• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Bad form or being conservative?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    If you are curious and want to know why she is doing it, why don't you ask her, instead of a bunch of strangers on a bulletin board?

    Yes, I have competed extensively at recognized dressage competitions (through PSG), and also done a couple of horse trials. Garant, E.M. Bo Peep, Dior, S.H. King Me. Lots of breed shows, including Devon. I've ridden through Grand Prix.

    Comment


    • #42
      LOL.

      within the last 5 years, I have been Vintage Cup Horse of the Year at Grand Prix, on my own horse that I bought as a 2 yr old, have won numerous USDF championships on a variety of horses, and right now am sitting in the top 5 at 2nd level on my 6 yr old non-warmblood in vintage cup. I have also won at Arabian Nationals, but have not had Arabians to compete with for a few years.

      So yes, I think I have a clue.

      Scores @ 63% at 2nd level are "not ready for prime time". Especially if the horse can score 70 plus at first level. Tells me he is no where near ready to be competitive, is just dipping his toes into second level and has a lot more work to do. It also tells me that this isn't the type of horse that can skate into good scores just because of his gaits. I certainly wouldn't show at a Nationals at that level. Why spend at that time, effort and $$ to fill the class for someone else ?

      And the odds are that some fancy young horse is going to beat the pants off of that one anyway, so nbd.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Gloria View Post
        Complaint? Protests? Where did you get that idea from, Pely and Rebecca? Can't a girl be curious and want to know why someone would do such and such? As far as I know, this is still a free country where an open discussion is encouraged. By the way, do you compete at rated shows at all? Again, curious mind wants to know.
        Originally posted by rebecca yount View Post
        If you are curious and want to know why she is doing it, why don't you ask her, instead of a bunch of strangers on a bulletin board?

        Yes, I have competed extensively at recognized dressage competitions (through PSG), and also done a couple of horse trials. Garant, E.M. Bo Peep, Dior, S.H. King Me. Lots of breed shows, including Devon. I've ridden through Grand Prix.
        Originally posted by Pely View Post
        LOL.

        within the last 5 years, I have been Vintage Cup Horse of the Year at Grand Prix, on my own horse that I bought as a 2 yr old, have won numerous USDF championships on a variety of horses, and right now am sitting in the top 5 at 2nd level on my 6 yr old non-warmblood in vintage cup. I have also won at Arabian Nationals, but have not had Arabians to compete with for a few years.

        So yes, I think I have a clue.
        Whoops!
        Donald Trump - proven liar, cheat, traitor and sexual predator! Hillary Clinton won in 2016, but we have all lost.

        Comment


        • #44
          Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

          If you continue to compete at the lower level while moving up a level at some shows, people will accuse you of sandbagging (as here).

          If you move up to a new level before your horse is spectacular at that level, then you are accused of being an incompetent rider, or pushing your horse too fast.


          If she QUALIFIED at Training, she must have been COMPETING at Training. Therfore it seem entirely appropriate to be competing in the Training championships.

          It sounds to me as if they started the year bridging Training and First, and finihed the year bridging First and Second (e.g., great at First and competent at Second)

          I don't now how competitive the breed show finals are, but to me it makes perfect sence to enter the finals at the levels you are qualified and have a good chance of doing very well (Tr and 1st), and NOT enter the finals at a level where you may be qualified, but don't have much chance of placing well (Second in this case).

          Once the horse is going REALLY well at Second, she won't be showing and qualifying at Training, and then she won't be in the Training finals. Problem solved.

          ANy "Finals" are about showing off the things you have completely mastered, not about progressing the education of the horse, or competing "just because you qualified". (There is nothing wrong with entering the finals, just because you qualified, but that isn't generally the focus of the competition.)
          Janet

          chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #45
            Guys, chill a bit will you? This is a simple question, no need to get offended or upset. I am happy to see them at First and did well, but no, I wasn't happy to see that pair at Training, and that was the start of the thread because it baffled and annoyed me. And no, I'm not ashamed to say that that practice annoyed me. Yes, I can see that she is not competitive at 2nd, so I can see why she is not showing at 2nd. And yes, I can see, after Sonoma's post, see why she is showing at Training.

            Again, this is a simple question. If I wanted to bash her, I would have given out more details about her and it would be very easy to see whom I'm talking about.

            This is a question of "apart from chasing ribbons, why somebody does such and such", not "why SHE does such and such".

            Rebecca and Pely, did you compete at Finals at two levels? Especially with one level being "Training"? It seems to make more sense to me that people compete at two consecutive level at "higher" levels, not Training level. Now please understand that I'm not trying to be mean or offend you, I'm honestly curious whether that is normally done.

            Janet, your explanation makes sense. I know it is legal that a pair compete at two consecutive levels. My question: do you see it done regularly at Finals, especially at lower levels? Training level? - chewing bit and thinking...

            Comment


            • #46
              I have seen it done at Arab finals a lot. I do not own Arabs but I knew someone that did and compete there at one time.
              Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole

              Comment


              • #47
                Just about everyone qualifies and competes 2 levels at USDF Regionals.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #48
                  Umm interesting... Thanks.

                  [edit to add]: Now, the two levels people compete at Regionals, is one level the pair is confident in, and the higher level they are competent in but still present a challenge; or both levels a piece of cake, where the horse can close his eyes and do the whole test easily?
                  Last edited by Gloria; Oct. 11, 2012, 06:52 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Given that Morgan GN's are happening, it wouldn't be a Morgan, would it?
                    Proud member of the Snort and Blow Clique

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      I plan to try to qualify at intro and training next year. If I go to any championship show I want as many classes as possible.
                      On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #51
                        Perfect Pony, your comment, "to try to qualify at intro and training next year", tells me that you are working hard at training level, which tells me that Training level is not an easy walk for you, at least not yet. It makes perfect sense then that you aim to show both training and intro at Championship, and that is admirable and advisable, because you will be competent at Training and confident in Intro. Now, if Training is a piece of cake for you, would you accept my plead to leave Intro to Intro folks?

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          I don't think so. I hope training is a peice of cake by next fall, and I would also hope I am schooling first. I will still show at intro! She will only be 4.
                          On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #53
                            4? oops

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              The levels are not so divided that one is a "piece of cake" while the next highest is more difficult, especially as one moves up the levels.

                              There isn't as much difference between training and first if the horse's training is on track. Both require working gaits. There is a difference in the amount of collection required between first and second. working/lengthening vrs. collected/medium.

                              Some horses, when confirmed in the single flying change have more difficulty again with the simple changes.

                              I would compete in a championship show at the levels where my horse was proficient. Sometimes the higher level is an easier test for that horse !

                              Training should be linear and progressive, and done according to the training scale, but the tests for competition are only guidelines, not absolutes.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                A bit OT, but I HEARTILY disagree that just because a horse is getting fabulous scores it is sandbagging or working "beneath" it's level.

                                My trainer has a young (4yo) green bean that scored a 75% at its very first USDF show. I've sat on him, and he barely steers! Surely if she showed him the whole season (she just brought him out), the scores would only have improved. However, this horse was exactly at the appropriate level--he's just a great mover and she knows how to show him off.

                                I do know some people are awards whores--that will never change--but the score itself doesn't tell you the whole story.
                                From now on, ponyfixer, i'll include foot note references.

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #56
                                  Pely, thank you for the explanation. That makes sense, and actually explains another "mystery" that I've been contemplating... That pair in my example is extremely proficient at both Training and First, meaning, very accurate and fluid. It was an easy walk at the park for that horse at First Level, and a total piece of cake at Training. They actually got similar scores at both levels. If I just looked at the First Level scores alone, I would say they were knocking at the door of 2nd, but then I was confounded at the lack of powers and the First Level frame a First Level horse ready for 2nd should have. Now I'm very curious whether they would move up to 2nd next year.

                                  Pony Fixer, I totally agree that scores alone don't tell a whole story. I think a few eye brows are being raised when the horse is a mature seasoned dressage horse.

                                  Comment

                                  Working...
                                  X