• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

CP cruelty charges dismissed

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CP cruelty charges dismissed

    http://www.nj.com/hunterdon-county-d...dismisses.html


    "Animal cruelty charges have been dismissed against Olympian Cesar Parra, Hunterdon County Prosecutor Anthony P. Kearns III announced this morning, May 24.
    In March 2012, the Hunterdon County SPCA issued four summonses to Parra, 49, of Whitehouse Station after a complaint was made regarding an incident that occurred almost three years prior. Parra was accused by the SPCA of “torture or torment to a living animal” after a horse he was training was injured in June 2009.
    Kearns said, “Of the four summonses issued to Parra, one was related to a fourth degree crime, one was for a disorderly persons offense, and two were civil complaints.”
    The one criminal summons related to the disorderly persons offense was reviewed by the Hunterdon County Prosecutor’s Office. Prosecutor Kearns noted, “This incident occurred almost three years prior to the complaints being issued and the Statute of Limitations on Disorderly Persons offenses is one year, therefore that summons was dismissed.”
    Kearns added, “In regards to the remaining fourth degree criminal complaint, a thorough investigation into this matter was completed by my office, including multiple witness interviews. It has been determined that there is insufficient evidence to proceed with criminal charges in the case. The summons will be dismissed. The two civil complaints have been referred back to the Readington Township Municipal Court for appropriate disposition.”
    Meanwhile, a trial in a lawsuit between Miranda and Parra is scheduled to go to trial in July.
    Miranda filed suit in June 2011 against Parra, claiming Parra was negligent in the way he handled the horse and how he cared for him after the injury. On March 16, Miranda’s motion to file an amended complaint was granted. The amended complaint adds that Parra acted with wanton disregard to the rights of others. She claims that the release she signed just before the incident is not enforceable due to Parra's negligence.
    In April, Parra filed a counterclaim against Miranda and asked the judge to conduct a jury trial.
    The trial is scheduled to start on July 12."
    "Friend" me !

    http://www.facebook.com/isabeau.solace

  • #2
    the silence is deafening......
    We don't get less brave; we get a bigger sense of self-preservation........

    Comment


    • #3
      He is not someone I would support on the team.

      Comment


      • #4
        I definitely wouldn't want someone on the team who looks like the Pillsbury Dough Boy

        Comment


        • #5
          "insufficient evidence to proceed" is not a vote of innocence.
          Summit Sporthorses Ltd. Inc.
          "Breeding Competition Partners & Lifelong Friends"

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ise@ssl View Post
            "insufficient evidence to proceed" is not a vote of innocence.
            No. But, when a prosecutor refuses to go forward, if means she or he thinks there isn't enough evidence for any jury to find the person guilty - which is worse than a "not guilty" verdict where at least there was enough evidence to take the case to a jury. I hope Dr. Parra will get his justice one day (and I don't mean exoneration), but this prosecution offended me as a lawyer. I don't know if you recall - I reached out to you politely in a PM, and you didn't want to hear it

            I imagine CP will see this as vindication. He's showing Van the Man this weekend at the NJHP and will undoubtedly be as cocky as ever.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by 2tempe View Post
              the silence is deafening......
              So say something.......
              I wasn't always a Smurf
              Penmerryl's Sophie RIDSH
              "I ain't as good as I once was but I'm as good once as I ever was"
              The ignore list is my friend. It takes 2 to argue.

              Comment


              • #8
                Discobold - I honestly don't remember you.
                What was disturbing to me as a resident taxpayer in Hunterdon County was the fact that the County Investigator assigned to this case didn't bother to contact ALL of the individuals who came forward. Additionally, the ones he did speak to were limited to answering Yes or No to questions he asked them and he did not allow them to give full statements. So the issue of "insufficient evidence" is questionable due to the limited effort for discovery.
                It's rather unfortunate but horse people have to understand the legal system does not consider equine abuse issues to be a pressing matter. Even the laws on the books consider horses to be "property". The fact that they are living, breathing animals for many of us more like part of our family - doesn't equate with existing law. And I'm NOT in any way shape or form taking the PETA approach - which Mr. Davis - CP's benefactor was espousing in his press release.
                CP can continue with his proud strutting around at horse shows. But I'm one person who will NEVER watch him ride.
                Summit Sporthorses Ltd. Inc.
                "Breeding Competition Partners & Lifelong Friends"

                Comment


                • #9
                  You guys sound like the RaRA PETA groups agains't the NYC carriage industry. No matter what happen, CP (or the Carriage industry) will undoubtly always be guilty.

                  Originally posted by ise@ssl View Post
                  What was disturbing to me as a resident taxpayer in Hunterdon County was the fact that the County Investigator assigned to this case didn't bother to contact ALL of the individuals who came forward. Additionally, the ones he did speak to were limited to answering Yes or No to questions he asked them and he did not allow them to give full statements. So the issue of "insufficient evidence" is questionable due to the limited effort for discovery.
                  How do you know that ALL of the individuals weren't contacted and/or allowed to give full statement? They called you?

                  Who came forward?!? Mr. Buck?!? You really believe he is to be listened?!? (We haven't heard from him much lately...)

                  **ALL** How many witnesses were there?!? In the video we could see like max 10 people... Doesn't take that long to question each ones.

                  Oh.... They should have get the testimony of every individuals for the past 10 years who have something to say agains't CP, no matter if it is relevant or not to this case... as long as it is **proving** that CP is a mean person and beats horses on a daily basis.

                  As for me, CP will remain innocent in this case until proven guilty.

                  But I guess the Olympic torch could be used to burn him alive!
                  ~ Enjoying some guac and boxed wine at the Blue Saddle inn. ~

                  Originally posted by LauraKY
                  I'm sorry, but this has "eau de hoarder" smell all over it.
                  HORSING mobile training app

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I think he should take up bicycling.
                    Groom to trainer: "Where's the glamour? You promised me glamour!"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by alibi_18 View Post
                      You guys sound like the RaRA PETA groups agains't the NYC carriage industry. No matter what happen, CP (or the Carriage industry) will undoubtly always be guilty.



                      How do you know that ALL of the individuals weren't contacted and/or allowed to give full statement? They called you?

                      Who came forward?!? Mr. Buck?!? You really believe he is to be listened?!? (We haven't heard from him much lately...)

                      **ALL** How many witnesses were there?!? In the video we could see like max 10 people... Doesn't take that long to question each ones.

                      Oh.... They should have get the testimony of every individuals for the past 10 years who have something to say agains't CP, no matter if it is relevant or not to this case... as long as it is **proving** that CP is a mean person and beats horses on a daily basis.

                      As for me, CP will remain innocent in this case until proven guilty.

                      But I guess the Olympic torch could be used to burn him alive!
                      As the Casey Anthony trial demonstrated there's guilt innocence and that which can be proved in court
                      I wasn't always a Smurf
                      Penmerryl's Sophie RIDSH
                      "I ain't as good as I once was but I'm as good once as I ever was"
                      The ignore list is my friend. It takes 2 to argue.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        FWIW, I know someone who trained with him most of this past winter. While he certainly demands top effort from both horse and rider, she never saw anything that came close to “abuse”, and she has seen much more aggressive and assertive methods used at some very high end barns in Germany and Holland. She also talked to a few of his people that were present for the incident in question, and their version of the horse’s behavior differs from the owner’s version (one of his people described the horse as “a striker that had to handled with care”).

                        That being said, CP will need a very good show this weekend to move up the ranking list. He is currently ranked #18 on the USEF High Performance GP ranking list, and the top 15 get invites to Gladstone (I believe it will be the top 16, since Steffen Peters has two horses in the top spots). I think CP’s chances of making the Olympic team are pretty slim.
                        Last edited by DownYonder; May. 25, 2012, 11:22 AM. Reason: typo and clarification

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          It is often difficult to find sufficient proof so long after the fact, especially when the incident in question was not viewed as a possible criminal act and investigated as such at the time.
                          "The captive bolt is not a proper tool for slaughter of equids they regain consciousness 30 seconds after being struck fully aware they are being vivisected." Dr Friedlander DVM & frmr Chief USDA Insp

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by CFFarm View Post
                            I think he should take up bicycling.
                            Believe me, as a cyclist we wouldn't want him either.
                            www.destinationconsensusequus.com
                            chaque pas est fait ensemble

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              @DY who said: "one of his people described the horse as “a striker that had to handled with care”). "

                              Of course CP's people are going to say that. Do you honestly think they would say something that would benefit William's owner and speak against CP?? Of course they wouldn't, particular not with a man that wants all "his people" to sign confidentiality agreements.


                              I would LOVE to see him on a bike. Put him in a Peloton of 50 guys going 28+ mph in a crit. The man wouldn't last 2 seconds. He would be decimated after the first turn. lol.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by SnicklefritzG View Post
                                @DY who said: "one of his people described the horse as “a striker that had to handled with care”). "

                                Of course CP's people are going to say that. Do you honestly think they would say something that would benefit William's owner and speak against CP?? Of course they wouldn't, particular not with a man that wants all "his people" to sign confidentiality agreements.
                                So you are attesting that this person was lying? Do you think she (or he) also "lied" to the investigators? That would take a lot of chutzpah - it could be a bit embarassing getting pulled into court and having to tell a different story while under oath.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by DownYonder View Post
                                  So you are attesting that this person was lying? Do you think she (or he) also "lied" to the investigators? That would take a lot of chutzpah - it could be a bit embarassing getting pulled into court and having to tell a different story while under oath.
                                  Totally agree. I don't think there is anything wrong with having employees sign confidentiality agreements, the internet can be a dangerous place, just look at this thread as an example.
                                  "You gave your life to become the person you are right now. Was it worth it?" Richard Bach

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Alibi - I spoke with Trudy personally. And the individuals that were not contacted by the Investigator had called her to say THEY WERE NOT CONTACTED even though the were on the list. Others called her to say they tried to explain their experiences but were told to just answer yes or no to questions asked.
                                    I do not know, nor have I ever communicated with Mr. Buck nor do I intend to do that.
                                    I'm an anti - PETA person.
                                    Summit Sporthorses Ltd. Inc.
                                    "Breeding Competition Partners & Lifelong Friends"

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      While the amount of smoke makes me think there's a fire somewhere in the barn in question, I felt the case appeared to be a witch hunt, and the way everything was phrased, the "evidence" involved, etc., all made it appear much more similar to the anti-carriage folks than legit.
                                      Originally posted by Silverbridge
                                      If you get anything on your Facebook feed about who is going to the Olympics in 2012 or guessing the outcome of Bush v Gore please start threads about those, too.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by DownYonder View Post

                                        That being said, CP will need a very good show this weekend to move up the ranking list. He is currently ranked #18 on the USEF High Performance GP ranking list, and the top 15 get invites to Gladstone (I believe it will be the top 16, since Steffen Peters has two horses in the top spots). I think CP’s chances of making the Olympic team are pretty slim.
                                        I know it's not on point, but heather blitz, on dressage radio, said that ravel is an automatic in and will not be going to Gladstone. SP will be competing on his 2nd horse.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X