• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Sign the NO BLOOD RULE petition

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sign the NO BLOOD RULE petition

    http://no-fei.com/

    background:
    Press Release of the FEI/Pressemitteilung der FEI, 23. Juni 2011

    The FEI Dressage Committee discussed several issues at its meeting in Paris (FRA) earlier this month and the following five key developments were decided upon.

    “Blood rule
    The committee proposed a new blood rule explicitly stating that the test would be stopped if blood appears anywhere on the horse.
    At top level events (Olympic Games, Championships and Finals for seniors), where FEI vets will be present at the warm-up arena, they would examine the horse and the test would resume if bleeding from minor injuries had stopped.
    If the bleeding had not stopped, the horse would be eliminated. Where vets are not present to examine the horse, bleeding would result in immediate elimination.
    The FEI’s Vet Committee and Legal Department are considering the proposal for this rule, which would sit in Article 430.7.1. or Article 440 of the Rules for Dressage Events, which can be viewed here.
    As always, rule revisions will be presented for National Federation approval at the FEI General Assembly in November for implementation on 1 January 2012.
    "I'm holding out for the $100,000 Crossrail Classic in 2012." --mem
    "With all due respect.. may I suggest you take up Croquet?" --belambi
    Proud Member of the Opinionated Redhead Club!

  • #2
    how is that different from how it reads now
    www.destinationconsensusequus.com
    chaque pas est fait ensemble

    Comment


    • #3
      Page 45.

      http://www.horsesport.org/sites/defa...ERSION_web.pdf



      Old rule; Blood = elimination

      New rule; blood = vet can look and decide if it's OK.
      ... _. ._ .._. .._

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Equibrit View Post
        Page 45.

        http://www.horsesport.org/sites/defa...ERSION_web.pdf



        Old rule; Blood = elimination

        New rule; blood = vet can look and decide if it's OK.
        In that case, it seems to be an improvement (not elimination for all cases), but still seems too strict. If my horse nicks himself (on the white sock let of course) at the fetlock which requires nothing more than some ointment and now has a speck of blood on the white sock, it must "stop bleeding" before the vet can get from it's station to the ring (under a minute?) Nothing will stop bleeding that quickly, the wet blood won't be dry.

        Granted I would hope you wouldn't be stopped for such a minor nick, but the way the rule is written there, it sound like they would have to.

        Comment


        • #5
          we all were talking about this today. i think blood should = elimination.

          it would not be fair to the other riders in the warmup to either prolong their warmup and delay their ride while a vet checks the horse and decided if the rider is allowed to ride or not.. it would mess all the schedule up.

          or

          if they permitted the bloodied horse and rider to ride LAST after all the other compeititors than that would be better. but then bloodied rider would have to wait around after already warming up to do the test...THEN have to warmup again!

          it think they should stick to the old rule. any blood=elimination. that is just me. i understand if it is a minor knick but that would have to be the way it goes. ... why would they want to make all the other riders wait around??

          seems silly.
          *Member of the Quality Free-Choice Hay/Pasture Feeders Society* Member of the As Much Turnout as Possible Group* FEED by WEIGHT not VOLUME*

          Comment


          • #6
            I read this new rule as more FAIR to riders and horses who have spent years training correctly, not to be eliminated over something ridiculous, whereas the current rule is inflexible.
            "It's not how good you ride, It's how good your horse covers for you." -Kristan
            Magic Rose Farm- home of Beste Gold & Hot Shot
            Beste Gold & Offspring on Facebook
            Magic Rose Farm Warmbloods on FB

            Comment


            • #7
              I think elimination for any appearance of blood without further investigation/discussion is ridiculous. It is entirely possible as others have said for a horse to nick itself kind of like a human version of a papercut. What about someone who spent $$$$ in training, travel, etc. to get to the show only to be eliminated for something that silly?

              I imagine a lot of people would prefer to be put at the end (@HHF) if they were the one that had the blood problem with their horse. I think it sounds a lot better for that one person to have to warm up again as opposed to being eliminated altogther.

              Comment


              • #8
                it's possible blood on a horse isn't it's own too!
                went out one day to fetch my horse, and there was blood on his leg. I proceeded to have a mild internal freakout while searching for a wound. It wasn't until an hour later when I saw his buddy had managed to give himself a bloody nose that the mystery of the invisible bloody wound was solved.
                Multiple horses are moving about in the warmup together. It's entirely possible for blood from one to sling off and hit another.

                plus, I'm sure there are some dirty sheisters out there that would/could frame a horse with blood to cause elimination under the current rule if they had an un attended moment alone with the horse.
                www.destinationconsensusequus.com
                chaque pas est fait ensemble

                Comment


                • #9
                  ^^^ yeah, totally. How did that strict rule get there in the first place? Did not those people think about such possibilities at the time?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I was lurking on here and saw the thread. I have to say that I think that the rule is acceptable in that it is meant to protect the horse . It is to allow a vet to check the horse to make sure that the obvious blood is not coming from something more severe than a nick. Blood spatters and I think it is great that they rewrote the rule to allow someone to continue to ride. Yes it is an inconvenience but really, if the blood was coming from more than a nick, I think anyone would be grateful to get checked. And even if it is just a nick, allowing the opportunity to continue the ride is great because of the money and time involved. A much better solution than just elimination. If I were competing, I would rather that the horse in the ring get checked and wait than to see them get eliminated after all the effort they also put in. Yes waiting sucks but really, the horse who may be injured even with just a papercut is more important and that's what the rule IMO saying.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I think it is sad that such a rule ever had to be made in the first place!
                      Every mighty oak was once a nut that stood its ground.

                      Proud Closet Canterer! Member Riders with Fibromyalgia clique.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by flyracing View Post
                        In that case, it seems to be an improvement (not elimination for all cases), but still seems too strict. If my horse nicks himself (on the white sock let of course) at the fetlock which requires nothing more than some ointment and now has a speck of blood on the white sock, it must "stop bleeding" before the vet can get from it's station to the ring (under a minute?) Nothing will stop bleeding that quickly, the wet blood won't be dry.
                        This may be a case of interpretation. Perhaps they mean that if the bleeding is not excessive and stops when pressure is applied. I think they are going to have to be more specific and make some edits to the rule because you are right that no bleeding is going to stop instantly. I got a tiny nick on my finger yesterday, and it took about 2 minutes of holding pressure on it to make it stop. However, there was no pain, and I could carry on with what I was doing. This is going to be tricky because it will involve judgment calls that may get some people fired up.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The new, proposed rule is impossible to execute (what if the FEI Vet is far from the arena, any blood would have dried if he gets there, or wiped away by grooms/trainers. What if it happens to the last horse? Shall the entire competition be postponed? How much time for a re-run?). Furthermore the rule is only for the elite GP riders at major championships? This is totally unfair. Why do they get a second chance while for instance Pan Am riders, or junior young riders at the North American Championships would get eliminated.

                          Also, how will this reflect on the world that equestrian sport is a sport which tolerates blood on a horse? The image of the sport will be negative as a blood sport.

                          Very often bleeding from the mouth is a training issue (not always). Tight nosebands, much bit pressure, internal stress in the horse...

                          This is not the way for dressage to go!!

                          More info read here:
                          http://www.eurodressage.com/equestri...me-blood-sport
                          --
                          Europe\'s Largest Dressage and Breeding News Related Website
                          http://www.eurodressage.com

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I have to agree with Eurodressage about the mouth bleeding.
                            It is generally the horses who are unsettled in their mouth and contact, often straining against tight nosebands who generally (not always) have blood in the mouth. The horses who quietly accept their bit rarely inadvertently bite their tongues or have lip/gum rub’s. The horses who are ridden with maximum pressure are often unsettled and busy with their mouths as a sign of stress, as a result they can often nip their tongues or cause rubs on their lip and gums from leaning into the heavy contact.

                            Bleeding/agitated red sides from spur marks are inexcusable. Yes, sometimes when they are freshly clipped the hair follicles can become aggravated but if this is your argument, don’t clip right before a show.

                            That said, as some have mentioned, there are special cases and horses can do some weird things. In Wellington this past winter at a CDI our stallion Sandro's Heir was playing with his stall mate over the wall, feeding him hay and licking his face (don‘t ask!). The other horse got annoyed and bit down on his tongue, actually puncturing through it in a spot causing him to start bleeding heavily from it, about 50 minutes before the test. We found the FEI vet, explained the situation, had him examined and were cleared to compete as the bleeding did stop and did not resume while he was being ridden; he competed well. The vet could actually see the other horses teeth marks in a reverse semi-circle in a way “proving” Sandro had not bitten his own tongue. It would have been unfortunate to lose the hefty CDI entry fees but we would not have wanted him to compete with blood in his mouth either.

                            Some have mentioned cast off blood or other strange situations, from our own experience of an "innocent" blood situation, the FEI vet was already more than happy to work with us.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              It is a slippery slope.

                              As a competitor, I will gladly take the risk that I may be eliminated if my horse nicks itself in the warmup ring. It is worth it to me, if it means the same rule will also get in the way of the trainer whose horse is bleeding from abusive hands or spurs.

                              An injured horse should not be competing. I don't care how small the injury is. What's next, allowing lame horses? So long as he's not falling down, a little limp is fine..

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by heronponie View Post
                                It is a slippery slope.

                                As a competitor, I will gladly take the risk that I may be eliminated if my horse nicks itself in the warmup ring. It is worth it to me, if it means the same rule will also get in the way of the trainer whose horse is bleeding from abusive hands or spurs.

                                An injured horse should not be competing. I don't care how small the injury is. What's next, allowing lame horses? So long as he's not falling down, a little limp is fine..
                                I agree! First it's the Bute (low levels being allowed) then it is the Blood rule...next it will be grade 1 lame horses are able to compete.

                                just unfair and rider greed.

                                this rule will allow riders who have spur marked their horses or ripping at their horses mouth to compete if the injury is minor... ( it will allow these riders a way out of their harshness and still be allowed to compete!)

                                the rule doesn't even state unless determined to be caused by rider brutality or anything like that....it just says if it is minor allowed to compete...(no matter what caused it??)

                                most stewards and TD's are intimidated by BNT's anyway.

                                *Member of the Quality Free-Choice Hay/Pasture Feeders Society* Member of the As Much Turnout as Possible Group* FEED by WEIGHT not VOLUME*

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Digressing a tad...

                                  The IALHA had their annual show last week in Ft. Worth. I always look forward to the pictures of the dressage portion from the event but this year there was one picture which stood out. While it wasn't actually during any of the classes and was an exhibition, the horse's side was bloodied from the spur to the point a person could see it from a mile away yet people are defending this action as an "accident." The facility who put on the exhibition has loosely apologized but defends their rider stating it was only a little blood which was transferred across the body from the spur and the horse was fine.

                                  Interestingly the show management did nothing to prevent the public from witnessing what I consider to be a rather blatant disregard for the horse and their viewing public. The stable did nothing to pull the horse prior to entering the exhibition. While all these rules which are being discussed apply to competition and not necessarily an exhibition given at a sanctioned competition, I still find it curious that absolutely nothing was done and further discovered the IALHA has disconnected the link for contact information on their own website. They do, however, have a FB page where there is a lengthy discussion taking place. The same is true of the training facility, The Haras Dos Cavaleiros.

                                  http://pets.webshots.com/photo/28817...92713508lXHFLj

                                  I was so disappointed with the way this was handled, or should I say not handled. Which begs to question where one draws the line in the sand?
                                  "Every little girl wants a pony so why should big girls be any different???"

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I hope, but don't expect common sense to rule. I was in a near panic when my grey got bitten by a large horse fly and bled! It was in a place that wouldn't be misinterpreted, fortunately it stopped and I was able to clean it up before competing, but I would be upset to lose entries from a horse fly. By the way he was coated in fly spray, but those little buggers have become addicted to fly spray in my opinion!

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Even if it's a tiny spot from an insect bite which spread - that picture is horrifying!

                                      I wouldn't say abuse, as I can't know what happened from that photo - I don't think you see raw skin w/ obvious spur digs in it anywhere? But blood covering that much of the side is just disturbing.


                                      I have a horse who gets very minimal nose bleeds in super dry weather. I still support elimination for blood. Of course some extent of common sense should take part, even if it means it's likely that rule will work against me sometime.
                                      Last edited by netg; Oct. 19, 2011, 10:52 AM.
                                      If Kim Kardashian wants to set up a gofundme to purchase the Wu Tang album from Martin Shkreli, guess what people you DON'T HAVE TO DONATE.
                                      -meupatdoes

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        A lot of hubbub about this rule, but there's a totally simple solution:

                                        Stick to showing blood bay horses! Blood is almost impossible to spot on a deep reddish bay as long as you keep it off the white saddle pad! I basically have to sweat scrape all the blood off my horse after using, um, "active aids," but no one is the wiser! That woman's mistake in the pic was riding a gray!


                                        Haha, just joking. Carry on.
                                        2007 Welsh Cob C X TB GG Eragon
                                        Our training journal.
                                        1989-2008 French TB Shamus Fancy
                                        I owned him for fifteen years, but he was his own horse.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X