• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

DT "The Clinic" with Walter Zettl

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DT "The Clinic" with Walter Zettl

    Nice to see this in the October issue!

  • #2
    What is it? Free advertising for DT this week?
    "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Originally posted by Velvet View Post
      What is it? Free advertising for DT this week?
      When you have a quality edition, word of mouth follows,.

      Comment


      • #4
        Um, yeah. Quality since when?

        The last topic shows just exactly the quality that you'd expect. Talking about getting more men in dressage because it's so sorely lacking that it's suffering from a lack of them?
        "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

        Comment


        • #5
          Agree with Velvet. I don't like the mag, but someone bought a subscription for me for a Christmas present. I find it geared toward beginner riders and the rest is all advertisement. When they have a pro write an article, there is never anything really 'new' in the articles. Boring.

          I liked Axel's critiques the best of all that have done them. I am not a Zettl fan and I did not like his advice to these riders which was basically to ride your horse all strung out.

          Comment


          • #6
            Velvet, have u read the article? It interviews many pros about the problems men face getting into the sport. What exactly is poor quality, besides that u might not like it?

            The only poor quality I saw on the other thread was people being inappropriate about the whole topic and giving incorrect info about the article. Someone referred to being gay as "Gal" in one post and u r complaining about the article?!?!? Come on.

            Comment


            • #7
              I dont think it is geared towards BEGINNER riders - I think its geared towards lower level riders which is completely different. Its assumes people have an independent seat and reads like it assumes the reader is a solid intermediate or beginner intermediate. IMO. When running a business, you have to ask yourself who your audience is and how to reach as many as possible - to get as many subscribers as possible so you can make some money and stay in business.

              If its all old news to you - dont buy the magazine.

              The article about canter work I like. Not because I learned something new about the exercises but the bits of philosophy woven through the descriptions.

              I have liked the new addition of riders sharing about difficult horses or issues they have worked with - usually high level riders. The last 3 issues, I copied the articles and gave them to a young woman who has a horse that she has spent 2-3 years patiently trying to work through some things. They really have inspired her. She is far better than a beginner rider.

              The clinic is 'ok' usually - I have not read them in a while because I do feel that when someone sends in a picture in dressage - they will pick one that makes them look the best and when judging dressage I prefer to see a moving picture not a snapshot. You CAN read more in a snapshot of someone over a jump in PH I think but in dressage - I would rather see a 30 second clip at least. I guess I have not read the clinic in a while because I did not care for it.

              Most magazines are filled with advertisements. Its what keeps the magazines going and keeps the price down for subscribers. Also, SOMETIMES a new product is out there and its nice to know about it.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by LaraNSpeedy View Post
                The clinic is 'ok' usually - I have not read them in a while because I do feel that when someone sends in a picture in dressage - they will pick one that makes them look the best and when judging dressage I prefer to see a moving picture not a snapshot. You CAN read more in a snapshot of someone over a jump in PH I think but in dressage - I would rather see a 30 second clip at least. I guess I have not read the clinic in a while because I did not care for it.
                Don't the clinic subjects usually also have a test video online?

                I will admit, I generally like DT (though this issue was disappointing), but then again I am very much a smurf when it comes to dressage.
                You have to have experiences to gain experience.

                1998 Morgan mare Mythic Feronia "More Valley Girl Than Girl Scout!"

                Comment


                • #9
                  Welllll...I get free copies, so while I'm not impressed most of the time, it/s not as if I were wasting any money. However,I do find some of thearticles almost amusing: Something like "improving your canter zig-zags." Ummm..like someone at that level is going to look to a magazine article for helP? And it sure isn/t particularlyuseful(though it may be interesting) for lower level riders. (Sorry for typos) using one of those split/angled keyboards for ther first time)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Nope. Haven't read the article and I think it's in really poor form to advertise that mag out here on The Chronicle of the Horse . It's a competing mag and really shouldn't be advertised out here. If you have an article we all can read, that's one thing. Talking about one to generate more sales is another.
                    "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I do not find someone mentioning an article that they found useful to be advertising. As to the amount of ads found in any publication, it generally takes between 70% and 80% of the magazine to be ads, or the magazine would be losing money.

                      I have not subscribed to any horse magazine for many years, because as TonF said, lots of the information tends to be redundant.

                      I did not see the article to which the original poster refers. But, I have seen Walter Zettl do clinics. From the multiple clinics I have seen through the years, I find his to be amoung the most productive for the rider during that clinic. Whether they can take what he has taught them home to make it their own, I cannot say.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Dear Velvet,

                        You are a party foul. Everyone was having a nice book-club style conversation about an article they saw in a magazine and you had to go an ruin it. I have spent enough time dealing with those horrible barn women that feel it is their duty to suggest who people ride with, what they do with their horses and what saddle they should ride in. Don't you dare tell me what I can and can't talk about on a public space that you don't own.
                        Last edited by HorseNOTbicycle; Sep. 28, 2011, 11:14 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I haven't seen this month's issue yet. However, I don't see this thread as an advertisement but as a sharing of info on an article someone found interesting. DT only has a small overlap with COTH regarding their customer base, so I'm not sure there is any conflict here. I guess that's really the mods' call anyway. I think DT is improving--last month had a great article with Heather Blitz, and I enjoy anything written by Courtney King-Dye. Some of the stuff is redundant--that's the nature of dressage training. But refreshers can be helpful and sometimes I see the same info worded somewhat differently, making it more impactful. JMHO of course.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I audited Mr. Zettle's clinic once. During the recess, I approached him with a difficult problem I had with my horse. Now it was years ago and I was a rank beginner. He picked up my hand, held it, and showed me how to handle the reins.

                            That few seconds was one of the most amazing moments in my horsey career.

                            I don't know how to describe it, but it was gentle, senitive, and firm all at the same time. I felt I was about to purr and for some reason I simply wanted to do what he suggested, that I would not dare refuse it. I can see why horses would work their hearts out for him.

                            Regardless your "political" agenda, please give a master his due. He really IS a master.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by quietann View Post
                              Don't the clinic subjects usually also have a test video online?
                              Having the video submission along with the still photo was Axel's idea for his column. He is of that same mind as LaraNSpeedy, that it is difficult to critique a still photo in the context of dressage. Having a side by side submission of stills + video gives the magazine something that is printable (the still) and gives him enough information (the video) to make informative comments about the horse and rider. Besides, being married to me, he sees the beautiful photos that I've captured from movements which were ... not so beautiful.

                              The problem is, we need more submissions! The magazine is getting plenty of still photos, but not enough accompanying video clips. So as soon as there are more video + still submissions, we are all over it!
                              www.TerriMiller.com
                              Photos & Commissioned Paintings

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Thank you Terri Yes, DT needs submissions with videos!
                                www.mooredressage.com
                                www.alsikkanfarm.com

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by HorseNOTbicycle View Post
                                  Dear Velvet,

                                  You are a party foul. Everyone was having a nice book-club style conversation about an article they saw in a magazine and you had to go an ruin it. I have spent enough time dealing with those horrible barn women that feel it is their duty to suggest who people ride with, what they do with their horses and what saddle they should ride in. Don't you dare tell me what I can and can't talk about on a public space that you don't own.
                                  What are you spouting about? What "everyone" was having this "nice conversation" of which you speak? Velvet's post was the second one in the thread.
                                  Donald Trump - proven liar, cheat, traitor and sexual predator! Hillary Clinton won in 2016, but we have all lost.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by SillyHorse View Post
                                    What are you spouting about? What "everyone" was having this "nice conversation" of which you speak? Velvet's post was the second one in the thread.
                                    I was referring to her second post - post #10 - that was complaining about what we should/shouldn't be able to post on the forum. Are you ok with her telling everyone they should not be discussing magazine articles from other publications on this forum, because I am not.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by HorseNOTbicycle View Post
                                      I was referring to her second post - post #10 - that was complaining about what we should/shouldn't be able to post on the forum. Are you ok with her telling everyone they should not be discussing magazine articles from other publications on this forum, because I am not.
                                      Since YOU were not a part of the conversation at all, are you a new alter for Carol or someone else out here? Must be. You only have a few posts and yet you spewed at me immediately.

                                      I'm guessing this is another person wanting to keep on "nice" alter and then have one "mean" alter in their pocket. Yet another reason I'm so happy I have the ignore feature!

                                      It is advertising when there is NO mention of the topic at all. Not book club type posts since it mentions an article but not what is in it. It's closed off to anyone who has not read the article. Has no details for the general COTH forum populace. Thus, I stand by my first conclusion that it's a way of sneaking in advertising to bump circulation for DT.
                                      "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #20
                                        I did something new when I read the clinic yeaterday. I looked at the photos and jotted down my own critique, then I read the commentary. At first I just jotted down the faults, but after reading WZs commentary I went back and commented on the correct stuff too. Sorry, spoil-sports, but I enjoyed the activity and the commentary.

                                        I enjoy DT, and no, I am not getting a kick back for saying this.

                                        I really liked the story on Chuck Grant. When I was younger and riding hunters his was one of those names you saw once in a while. Now I wish I had paid more attention! What an interesting guy!

                                        WZ has been a bit out of sight for a while. I wonder if he is free from other obligations now.....

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X