• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Lauren's Ideas on Fixing Showing

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lauren's Ideas on Fixing Showing

    Interesting ideas. What do you guys think?

    http://chronofhorse.com/article/rubbing-bottles

    I think it needs a new title (the article) for a start.

    On the showing and dividing the divisions I think that one step further and having them not divided by Ammie status at all would work, if using her system. It would level the playing field. I also like the rider coefficient getting more valuable as you go up the levels, and yet again, I've seen judges who then just look for a pretty position and forget to associate it with effectiveness. Not sure how well that would work, but it might be something to try.
    "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

  • #2
    Aside from the title needing a little more tact (hey, it could be a lot worse than it is!), I think Lauren had great ideas. One thing that really bothers me, though, is the word 'amateur'. To me, it's connotation suggests that non-professional riders are less competent, which in many cases is false.

    On another note, she is so right about branching away from typical elevator music in freestyles. Our sport is fun, let's not act like it isn't!
    And this is the story of your red right ankle.

    Comment


    • #3
      I think it is a super article and the title calls attention to it. I LOVE the idea of dividing classes like they do at the BLMs. I ride in the open divisions at USDF shows because I teach w/t lessons to beginners. That means I'm up against GP riders on young (but amazing) client horses. Yes, I am riding for my own percentage and I don't care if I win or not, but it would be nice to have a glimmer of hope for the placings, LOL!

      Comment


      • #4
        Having shown the BLMs many times, I think this system works well. There are "lesser" and "greater" pros, ammies, and Jr/YR within each division, although in a perfect world maybe it would be Open A/B, Ammy A/B, and Jr/YR A/B--but that doubles the number of classes, which is likely not ideal or feasible financially for the shows.

        I have no problem with the rider coefficients increasing over time either. At my first show using the new rider system, I had straight 7s, except for one where I got a 6 for effectiveness of aids (that would be when it was clear my half halt didn't come through right in front of the judge, LOL). It helps to pinpoint what the judge did/did not like about my riding. As the levels go up, you BEST have your "riding" house in order, so it should be "easy" points if you are doing your homework and an appropriate ding when you haven't.

        I also agree about the freestyles. I did my "Michael Jackson" freestyle, complete with lyrics, and also only had one judge comment on not liking it. I think if we make that more fun, more interesting, etc. it might increase MFS participation, audience numbers and overall increased interest in dressage. I am struggling with music choices for my next MFS--soundtracks are largely boring or overdone, and I can't find anything interesting/spicy that matches my horse's gaits. Sigh.
        From now on, ponyfixer, i'll include foot note references.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Young Equestrian View Post
          One thing that really bothers me, though, is the word 'amateur'. To me, it's connotation suggests that non-professional riders are less competent, which in many cases is false.
          If you reread the article, you will see that she makes that point quite well in this paragraph:

          “This is a terrific system. There are amateur riders out there who've shown extensively, who've made FEI horses, who've been there and done that. I think it's more fair that they show against me, instead of against my students who are riding at first level for the first time, or what have you. And in the same line, I think the wonderful professional riders who specialize in starting greenies and then selling them, or teaching beginner riders to post on the correct diagonal, and who've never seen a second level test in their lives shouldn't be thrown in the deep end.”

          Comment


          • #6
            Thanks, guys!

            (And title writing is my absolute LEAST favorite part of this blogging thing! I suck at it!)
            spriesersporthorse.com | farm on Facebook | me on Facebook | blog

            Comment


            • #7
              Definitely need a different title. I admit that I would not have read the article based on its title if Velvet hadn't provided the link and given me a clue as to the content. Try to say something in the title that at least hints at the content. But that aside, lots of good information, and I loved what you said about freestyle music. Personally, I want music that makes me tap my foot as I'm watching the ride.

              One suggestion for a title change:

              "Thoughts on How to Improve Dressage Competitions"

              Simple and to the point. Right away I have a clue about what I am about to read.

              Comment


              • #8
                Assertions were made -- folks asked for facts to back them up -- were told "we are judges, we know" -- so the year's scores were gathered and analyzed using statistical analysis (by experts in the field) -- low and behold the facts belied the judges' perceptions

                Insisting that science should trump anecdote is not "getting one's knickers in a twist"
                Nothing says "I love you" like a tractor. (Clydejumper)

                The reports states, “Elizabeth reported that she accidently put down this pony, ........, at the show.”

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by dwblover View Post
                  I think it is a super article and the title calls attention to it. I LOVE the idea of dividing classes like they do at the BLMs. I ride in the open divisions at USDF shows because I teach w/t lessons to beginners. That means I'm up against GP riders on young (but amazing) client horses. Yes, I am riding for my own percentage and I don't care if I win or not, but it would be nice to have a glimmer of hope for the placings, LOL!
                  I read the article and looked for a way to comment. Had I found it I would have written exactly what is quoted above.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by dwblover View Post
                    I think it is a super article and the title calls attention to it. I LOVE the idea of dividing classes like they do at the BLMs. I ride in the open divisions at USDF shows because I teach w/t lessons to beginners. That means I'm up against GP riders on young (but amazing) client horses. Yes, I am riding for my own percentage and I don't care if I win or not, but it would be nice to have a glimmer of hope for the placings, LOL!
                    EXACTLY!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by suzy View Post
                      Definitely need a different title. I admit that I would not have read the article based on its title if Velvet hadn't provided the link and given me a clue as to the content. Try to say something in the title that at least hints at the content. But that aside, lots of good information, and I loved what you said about freestyle music. Personally, I want music that makes me tap my foot as I'm watching the ride.

                      One suggestion for a title change:

                      "Thoughts on How to Improve Dressage Competitions"

                      Simple and to the point. Right away I have a clue about what I am about to read.
                      Had it been an article, it probably would have had a more transparent title.

                      It's part of an on-going blog. A blog that I read regularly because I really like her writing and also like most of what she says. I like the catchy titles, and like the little mystery of what the particular blog entry is actually going to be about. I expect it, because it's her blog, and she always does this in it.

                      I don't think she should change her blog style because you happened to stumble on one of her entries one day and it wasn't immediately clear to you what she was writing about.

                      Just sayin'
                      "One person's cowboy is another person's blooming idiot" -- katarine

                      Spay and neuter. Please.

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        Originally posted by monstrpony View Post
                        Had it been an article, it probably would have had a more transparent title.

                        It's part of an on-going blog. A blog that I read regularly because I really like her writing and also like most of what she says. I like the catchy titles, and like the little mystery of what the particular blog entry is actually going to be about. I expect it, because it's her blog, and she always does this in it.

                        I don't think she should change her blog style because you happened to stumble on one of her entries one day and it wasn't immediately clear to you what she was writing about.

                        Just sayin'
                        Admit it. You just like it because it sounds dirty!!
                        "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by suzy View Post
                          If you reread the article, you will see that she makes that point quite well in this paragraph:
                          I agree with L. Sprieser, that was just a general comment on the term. Perhaps a change in terminology is in order?
                          And this is the story of your red right ankle.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Velvet View Post
                            Admit it. You just like it because it sounds dirty!!
                            I'm way too Disney... I just had the Aladdin theme going through my head.
                            Originally posted by Silverbridge
                            If you get anything on your Facebook feed about who is going to the Olympics in 2012 or guessing the outcome of Bush v Gore please start threads about those, too.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Young Equestrian View Post
                              Aside from the title needing a little more tact (hey, it could be a lot worse than it is!), I think Lauren had great ideas. One thing that really bothers me, though, is the word 'amateur'. To me, it's connotation suggests that non-professional riders are less competent, which in many cases is false.
                              Originally posted by Suzy
                              If you reread the article, you will see that she makes that point quite well in this paragraph:

                              “This is a terrific system. There are amateur riders out there who've shown extensively, who've made FEI horses, who've been there and done that. I think it's more fair that they show against me, instead of against my students who are riding at first level for the first time, or what have you. And in the same line, I think the wonderful professional riders who specialize in starting greenies and then selling them, or teaching beginner riders to post on the correct diagonal, and who've never seen a second level test in their lives shouldn't be thrown in the deep end.”
                              Originally posted by Young Equestrian View Post
                              I agree with L. Sprieser, that was just a general comment on the term. Perhaps a change in terminology is in order?
                              Amateur means what it means. What would you suggest changing it to?
                              Donald Trump - proven liar, cheat, traitor and sexual predator! Hillary Clinton won in 2016, but we have all lost.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Don't genies live in lamps??
                                "When life gives you scurvy, make lemonade."

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by BEARCAT View Post
                                  Don't genies live in lamps??
                                  Desert genies live in lamps, beach bum genies live in bottles?
                                  "One person's cowboy is another person's blooming idiot" -- katarine

                                  Spay and neuter. Please.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I completely agree about the music. I cannot stand listening to flouncy elevator music.

                                    As for increasing rider coefficients, I'm not sure I agree. The movement scores cannot be earned without having effective aids and harmony, so I don't see rider scores needing to be distinguished from the other scores.

                                    I guess it's nice to get a good score for position even if you can't ride well, or have a bad ride, but I think the actual riding part is more important.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by SGray View Post
                                      Assertions were made -- folks asked for facts to back them up -- were told "we are judges, we know" -- so the year's scores were gathered and analyzed using statistical analysis (by experts in the field) -- low and behold the facts belied the judges' perceptions

                                      Insisting that science should trump anecdote is not "getting one's knickers in a twist"
                                      Agreed!

                                      While I like the spirit of the blog, I think the problem is more complicated than meets the eye. There are plenty of pros and amateurs riding schoolmasters above their riding level for career or award accolades, and this confounds Lauren's proposal. This may not be as evident where Lauren is located but it is evident elsewhere.

                                      Yes, I would hate to ride against the wealthy amateur who has been to Europe with her nice horses and is basically a pro but doesn't need the income so isn't a pro. But this usually isn't the case in the regions I have ridden in (I move alot). *Most* pros ride 5+ horses a day and *most* amateurs ride 1 horse per day. I think this is the fairest division. Lets not forget that *anyone* can enter the OPEN classes, that's why they're "open", but only non-professionals can enter the amateur classes. I'd hope that the wealthy, talented amateur who takes her well-bred horses to Europe for training but doesn't need to have an income so technically isn't a "pro" would opt to ride against the professionals in the open division.

                                      I don't think the people who call themselves "pros" who haven't ridden higher than second level should ride against the typical amateur at the lower levels. Even a Jumper convert will have a much much more solid seat than the average lower level amateur with a full-time job unrelated to horses. They shouldn't show against each other in my opinion.

                                      J.
                                      Proud member of the Colbert Dressage Nation

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I've been a fan of Lauren's since before I got into dressage, back when she was a member of a social-networking site group. As a very low-level AA rerider, can't comment a lot on her judging article (though I do like her proposed way of dividing classes), but her previous blog entry about her discussions with the RJ Classics folks is also great: http://chronofhorse.com/article/fashion-forward
                                        You have to have experiences to gain experience.

                                        1998 Morgan mare Mythic Feronia "More Valley Girl Than Girl Scout!"

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X