to provide "some protection" should you fall or from branches. And as someone who has fallen with and without sleeves, yeah sleeves provided some protection from some rather interesting and painful scratches and scrapes.
          "Never do anything that you have to explain twice to the paramedics."
          Courtesy my cousin Tim

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #25
            Originally posted by fooler View Post
            BHS training stressed long sleeves to provide "some protection" should you fall or from branches. And as someone who has fallen with and without sleeves, yeah sleeves provided some protection from some rather interesting and painful scratches and scrapes.
            Doesn't really fit the topic at hand since the military influence ended long before I started riding and that point you made goes against the looser, sleeveless style that was allowed.
            "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Velvet View Post
              Doesn't really fit the topic at hand since the military influence ended long before I started riding and that point you made goes against the looser, sleeveless style that was allowed.
              I believe they make an excellent point. I always ride in long sleeves or when its hotter 3/4 sleeves if I'm out of the arena. In an arena I will wear a polo. JMPO, but I don't like to see sleeveless shirts worn in a class. Looks like the rider thought they were still in warm-up.
              Hillary Rodham Clinton - the peoples choice for president.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Sannois View Post
                Really? That is kind of rude.
                You mean because someone does not have perfectly toned arms, but has a great Dressage test, they are offensive?
                You totally missed their point.
                Hillary Rodham Clinton - the peoples choice for president.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Back in the 60s and maybe later it was considered gauche to wear anything sleeveless to work. And no bear legs except with shorts, always pantyhose.

                  These are fashion rules, which trump dressage rules.

                  PS
                  Bear legs were really gross, unless property toasted. Make that bare legs.
                  Last edited by narcisco; Apr. 25, 2013, 09:18 PM. Reason: homonym issue

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Bear legs are totally gross, however.
                    See those flying monkeys? They work for me.

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Gestalt View Post
                      I believe they make an excellent point. I always ride in long sleeves or when its hotter 3/4 sleeves if I'm out of the arena. In an arena I will wear a polo. JMPO, but I don't like to see sleeveless shirts worn in a class. Looks like the rider thought they were still in warm-up.
                      I believe the post I responded to was edited as I was replying to the cavalry influence expecting long sleeves. As for the BHS (as it now states) that still does not apply to the debate because the poster specifically states LONG sleeves and our rules allow short sleeves.

                      I also believe that you are basing your current opinion regarding sleeveless as looking incorrect only due to what you expect to see and the fact that it is incomplete because you only can see them in the warm up these days.

                      With current fashions including low rise and nearly see-through breeches, I would think the sleeveless shirt more than acceptable. Let's also not forget that some show shirts these days are a bit see-through and skin tight. I prefer the old fashioned rat catcher if you want something classic. Lets not even talk about skunk stripped helmets.

                      In a society where bare midriffs, bare legs, flip flops on the office and tops that show off more cleavage than a bar maid at a mid evil festival, showing bare arms really should be acceptable in the show ring--again.
                      "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by Velvet View Post
                        I believe the post I responded to was edited as I was replying to the cavalry influence expecting long sleeves. As for the BHS (as it now states) that still does not apply to the debate because the poster specifically states LONG sleeves and our rules allow short sleeves.

                        I also believe that you are basing your current opinion regarding sleeveless as looking incorrect only due to what you expect to see and the fact that it is incomplete because you only can see them in the warm up these days.

                        With current fashions including low rise and nearly see-through breeches, I would think the sleeveless shirt more than acceptable. Let's also not forget that some show shirts these days are a bit see-through and skin tight. I prefer the old fashioned rat catcher if you want something classic. Lets not even talk about skunk stripped helmets.

                        In a society where bare midriffs, bare legs, flip flops on the office and tops that show off more cleavage than a bar maid at a mid evil festival, showing bare arms really should be acceptable in the show ring--again.
                        Another poster referenced the cavalry, not me. I noted the BHS encouraged long sleeves. Actually not a bad idea especially with the newer fabrics. The long sleeves provide sun and insect protection.
                        Agree that current fashion is to show as much as possible. Of course we all know fashion changes, to quote Heidi- one day you are in and the next you are out.

                        As yet another poster noted, if you don't like the current rules then follow the process to suggest a change to existing rules or to add new rules.
                        "Never do anything that you have to explain twice to the paramedics."
                        Courtesy my cousin Tim

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          It's hot where I live. Coats get waved a lot. I have seen people ride with stock ties and even sleeveless when coats are waved, nothing has ever been said about it that I know of anyway.

                          Does anyone one of somebody who has had a problem?
                          See those flying monkeys? They work for me.

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #33
                            Originally posted by nhwr View Post
                            It's hot where I live. Coats get waved a lot. I have seen people ride with stock ties and even sleeveless when coats are waved, nothing has ever been said about it that I know of anyway.

                            Does anyone one of somebody who has had a problem?
                            Let's ask suzy! If for no other reason than to see if she can kill this thread that seems to be taking an all too serious turn.

                            Maybe I should send her out to the US Dressage Finals thread, too.

                            Paging Suessy!
                            "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Velvet talked about riding with a choker, but the 90's era rule was "without a stock tie" which is of course a different thing. I suspect the rule was changed to "without neckwear" to make the situation more equal for people who rode in stocks vs. chokers, and/or to clarify the rule. It would suck for jackets to be waived but people to feel like they now had to hunt down a choker.

                              In the hunters, if jackets were waived (um never), we still wore chokers.

                              And yes, 85 F is a nice day in California too. Plenty of shows when I was young where it was pushing 100 and we still wore (ugh) jackets.

                              As for the sleeves, I still giggle about the few years in eventing after vests were mandatory but no one thought to say that a shirt was.... Apparently someone on one of the rules committees couldn't live with that.
                              If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Originally posted by Velvet View Post
                                In a society where bare midriffs, bare legs, flip flops on the office and tops that show off more cleavage than a bar maid at a mid evil festival, showing bare arms really should be acceptable in the show ring--again.
                                I want to hear more about those "mid evil" festivals.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Originally posted by Velvet View Post
                                  In a society where bare midriffs, bare legs, flip flops on the office and tops that show off more cleavage than a bar maid at a mid evil festival, showing bare arms really should be acceptable in the show ring--again.
                                  I want to hear more about those "mid evil" festivals.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    Originally posted by suzy View Post
                                    I want to hear more about those "mid evil" festivals.
                                    Well , you know, it's half way between least and greatest evil festivals.

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      #38
                                      Originally posted by suzy View Post
                                      I want to hear more about those "mid evil" festivals.
                                      Damn autocorrect!
                                      "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by nhwr View Post
                                        It's hot where I live. Coats get waved a lot. I have seen people ride with stock ties and even sleeveless when coats are waved, nothing has ever been said about it that I know of anyway.

                                        Does anyone one of somebody who has had a problem?
                                        Yes, absolutely. I have seen TDs warn riders in sleeveless shirts that they are in violation of the rules. The riders solve the problem by putting their jackets on for the show ring. I also saw a rider disqualified for wearing a stock tie with no jacket.

                                        My own personal story - I had a really bad test last year where my stock tie fell off as I was entering the ring (someone left a horse in the trailer next to the ring, horse decided to destroy the trailer during my test - MY horse was not amused). The judge threatened to disqualify me for not having a stock tie at the end of the ride. I asked her to please do it - I didn't want THAT ride on my record. She was older and apparently (a) didn't hear the horse battering the trailer, and (b) didn't see my stock tie go flying, (c) didn't want to give me credit for NOT going flying...

                                        Some judges and TDs take the dress rules more seriously then others. I am amazed when I hear people say they've never seen bits checked, spurs checked, whips checked. It happens at almost every show I've been to!

                                        As for the "why" - I suspect it is all part of the formal dress code of dressage. I can remember as far back as the 80s, a short or long sleeve shirt was required.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Personally, I write something on the test. It is one of those may rules not a shall rule. Afaic, the riders neckware has zero to do with their performance, so if dont have to eliminate, I wont based on attire.
                                          www.settlementfarm.us

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X