• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Is Dressage Judging becoming more confusing?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is Dressage Judging becoming more confusing?

    When I look at the scores from shows and qualifiers both here and in Europe I really have to wonder if we aren't getting fruit salad - i.e. apples and oranges. When we see scores of 65% and above (some in Grand Prix) for rides by both rider/horse combinations who are ranked at the top of the sport AND rider/horse combinations who are amateur riders on school masters - are the judges seeing the same qualify of movement in both instances?? I'm not trying to imply we don't have excellent Amateur riders who have well trained horses but are judges giving a 6 or 7 when they would NOT give a 6 or 7 to professionals?

    And if there is a difference in the level of expectation each judge places on Amateur versus Professional doesn't this create a great deal of confusion with respect to what a score tells us about the ride? I ask this now that the USDF is proposing minimum scores for moving up the levels and the debate it has created.

    We've all watched rides at all levels that seem to be examples of what the sport should NOT be but we all have probably seen some rides that didn't score what we expected - perhaps because the person was not well known.

    Just curious what others think about this. I see judging in the sport and in the Young Horse and Breeding Division that is increasing more disconnected and very often hard to understand.
    Summit Sporthorses Ltd. Inc.
    "Breeding Competition Partners & Lifelong Friends"

  • #2
    I am not sure I agree with the differentiation between Amateurs and Professionals. We have some excellent professionals and then some "not so" excellent Professionals. We have some excellent Amateurs and then some "not so" excellent Amateurs. There are some Amatuers that work full time at the sport of dressage and could outride many professionals I know.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm completely with ltw on this as far as judging amateurs vs. pros is concerned.
      Comparing scores for dressage tests with those given at young horse competitions or breed shows is indeed an apples to oranges comparison since different "things" are being scored.

      So I guess I don't quite see your point, Ilona.
      Siegi Belz
      www.stalleuropa.com
      2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
      Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

      Comment


      • #4
        I don't think the problem is related to classes where riders are well known vs not well known, or amateur or professional, for that matter.

        A friend recently showed her nice but green Arabian (Training Level) at a recognized show under two "R" judges. The comments were almost identical (as were the rides) but the scores were off by a fairly wide margin (a 4, 5s and a couple of 6s from one judge... 5s, 6s, 7s and an 8 from the other).
        Patience pays.

        Comment


        • #5
          depending on where the judge is sitting he will be able to see or not see certain things. that's why there's multiple judges sitting on one test and their scores are averaged for the results.

          but if scores vary from judge to judge for different tests, it's entirely possible that the different scores were deserved and accurate, and the rider did a different quality movement each time. a green horse is especially likely to perform the movements differently in different tests, even if the tests are on the same day.

          we seem to assume that any time there's a question the judge is wrong; that isn't always the case

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            OK - maybe I wasn't clear. If I see a score of 65% at Grand Prix for a person that I know is not a super rider and they are riding a school master - how can they be scoring that high when some top riders on top horses are just a few points above that. The person was in an AA class - FEI of choice. Do judges tend to be a little more generous for FEI classes with AA riders?
            Summit Sporthorses Ltd. Inc.
            "Breeding Competition Partners & Lifelong Friends"

            Comment


            • #7
              I see the OP's point, but I don't think it is always related to AA or being well known. The fact is that all 65%'s are not created equal. As someone else pointed out, the number of judges makes a huge difference. Usually scoring is lower with multiple judges. This is another reason why HOY ranking is a bit unfair. People riding in Florida with top competition and multiple judges have their scores compared with somone that did a local show in the Midwest with an easy judge. (Don't say it doesn't happen....it definitely does). I remember one year when two AA's were almost tied for either I2 or GP. I knew both of these horses/riders and there was a world of difference between them.

              Devon is another example where you see how goofy scoring is. There are people qualifying for Devon with high 60's; even 70+ and then they end up at the bottom of the class with low 50's and I've even seen scores in the 40's. There is almost no excuse for getting a score in the 40's at Devon; it means you should not have qualified IMO.

              I DO think the AA classes are judged more leniently, even if the judges claim they are not.

              Comment


              • #8
                I agree with much of what has been written here. The other thing that needs to be added into the mix is that many judges have not trained a horse from the very beginning. They do not recognize some of the fatal flaws in the training because of this, and hence reward things that should really go punished. One of my really big, bug-a-boos, are the 6's and 7's given for those "stretchy circles" in which the horse is just dropping the neck and not really stretching. This is a fatal flaw, and should be punished with a 3 or 4 because the correctness is not being demonstrated. In fact, the movement is not even being demonstrated, so maybe it should be a zero.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Most of the judges HAVE trained quite a few horses and have trained and competed at the levels they are judging. There are a few notable exceptions, but that's what they are; exceptions.

                  why ASSUME the judge isn't judging correctly? Why not consider teh possibility that there's another reason.

                  Ok. An amateur on a schoolmaster got a 65% in a Grand Prix class.

                  And you don't think she rode well enough to deserve it.

                  Well, an amateur with good instruction who practices quite hard, and has an easy, reliable, cooperative schoolmaster, might do very well. The amateur might have a lot of experience riding at lower levels, and there's 'nothing new after third level', once you have reached that level you know all the basic concepts. It's still a lot of work to get from there to GP, and for all you know the rider really paid his dues working very hard very often with his coach.

                  And a good horse can really help. I know GP schoolmasters that are just murder to ride and never score well because there are defects in their training, and ones that quite often go out there and if the person doesn't get too wierd with them they are going to do pretty well.

                  That's still not easy, and it's not 'cheating' to learn on a trained horse, actually, it's the classical ideal of how to learn the upper levels.

                  Too, maybe you don't understand where the rider gets the points. It's very easy to get mad watching who wins if you don't follow how the judge is scoring.

                  Some of the errors you may have seen could have been really minor ones.

                  Some horses are 'crowd pleasers'. They go out there and look perky, or they're an unusual size, color or breed, and everyone likes them. That doesn't mean the 'plain' horses should score low. They're scored on technical aspects of doing the test, not crowd appeal. 'Personality', 'style', etc doesn't mean much.

                  You can also be very sure that 99% of spectators have a very, very different view of how one should ride than the judge does.

                  Spectators often complain if the rider isn't a frozen statue; the judge views that very, very differently. Does the rider jerk the reins and get 'criminal' status with the audience. Maybe so, but the judge may see this as a necessary and effective correction.

                  If the rider bounces in the saddle, he may not see it as a lack of basic ability, he may see what's really going on - a lack of suppleness, a momentary tipping onto the forehand that tightens the horse's back, or just a huge moving horse that the rider is being loose, soft and following.

                  Spooking, especially between the movements, may not affect the score of any movement at all. Being excited, even restless, isn't that bad either. Alot of GP horses are extremely eager and excited and score very well.

                  As an example, you lose much more points for stepping back in the piaffe than you would for stepping too forward. Stepping too much forward is a fault, but a much more minor one.

                  You lose far fewer faults if the horse doesn't lift his knees up to his chin or sit like a dog in piaffe than many people think. The basic points in the piaffe come from the real basics - a diagonal, trot like gait, with a desire to go forward, an overall steady rhythm. In fact, an extreme sitting position is usually incorrect and due to a loss of balance, it also makes the transitions in and out of the piaffe have serious problems in most cases.

                  The rhythm and evenness in piaffe are important, but even so, a few funny steps isn't going to blow the whole thing, as long as the majority of the steps are good.

                  As another example, you may lose very little by doing a large pirouette, but you would lose a lot more points for doing a very small pirouette and losing the canter rhythm. Keep the canter rhythm, get around, the score will be pretty good.

                  These are just examples. Getting a better idea of what the judge's training is like really helps to understand scoring.

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    slc2 - Judges have to ride and compete for the qualifications but I'm not so sure your comment that most have trained horses is true. We see up and coming judges all the time who are constantly BUYING horses at the next levels so they can get their qualifying scores to move up the ranks in judging. Trainers are riding them most of the time to keep their skills sharp.

                    I just wonder see such disparity in scores and I'm very aware that judges are sitting at different locations an can see movement differently for scoring but sometimes the range of scores is 2 or more points. I also see a difference in what European judges score compared to many US judges - can someone explain that?
                    Summit Sporthorses Ltd. Inc.
                    "Breeding Competition Partners & Lifelong Friends"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Melissa.Hare.Jones View Post

                      A friend recently showed her nice but green Arabian (Training Level) at a recognized show under two "R" judges. The comments were almost identical (as were the rides) but the scores were off by a fairly wide margin (a 4, 5s and a couple of 6s from one judge... 5s, 6s, 7s and an 8 from the other).
                      I've noticed that too. Here in Arkansas, the show organizers will only hire judges that give inflated scores. If you want an easy qualifying score, come show here, LOL!! I see rides that should have gotten no higher than a 55% (and that's being generous) end up with a 60%...
                      "To be an equestrian in the classical sense is not just to be a rider.
                      It is a position in life." --Charles de Kunffy

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by ise@ssl View Post

                        I just wonder see such disparity in scores and I'm very aware that judges are sitting at different locations an can see movement differently for scoring but sometimes the range of scores is 2 or more points. I also see a difference in what European judges score compared to many US judges - can someone explain that?
                        IMO (and my opinion is VERY amateur, but I am a good observer ) is that our level of American trained amateur riders (in general) is not even close to that of more serious European amateurs. So, the judging in turn has also been "lowered", maybe to not discourage these riders, or maybe out of pure ignorance. I don't know why, but I have also noticed the trend of inflated scores from many US judges and the poor riding of US competitors, even those claiming to be "professionals"... There are no required credentials or licensing required for trainers, so anyone can claim to be one, even if they have no business training or instructing anyone...

                        There has to be some reason for it, and that's all I can think of that makes sense.
                        "To be an equestrian in the classical sense is not just to be a rider.
                        It is a position in life." --Charles de Kunffy

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Perhaps some 'up and coming' dressage judges have less experience, but no one becomes an R or S judge without making their way through some pretty hefty requirements. I think Linda Zang, Hilda Gurney, Carol Lavel, Mike Poulin, Sharon Poulin and many, many other judges have extensive experience training horses.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by slc2 View Post
                            Perhaps some 'up and coming' dressage judges have less experience, but no one becomes an R or S judge without making their way through some pretty hefty requirements. I think Linda Zang, Hilda Gurney, Carol Lavel, Mike Poulin, Sharon Poulin and many, many other judges have extensive experience training horses.
                            True, but most American judges are training American Dressage horses...
                            "To be an equestrian in the classical sense is not just to be a rider.
                            It is a position in life." --Charles de Kunffy

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X