• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Would you complain?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Would you complain?

    Would you put in a complaint on a judge who was less then tactful in her comments on horse and rider?

    This wasnt a single occassion but on numerous different horses and riders.

    For example she said (and this is not exact) 'useful type (of horse) but limited ability'. This was actually on quite a talented horse and I understand she can only judge whats in front of her at the time but honestly, even if this WERE true surely it wouldn't hurt to put it in a nicer way.

    She also said something along the lines of 'horse has more potential then rider' (and this was to a trainer).

    Like I said, while her comments may or may not be valid, she put them in a manner that was, quite frankly IMO, rude.

    Worth putting in a complaint or not?
    I have horse to sell to you. Horse good for riding. Can pull cart. Horse good size. Eats carrots and apples. Likes attention. Move head to music. No like opera! You like you buy.

  • #2
    I don't actually see those comments as rude. Complaining about them I would find offensive.

    If you really feel that the judge was incorrect then it might be a differennt story, but there had better be a very obvious (to everyone on the premises) faux pas, not just a disagreement of rider/owner and judge.

    If you don't agree with that judge don't ride under him/her again.

    They could actually be correct and trying to tell you something.

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree. I don't think they are the most tactful, but they are frank. I wouldn't bother complaining over it. If it really upset me, I'd avoid that judge in the future.

      Comment


      • #4
        judge could have been drunk. was it after lunch?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by feisomeday View Post
          judge could have been drunk. was it after lunch?


          Haha, sorry, I had an experience like that at a schooling show, I swear.
          Class before lunch, I got a comment of "horse would be better pulling cart. might not be suited for dressage" (which you know, while not the nicest comment WAS honest, I gues) but AFTER lunch (pretty sure that fruit punch was spiked!), same judge, got a MUCH higher score with the comment of "beautiful pair! really nice movement. could go far!"

          So the judge only liked my horse while drunk!?
          Jeeze. I need to schedule ALL my classes after lunch!
          In my opinion, a horse is the animal to have. 1300 pounds of raw muscle, power, grace, and sweat between your legs - it's something you just can't get from a pet hamster.

          Comment


          • #6
            "horse would be better pulling cart. might not be suited for dressage"
            Now that IS harsh.

            Comment


            • #7
              Quoted from TropicalStorm:
              "Class before lunch, I got a comment of "horse would be better pulling cart. might not be suited for dressage" (which you know, while not the nicest comment WAS honest, I gues) but AFTER lunch (pretty sure that fruit punch was spiked!), same judge, got a MUCH higher score with the comment of "beautiful pair! really nice movement. could go far!"

              So the judge only liked my horse while drunk!? "
              OMG that's hilarious. Now we know the secret to making the Olympic Team.

              I do agree the draft horse comment was harsh.

              Comment


              • #8
                The second one is a little harsh, but IMHO not complaint worthy. As for the first one, I don't think it is at all offensive. In fact if the phrase was reversed and said, "limited ability but useful type," I would consider that a nice compliment for a horse that doesn't have fabulous talent, but is well schooled and has a good mind. As to whether the horse is actually talented, well if you think the judge knows horses, then the horse either isn't all that talented or wasn't well presented to show off its talent. If you think the judge doesn't know horses, then why would you pay to be judged by her?

                Comment


                • #9
                  i pay to hear the judge's opinion and i would rather hear it. not everyone sees the comments as rude, i don't.

                  there are a great many people these days putting very unsuitable horses into dressage. they may as well have a little reality served up now and again, rather than blaming the judge for low scores.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Excuse my obvious ignorance, but what the heck,SLC, is a horse "unsuitable for dressage"? In my youthful optimism, I want to believe that,at least in the non-FEI levels, any horse that can do the simple patterns required in an even relaxed tempo should be rewarded regardless of "brilliance" and the OOOooh factor. Geez, talk about elitist. You and Obama. A judge is only there to make the most possibly objective numerical score and a minimum of comments at the end. Unfortunately, being a judge , like in the western and arab communities, doesn't take much more than having the $$ and time to take the accreditation courses.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Yeah, where are all these "very unsuitable horses?" slc keeps talking about them, but I have yet to see any!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Amen!! I guess only good looking men and women should be seen in public also since they're "more suitable" for viewing. Give me a freakin' break! A judge is there to give a score, a reason for the score, and nothing more. Did the horse and rider perform to the standards stated at the top of the test? Personal opinion and "mini riding lessons" in the comment section are inappropriate.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          In answer to your question, no, I wouldn't complain. By entering a competition that is judged, you set yourself up for being judged. Judging by its very nature, in any discipline, is to some degree subjective. If you find nothing of value to learn from in the judge's comments, ignore them. If there is anything to learn from, do so. Otherwise, I'd chalk it up to life lessons learned. I'd suck it up and move on.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            [QUOTE]
                            Originally posted by JackSprats Mom View Post
                            For example she said (and this is not exact) 'useful type (of horse) but limited ability'. This was actually on quite a talented horse and I understand she can only judge whats in front of her at the time but honestly, even if this WERE true surely it wouldn't hurt to put it in a nicer way.
                            I think it is VERY important to note that the OP has stated that these were not the "exact words". The judge very well may have said something that was more diplomatic sounding but it wasn't TAKEN the way it was written.

                            This happens all the time. Poor judges...they're damned it they do and damned if they don't.

                            She also said something along the lines of 'horse has more potential then rider' (and this was to a trainer).
                            Once again...poster says "something along the lines of". Unless we know EXACTLY what the judge wrote...how can we offer a fair opinion?


                            I know someone who got only ONE comment from a judge down in the "further comments box". It said, "Nice turnout".

                            That rider went around telling everyone that the judge said, "You can't ride your way out of a paper bag, but at least you LOOKED good!"

                            HAHAHA. That rider was a bit tongue in cheek, but it's still a perfect example about how a rider can INFER lots of things from a simple comment that were never actually said.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              [quote=PennyRidge;3147226]


                              I know someone who got only ONE comment from a judge down in the "further comments box". It said, "Nice turnout".

                              That rider went around telling everyone that the judge said, "You can't ride your way out of a paper bag, but at least you LOOKED good!"

                              HAHAHA. That rider was a bit tongue in cheek, but it's still a perfect example about how a rider can INFER lots of things from a simple comment that were never actually said.

                              I've always been told that if you only get the comment "nice turnout", then that rider's interpretation is exactly correct. It means the judge has nothing else good to say about you.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I don't think the comments were rude, but then those weren't the exact comments, so who knows?? Was this regarding your Arab? If so, the judge may not be feelin' the groove on that particular breed??

                                I agree that you pay the judge for an opinion. One of the reasons I liked the dressage judging/scoring system is that you weren't out there with 20 others in a rail class getting a first, fifth or tenth assigned to your number with no reasoning or explanation. You are getting real comments with details and real observations, one on one, you and the judge. They even have scribes so the judge can keep her/his eyes on you at all times. Again, unlike a rail class where of the 20 of you, the judge glances at you for a total of 6 seconds during your whole ride.

                                Sometimes the comments aren't pleasant but as long as they aren't outright hateful and inappropriate, I don't see the problem. Truthful comments, no matter how uncomfortable they may be, is how you improve and learn what weaknesses to strengthen.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Hah! I fully expect to get something along the lines of "talented horse, rider needs to be shot" in my first try

                                  And it wouldn't bother me a bit! I'll just have to work harder to prove them wrong.

                                  Eileen
                                  Mad Mare™ Studio
                                  Custom Swarovski®, Czech glass and gemstone browbands in Circlet, Diadem and Tiara styles. Matching stock pins, bracelets and belts.
                                  http://MadMare.com

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    There are horses who are just not dressage horses even at the low level. My hunter who we tried to event flunked out of novice dressage in eventing. A BNT who was a dressage rider not an eventer managed to get this horse to frame sorta once, by using a leverage bit and draw reins and that was it. He was just a big 17.2 HD QH who at best was level and really was a bit down hill and had a back longer than a weenie dog. He was just physically unable to lift up under him self to do well at even the lowest levels.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by JackSprats Mom View Post
                                      She also said something along the lines of 'horse has more potential then rider' (and this was to a trainer).
                                      Obviously I can't comment on this particular pair, but I've seen some pretty poor riding by "trainers" where the horse really did have more potential than the rider.

                                      I don't think the comments merit a complaint, but if you feel they were way off the mark, don't pay your money for that judge's opinion again.
                                      Donald Trump - proven liar, cheat, traitor and sexual predator! Hillary Clinton won in 2016, but we have all lost.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Was this regarding your Arab?
                                        There's that old chip again!

                                        I think it's just bad sportsmanship to 'complain' about little things like that. Suck it up and move on.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X