• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

(Cross post from Eventing): What gets you a 4 on a movement?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • (Cross post from Eventing): What gets you a 4 on a movement?

    (I'm cross-posting from the Eventing forum in hopes that more dressage peeps will see it )

    My friend was complaining about her dressage score at Entry (sort of like BN for us Canucks) (ETA: I'm really not sure what this translates into in a pure dressage test - perhaps Training?). She said that her dressage instructor (who didn't see the test) said that the judge was incorrect in giving a 4 for any movement or pattern that was completed. I thought "huh?? That's what a 0 is for; 4 = insufficient". My friend insists that a 4 means a break in gait or a major disobedience; that if the movement was completed as directed (e.g. a 20m canter circle on the left) that the minimum score can be no less than 5.

    Well, that doesn't sound right to me, but I'm not a judge. So, using a 20m canter circle on the left as an example, what would earn you a 4 on the movement?

    thanks!!
    I don't mind if you call me a snowflake, 'cause baby, I know a blizzard is coming.

  • #2
    I was really excited about this title. What has gotten me a 4 on a movement? Oh so many, many things.

    What has gotten my pony a 4 (once 8, then crossed out as the last stride became a pony-says-no fit) on a canter circle left in TL 3 was the aforementioned pony-says-no fit. There was one, maybe 2 strides left in the circle and I put a touch more inside leg to bend her around... bad choice, my friends, bad choice. What once was a lovely balanced canter turned into a pony bronc fest. Comment: "Lovely circle. Pity about the rodeo."

    For some reason, the submission scores were rather low.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      haha, love it!! Gotta love pony mares. I too have received a crossed out score... it didn't go higher...

      While my friend was grousing I was scratching my head -- I have received PLENTY of 4's when I have "more or less" completed the movement... depends on your definition...

      I am guessing the reason that my friend was cheesed off is that she feels that she DIDN'T have a major meltdown, break to a trot, wrong lead etc., so she thinks it's unfair to get less than a 5 if none of those things happened.
      Last edited by fargaloo; Jul. 19, 2012, 02:46 PM.
      I don't mind if you call me a snowflake, 'cause baby, I know a blizzard is coming.

      Comment


      • #4
        I got a 4 on walk to trot transition.

        What happened? well, judge's comment was "stopped to poop" with a frowny face.



        It still makes me laugh.

        Comment


        • #5
          Umm I still dread my stretchy trot circle - big ole 4 for "insufficient stretching" or "downward but not forward enough," and all slew of other things. What can I say? Pony loves to keep his head up so he can look at the judge: maybe he thinks he will get an 8 by batting his eyelashes? Arch.

          Comment


          • #6
            Score/Performance Level

            10 = Excellent
            9 = Very good
            8 = Good
            7 = Fairly good
            6 = Satisfactory
            5 = Marginal
            4 = Insufficient
            3 = Fairly bad
            2 = Bad
            1 = Very bad
            0 = Not performed

            It means your execution of the movement was between marginal and fairly bad. More an expression of quality than quantity.
            ... _. ._ .._. .._

            Comment


            • #7
              Why a 4? If the horse was on the forehand, and/or incorrect bend, and/or head up in the air, and/or curled up behind the bit, and/or poor contact, and/or 4-beat canter, and/or uneven tempo, and/or way too fast or way too slow, and/or the circle size was incorrect or not circular enough, etc. etc. There are many things that can cause the judge to give a 4. The rider needs to read the objectives of the test, what the requirements are for the level and assess the ride based on them. The trainer, instead of blaming the judge, should be offering constructive help to the rider. But then if the trainer is blaming the judge, maybe the trainer doesn't really understand the reasons for a 4 and needs some more education.

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #8
                Thanks, everyone for your comments -- very helpful.

                As an aside -- I am disappointed in my friend over her attitude, and am surprised that her instructor is supporting her. We all know that judges are human and can make mistakes, but my friend is railing about how this judge is "incompetent" (and by the way, I happen to have ridden in front of this judge many times and have found her extremely fair and insightful; she also has an excellent reputation in the local community). My friend is ticked at me because I am refusing to join in the pile-on. Apparently her instructor has been backing her up with stories of "dressage is so political!! Judges are so biased!!", so my friend is now mad as a wet hen. Over an Entry level dressage test.
                I don't mind if you call me a snowflake, 'cause baby, I know a blizzard is coming.

                Comment


                • #9
                  At a recent show, I did 4-1 and there is medium down the diagonal with some collected trot steps in the middle. It is a coefficient, and on my test sheet you see an 8, and then it got crossed out to a 4. Well, the horse I rode spooked and jumped up on all fours (it was in an indoor and some one came running by during out test). It was at the end of the movement, we were actually turning the corner. We recovered and got a 7 on our next half pass, but I guess a spook constitutes a 4. But big spooks are hard on scoring sometimes because then you can get nailed in your obedience score too. I saw someone once do the PSG canter zig-zag and do half of it in trot, and they got a 3.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I think the moral of the story is that there are lots of ways to earn a 4, and very very few ways to earn a 10.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Well too bad for your friend, she might miss a good opportunity to learn from her hum...(not) mistakes!

                      Have you seen her test? Was it recorded?
                      Judges can make mistakes and if she can proves her point, she could have her test re-evaluted! But really...at Entry level...
                      ~ Enjoying some guac and boxed wine at the Blue Saddle inn. ~

                      Originally posted by LauraKY
                      I'm sorry, but this has "eau de hoarder" smell all over it.
                      HORSING mobile training app

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Is this 'instructor' a dressage person? Has this instructor been through any dressage judge training sessions?

                        Just trying to get a perspective of level of involvement / competence.

                        There are some 'instructors' that I know of that are not so experienced in this discipline that others.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          A more interesting discussion would be how we have gotten 1s!


                          My 4s have all involved aerials or unplanned transitions to other gaits. But my horse is a balanced nice mover.

                          I would think in intro if you have a horse who is inverted, on the forehand and lacks impulsion you may be starting at a 5. Then make the circle the wrong size or oblong, and you could easily get a 4 which doesn't result from a misbehavior of some sort.
                          Originally posted by Silverbridge
                          If you get anything on your Facebook feed about who is going to the Olympics in 2012 or guessing the outcome of Bush v Gore please start threads about those, too.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Crossing hind legs in a walk piro.
                            not enough bend in a SI.
                            Not enough stretch in a stretchy circle.
                            trot steps in a simple change.
                            too many walk steps in a simple change.
                            adding a flying change into the counter canter loop.


                            what movement was it?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The attitude is something I've seen before...many times. I think I finally have some of it figured out. If you only ride in your own backyard as a dressage rider and you're in a place where the quality of dressage is not that high, then you think something that is not really that good should always have a minimum of 5. If you are in a place where the standards are higher, then people understand immediately why they got a 4--they have a better trained eye and understanding.

                              This can happen in eventing, too, because there are often rides that are not very good, but people watching are so used to poor to somewhat good tests that they thinks somewhat good is AWESOME and they're wondering why people aren't getting 8s across the board.

                              And judges can add to this by rewarding rides that are not so great because, by comparison and after a LONG day in the sun, they are ready to throw some higher scores out. (Most really aren't that stingy.)

                              I think your friend and her instructor are suffering from this syndrome. I see it in certain parts of the country, especially those with less consistant access to top coaches. People come up through the levels and don't get to see truly soft, balanced and wonderful examples of a horse doing each level.

                              Just a thought. (And many of those places like the Santa Claus judges and refuse to get tough judges unless they can't find anyone else available. )
                              "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                lorilu -- I wish it was as exciting as a pirouette... no, it was a 20m canter circle

                                mjhco -- interestingly enough, the instructor is (or was) a recognizable name locally; I am pretty sure she has competed at a high level (I think GP) but no idea if she has any judging experience. (Being an eventer, I am not really up on the dressage scene.) From my limited interaction with her, I suspect she has a bit of a chip on her shoulder with regards to competition.

                                alibi_18 -- I actually watched her test. I figured it would be a low 60's and it was a 59.5%. (Aren't I smart.)

                                thanks for all your feedback. I love the idea that there are many ways to earn a 4 and very few to earn a 10 - well said cnm161!
                                I don't mind if you call me a snowflake, 'cause baby, I know a blizzard is coming.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Once I got a whole bunch of 4's on a first outing with a very nervous horse who cantered through half of an Intro test

                                  I'd have to go through old tests to figure out if I've ever gotten one for something less obvious, but it certainly seems possible.
                                  "In order to really enjoy a dog, one doesn’t merely train him to be semi-human. The point of it is to open oneself to the possibility of becoming part dog."
                                  -Edward Hoagland

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    What were the comments associated with the 4's?

                                    With the other scores?

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Just wait till she gets to sticking that g*&^%$#n turn on the haunches. But yeah, judges are human, and sometimes make mistakes. Those can go both ways. I have a friend who has a videotaped test in which she received a 7 for a halt at A that she never performed.

                                      Scores should always be looked at over several shows as trends.
                                      "Reite dein Pferd vorwärts und richte es gerade.” Gustav Steinbrecht

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        In general a 4 is something like wrong gait, wrong lead, stopping, shying, major problems. Generally most judges give a 5 if it's just not good.

                                        For example, in a 20 m circle, little bend, not good quality gaits, not on bit kind of things are usually 5. What gets a 4 is something like on the wrong lead, head bent in wrong direction, flipping head up repeatedly, or maybe making a square or a 38 m circle.

                                        In general, what is acceptable is supposed to be more and more stringent the higher you go in the levels.

                                        In general, the first time you see a problem, it might be a 5, but if it's the same or worse on the other side, it's a 4.

                                        As long as the judge is consistent in judging everyone the same way, it's OK.

                                        That said, recent show shows the problems we have. Judge judging the owner of the facility who does no piaffe, passage, transitions, or pirouettes at I-2. Lovely changes. Could be very generous and give 8's for changes, but the best given for the rest should have been 4's, and into 3's as it got worse. The score was 70%. That means those non p/p and por. had to get 6's. Sad.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X