• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Higher level or higher score: which is better when selling

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Higher level or higher score: which is better when selling

    When shopping, would you rather see a horse doing mid 60's in training level, or see lower scores at 1rst level?

    Trying to decide if I should give 1rst level a try this weekend with Pony, but I would be risking lower scores.
    Freeing worms from cans everywhere!

  • #2
    What kind of buyer do you hope to attract? Confident and always looking for a new challenge, or steadfast and methodical?

    I think there are two distinct types of Dressage competitors...and they often don't understand each other. There's good points to perfecting a level before moving on, and good points to achieving "good enough" and moving on to the next challenge.

    Confident and new challenge type was the perfect buyer for my TB.

    Steadfast and methodical type was the perfect buyer for my Clyde mare.

    What kind of buyer do you hope to find for Pony?
    Lifestyle coordinator for Zora, Spooky, Wolfgang and Warrior

    Comment


    • #3
      I would prefer higher scores at training. If your talking mid 60's at training and are expecting lower at 1st level, are you expecting to score in the 50's?
      I got a score in the 50's at 1st level and quickly decided we are not ready to show 1st level yet.
      Dawn

      Patience and Consistency are Your Friends

      Comment


      • #4
        From a non-dressage point of view: We're missing some key information here. How old is Pony, and what do you expect Pony to be capable of?

        Scenario A, Pony is still in training and will eventually move up through the ranks (to 1st Level and beyond)... I would want higher scores at a lower level. It is, likely, a better demonstration of what Pony is capable of, given that Pony still has more to learn. This shows that Pony is doing well, has a firm grasp on all the movements required, and hints that Pony will do well when s/he moves up.

        Scenario B, Pony is not young, not particularly in training, just hasn't been shown beyond training level. In this scenario, I think I would wonder why Pony has never moved up, so short of abysmal scores, I would rather an ad say, "Pony scored XX at their very first show competing in 1st Level! We anticipate many success as training progresses."

        Just food for thought on a general sport horse whole.

        Comment


        • #5
          I would rather see consistent and higher scores at a lower level vs. just a couple decent scores at Training and then lower scores at First. IMHO if I saw decent scores at T and then low scores at First, I would assume pony is being moved up too fast and not ready for the new challenge. But I tend to take the slow road on these things!
          "A horse's face always conveys clearly whether it is loved by its owner or simply used." - Anja Beran

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            Pony is proven hunter/jumper with a good show record, but at 13.3, is tough to market that way. Started doing some dressage thinking this may help her be sellable for eventing, and it seems she may actually have some skill at it, and be able to move up the levels a bit. perhaps I will do one of each test (training 2, and First 1)?
            Freeing worms from cans everywhere!

            Comment


            • #7
              If you're trying to sell her as an all-rounder I'd say get some solid first level scores. You're not really marketing to the dressage set that wants to see 70%+ so the pony's value will come more from her experience than stellar ability, I would think. The range of scores you're talking about won't really add any value in terms of prospects for advancing, so I'd go for buyers who want something that can do quite decently at several different things. Good luck!
              Proud COTH lurker since 2001.

              Comment


              • #8
                If I were looking for such a horse, scores at Trgg/First level dressage are irrelevant in my purchasing decision regardless of what they were.
                Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress.
                Alfred A. Montapert

                Comment


                • #9
                  There's very little difference between 1st and training. If you think you can get a 60 and 6's or better on your lengthenings then do it. If your lengthenings are weak, skip it and just do training.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Try the 1st level if nothing else you can say to the buyer, "Here was Pony's scores for this show as you can see we need to work on x,y,z before we try again." For me the ammie buyer (your market) it means you tried it and I can turn over the video and scores to my trainer and say can we get better? I like the idea of riding one of each test as well.
                    Adoring fan of A Fine Romance
                    Originally Posted by alicen:
                    What serious breeder would think that a horse at that performance level is push button? Even so, that's still a lot of buttons to push.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      If you think you can score AT LEAST 60% at a higher level (recognized show) then go for it, otherwise scoring better at lower level will help sales.
                      Now in Kentucky

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Agree with the above post, if you think you can get at least a 60%, then give it a shot. If it doesn't go well, then move back down. I don't think that one set of less than steller scores at 1st level is going to harm the marketability of the pony. IMO, you're in the same boat for marketability if you don't attempt 1st level than you are if you got below a 60% at first level...either way the pony isn't quite ready, which you can explain to a potential buyer. But if you do go to the show and score above a 60% then you've just added to the marketability.

                        If you're marketing it to an event crowd, having 1st level experience may be a plus since it shows that there has been a focus on dressage training, which is often the weakest of the 3 phases for lower level eventers. Also, as an eventer, if I see a horse that is getting in the low 60's at a recognized dressage show at 1st level, that horse should be able to score in the low 30s in a beginner novice/novice event (which I'm assuming is where the pony would top out for eventing), and put you in a good spot coming out of the dressage phase.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Depends what you are selling to. A prospect for the upper levels or a school horse suitable for a junior or ammy?

                          Firstly its nice that the horse has been out and scored well enough not to be eliminated. The experience in company and away from home is valuable.

                          But at that level, I wouldn't consider the scores much and there is little difference between training and first level in my mind, since I would be aiming higher. Training and first level are not much more than green broke in my barn.

                          I've had green appaloosas at their first show score in the 70's at first level- would that mean they'd get 80's at training? I doubt it. Nor are they ever going to be FEI horses for the most part. But they are obedient and steady and that counts at those levels. And those scores are probably the highest ones they'll ever get in their lives.

                          I think for marketing purposes for a prospect, you would rather score high at a lower level because for some people it means the horse has better movement, but as I said, my appaloosas do better than what's being quoted at those levels and I wouldn't call their movement great.

                          For marketing purposes for a schoolmaster, you'd rather want the higher level experience as some would presume the horse has more show miles.

                          For me there is no substitute for going and watching the horse at liberty, or well ridden, to judge the movement. For marketing, get a really super rider to ride in your videos to show the horse at its best.
                          "The Threat of Internet Ignorance: ... we are witnessing the rise of an age of equestrian disinformation, one where a trusting public can graze on nonsense packaged to look like fact."-LRG-AF

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            At training and first I don't care much about scores. Unless the horse / pony consistently got 5's for gaits. And 4's for submission.

                            I am more interested in that the horse / pony competed SUCCESSFULLY and was not a nut job.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Another perfectionist here. I want to get it as good as I can before moving up.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I'd rather see higher scores at a lower level. Lower scores at a higher level = something to fix. Not something a buyer wants to invest in. IMO.
                                Proud member of the Colbert Dressage Nation

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  scores themselves not that enlightening

                                  Scores in the sixties are the bulk of the show scores at lower level, not very enlightening. Show me the video! I'd probably be interested in the score for gaits and submission.
                                  http://behindthebitblog.com
                                  Dressage, riding, sport horse blog
                                  BTBbrowbands.com
                                  Unique browbands for dressage and hunter riders

                                  Comment

                                  Working...
                                  X