• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Helmets Required?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by SisterToSoreFoot View Post
    Whatever. Asking people to reflect on their choices is part of understanding them. I wouldn't walk up to a stranger and ask, but if that person was going on about it on a public forum where the topic was being discussed, i.e.COTH, I would ask, and did.

    Maybe I "needed" to ask the question.
    You can ask any question you want. You don't get to dictate the answer. Nor do you get to become upset with that answer. Also you don't get to be upset if the person you question thinks you are being intrusive and says so.

    So suck it up and move on down the road.

    G.
    Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

    Comment


    • A helmet was certainly good enough for the Olympic Gold Medalist. I don't think Charlotte felt any less accomplished in the arena without a top hat.
      The only thing the government needs to solve all of its problems is a Council of Common Sense.

      Comment


      • I don't think nay-sayers are saying they "must" have top hats, or even whether a top hat will help their performance in anyway. There is no doubt helmets are safer than top hats. There is no doubt that head trauma sucks big time, and have huge negative impact on the families.

        What they are saying is, it is nobody's business how they should live their lives.

        And that is a very valid argument. We all know hamburgers are bad for your health, but nobody has a right to tell another person whether they are allowed to eat hamburgers.

        Unfortunately, in this country, people are losing controls of their own lives because the push from certain very loud sector of the society (not necessarily equestrian society; this is a general phenomena of the society) is very strong.

        They first say "it's everybody else's fault".

        They then say, "Since it's not your fault, somebody else, somebody richer, should take care of you."

        They then say, "Somebody else, somebody richer, MUST take care of you."

        Then they say, "If that somebody else, somebody richer, refuses to take care of you, we as government will make them."

        And then when you are addicted to the aids like a trust fund kid living off bloody milk, they tell you, "I as your protector and god, am going to tell you how to live."

        While at the same time, we, as everybody "else," in order to protect ourselves from having to take care of everybody else, MUST make other people behave as we want them to behave.

        I don't have a solution - just sadness.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
          You can ask any question you want. You don't get to dictate the answer. Nor do you get to become upset with that answer. Also you don't get to be upset if the person you question thinks you are being intrusive and says so.

          So suck it up and move on down the road.

          G.
          Move it down the road on COTH... now that's funny!


          Some people seem to WANT TO KNOW how everbody feels about something. The get upset when you don't agree with them.

          Wearing a helmet s a personal choice issue. If you own the space where they are riding then you can try and dictate what they must do.
          The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

          Comment


          • Gloria, I love your post #123. Thank you!

            Comment


            • Do you want to end up like Courtney who can hardly take care of herself let alone ride a horse in the Olympics? You insist on making a fashion choice out of stubborness but fail to see that it doesn't just involve you, it involves your family. Your husband, your children, your relatives. The people who will take care of you if you sustain an injury like Courtney.

              If you don't have family then someone in a hospital will take care of you. Maybe for the rest of your life. Is it that important to not wear a simple helmet?

              Wear or don't wear one at home. For whatever reasons you can make up. But don't expect to go to a horse show and not wear one.
              http://weanieeventer.blogspot.com/

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Gloria View Post

                What they are saying is, it is nobody's business how they should live their lives.
                s.
                It's other people's business when a personal choice affects other's lives. We live in a community and therefore our business overlaps with other people's. We have laws because some people hurt others--by stealing, selling drugs, assault, etc. You can't say it's "nobody's business" if someone is doing something that negatively effects others.

                The crux of the argument is "does someone NOT wearing a helmet negatively effect other people? If so, is it enough to take away that person's freedom to choose?"
                2007 Welsh Cob C X TB GG Eragon
                Our training journal.
                1989-2008 French TB Shamus Fancy
                I owned him for fifteen years, but he was his own horse.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by SisterToSoreFoot View Post
                  The crux of the argument is "does someone else NOT wearing a helmet negatively affect others?"
                  Precisely! Which is why I asked for an example of a head injury sustained during an FEI-level test. Anyone?? (The issue up for debate is the requirement for helmets in FEI-level classes).
                  Proud COTH lurker since 2001.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by enjoytheride View Post
                    Do you want to end up like Courtney who can hardly take care of herself let alone ride a horse in the Olympics? You insist on making a fashion choice out of stubborness but fail to see that it doesn't just involve you, it involves your family. Your husband, your children, your relatives. The people who will take care of you if you sustain an injury like Courtney.

                    If you don't have family then someone in a hospital will take care of you. Maybe for the rest of your life. Is it that important to not wear a simple helmet?

                    Wear or don't wear one at home. For whatever reasons you can make up. But don't expect to go to a horse show and not wear one.
                    If it's not YOU and YOUR family, it's none of your business. Who cares if someone else does or doesn't care what might happen to wives and children? Mind your own house. It doesn't raise YOUR insurance premiums, you are not the one tending that person, their head and their family is THEIR problem, not yours. They aren't yanking the helmet off your head.

                    Now, in the case of USEF/FEI--they're an organization sanctioning shows. Those bereaved family members would sue them and those shows and trainers and probably the guy who raked the ring, so they're entitled to cover their butts. They don't care about you or your family's suffering, nor should they, but they DO care that you could take them to court for not making you wear a helmet when failure to do so results in your smacking your head.

                    The rider still has a choice: go to those events or don't. I don't show, I haven't ridden dressage since my old horse died, but if I chose to go to rated/sanctioned shows, I'd wear the stupid helmet because that's the rule and a condition of participation. If I don't want to follow the rules, I don't have to show. They're not obligated to provide every single person who wants to show with the venue to do so using whatever criteria they want.
                    Author Page
                    Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
                    Steampunk Sweethearts

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by SisterToSoreFoot View Post
                      It's other people's business when a personal choice affects other's lives. We live in a community and therefore our business overlaps with other people's. We have laws because some people hurt others--by stealing, selling drugs, assault, etc. You can't say it's "nobody's business" if someone is doing something that negatively effects others.

                      The crux of the argument is "does someone NOT wearing a helmet negatively effect other people? If so, is it enough to take away that person's freedom to choose?"
                      Understand. Remember I'm a helmet proponent, not opponent. However, we do need to be very careful at which point we draw the line. If I had a magic wand, I would change the society mentality of everybody has to take care of everybody else, and then everybody is allowed to make decision for themselves, and that means, everybody has to learn to take care of themselves.

                      Freedom and liberty is not for the faint of heart.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Gloria View Post
                        What they are saying is, it is nobody's business how they should live their lives.

                        And that is a very valid argument. We all know hamburgers are bad for your health, but nobody has a right to tell another person whether they are allowed to eat hamburgers.

                        .
                        NYC has the right to not allow tran fat
                        Require calorie counts to be listed on the menu
                        ban smoking
                        And about to be the law, limit the size of soda drinks

                        It seems the mayor thinks he has the right and the courts have backed him up

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
                          NYC has the right to not allow tran fat
                          Hence, what I said about the mentality of "everybody else MUST take care of ME."

                          Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
                          Require calorie counts to be listed on the menu
                          Require calorie count does not ban you from eatting it. It is provided for valuable information.

                          Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
                          ban smoking
                          Ban smoking in public space: to protect other people, because a smoker can negatively affect all innocent bystanders.
                          Ban smoking anywhere: again: the mentality of "everybody else MUST take care of ME."

                          Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
                          And about to be the law, limit the size of soda drinks
                          Again, the mentality of "everybody else MUST take care of ME." not to mention proving once again how trivial our law makers are. If they have to concern themselves with something as to the size of cups, no wonder they can't get their asses to do anything else that is important.

                          Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
                          It seems the mayor thinks he has the right and the courts have backed him up
                          Yeah, no kidding, idiot.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by danceronice View Post
                            The rider still has a choice: go to those events or don't.
                            THIS.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by danceronice View Post
                              If it's not YOU and YOUR family, it's none of your business. Who cares if someone else does or doesn't care what might happen to wives and children? Mind your own house. It doesn't raise YOUR insurance premiums, you are not the one tending that person, their head and their family is THEIR problem, not yours.
                              Libertarians understand this intuitively. Socialists never will.

                              Comment


                              • Well I have seen a few bad falls in the warm up ring....some requiring air ambulance.

                                If you don't want to wear a helmet, then don't wear one. Does it kill you or really cause any issue at all to put one for a show?? No. You don't wear your show jacket at home and seem to put that on fine with no qualms. Add a helmet to your show gear.

                                Continue to ride sans helmet thinking about how cool you look at home.

                                Strap one on at shows and get over it.
                                Fillys By Vibank - 2017 Road to RRP
                                https://www.youtube.com/user/jealoushe

                                Comment


                                • It's rather a stretch to assume that everyone who wishes to retain the option of top hats in FEI classes must not wear helmets when schooling. For an increasing number of advanced riders, FEI classes are the only time helmets are not worn. So the debate should be about that alone, but focus is never a strong point of internet BBs.
                                  Proud COTH lurker since 2001.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by SisterToSoreFoot View Post
                                    It's other people's business when a personal choice affects other's lives. We live in a community and therefore our business overlaps with other people's. We have laws because some people hurt others--by stealing, selling drugs, assault, etc. You can't say it's "nobody's business" if someone is doing something that negatively effects others.

                                    The crux of the argument is "does someone NOT wearing a helmet negatively effect other people? If so, is it enough to take away that person's freedom to choose?"
                                    As I said earlier I took sole care on my brain damaged mom from Dec 1982 to Oct 1996.

                                    It was hard on me and it was hard on my family. In many ways she was like a four year old who didn't talk very well.

                                    It wasn't her fault she had a brain tumor but i would have REALLY been pissed if she had ended up that way because she didn't want to wear a helmet and fell off a horse
                                    I wasn't always a Smurf
                                    Penmerryl's Sophie RIDSH
                                    "I ain't as good as I once was but I'm as good once as I ever was"
                                    The ignore list is my friend. It takes 2 to argue.

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      Shows have rules. You MUST wear certain attire, your horse can only have certain bits, certain color saddle pads, boots/no boots depending on class, etc. etc. They are just making a rule that is applicable to you while you're at a SHOW.

                                      If you want to be stupid and go helmet-less at your own farm, on a trail, etc. on your own time, go for it--you're still perfectly free to do so. This whole, "They're taking away my RIGHTS!!!" nonsense is overly dramatic and untrue.
                                      Topline Leather -- Bespoke, handwoven browbands & accessories customized with Swarovski crystals, gemstones, & glass seed beads. The original crystal braid & crystal spike browbands!

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by danceronice View Post
                                        If it's not YOU and YOUR family, it's none of your business. Who cares if someone else does or doesn't care what might happen to wives and children? Mind your own house. It doesn't raise YOUR insurance premiums...
                                        That's where you're wrong. Every time an insurance company has to pay out a catastrophic claim, you'd better believe the rest of us pay higher premiums. It's called "spreading the risk."
                                        Donald Trump - proven liar, cheat, traitor and sexual predator! Hillary Clinton won in 2016, but we have all lost.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by Gloria View Post
                                          I don't think nay-sayers are saying they "must" have top hats, or even whether a top hat will help their performance in anyway. There is no doubt helmets are safer than top hats. There is no doubt that head trauma sucks big time, and have huge negative impact on the families.

                                          What they are saying is, it is nobody's business how they should live their lives.

                                          And that is a very valid argument. We all know hamburgers are bad for your health, but nobody has a right to tell another person whether they are allowed to eat hamburgers.

                                          Unfortunately, in this country, people are losing controls of their own lives because the push from certain very loud sector of the society (not necessarily equestrian society; this is a general phenomena of the society) is very strong.

                                          They first say "it's everybody else's fault".

                                          They then say, "Since it's not your fault, somebody else, somebody richer, should take care of you."

                                          They then say, "Somebody else, somebody richer, MUST take care of you."

                                          Then they say, "If that somebody else, somebody richer, refuses to take care of you, we as government will make them."

                                          And then when you are addicted to the aids like a trust fund kid living off bloody milk, they tell you, "I as your protector and god, am going to tell you how to live."

                                          While at the same time, we, as everybody "else," in order to protect ourselves from having to take care of everybody else, MUST make other people behave as we want them to behave.

                                          I don't have a solution - just sadness.
                                          Want to know how far it goes? I was BALLISTIC this morning before I even got out of bed! Big report on NPR:

                                          Seems there's an obscure provision in the new health insurance law that says employers can provide "incentives" to their employees to "adopt healthier behaviors." This is already being interpreted by companies to mean, "dump the flab or we dump YOU!" Mandatory, off-the-clock attendance at "Wellness Seminars," gym memberships, food monitoring, all kinds of school-nurse BS is suddenly the paternalistic province of large companies, on YOUR time and on YOUR nickel, in the name of "saving on health-care costs." Major monetary penalties for non-participation, stigmatization in the corporate culture, and all of it functionally eliminates the whole point of supposedly not discriminating against pre-existing conditions. Not to mention the STRESS of having to be "company person" 24/7 or "you're in trouble." Corporate feudalism, much? Guess they ought to change "employee" to "retainer." As in, THEY OWN YOU.

                                          Apparently most of their employees are just ducky with this!

                                          Personally, I'm mighty glad I'm self-employed . . . I cannot IMAGINE living in a world where your employer, not you, decides how you live your private life. E. Gads!!!

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X