• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Calling all US AA's................

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • So, are you advocating going back to USDF shows and USEF shows, with different tests, so EF can concentrate on those going up to the international level, while DF concentrates on the rest of us? Shouldn't those tests lead logically towards the demands of the FEI level tests - so horses get a correct foundation? Perhaps just cutting out the gaits score entirely at the lower level, so then it is only about training - and a WP type jog and lope wins this "pattern class" that has been created because it is submissive? What about those on the cusp - say, in the top 100 worldwide but not yet at real player on that stage? What about the developing rider programs?
    AFAIAC, I am encouraged that those members you listed are concerned with,and willing to step up and offer to do something, to meet the needs of the AA under the "EF-DF Umbrella".
    I think you look for conspiracies where they do not exist.


    Originally posted by pluvinel View Post
    It should not be the role of the USDF to "raise up" international competitors. The USDF is a member organization that should support the needs of the majority of the members, not some elite sub-set who want to go to international competitions. Those people have their own committee....it is called the USEF High Performance Committee.

    The USEF dressage tests are written by members of the USEF Dressage Committee....and guess who is on that committee.....all are USDF leaders
    http://www.usef.org/_IFrames/AboutUs...eeDisplay.aspx

    The USDF leaders who are on the USEF Dressage Committee should be advocating for USDF members by proposing programs and NATIONAL tests that would favor the greatest number of horses and riders in the US.

    Once you get to CDI's the FEI tests come into play.....so its another game.....a game that the majority of USDF members will probably not play.

    Here's who's on that USEF Dressage Committee that associated themselves with the AADI....

    MS JAYNE AYERS - Chair
    DR. HILARY M. CLAYTON
    MRS JANET FOY
    MS LISA GORRETTA
    MR AXEL STEINER

    Comment


    • Originally posted by lorilu View Post
      So, are you advocating going back to USDF shows and USEF shows, with different tests, so EF can concentrate on those going up to the international level, while DF concentrates on the rest of us? Shouldn't those tests lead logically towards the demands of the FEI level tests - so horses get a correct foundation? Perhaps just cutting out the gaits score entirely at the lower level, so then it is only about training - and a WP type jog and lope wins this "pattern class" that has been created because it is submissive? What about those on the cusp - say, in the top 100 worldwide but not yet at real player on that stage? What about the developing rider programs?
      AFAIAC, I am encouraged that those members you listed are concerned with,and willing to step up and offe to do something, to meet the needs of the AA under the "EF-DF Umbrella".
      I think you look for conspiracies where they do not exist.
      I am not advocating nothing.

      As a USDF GM member, it is my opinion is that the DF should focus on education and the EF should focus on its mission, eg., equestrian competition.

      As far as the AADI and the people from the EF Dressage committee.....I will believe there is change afoot when I see actual CHANGE.....All I see with the AADI is a bunch of people creating boards, regional reps, etc. Motion without results.

      We don't need more ideas, boards, committees, reps....we need the DF/EF (for this purpose they are the same) to show by some token action that they're willing to step up and actually make a change.

      Show me the beef.....I have posted ad-nauseum of items that can be done by the stroke of the pen without cost or resources. All it takes is will.
      Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress.
      Alfred A. Montapert

      Comment


      • Originally posted by pluvinel View Post
        Maybe those current with the judge's training can chime in, but if I can recall from L-judges program, gait has a huge impact on each and every movement score.

        Back in the days of the dinosaurs, gaits were scored in the collective marks and the rest of the dressage test was a test of obedience and training.
        This is what instructions where when I was scribing for an L candidate last year and the year before. (Who graduated with distinction! Woohoo, go Reiter!)

        As a scribe listening in when I could I never heard a discussion of what "obedience" is, but these days it seems as if a steady head position is a large part of obedience, when previously it had a lot more to do with how the horse used its body and responded to cues.


        The theory is that correct training leads to increased suspension and cadence in a horse, elasticity and movement through the back. However, these days many warmbloods are born that way, which I would think would give a very high bias toward well-bred warmbloods, at least. They can be spectacular, sure, but ExVet's horses can, too! (I say that because she's the only one I know I have seen showing in person.) The criteria for movement and how it affects scores will be in favor of someone on a warmblood, and given how well ExVet trains and rides her horses, I think sometimes the criteria just seem wrong here - I have seen her in rides where she clearly seemed to have the most obedient and well-trained and conditioned horse out there, even if it wasn't born bouncing 2' off the ground.



        But I am a nobody when it comes to dressage. I find the notion PP gave of coming to dressage because you can afford to show it since it is less expensive than hunters a glaring example of different priorities. I don't give a rip which kind of shows are more or less expensive - I care about the discipline which encourages me to build a partnership with and develop my horse in a beautiful way. My not showing right now is about figuring out what my horse and I both need to learn about behavior in public places and not finances, but even if we were at a stage where we were doing well and competitive, I would absolutely skip showing/memberships before I would skip the learning opportunities which would help us further develop. I want continued development, and missing a year or two of showing is very small in the big scheme of a horse's progress.
        If Kim Kardashian wants to set up a gofundme to purchase the Wu Tang album from Martin Shkreli, guess what people you DON'T HAVE TO DONATE.
        -meupatdoes

        Comment


        • (I Tried. I Can't Help It.) If you are "not advocating nothing", clearly you ARE advocating something. So what is it?

          Can't help it. former teacher here....

          Comment


          • Originally posted by lorilu View Post
            (I Tried. I Can't Help It.) If you are "not advocating nothing", clearly you ARE advocating something. So what is it?

            Can't help it. former teacher here....
            I are an engineer......(inside joke)
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmYDgncMhXw
            Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress.
            Alfred A. Montapert

            Comment

            Working...
            X