• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

"Modern Dressage = Horse Abuse"...article

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "Modern Dressage = Horse Abuse"...article

    If this has been brought up here before, my apologies (I am always a day late with this kind of stuff because I really don't surf the internet too frequently). Anyway, this article on this guys site gave me a headache. There are many truths, but wow! the delivery is pretty unpaletable. It took me some time to realize this is a dressage enthusiast. In the beginning I was thinking it was either someone who hates all riders of horses, or some opposing discipline:

    http://www.horsemanpro.com/articles2/dressage_abuse.htm

    Some Quotes:
    (using a small child to make a point....reminds me of a preacher):

    "Once, when my family and I were watching the Olympic Games dressage competition, one of my children (then four years old) asked me with her innocence: "Daddy, why do the riders look so stiff and grouchy?" (Imagine that, a little four-year-old child who knows nothing about horses and riding can see the obvious absurdity of these riders’ actions, which their presence reflects. Some folks said in defense of this observation that the riders are not grouchy but rather are concentrating, and yet they compare dressage to a dance. Just how bad must a dancer be to have to concentrate on where his feet are?)
    I told my kids that they look the way they do because “they, as well as their hearts, are hard as stones.” One would think that this may be a cruel statement, but here is a simple enlightened response to that. The dressage folks preach a freedom of movement and a willingness to work on the part of the horse. Well, if that’s so, why do they need all the severe aids...."


    And from another article on the same site ("There is No Such Thing as Dressage Today"):

    "Just for short note, the dressage is for very advanced riders only. It takes about 10 years of riding several horses per day, under an advanced rider (teacher) supervision (working, not playing) before a person can say he or she is dressage rider, providing he or she had the talent to become one. This does not make him a trainer yet, that takes another ten years. To become a genuine teacher (instructor) that takes another ten years, which then makes such person 30 years full time employment as a dressage rider and twenty years as dressage trainer before he is qualified as a teacher (old days term master)."

    Dammit. I'll be 75 years old and my horse will be....dead, before I can ever "do dressage" .

  • #2
    I'm guessing this dude rides dressage from his computer chair.
    "Rock n' roll's not through, yeah, I'm sewing wings on this thing." --Destroyer
    http://dressagescriblog.wordpress.com/

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by hundredacres View Post
      . Just how bad must a dancer be to have to concentrate on where his feet are?)
      Because,true dancers just kind of float around. They don't have to work at it or anything
      .

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by kinnip View Post
        I'm guessing this dude rides dressage from his computer chair.
        Looks like from under the horse:

        http://www.horsemanpro.com/about.htm

        And like bronc riding is good for the horse.

        Let me add I think Gerhard Kapitzke's definition of "classical riding" makes a lot more sense. I can't write the whole quote here but here's some.

        "The term classical could be defined as historically developed tradition. However, it signifies much more than a mere historical process-from an equestrian point of view, it is synonymous with timeless validity, highest standards of quality, examplary training methods, nonviolence and respect for our fellow beings: in short, it represents a cultural asset recognized by numerous generations, which stands for the harmony between animals and humans and is a fundamental and powerful example and guide to many."

        JMHO
        Last edited by CFFarm; May. 22, 2011, 05:53 PM. Reason: to add
        Groom to trainer: "Where's the glamour? You promised me glamour!"

        Comment


        • #5
          Well, not every one's a winner. Just sayin'.

          Comment


          • #6
            What Kinnip said.

            I had a quick look at his site and have to say what a nasty misogynist he is! Hundredacres, don't waste your time on him. Searching for the "truth" in that stack of dreck takes more time than it's worth.

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              LOL...I missed the rodeo pictures! That just makes it all the more -- odd. And you aren't kidding, Beasmom . What a nut.
              Something else I've observed about horse related sites - it seems like the fluffier the website, the less legitimate they actually are. This isn't an absolute, but in this case all of the content, it's definitely "fluff".

              Comment


              • #8
                It does have some beautiful pictures of the old Czech stables, but accompanied by a few very odd comments.
                Tranquility Farm - Proud breeder of Born in the USA Sport Horses, and Cob-sized Warmbloods
                Now apparently completely invisible!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by kinnip View Post
                  I'm guessing this dude rides dressage from his computer chair.
                  You know, amazingly enough, there are plenty of real dressage riders who aren't happy with the "look" of modern competitive dressage.

                  It HAS changed -- so many riders never let go of the horse's mouth, they ride the curb constantly, while driving the horse forward, forward, forward.

                  Horse is in a constant choke hold. Of course there are exceptions, but personally I find most modern, GP rides rather ugly today....very little harmony, lightness or expression.

                  Abuse? Well, for alot of us working for a living is abuse , but in terms of the "dance" quality dressage was always suppose to exhibit, I also find that in short supply as well.

                  But not sure we need to the ranting of this guy to tell us that. Mainly we just need eyes...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Against My Better Judgement: A blog about my new FLF OTTB
                    Do not buy a Volkswagen. I did and I regret it.
                    VW sucks.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      hmmm... apparantly the racing industry is just perfect according to this person. Do they not know about all the break downs and problems with washed up runners going to slaughter? Gosh, this article is ignorent...

                      Apparantly he has not seen race riders carrying crops...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by englishcowgirl View Post
                        hmmm... apparantly the racing industry is just perfect according to this person. Do they not know about all the break downs and problems with washed up runners going to slaughter? Gosh, this article is ignorent...

                        Apparantly he has not seen race riders carrying crops...
                        I like the article about women being abusive because we like to be in control of something.
                        Against My Better Judgement: A blog about my new FLF OTTB
                        Do not buy a Volkswagen. I did and I regret it.
                        VW sucks.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Ooh. I missed that one.

                          I stopped with his attacks on poor ol' Sally Swift. Good Lord, the man is full of vitriol!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            This website is eerily similar to anothers (who frequents this forum and goes on and on and on about the evils of modern dressage, judging, etc). Too many similarities, makes me wonder if this type of personality seeks out riding disciplines and attacks them to get their own names out there and noticed.
                            Last edited by 4xhoof; May. 24, 2011, 04:11 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              His article detailing how women are weak/flawed/and inferior, and as such, seek control over something and are somehow thus responsible for the abuse of horses is rather infuriating (as is his failure to master the English language).

                              "Suffering from a major case of intellectual inferiority complex, which is a weakness often exploited by the so-called "progressive" ruling powers, which are men and not women. This feminine intellectual inferiority complex has been exploited by men already in my young days in all the communist countries and it finally arrived here in the states about 40 years ago (the seventies). It should be noted that the more a woman suffers from this intellectual inferiority complex the more she will desire (or dream of) respect and recognition not only by men but also by women.And so they often become some activists, often sexists, go to some school and then when debating something always referring to some researches or so-called "scientific facts". They are simply eager to become someone respected and acknowledged, or better yet, admired or celebrated, and so they have this urge to prove themselves not only to themselves but to others, hence so much of the competition (sports, horse shows etc.) in this feminized world.
                              In short, the feminization of the "modern world" has only one purpose, which is about the weakening of men in order to control them, and women were always used for such purpose from the times when human beings begun to seek power over one another. Remember folks that whenever you believe that some woman is in power or in control, there is always someone else pulling her strings to control men and women through her, and at the top of this unseen hierarchical tower there are no women."

                              Does any of this make sense to anyone else? It certainly seems to be full of logical fallacies.

                              These comments are also relatively telling of the writer's ignorance and bias:

                              "A genuine lack of awareness, as most women simply have no clue what is going on, which is mostly caused by the following flaws."

                              "Denial, as most women due to their judgmental nature cannot handle guilt and/or the fear of harming life."

                              WTH?? *sigh* So much stupid and so few places to discard bodies.
                              A Native Floridian no longer lost somewhere in Clovis, New Mexico, but instead wreaking havoc in Reno, NV.
                              www.theideaoforder.com
                              www.xhaltsalute.com

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                LOL, read this site a while ago. The delivery is harsh, he's an obvious misogynist (sp?), but if you can get past your personal feelings on his abrasive manner, there is a lot of truth there.
                                Lowly Farm Hand with Delusions of Barn Biddieom.
                                Witherun Farm
                                http://witherun-farm.blogspot.com/

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  I read this site a while ago too. The guy is a sexist pig. Read any of his other rants and you can see that. I stop reading when someone allows their personal beliefs to enter into the writing, unless prefaced with "my personal belief is..."

                                  He's an ass.

                                  Comment

                                  • Original Poster

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by The Hobbit View Post
                                    His article detailing how women are weak/flawed/and inferior, and as such, seek control over something and are somehow thus responsible for the abuse of horses is rather infuriating (as is his failure to master the English language).

                                    "Suffering from a major case of intellectual inferiority complex, which is a weakness often exploited by the so-called "progressive" ruling powers, which are men and not women. This feminine intellectual inferiority complex has been exploited by men already in my young days in all the communist countries and it finally arrived here in the states about 40 years ago (the seventies). It should be noted that the more a woman suffers from this intellectual inferiority complex the more she will desire (or dream of) respect and recognition not only by men but also by women.And so they often become some activists, often sexists, go to some school and then when debating something always referring to some researches or so-called "scientific facts". They are simply eager to become someone respected and acknowledged, or better yet, admired or celebrated, and so they have this urge to prove themselves not only to themselves but to others, hence so much of the competition (sports, horse shows etc.) in this feminized world.
                                    In short, the feminization of the "modern world" has only one purpose, which is about the weakening of men in order to control them, and women were always used for such purpose from the times when human beings begun to seek power over one another. Remember folks that whenever you believe that some woman is in power or in control, there is always someone else pulling her strings to control men and women through her, and at the top of this unseen hierarchical tower there are no women."

                                    Does any of this make sense to anyone else? It certainly seems to be full of logical fallacies.

                                    These comments are also relatively telling of the writer's ignorance and bias:

                                    "A genuine lack of awareness, as most women simply have no clue what is going on, which is mostly caused by the following flaws."

                                    "Denial, as most women due to their judgmental nature cannot handle guilt and/or the fear of harming life."

                                    WTH?? *sigh* So much stupid and so few places to discard bodies.
                                    Man, I missed all of that! I had no idea exactly how messed up he is!

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Trevelyan96 View Post
                                      LOL, read this site a while ago. The delivery is harsh, he's an obvious misogynist (sp?), but if you can get past your personal feelings on his abrasive manner, there is a lot of truth there.
                                      Agreed! Except he answers to the accusation that he's a chauvanist quite nicely on his correspondence page. He even says that he likes women! I just left the thread wherein Rick Gore is accused of being a chauvanist, too, & I also didn't find that with him.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I doubt very much that there is more truth than misogyny.

                                        I'm sure he likes women -- as long as they know their place!

                                        It doesn't help your cause to insult and belittle half your audience.

                                        To echo NotABreed, he's an ass.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X