• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Horse Boy Dressage - What??

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by meupatdoes View Post
    How interesting that you will go on and on about your concern for "the safety of the kids" but when the proprietor or the program you are criticizing welcomes you to discuss your concerns you don't show up. I guess it is more fun to just criticize people while ignoring all opportunities to establish an actual dialog even when they are iffered.

    And the person who found the time to create this thread crticizing another program and was starting to "organize the questions to be asked" was similarly remarkably unavailable when the object of the thread she STARTED said, "Well ok, here I am, let's chat."

    Criticizing people anonymously is great fun when you can imagine yourself scoring zingers over the keyboard and put on some front of "concern."

    You guys are criticizing a REAL PERSON and when they demonstrate the class to hear you out, you bail. Maybe you should quit trying to negatively impact people's REAL reputations if you aren't even willing to talk to them when they offer. Maybe before negatively impacting a REAL LIFE program you should ask yourselves "Is this just a fun afternoon on the internet for me or would I actually take the opportunity to engage in constructive dialog with this REAL PERSON if it arose?" Ridiculous.
    So because i didn't rearrange my life to show up for a conference call I'm not entitled to an opinion. No Sh*t I'm criticizing a "real person". That person is not above criticism because their goals seem to be all high and noble. From the moment someone becomes involved in a public organization, they will be subject to public opinion and not all opinions are good. Someone who is involved in a non profit organization should be under the public eye. Pardon me for being a skeptic but once i donated to a non profit organization every month until i found out the chairman of this non profit and using my hard own money to run for president.
    Yes, I smell like a horse. No, I don't consider that to be a problem.

    Originally posted by DottieHQ
    You're just jealous because you lack my extensive koalafications.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by meupatdoes View Post
      You guys are criticizing a REAL PERSON and when they demonstrate the class to hear you out, you bail.
      The real person in question is also a public figure. There is nothing shameful about discussing a public figure in a public forum (aside from the nastiness and personal jabs that both sides have engaged in). Nor is there anything wrong with discussing a training method that is being promoted and sold on the internet. Consider the Parelli program -- it and its founders are the butt of half the jokes on this forum (and perhaps in the horse world more generally), but nobody gets too bent out of shape about it because they are public figures. Part of putting oneself out there as a professional (or an author or a filmmaker) is accepting the associated spotlight, even when it is harsh.

      I can't speak for all of the folks who have been critical of HB methods, but I believe that many of us were absent from the conference call for the same reasons (including but not limited to prior engagements). Specifically, I have been provided with enough information to decide that I will not participate in, recommend, or contribute to the HB program as it is currently run. I have also already spoken personally with a representative of this organization and have had a chance to discuss some of my concerns directly. This now makes me a lot more interested in the perspectives that fellow dressage riders, TR/hippotherapy professionals, families of autistic children, and horsemen share on this forum (incl. horseboyworld, if they care to participate) than I am in a(nother) private conversation about what the HB folks do. The phone call is simply as irrelevant to me as it is to those who are less critical of the program and similarly did not feel the need to participate.

      As horseboyworld said, all charities should be subject to scrutiny -- I believe that this is the spirit in which MrsFitzDarcy&Feliks started the thread and which has inspired many of us to post comments. And it sounds like horseboyworld has found a bit of a silver lining in the storm cloud of controversy, as Isabeau reports. If that is the only good to come out of this thread, it has already accomplished something, but I think that all of the opinions expressed here might also be useful to someone, someday who needs to evaluate the program without the benefit of horse experience. Not participating in a phone call does not make anyone's concern less genuine, their motives more sinister, or their scrutiny (eta: or support) less legitimate.
      Evolutionary science by day; keeping a certain red mare from winning a Darwin award the rest of the time!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by meupatdoes View Post
        You guys are criticizing a REAL PERSON and when they demonstrate the class to hear you out, you bail. Maybe you should quit trying to negatively impact people's REAL reputations if you aren't even willing to talk to them when they offer. Maybe before negatively impacting a REAL LIFE program you should ask yourselves "Is this just a fun afternoon on the internet for me or would I actually take the opportunity to engage in constructive dialog with this REAL PERSON if it arose?" Ridiculous.
        Actually, I'd prefer to talk to someone in a venue like this or email rather than a conference call because unless record the call, it can be easy for a good speaker to dominate and side-step questions and so on. Text can be re-read and provides some measure of accountability to reduce "he said, she said" type problems.

        Also, the people who are expressing concern about the risks involved with a program that seems to have safety issues are, in fact, talking about someone's REAL LIFE also - the REAL LIFE of the person (most likely an autistic kid) who could be really horribly injured as a result of not taking proper safety precautions.

        I'm personally more interested in protecting the REAL LIFE of the kid than the REAL LIFE reputation of a program. The program can revamp their image. A person with a TBI is going to have a much harder time declaring 'do over'.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by kdow View Post
          I'm personally more interested in protecting the REAL LIFE of the kid than the REAL LIFE reputation of a program. The program can revamp their image. A person with a TBI is going to have a much harder time declaring 'do over'.
          And you feel (et al) that interacting with the program through the COTH boards is the best way to do that, even more effective than the more direct means of communication?

          It is one thing if the public figure does not give direct access so the only way to communicate concerns is obliquely.
          That is not the case here. He has given his contact info, both phone and email, and if you want to make sure it is "all typed out" as opposed to "spoken" I am sure he would engage in email dialog.

          At this point when direct communication is more than possible in several mediums and he has both expressed and DEMONSTRATED his willingness to listen, this continued public slandering "in the name of discussion" is just gratuitous.
          The Noodlehttp://tiny.cc/NGKmT&http://tiny.cc/gioSA
          Jinxyhttp://tiny.cc/PIC798&http://tiny.cc/jinx364
          Boy Wonderhttp://tiny.cc/G9290
          The Hana is nuts! NUTS!!http://tinyurl.com/SOCRAZY

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Niennor View Post
            So because i didn't rearrange my life to show up for a conference call I'm not entitled to an opinion. No Sh*t I'm criticizing a "real person". That person is not above criticism because their goals seem to be all high and noble. From the moment someone becomes involved in a public organization, they will be subject to public opinion and not all opinions are good. Someone who is involved in a non profit organization should be under the public eye. Pardon me for being a skeptic but once i donated to a non profit organization every month until i found out the chairman of this non profit and using my hard own money to run for president.
            You can rearrange your life to type all this out in emails directly to him since he has provided his contact information, both phone and email, and has both expressed and demonstrated his willingness to listen to what people have to say.

            This is like he is standing there saying, "YES, I WILL LISTEN TO YOU AND HEAR YOU OUT!" and everyone just ignores him and talks amongst themselves instead, patting themselves on the back for what concerned citizens they all are and seeing who can come up with the best "STAY AWAY FROM HIM!" poster to wave around.
            The Noodlehttp://tiny.cc/NGKmT&http://tiny.cc/gioSA
            Jinxyhttp://tiny.cc/PIC798&http://tiny.cc/jinx364
            Boy Wonderhttp://tiny.cc/G9290
            The Hana is nuts! NUTS!!http://tinyurl.com/SOCRAZY

            Comment

            Working...
            X