• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

new USDF Score/Competition Database

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Honestly? I don't want to pay any more money to the USDF for something I am getting for free from centerline scores. U SDF has a history of not being the most effective with program/website issues.
    Humans don’t mind duress, in fact they thrive on it. What they mind is not feeling necessary. –Sebastian Junger

    Comment


    • #42
      So I just tried to search my own horse's scores by horse name (which is trickier, and I wanted to compare to CL scores, which I LOFF). Well, one of my horses has an apostrophe in his name, so it won't let me search for him. I tried all permutations and nadda. So I had to search me and then click on his name.

      I think the site is busy and less-elegant than Jay's site as well.

      I do like the placing feature, though. Sometimes it's nice to see that the low 60s you got won the class (ie, you sucked the least of the suckees).
      From now on, ponyfixer, i'll include foot note references.

      Comment


      • #43
        This is an interesting section of the EB minutes

        http://www.usdf.org/docs/about/about...EB/4-29-12.pdf

        Membership growth and retention initiatives report and strategy discussion – Stephan Hienzsch and Cindy Vimont (Section 4 – 12)

        George asked Stephan for his opinion on the next steps that should be taken regarding initiatives and strategies to improve membership growth and retention rates. Stephan asked for guidance on how to best utilize USDF’s limited human and financial resources. He believes that USDF needs to prioritize member retention vs. attracting new members. George suggested not putting much more resources to the Education Memberships. Janine recommended that USDF should engage in outreach only when minimal resources are required. She strongly recommended creation of a regional tier of awards. While the rider awards program remains enormously popular, the national year-end awards program is not seen as accessible to the majority of our members.

        .....

        Discussion continued on how USDF can encourage dressage interest with western riders and not appear elitist. We should share and encourage dressage education and stay abreast of other developments.

        George said that USDF should continue with a membership advisory group with the goal being to identify the mission and goals of the Membership Committee in the future. This should include guidelines on how to populate the committee. Kevin would like to see a deadline for goals and populating the committee.
        Applying "USDF’s limited human and financial resources" in recreating and duplicating Centerlinescores existing web site doesn't seem to be the best way to make use of member funds.

        Some marketing courses might also help.

        .
        Last edited by pluvinel; Oct. 5, 2012, 06:57 PM.
        Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress.
        Alfred A. Montapert

        Comment


        • #44
          You guys just keep missing the forest for all those trees. Why give things away for free? Giving free access to a database that costs the members $$ is a good way to throw away money.

          I get it. You all love Centerline being for free, but it never should have been given away for free. It's paid by the members (those of us who are) and should be available only to the members. Same with USEF information.

          Not everyone has a right to it. I don't know where you people are coming up with that idea. If I pay for something it's mine. This belongs to the USDF, and since the USDF is member supported, it belongs to the members. Centerline can feel free to built it's own database and keep it update. They seem to think that they can find that information elsewhere as it is, so I say, "Have at it!"

          The only exception I'm taking with the USDF is that they are not allowing GMO members to have access. THAT is wrong. They already rob the GMOs and make joining super expensive (to the GMOs since they are building in the USDF fees). They are basically taking money out of the GMOs mouths at this point in time. They need to figure out a way to still include the GMOs and if that means a fee to the GMO rather than individuals and then giving them a membership that is basically meaningless, so be it. But what they are doing right now is killing small/start up GMOs. And locking them out of access to the database when they're also contributing to the USDF is wrong.
          "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

          Comment


          • #45
            You guys just keep missing the forest for all those trees. Why give things away for free? Giving free access to a database that costs the members $$ is a good way to throw away money.
            no you missed the forest...why not let centerline do what they do? It does not cost USDF anything. I would never pay USDF for scores, why would I? I bet if you asked them how much they made selling scores it would be minimal.
            Humans don’t mind duress, in fact they thrive on it. What they mind is not feeling necessary. –Sebastian Junger

            Comment


            • #46
              Not selling them. It should be a member (any membership level) benefit and mot public. If Centerline wants to get in bed with them, fine. But they should make a donation/pay compensation for access to the data. Centerline is not altruistic. Don't be fooled. It's looking for a way to draw traffic and then make money off potential advertising. That sort of business relationship is fine.
              "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #47
                Originally posted by Velvet View Post
                Not selling them. It should be a member (any membership level) benefit and mot public. If Centerline wants to get in bed with them, fine. But they should make a donation/pay compensation for access to the data. Centerline is not altruistic. Don't be fooled. It's looking for a way to draw traffic and then make money off potential advertising. That sort of business relationship is fine.
                And why shouldn't Centerline make money? It's the American way. Jay built a better mousetrap.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Velvet View Post
                  You guys just keep missing the forest for all those trees. Why give things away for free? Giving free access to a database that costs the members $$ is a good way to throw away money.

                  I get it. You all love Centerline being for free, but it never should have been given away for free. It's paid by the members (those of us who are) and should be available only to the members. Same with USEF information.

                  .....

                  The only exception I'm taking with the USDF is that they are not allowing GMO members to have access. THAT is wrong. They already rob the GMOs and make joining super expensive (to the GMOs since they are building in the USDF fees). They are basically taking money out of the GMOs mouths at this point in time. They need to figure out a way to still include the GMOs and if that means a fee to the GMO rather than individuals and then giving them a membership that is basically meaningless, so be it. But what they are doing right now is killing small/start up GMOs. And locking them out of access to the database when they're also contributing to the USDF is wrong.
                  Not because it is free.....because:

                  (1)-Jay produced a great mousetrap.

                  (2)-The USDF simply had to reach out to Centerline and he's said he would have been happy to "partner" with USDF....for NO MONEY. Instead, what did USDF do? They spent member funds replicating an already functioning site when Williams, Malone & Co admit having limited resources and funds. Did anyone in USDF (a) evaluate the alternatives for the cost to develop a site from scratch vs buying the already existing site or (b) give Jay the contract to run the site for USDF or (c) explore some sort of commercial "partner" arrangement?

                  (3)-USDF is a member organization. Besides the fiduciary responsibility of USDF to be good stewards of member funds, how does ignoring/rebuffing a superb volunteer effort engender/attract support for potentially new and/or existing members?

                  As far as who "owns" the data.....It seems the US Supreme Court has already decided the answer to the question in the case
                  Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co

                  This, then, resolves the doctrinal tension: Copyright treats facts and factual compilations in a wholly consistent manner. Facts, whether alone or as part of a compilation, are not original and therefore may not be copyrighted. A factual compilation is eligible for copyright if it features an original selection or arrangement of facts, but the copyright is limited to the particular selection or arrangement. In no event may copyright extend to the facts themselves.
                  We have all seen a Periodic Table in school. You cannot copyright the elements....what the law allows you to do is to copyright the the "expression" (eg., the formatting and display) of the information.

                  So by copying the formatting it would seem that Centerline might have grounds for a case of copyright infringement against USDF.
                  Last edited by pluvinel; Oct. 6, 2012, 10:02 AM.
                  Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress.
                  Alfred A. Montapert

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Pluvinel - there is also the issue that the information is IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN at every single show or published in magazines.

                    For those that think it shouldn't be free - should the COTH or any other magazine have to pay a fee to print any show results?

                    If the USDF doesn't have funds - they certainly won't have them to defend a law suit which clearly has no legs to stand on.

                    And here once again is a decision made by the USDF without any feed back from the members who pay the bills. Had they put their thinking caps on and put their over inflated egos in their pockets they would have seen the possibility of partnering with Centerline and reaping income from advertising. This option wouldn't have cost the USDF MEMBERS a dime!

                    And the dunce cap goes to..................the USDF.
                    Summit Sporthorses Ltd. Inc.
                    "Breeding Competition Partners & Lifelong Friends"

                    Comment


                    • #50

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        I don't understand the proprietary-data argument. That's like saying that the FEI owns all scores for all international competitions, so if you're not a member of the FEI you can't see what the current international rankings are-- or what score won the Olympics.

                        CLScores serves as a quick buyer-beware, which is of benefit to the sport. It's also a great way to gauge your competition (as I just did for the championships... and I really regret it because now I'm psyching myself out). More awareness of higher standards is nothing if not helpful for the state of US dressage.

                        I'd like to see some measures of center graphically in CLScores (I love me some box plots!) but I think it's a great service.

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          You're right. None of you understand the fact that the USDF owns the database. They compiled the data, organized it and manage all incoming source data. It has NOTHING to do with a copyright or the fact that the datab is often published elsewhere.

                          It is a DB owned by USDF. They opened it up, and they have every right to close that door and create a locked down interface. And well they should. The only business relationship they should have with Centerline is possibly charging them a fee to give them access to the database.

                          I can't state it more clearly. If you are a luddite you'll just never get it and I hope you never work with corporate data and data security (let alone marketing).
                          "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            USDF is not a corporation. It is a non-profit, and I believe it is held to a different set of standards entirely than a coporation.

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Nope. You are wrong. Their data is their data. There are no laws stating that their DB or other info must be public. They also make money and it's legal. They are a 501.3c
                              "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                you know you can get the data from the shows themselves, which is how USDF gets them. The secretary sends them the results.

                                AND, if the USDF were not so stingy with the information we would not have payed any attention to centerline scores right?
                                Humans don’t mind duress, in fact they thrive on it. What they mind is not feeling necessary. –Sebastian Junger

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Velvet - I just can't wrap my head around you opinion. Centerline can pay for a membership and access the information just the way any of us who are members can. So the "their" you refer to is really all of US who have memberships - not the officers or employees of the USDF.

                                  And it's a 501(c)(3) - not the reverse. Non-profits by law exist for the benefit of the members. So anyone who is a member can use the information. As others have pointed out - Centerline's program is easy to use and they are very quick to respond to questions or about omissions and/or errors. I can't say the same about the USDF. Time will tell if they really are building a better mouse trap.
                                  Summit Sporthorses Ltd. Inc.
                                  "Breeding Competition Partners & Lifelong Friends"

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Just... wow.

                                    So, I've had some time to think about this a little bit more and it seems that many of you have reached the same conclusion.

                                    We are all talking about the same set of underlying public data here. Whether that is displayed: at the show, in a PDF on the show's website, on USEF.org, on USDF.org, on chronofhorse.com, in the magazine, etc.

                                    In the same way that Google crawls the public web and correlates and collates and aggregates other public data, we do the same thing for the public dressage scores.

                                    HOWEVER, What makes CenterlineScores.com VALUABLE to Riders, Trainers, Horse owners and potential horse owners IS NOT THE DATA. It is just a raw materials starting point because (as many have said, THE DATA HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE FOR over 10 years online!) CenterlineScores.com just takes those raw data points and puts them together in a particularly useful and usable way. USDF could have done this VERY. SAME. THING. -- A DECADE AGO. They didn't. We didn't just build a BETTER mousetrap. We INVENTED it.

                                    It took me just over 3 days to design, build and populate the initial database with the first raw public data points (scores from 2003-2010).

                                    It took me ANOTHER 8 MONTHS to do the thinking, design and coding necessary to build and prepare the website for launch last year.

                                    Will I try to get some revenue out of the site at some point in the future? Yes. But let's be clear. If I ever do make any money, it will ONLY be because of a ton of hard work and my own particular brand of crazy that causes me to:
                                    • Wake at 4 am most days to write code
                                    • Personally answer every email sent within 24 hours of receiving it
                                    • Spend hours researching and correcting errors in the USDF data
                                    • Manually review test sheets sent in by riders who want to add rides that were missing from the USDF data
                                    • Brainstorm and design new features
                                    • Think about analyses that can/should be done
                                    • Monitor the hardware & software


                                    .. and a thousand other things it takes to make this happen.. all while maintaining a full-time job and trying to support my family and my wife's Dressage training & showing.

                                    At the end of the day, all of this effort will not be (and never has been) about me getting rich on the back of the USDF. What I was trying to do is to bring in a tiny little bit of accountability and transparency, make it easier for people to research horses and riders, and to help broaden this sport that we all love.

                                    Whenever I consider adding a new feature or view of the data, one of the decision criteria is this:
                                    Will it discourage people from doing recognized shows with licensed judges?
                                    If it does. I don't add it. As someone else said earlier...

                                    Originally posted by mbm View Post
                                    it does dressage no good to be so opaque.....
                                    There can be no doubt that CenterlineScores.com has CHANGED US dressage at the national (vs. FEI) levels. People look for and evaluate trainers, riders and horses in a completely different way now. On balance, that's a VERY, VERY good thing.

                                    The Bottom line is:

                                    Locking the data up behind a password does nothing to promote or improve accountability for the sport of Dressage.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Well said Jay.

                                      *star*
                                      "Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are vexations to the spirit."
                                      - Desiderata, (c) Max Ehrman, 1926

                                      Comment


                                      • #59

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          [QUOTE=CenterlineScores;6595191]
                                          HOWEVER, What makes CenterlineScores.com VALUABLE to Riders, Trainers, Horse owners and potential horse owners IS NOT THE DATA. It is just a raw materials starting point because (as many have said, THE DATA HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE FOR over 10 years online!) CenterlineScores.com just takes those raw data points and puts them together in a particularly useful and usable way. USDF could have done this VERY. SAME. THING. -- A DECADE AGO. They didn't. We didn't just build a BETTER mousetrap. We INVENTED it.
                                          [QUOTE=CenterlineScores;6595191]

                                          THIS! I use to spend ages moving backwards through USDF's website trying to locate the information that is now readily available in Jay's database. For my scores, no.....for horse/rider scores I was interested in purchasing/training with, offspring (Jay do you think you could add this feature to your database ), etc.....

                                          And, I think it is sad that both USDF and USEF has dragged their feet on creating useful databases to assist members, breeders, riders, trainers....improve their knowledge base. Each of us should be wondering why that is the case!

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X