• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Today: FEI Rules NO to blood rule proposal

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Today: FEI Rules NO to blood rule proposal

    http://www.fei.org/sites/default/fil...ber%202011.pdf

    At higher levels, there is still some extenuating circumstances where the test is stopped upon sight of blood, but allows times for the attending veterinarian to investigate.
    Practice! Patience! Persistence!
    http://www.mariposasporthorses.com/
    https://www.facebook.com/MariposaSportHorses/

  • #2
    I find this extremely disturbing. If I have a horse with a tiny nick, or god forbid a FLY BITE which causes blood, I am going to be STOPPED and told to LEAVE the arena? Are the people stopping me going to pay for my test, stabling, gas to haul to the show etc? Ridiculous and just another example of how "overboard" we have gone in the horse world!!
    www.shawneeacres.net

    Comment


    • #3
      So it did pass, just only for higher stake competitions? That makes sense. "Small" fei shows may struggle more to have the fei vet near to the ring at all times and the "cost" of auto-elimination is much lower than say when you travel across an ocean for a world championship.

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        Fly bites do not cause gobs of blood to drip from a horse's mouth. The current proposed discussion directly deals with the amount of blood one sees in a horse's mouth. Blood specked foam due to a bit pinch is one thing. Blood stained teeth, lips and dripping blood are quite another.
        Practice! Patience! Persistence!
        http://www.mariposasporthorses.com/
        https://www.facebook.com/MariposaSportHorses/

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by shawneeAcres View Post
          I find this extremely disturbing. If I have a horse with a tiny nick, or god forbid a FLY BITE which causes blood, I am going to be STOPPED and told to LEAVE the arena? Are the people stopping me going to pay for my test, stabling, gas to haul to the show etc? Ridiculous and just another example of how "overboard" we have gone in the horse world!!


          I agree and hope they shortly write something in to include "under 1 cm" non-dripping blood spots that are not in the area of any tack or the rider's body (spurs). It could be evaluated after the test is concluded to determine there was no way it was caused in any way by riding the horse.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by rodawn View Post
            Fly bites do not cause gobs of blood to drip from a horse's mouth. The current proposed discussion directly deals with the amount of blood one sees in a horse's mouth. Blood specked foam due to a bit pinch is one thing. Blood stained teeth, lips and dripping blood are quite another.
            The report you linked specifically says "anywhere on the horse's body. It is not limited to the mouth even if that is the first big public display that brought this to life.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by shawneeAcres View Post
              I find this extremely disturbing. If I have a horse with a tiny nick, or god forbid a FLY BITE which causes blood, I am going to be STOPPED and told to LEAVE the arena? Are the people stopping me going to pay for my test, stabling, gas to haul to the show etc? Ridiculous and just another example of how "overboard" we have gone in the horse world!!
              No, correct procedure is to notify officials before you ride & have your horse assessed - & passed for absurdities such as this.

              As for expenses, this is no different than if you arrived at the showgrounds & your horse walked off the trailer lame, or took a wrong step during warmup ...

              If you want a guaranteed return for your entertainment money, go to a movie, if you don't like it in the first quarter, you can get your money back.

              Comment


              • #8
                Blood coming from the horses mouth, or from the sides where the spurs are is QUITE a bit different than a small nick from a bump, or other small but TOTALLY insignificant injury that has no bearing on the horses ability to perform! I am sorry but these are animals, how often have you, a human animal, gotten a small nick that bled for 5 minutes and then was totally fine?? This is going OVERBOARD as usual from horse people!
                www.shawneeacres.net

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by alto View Post
                  No, correct procedure is to notify officials before you ride & have your horse assessed - & passed for absurdities such as this.

                  As for expenses, this is no different than if you arrived at the showgrounds & your horse walked off the trailer lame, or took a wrong step during warmup ...

                  If you want a guaranteed return for your entertainment money, go to a movie, if you don't like it in the first quarter, you can get your money back.
                  Exactly where does it say hat you can have a horse examined and "passed"?? Yes, things can and do happen, but I don't think it is up to someone to arbitrarily make a decision "for me", unless the horse is VISIBLY in pain, EXCESSIVE bleeding, etc.
                  www.shawneeacres.net

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    Originally posted by flyracing View Post
                    The report you linked specifically says "anywhere on the horse's body. It is not limited to the mouth even if that is the first big public display that brought this to life.
                    I know full well what the article said. Whip welts, bloody sides from spurs, blood from the nasal passages or lungs, or dripping from the mouth, it all points to the very simple fact the horse is injured enough to not be fit for riding.

                    Seriously, if at GP level a rider needs to gouge the horse with spurs so hard it breaks his skin, then it's the rider's temper firing up. As a breeder of high-end dressage horses I will not allow any trainer to gouge my horses with spurs like this, nor will I allow them to reef on their mouths. I've ridden at the GP, I KNOW what it takes to get there. I also know that many things that are done these days to get horses to GP younger and faster are absurdly disgraceful.

                    There is going to be much more discussion around the FEI about defining the rule so that it makes more common sense. There is quite a difference to a small scratch or a bug bite and the kind of blood flow that points to the most serious accusations of abuse. I aim my bullets at abuse, not explainable happenstance life circumstances.
                    Practice! Patience! Persistence!
                    http://www.mariposasporthorses.com/
                    https://www.facebook.com/MariposaSportHorses/

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      http://www.fei.org/sites/default/fil...ber%202011.pdf
                      "The FEI Dressage Committee has presented this proposed rule to all National Federations. The Committee has also made National Federations aware of the views of the International Dressage Riders Club, International Dressage Officials Club, the Association of International Dressage Event Organisers and other parties on this proposed rule.
                      The National Federations are currently reviewing the proposal.
                      As always, proposed rules revisions are presented for National Federation approval at the FEI General Assembly for implementation on 1 January the following year.
                      "

                      No decision yet.
                      ... _. ._ .._. .._

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        No, no ruling, I didn't state that? Oh, on reading my original post, it is missing key punctuation: It should say: Today: FEI Rules: NO to blood, rule proposal. There's only so much space in those subject lines. They have modified the proposal considerably over the past few months and will need more input and discussion before they make the final decision in January - they must precisely define what makes acceptable blood and what is blood due to possible abuse tactics. It's the abuse I'm gunning for (like most of us) and they need to be very, very clear on it and ensure they get it right the first time so it doesn't open the door to dubious training methodologies. Carte blanche, in either direction, is incorrect too, but the definitions need to be made and made correctly, since decisions take an overwhelming amount of time to get changed if they turn up wrong or insufficient. Like the definition, the subsequent range of penalties also needs to be discussed and decided upon.

                        Shawnee thinking more on what you stated and your point raised, you may find, once the FEI finally gets their definitions down as to what constitutes an elimination versus checkup, that the national equestrian federations will follow suit and mimic their rules to be similar. Equine Canada tends to follow FEI rules very closely, does not the USEF too?
                        Practice! Patience! Persistence!
                        http://www.mariposasporthorses.com/
                        https://www.facebook.com/MariposaSportHorses/

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          ALSO;
                          Protective headgear

                          In the wake of Courtney Dye King's tragic accident, the FEI Medical Committee has recommended making protective headgear mandatory across all disciplines when riding at show grounds outside competition arenas.

                          At its meeting, the Dressage Committee discussed making protective headgear mandatory everywhere on the showgrounds except during competition and warm-up prior to competition, and except for athletes under 18 and in Young Horse classes where it would be mandatory everywhere including during the test.

                          A draft rule will go forward to the General Assembly for approval and implementation on 1 January 2012
                          ... _. ._ .._. .._

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Let me give you an example of something that happened to my stallion (at home, mind you not a show). A few years ago my working student was riding him, when all of a sudden she noticed blood flying back from his face. She stopped immediately and saw a small nick on his nostril bleeding profusely. Before she had ridden him, he had rubbed his nose on his boots on front legs. There was a small split i the boot and it had nicked his nostril. Naturally, if I had been at a show and that happened people would have assumed his mouth was bleeding, and altho the small cut bled ALOT the first fifteen minutes, he was absolutely fine and actually in no pain whatsoever. It is incidents like this that could potentially cost a competitor alot of money as well as time, should they have worked very hard to get to a large dressage show/championships etc. This was a totally insignificant nick but would have definitely "eliminated" him from competition. Is that right?? I defintely do NOT want to see blood in horses mouth, on sides in any way showing either "abuse" or rough handling, or a significant injury that should keep the horse on he sidelines, allowed to continue. But I think more thought than just "blood" should go into such a ruling. Otherwise, the FEI may be up for some lawsuits in the future from disgruntled riders that are eliminated for insignificant "blood".
                            www.shawneeacres.net

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by shawneeAcres View Post
                              But I think more thought than just "blood" should go into such a ruling. Otherwise, the FEI may be up for some lawsuits in the future from disgruntled riders that are eliminated for insignificant "blood".
                              That is presumably, why the FEI are proposing that a vet may OK the horse for competition.
                              ... _. ._ .._. .._

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by Equibrit View Post
                                That is presumably, why the FEI are proposing that a vet may OK the horse for competition.
                                But what the proposal says is "ONLY AT THE TOP LEVELS OF COMPETITION". So if I go and show my horse second level and he has a small bleeding nick, flybite or whatever, the judge can say "outta here" with no veterinary involvment.
                                www.shawneeacres.net

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  shawnee,

                                  The FEI rules are ONLY for the upper levels and at FEI events. For your lower level horses and rules, check the USEF rule book. If you have a problem with those rules, go straight to the USEF.
                                  "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    no reason to complain

                                    WE do not need to give the humaniacs more fuel for their campaigns, imagine a photo of a horse bleeding on one of their posters.
                                    breeder of Mercury!

                                    remember to enjoy the moment, and take a moment to enjoy and give God the glory for these wonderful horses in our lives.BECAUSE: LIFE is What Happens While Making Other Plans

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      unwritten, not in the book.

                                      there has long been an unwritten rule in dressage that ANY BLOOD calls for Elimination
                                      breeder of Mercury!

                                      remember to enjoy the moment, and take a moment to enjoy and give God the glory for these wonderful horses in our lives.BECAUSE: LIFE is What Happens While Making Other Plans

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        GOOD RULE! LET'S SUPPORT IT

                                        RIGHT ON1




                                        Originally posted by Equibrit View Post
                                        ALSO;
                                        Protective headgear

                                        In the wake of Courtney Dye King's tragic accident, the FEI Medical Committee has recommended making protective headgear mandatory across all disciplines when riding at show grounds outside competition arenas.

                                        At its meeting, the Dressage Committee discussed making protective headgear mandatory everywhere on the showgrounds except during competition and warm-up prior to competition, and except for athletes under 18 and in Young Horse classes where it would be mandatory everywhere including during the test.

                                        A draft rule will go forward to the General Assembly for approval and implementation on 1 January 2012
                                        breeder of Mercury!

                                        remember to enjoy the moment, and take a moment to enjoy and give God the glory for these wonderful horses in our lives.BECAUSE: LIFE is What Happens While Making Other Plans

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X