• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Pan Am vs Olympics

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pan Am vs Olympics

    I saw an interesting announcement on the home page for COTH. It said that Laura Kraut (jumper rider) and Cedric were going to be unable to make the games due to quarantine issues.

    But what I saw that was interesting was the fact that they had been (Laura riding Cedric) on the Olympic team in 2008 and had won team gold. Here's the interesting question for me. In dressage at the Pan Am games the horses are all doing PSG/I1. It is not kosher for our top horse, Ravel, to go back a step to PSG and I1 and go to the games. Why not? Why is the jumping team allowed to send former Olympic riders and their horses?

    What is the reason for the difference? Hmmmmm...
    "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

  • #2
    The Pan Ams are going to be qualifying for both Teams and Individuals. Its pretty safe to assume that SP and Ravel are already qualified for the Olympics. Isn't the U.S. already qualified for the Olympics.

    Due to their dismal 10th place finish at the WEG, and McLain Ward was the highest placing rider the U.S. Show Jumping team HAS to qualify at the Pan Am Games. That's why the are trying to send their best horse and rider combinations.
    "I'm holding out for the $100,000 Crossrail Classic in 2012." --mem
    "With all due respect.. may I suggest you take up Croquet?" --belambi
    Proud Member of the Opinionated Redhead Club!

    Comment


    • #3
      1. The US is already qualified for the Olympics in dressage, so we don't need 'ringers' this year.

      2. Because of 1, it's silly to send our top GP horses and risk injury the year before the Olympics.

      3. Because of 1, it's silly to make our top GP horses spend what amounts to a full season in the small tour (by the time you make and learn a new freestyle, show enough to qualify for the trials, attend trials, training camp, and the Pan Ams). This means a lot of time away from GP work.

      4. Our current crop of small tour horses is very strong- and I'd bet that they'd beat at least some of our GP horses at the small tour level right now.

      Comment


      • #4
        I think that you can send whomever you want, at whatever level you want, to the Pan Ams, though usually it is the "developing" or sort of "B" team riders that go in all disciplines. I believe, however, that the Show Jumping team's qualification for the Olympics may be iffy, so they are probably trying to sent the "A" team, rather than developing riders. I'm not sure, but I think I heard something to the effect that they were not yet qualified for London. Or...they may be sending a mixed team, since Beezie Madden's horse (Via Volo? something like that?) has been winning in Europe, but is still a relatively new ride for her. While I'm sure Madden would never be considered "second string," they probably want to try out her newer horse even more before 2012.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Originally posted by tm
          What joiedevie said, plus, IIRC, by FEI rules, once a horse has placed 10th or better in a CDIO, it cannot be shown internationally at a lower level. So Ravel would not be eligible to drop down a level.
          That was part of my problem when I saw it. Why in dressage is is okay to go back down a step, but in jumping once you've already been to the Olympics or an event of that level (say, WEG, too) why would you be able to go back to the Pan Am games when it really is a step down?
          "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

          Comment


          • #6
            I believe the individual final at the Pan Ams is held at Olympic height for the show jumpers (1.6m).

            Comment


            • #7
              I am guessing that the U.S. Show Jumping is not looking at the Pan Am Games as a step down but as a gift. Hopefully the will place, assuming their stiffest competition is Canada and Brazil.
              "I'm holding out for the $100,000 Crossrail Classic in 2012." --mem
              "With all due respect.. may I suggest you take up Croquet?" --belambi
              Proud Member of the Opinionated Redhead Club!

              Comment


              • #8
                Show jumping at the Pan Am's is not as much a step down (if it is at all) from the Olympics like it is in dressage.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ponysize View Post
                  Show jumping at the Pan Am's is not as much a step down (if it is at all) from the Olympics like it is in dressage.
                  But that's the whole point. Why is it different for the two disciplines?? Why the double standard?
                  "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Because it's apples and oranges. This is all about bringing countries together for sport, just like the Olympics, but on a regional scale. You have more that can compete at that level of dressage than GP is my guess so it opens more teams to competition from smaller countries.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I could be totally off base but isn't jumping a bigger discipline in Latin America than dressage? So, if we were to send our best dressage, they couldn't compete, but they can in the jumping arena?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Actually, I believe that the horses that go to the Pan Am Games for dressage are not allowed to have competed at GP. It's a Small Tour Test.
                        Tranquility Farm - Proud breeder of Born in the USA Sport Horses, and Cob-sized Warmbloods
                        Now apparently completely invisible!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hasn't Paragon competed at GP? I think Paragon is going down to Pan Am.
                          Proud member of the Snort and Blow Clique

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Paragon competed in GP in one national show (well, one weekend, technically two shows).

                            The FEI rules only limit the number of times a horse competes in FEI-sanctioned shows at a higher level. Meaning they can't have placed or won at CDIs. National shows don't count for this rule, so Paragon is within the rules.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I think that the countries that we compete against in the Pan Ams are much further along in show jumping than they are in dressage. If we held the competition at Grand Prix level in dressage, I don't think as many countries would be able to field a team....just sayin.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by yaya View Post
                                Paragon competed in GP in one national show (well, one weekend, technically two shows).

                                The FEI rules only limit the number of times a horse competes in FEI-sanctioned shows at a higher level. Meaning they can't have placed or won at CDIs. National shows don't count for this rule, so Paragon is within the rules.
                                Thanks! Holy crap, will I ever understand this all?
                                Proud member of the Snort and Blow Clique

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  What I don't get is why USEF let the horses take off today, knowing they were headed for a Category 3 hurricane.

                                  Hopefully they are far enough inland, but Guadalajara is still in the "extreme threat" zone.

                                  Comment

                                  Working...
                                  X