• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Dressage Daily and Cesar Parra

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dressage Daily and Cesar Parra

    Can someone explain to me why Dressage Daily has nothing about the criminal charges pending against Cesar Parra by The State of New Jersey. I just reviewed the site and saw that there
    have been over 25 pages of links to articles relating to him. In
    comparison Stephen Peters has 3.

  • #2
    I think that a person can pay DD and others to print articles about them. It's CP's PR machine at work.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Originally posted by Justice~for~Horses View Post
      I think that a person can pay DD and others to print articles about them. It's CP's PR machine at work.
      I stand corrected, Steffen Peters does have more articles than Parra but still nothing on the criminal charges.

      Comment


      • #4
        If you really wanted an answer, the place to ask would be DD, wouldn't it?
        "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

        ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          If its a pay to play website as suggested then that explains it all.

          Comment


          • #6
            Yes, to be on Dressage Daily you pay. It's like an infomercial.
            Read it there, and check the facts elsewhere.

            Comment


            • #7
              The Parra story has been reported on the "Dressage News From Around the Globe" site.

              Comment


              • #8
                Don't you love that he claims this is the owners way of "distracting" him from his work of riding in the olympics. Therefore, he is suing them!

                Classy! (sarcasm)

                I dont know if he did anything wrong with the young stallion or not, but I have no respect for him suing right back under such a silly "excuse". Does he even have a shot at London?? (genuine question; I've not kept up).

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  [edit]

                  Dressage Daily | Daily Dressage News Since 1997
                  www.dressagedaily.com/The number one spot on the world wide web for dressage news, photos, horses for sale and more.....


                  This is how Dressage Daily describes their role in the industry.
                  Last edited by Moderator 1; Mar. 27, 2012, 01:26 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by flyracing View Post
                    Don't you love that he claims this is the owners way of "distracting" him from his work of riding in the olympics. Therefore, he is suing them!

                    Classy! (sarcasm)
                    The letter you are quoting from was from his attorney, not from CP.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Not sure how others feel about it but I feel any articles that are paid to be published on the Internet or in print should indicate they are paid advertisements or editorials.
                      Summit Sporthorses Ltd. Inc.
                      "Breeding Competition Partners & Lifelong Friends"

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        [edit]

                        FWIW, Ilona, I agree. they should make a notation when they're being paid (lots of $$) to do "articles" on professionals.
                        Last edited by Moderator 1; Mar. 27, 2012, 01:28 PM.
                        Hopeful Farm Sport Horses
                        Midwest Breeders Group
                        Follow me on Twitter
                        Join me on Facebook

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Thanks, Velvet. I was referring to ISE's comment regarding DD making it clear which of their articles are their own and which are paid promotional pieces. From a purely practical stay-out-of-the-fray standpoint, they might want to seriously consider noting which pieces are paid. Especially with this brouhaha surrounding a particular trainer. I know, I know--innocent until proven guilty, but I would not want my name or website associated with someone who is being investigated on animal abuse charges. Um, so I guess I'm not on the fence after all.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by suzy View Post
                            Thanks, Velvet. I was referring to ISE's comment regarding DD making it clear which of their articles are their own and which are paid promotional pieces. From a purely practical stay-out-of-the-fray standpoint, they might want to seriously consider noting which pieces are paid. Especially with this brouhaha surrounding a particular trainer. I know, I know--innocent until proven guilty, but I would not want my name or website associated with someone who is being investigated on animal abuse charges.
                            And here I thought you refused to reliquish your whip...

                            Don't get PC on me now! Where's my MARGARITA???
                            "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              ANYHOO, it's called an advertorial, and they're very common. Typically there's a notation somewhere that says that it's paid. I don't know if that's the case, but if it is, do we really care that much?

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                (Raising hand and waving) I don't !

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Actually, I do care. It's akin to reading a product review done by an impartial customer as opposed to a review written by someone who received something in exchange for the review. The latter just doesn't have the same credibility as the former.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    "If it IS" noted somewhere that it is a paid article, then do we care?
                                    I don't. I don't read them. Just like the pages of a magazine that sort of blend in with the copy that have "advertizement" in small print at the top.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I care. An infommercial is hardly objective.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        The OP of the thread has no IP overlap between other posters, so there's no evidence that she/he is an alter for anyone. While the general topic is a controversial one, please don't whip out the "troll" branding iron just because she brought it up.

                                        We've removed a bunch of posts related to the above issues; please avoid going down that path again.

                                        Thanks,
                                        Mod 1

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X